Search (93 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Vise, D.A.; Malseed, M.: ¬Die Google-Story (2006) 0.03 
    0.025358398 = product of:
  0.050716795 = sum of:
    0.050716795 = sum of:
      0.026285263 = weight(_text_:1997 in 4953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026285263 = score(doc=4953,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04508122 = queryNorm
          0.16052432 = fieldWeight in 4953, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4953)
      0.024431534 = weight(_text_:22 in 4953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024431534 = score(doc=4953,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04508122 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4953, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4953)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Wenn Larry Page und Sergey Brin irgendwo auf der Welt auf eine Bühne klettern, ist Ausnahmezustand. Längst sind die Erfinder von Google, die erfolgreichste Suchmaschine im Internet, Popstars geworden, scheinbar unzerstörbare späte Kinder der New Economy, deren Geist sie mit dem grandiosen Siegeszug ihres Produkts retteten über den Niedergang der zahllosen Internet- und Start-up-Träume, die zu Beginn des Jahrtausends zerplatzten. Eigentlich wollten die beiden netten Jungs nur eine etwas funktionstüchtigere Suchmaschine für ihre Universität basteln. Doch was 1997 in Stanford Studenten, Lehrern und Verwaltungsangestellten unter Google zur Verfügung stand (Google, eigentlich Googol, ist der mathematische Begriff für eine Riesenzahl, Brin und Page hatten ihn versehentlich falsch geschrieben), wuchs nach der Firmenausgründung in kürzester Zeit in den virtuellen Himmel. Mitte 2000 bereits erledigte Google 15 Millionen Suchanfragen pro Tag, nur 10.000 waren es noch Mitte 1998 gewesen. Anfang 2001 kletterte die Zahl auf 100 Millionen Suchanfragen pro Tag, 10.000 pro Sekunde. Nach dem Börsengang im August 2004 wurde Google milliardenschwer. Im Sommer 2005 besaß jeder der Firmengründer ein Reinvermögen von mehr als zehn Milliarden Dollar. Heute ist "googeln" als Verb im Duden aufgenommen, ebenso wie sich "to google" im angelsächsischen Sprachraum etabliert hat. In der Google-Story zeichnen der Pulitzer-Preisträger David A. Vise und Mark Malseed den ebenso spannenden wie wechselhaften Aufstieg der Google-Erfinder nach. Eine wahre Heldenstory -- und an manchen Stellen zu dick aufgetragen, insbesondere dann, wenn der Suchmaschine "menschliche Eigenschaften" zugesprochen werden. Aber es ist durchaus spannend zu verfolgen, wie zwei amerikanische Jungs innerhalb von nur fünf Jahren mit einem kalifornischen Studentenprojekt die globale Informationskultur umzustülpen vermochten. Zumal Vise und Malseed die Schwierigkeiten des Unternehmens mit Datenschutz und Copyright, mit Wettbewerbern und Konkurrenten nicht verschweigen. Und wer dazu noch die 23 Google-Suchtipps mitstudiert, wird nach der Lektüre noch leichter durchs Internet navigieren.
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  2. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.02 
    0.024431534 = product of:
  0.04886307 = sum of:
    0.04886307 = product of:
      0.09772614 = sum of:
        0.09772614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09772614 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  3. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02 
    0.021594629 = product of:
  0.043189257 = sum of:
    0.043189257 = product of:
      0.086378515 = sum of:
        0.086378515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086378515 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  4. Schmidt, W.: ¬Die Erfolgreiche : Wie die Suchmaschine wurde, was sie ist (2006) 0.02 
    0.021438101 = product of:
  0.042876203 = sum of:
    0.042876203 = sum of:
      0.01642829 = weight(_text_:1997 in 5938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01642829 = score(doc=5938,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04508122 = queryNorm
          0.1003277 = fieldWeight in 5938, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5938)
      0.026447913 = weight(_text_:22 in 5938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026447913 = score(doc=5938,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04508122 = queryNorm
