-
Bager, J.: Weniger ist mehr : Internet-Suchmaschinen richtig einsetzen (1998)
0.02
0.018469224 = product of:
0.036938448 = sum of:
0.036938448 = product of:
0.073876895 = sum of:
0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073876895 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29.12.1998 11:22:00
-
Lob, S.: Per Mausklick auf die neusten Nachrichten : Internet-Suchmaschinen liefern Presse-Überblicke und stellen persönliche Zeitungen zusammen (1998)
0.02
0.018469224 = product of:
0.036938448 = sum of:
0.036938448 = product of:
0.073876895 = sum of:
0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073876895 = score(doc=1622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29.12.1998 11:22:25
-
Hannemann, M.: Online ins Schlaraffenland der Wissenschaft : Literatur-Recherche im Internet ist ein teures Unterfangen ohne Erfolgsgarantie - Doch wer systematisch sucht, gelangt zügig ans Ziel (1999)
0.02
0.018469224 = product of:
0.036938448 = sum of:
0.036938448 = product of:
0.073876895 = sum of:
0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073876895 = score(doc=3106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
-
Watson, I.: Searching the WWW : a quick comparison of Infoseek, Lycos, Yahoo, InfoMarket and Webcrawler (1996)
0.02
0.017854942 = product of:
0.035709884 = sum of:
0.035709884 = product of:
0.07141977 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rogers, I.: ¬The Google Pagerank algorithm and how it works (2002)
0.02
0.017854942 = product of:
0.035709884 = sum of:
0.035709884 = product of:
0.07141977 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=2548,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Page Rank is a topic much discussed by Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) experts. At the heart of PageRank is a mathematical formula that seems scary to look at but is actually fairly simple to understand. Despite this many people seem to get it wrong! In particular "Chris Ridings of www.searchenginesystems.net" has written a paper entitled "PageRank Explained: Everything you've always wanted to know about PageRank", pointed to by many people, that contains a fundamental mistake early on in the explanation! Unfortunately this means some of the recommendations in the paper are not quite accurate. By showing code to correctly calculate real PageRank I hope to achieve several things in this response: - Clearly explain how PageRank is calculated. - Go through every example in Chris' paper, and add some more of my own, showing the correct PageRank for each diagram. By showing the code used to calculate each diagram I've opened myself up to peer review - mostly in an effort to make sure the examples are correct, but also because the code can help explain the PageRank calculations. - Describe some principles and observations on website design based on these correctly calculated examples. Any good web designer should take the time to fully understand how PageRank really works - if you don't then your site's layout could be seriously hurting your Google listings! [Note: I have nothing in particular against Chris. If I find any other papers on the subject I'll try to comment evenly]
-
Hock, R.E.: How to do field searching in Web search engines : a field trip (1998)
0.02
0.017412951 = product of:
0.034825902 = sum of:
0.034825902 = product of:
0.069651805 = sum of:
0.069651805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069651805 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.18-22
-
Loeper, D. von: Sherlock Holmes im Netz (1997)
0.02
0.01539102 = product of:
0.03078204 = sum of:
0.03078204 = product of:
0.06156408 = sum of:
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 6566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=6566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1997 19:50:29
-
Hüskes, R.; Kleber, D.: ¬Den Server im Griff (1999)
0.02
0.01539102 = product of:
0.03078204 = sum of:
0.03078204 = product of:
0.06156408 = sum of:
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.1999 21:21:10
-
Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000)
0.02
0.01539102 = product of:
0.03078204 = sum of:
0.03078204 = product of:
0.06156408 = sum of:
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:31
-
Eggeling, T.; Kroschel, A.: Alles finden im Web (2000)
0.02
0.01539102 = product of:
0.03078204 = sum of:
0.03078204 = product of:
0.06156408 = sum of:
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2000 14:06:22
-
Sauer, D.: Alles schneller finden (2001)
0.02
0.01539102 = product of:
0.03078204 = sum of:
0.03078204 = product of:
0.06156408 = sum of:
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=6835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11.11.2001 17:25:22
-
Breyer, K.: Kommerz statt Information (2002)
0.02
0.01539102 = product of:
0.03078204 = sum of:
0.03078204 = product of:
0.06156408 = sum of:
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 5.2002 21:21:22
-
Tetzchner, J. von: As a monopoly in search and advertising Google is not able to resist the misuse of power : is the Internet turning into a battlefield of propaganda? How Google should be regulated (2017)
0.02
0.015307425 = product of:
0.03061485 = sum of:
0.03061485 = product of:
0.0612297 = sum of:
0.0612297 = weight(_text_:i in 3891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0612297 = score(doc=3891,freq=12.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.35726398 = fieldWeight in 3891, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Let us start with your positive experiences with Google. I have known Google longer than most. At Opera, we were the first to add their search into the browser interface, enabling it directly from the search box and the address field. At that time, Google was an up-and-coming geeky company. I remember vividly meeting with Google's co-founder Larry Page, his relaxed dress code and his love for the Danger device, which he played with throughout our meeting. Later, I met with the other co-founder of Google, Sergey Brin, and got positive vibes. My first impression of Google was that it was a likeable company. Our cooperation with Google was a good one. Integrating their search into Opera helped us deliver a better service to our users and generated revenue that paid the bills. We helped Google grow, along with others that followed in our footsteps and integrated Google search into their browsers. Then the picture for you and for opera darkened. Yes, then things changed. Google increased their proximity with the Mozilla foundation. They also introduced new services such as Google Docs. These services were great, gained quick popularity, but also exposed the darker side of Google. Not only were these services made to be incompatible with Opera, but also encouraged users to switch their browsers. I brought this up with Sergey Brin, in vain. For millions of Opera users to be able to access these services, we had to hide our browser's identity. The browser sniffing situation only worsened after Google started building their own browser, Chrome. ...