          0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 5938, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5938)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Wer Google googelt, sieht zuallererst Google. Das klingt wie ein plattes Witzchen - ist aber schon das wesentliche Geheimnis des unheimlichen Erfolgs einer Suchmaschine, der es gelungen ist, binnen weniger Jahre das Internet, die Suche nach Informationen und die Werbewelt zu verändern und sich unentbehrlich zu machen. Googeln wurde buchstäblich zum Begriff. "Keine andere Marke hat je so schnell globale Anerkennung gefunden wie Google", schreiben David A. Vise, ein Reporter der "Washington Post", und sein Kollege Mark Malseed in ihrem Buch über den sagenhaften Aufstieg des Unternehmens, das Suchergebnisse in 35 Sprachen liefert. Allein in Deutschland nutzen heute über 22 Millionen Menschen die Suchmaschine mit den bunten Buchstaben regelmäßig - unter den Internet-Surfern hierzulande ein Marktanteil von 65 Prozent. Sie suchen nach Neuigkeiten über ihre Filmhelden, prüfen die Schreibweise von Fremdwörtern oder forschen wie Detektive nach Wissenswertem über die Frau oder den Mann, mit dem sie sich abends treffen werden - zum Rendezvous oder Geschäftsessen. Längst gelten in manchen Kreisen Menschen als Langweiler, über die selbst Google nichts weiß. Wie dieser Erfolg möglich war, beschreiben Vise und Malseed auf rund 300 Seiten. Man kann es mit dem Dichter Victor Hugo (1802-1885) aber auch kürzer sagen: "Nichts ist so mächtig wie eine Idee, deren Zeit gekommen ist." Noch mächtiger freilich ist eine Idee, die von der Konkurrenz übernommen wird - in totaler Verkennung der Bedürfnisse von Internet-Nutzern. Eine solche Idee brachte 1997 Google hervor - und hat längst Wirtschafts- und Kulturgeschichte geschrieben. Der zentrale Gedanke der beiden damals 22-jährigen Google-Gründer Larry Page und Sergey Brin ist simpel: Wenn die Lawine der im Internet abrufbaren Informationen weiter derart anschwillt, dann brauchen die Nutzer des weltweiten Netzes einen exzellenten Suchhund. Nicht umsonst ist der Name der Suchmaschine abgeleitet von dem Wort Googol, womit in der Mathematik eine absurd große Zahl mit hundert Nullen bezeichnet wird - eine Anspielung auf die unermessliche und längst unüberschaubare Weite des Internets.
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  5. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02 
    0.021377591 = product of:
  0.042755183 = sum of:
    0.042755183 = product of:
      0.085510366 = sum of:
        0.085510366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085510366 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  6. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.02 
    0.021377591 = product of:
  0.042755183 = sum of:
    0.042755183 = product of:
      0.085510366 = sum of:
        0.085510366 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085510366 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
  7. Spink, A.; Wolfram, D.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Searching the Web : the public and their queries (2001) 0.02 
    0.017386068 = product of:
  0.034772135 = sum of:
    0.034772135 = product of:
      0.06954427 = sum of:
        0.06954427 = weight(_text_:1997 in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06954427 = score(doc=6980,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.42470744 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In previous articles, we reported the state of Web searching in 1997 (Jansen, Spink, & Saracevic, 2000) and in 1999 (Spink, Wolfram, Jansen, & Saracevic, 2001). Such snapshot studies and statistics on Web use appear regularly (OCLC, 1999), but provide little information about Web searching trends. In this article, we compare and contrast results from our two previous studies of Excite queries' data sets, each containing over 1 million queries submitted by over 200,000 Excite users collected on 16 September 1997 and 20 December 1999. We examine how public Web searching changing during that 2-year time period. As Table 1 shows, the overall structure of Web queries in some areas did not change, while in others we see change from 1997 to 1999. Our comparison shows how Web searching changed incrementally and also dramatically. We see some moves toward greater simplicity, including shorter queries (i.e., fewer terms) and shorter sessions (i.e., fewer queries per user), with little modification (addition or deletion) of terms in subsequent queries. The trend toward shorter queries suggests that Web information content should target specific terms in order to reach Web users. Another trend was to view fewer pages of results per query. Most Excite users examined only one page of results per query, since an Excite results page contains ten ranked Web sites. Were users satisfied with the results and did not need to view more pages? It appears that the public continues to have a low tolerance of wading through retrieved sites. This decline in interactivity levels is a disturbing finding for the future of Web searching. Queries that included Boolean operators were in the minority, but the percentage increased between the two time periods. Most Boolean use involved the AND operator with many mistakes. The use of relevance feedback almost doubled from 1997 to 1999, but overall use was still small. An unusually large number of terms were used with low frequency, such as personal names, spelling errors, non-English words, and Web-specific terms, such as URLs. Web query vocabulary contains more words than found in large English texts in general. The public language of Web queries has its own and unique characteristics. How did Web searching topics change from 1997 to 1999? We classified a random sample of 2,414 queries from 1997 and 2,539 queries from 1999 into 11 categories (Table 2). From 1997 to 1999, Web searching shifted from entertainment, recreation and sex, and pornography, preferences to e-commerce-related topics under commerce, travel, employment, and economy. This shift coincided with changes in information distribution on the publicly indexed Web.
  8. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.02 
    0.015269709 = product of:
  0.030539418 = sum of:
    0.030539418 = product of:
      0.061078835 = sum of:
        0.061078835 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061078835 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  9. Eggeling, T.; Kroschel, A.: Alles finden im Web (2000) 0.02 
    0.015269709 = product of:
  0.030539418 = sum of:
    0.030539418 = product of:
      0.061078835 = sum of:
        0.061078835 = weight(_text_:22 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061078835 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9. 7.2000 14:06:22
  10. Poulakos, I.: ¬"Die Leute suchen immer dasselbe" (2001) 0.02 
    0.015269709 = product of:
  0.030539418 = sum of:
    0.030539418 = product of:
      0.061078835 = sum of:
        0.061078835 = weight(_text_:22 in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061078835 = score(doc=5541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18. 1.1997 12:15:22
  11. Sauer, D.: Alles schneller finden (2001) 0.02 
    0.015269709 = product of:
  0.030539418 = sum of:
    0.030539418 = product of:
      0.061078835 = sum of:
        0.061078835 = weight(_text_:22 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061078835 = score(doc=6835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11.11.2001 17:25:22
  12. Breyer, K.: Kommerz statt Information (2002) 0.02 
    0.015269709 = product of:
  0.030539418 = sum of:
    0.030539418 = product of:
      0.061078835 = sum of:
        0.061078835 = weight(_text_:22 in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061078835 = score(doc=568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9. 5.2002 21:21:22
  13. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.01 
    0.012215767 = product of:
  0.024431534 = sum of:
    0.024431534 = product of:
      0.04886307 = sum of:
        0.04886307 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04886307 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  14. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01 
    0.012215767 = product of:
  0.024431534 = sum of:
    0.024431534 = product of:
      0.04886307 = sum of:
        0.04886307 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04886307 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  15. Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000) 0.01 
    0.012215767 = product of:
  0.024431534 = sum of:
    0.024431534 = product of:
      0.04886307 = sum of:
        0.04886307 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04886307 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:16
  16. Hülsmann, M.: Profi-Suche : Suchdienste richtig nutzen (2001) 0.01 
    0.012215767 = product of:
  0.024431534 = sum of:
    0.024431534 = product of:
      0.04886307 = sum of:
        0.04886307 = weight(_text_:22 in 6422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04886307 = score(doc=6422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6422)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 14:19:22
  17. Schüler, P.: Wertes Wissen : Knowledge Management vermeidet Datenfriedhöfe (2001) 0.01 
    0.012215767 = product of:
  0.024431534 = sum of:
    0.024431534 = product of:
      0.04886307 = sum of:
        0.04886307 = weight(_text_:22 in 6815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04886307 = score(doc=6815,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6815, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6815)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.11.2001 19:58:22
  18. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01 
    0.012215767 = product of:
  0.024431534 = sum of:
    0.024431534 = product of:
      0.04886307 = sum of:
        0.04886307 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04886307 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  19. Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000) 0.01 
    0.012215767 = product of:
  0.024431534 = sum of:
    0.024431534 = product of:
      0.04886307 = sum of:
        0.04886307 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04886307 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:36:13
  20. Lewandowski, D.: Alles nur noch Google? : Entwicklungen im Bereich der WWW-Suchmaschinen (2002) 0.01 
    0.012215767 = product of:
  0.024431534 = sum of:
    0.024431534 = product of:
      0.04886307 = sum of:
        0.04886307 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04886307 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 9.2002 18:49:22

Authors

Languages

  • d 59
  • e 34

Types

  • a 86
  • m 4
  • el 3
  • x 2
  • More… Less…

Themes