How should Google be regulated? We should limit the amount of information that is being collected. In particular we should look at information that is being collected across sites. It should not be legal to combine data from multiple sites and services. The fact that these sites and services are using the same underlying technology does not change the fact that the user's dealings is with a site at a time and each site should not have the right to share the data with others. I believe this the cornerstone of laws in many countries today, but these laws need to be enforced. Data about us is ours alone and it should not be possible to sell it. We should also limit the ability to target users individually. In the past, ads on sites were ads on sites. You might know what kind of users visited a site and you would place tech ads on tech sites and fashion ads on fashion sites. Now the ads follow you individually. That should be made illegal as it uses data collected from multiple sources and invades our privacy. I also believe there should be regulation as to how location data is used and any information related to our mobile devices. In addition, regulators need to be vigilant as to how companies that have monopoly power use their power. That kind of goes without saying. Companies with monopoly powers should not be able to use those powers when competing in an open market or using their monopoly services to limit competition."
-
Iwazume, M.; Takeda, H.; Nishida, T.: Ontoloy-based information capturing from the Internet (1996)
0.02
0.015150423 = product of:
0.030300846 = sum of:
0.030300846 = product of:
0.060601693 = sum of:
0.060601693 = weight(_text_:i in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060601693 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Experimentelle Internet Search engine; Vgl. http://flute.aist-nara.ac.jp/doc/people/mitiak-i/Demo/IICA_demo1.html oder: http://ai-www.aist-nara.ac.jp/doc/people/mitiak-i/Demo/IICA_demo.html
-
Zhang, J.; Dimitroff, A.: ¬The impact of webpage content characteristics on webpage visibility in search engine results : part I (2005)
0.01
0.014283955 = product of:
0.02856791 = sum of:
0.02856791 = product of:
0.05713582 = sum of:
0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713582 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011)
0.01
0.014283955 = product of:
0.02856791 = sum of:
0.02856791 = product of:
0.05713582 = sum of:
0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713582 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sünkler, S.; Kerkmann, F.: How to do ... ? : Konzeption einer Spezialsuchmaschine für Tutorials (2016)
0.01
0.014283955 = product of:
0.02856791 = sum of:
0.02856791 = product of:
0.05713582 = sum of:
0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 2570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713582 = score(doc=2570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 2570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2570)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2016-04-fachbeitrag-suenkler.pdf.
-
Ulbrich, D.: Suchmaschinenoptimierung für öffentliche Bibliotheken am Beispiel von Google (2016)
0.01
0.014283955 = product of:
0.02856791 = sum of:
0.02856791 = product of:
0.05713582 = sum of:
0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 3180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713582 = score(doc=3180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2016-02-fachbeitrag-ulbrich.pdf.
-
Su, L.T.: ¬A comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines : I. Theory and background (2003)
0.01
0.012625352 = product of:
0.025250703 = sum of:
0.025250703 = product of:
0.050501406 = sum of:
0.050501406 = weight(_text_:i in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050501406 = score(doc=5164,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The project proposes and tests a comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines. The project contains two parts. Part I describes the background and the model including a set of criteria and measures, and a method for implementation. It includes a literature review for two periods. The early period (1995-1996) portrays the settings for developing the model and the later period (1997-2000) places two applications of the model among contemporary evaluation work. Part II presents one of the applications that investigated the evaluation of four major search engines by 36 undergraduates from three academic disciplines. It reports results from statistical analyses of quantitative data for the entire sample and among disciplines, and content analysis of verbal data containing users' reasons for satisfaction. The proposed model aims to provide systematic feedback to engine developers or service providers for system improvement and to generate useful insight for system design and tool choice. The model can be applied to evaluating other compatible information retrieval systems or information retrieval (IR) techniques. It intends to contribute to developing a theory of relevance that goes beyond topicality to include value and usefulness for designing user-oriented information retrieval systems.
-
Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008)
0.01
0.012625352 = product of:
0.025250703 = sum of:
0.025250703 = product of:
0.050501406 = sum of:
0.050501406 = weight(_text_:i in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050501406 = score(doc=2017,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Rowlands, I.: Google generation: issues in information literacy. In: http://www.lucis.me.uk/retrieval%20issues.pdf.
