Search (188 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.11
    0.10735904 = sum of:
      0.065287076 = product of:
        0.2611483 = sum of:
          0.2611483 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2611483 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4646618 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.042071965 = product of:
        0.08414393 = sum of:
          0.08414393 = weight(_text_:y in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08414393 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  2. Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009) 0.09
    0.08831205 = sum of:
      0.046240088 = product of:
        0.18496035 = sum of:
          0.18496035 = weight(_text_:authors in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18496035 = score(doc=3161,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.042071965 = product of:
        0.08414393 = sum of:
          0.08414393 = weight(_text_:y in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08414393 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
  3. Mukherjea, S.; Hirata, K.; Hara, Y.: Towards a multimedia World-Wide Web information retrieval engine (1997) 0.06
    0.0643491 = product of:
      0.1286982 = sum of:
        0.1286982 = sum of:
          0.08414393 = weight(_text_:y in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08414393 = score(doc=2678,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
          0.044554263 = weight(_text_:22 in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044554263 = score(doc=2678,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  4. Sleem-Amer, M.; Bigorgne, I.; Brizard, S.; Santos, L.D.P.D.; Bouhairi, Y. El; Goujon, B.; Lorin, S.; Martineau, C.; Rigouste, L.; Varga, L.: Intelligent semantic search engines for opinion and sentiment mining (2012) 0.06
    0.057307243 = sum of:
      0.022247275 = product of:
        0.0889891 = sum of:
          0.0889891 = weight(_text_:authors in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0889891 = score(doc=100,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.03505997 = product of:
        0.07011994 = sum of:
          0.07011994 = weight(_text_:y in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07011994 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Over the last years, research and industry players have become increasingly interested in analyzing opinions and sentiments expressed on the social media web for product marketing and business intelligence. In order to adapt to this need search engines not only have to be able to retrieve lists of documents but to directly access, analyze, and interpret topics and opinions. This article covers an intermediate phase of the ongoing industrial research project 'DoXa' aiming at developing a semantic opinion and sentiment mining search engine for the French language. The DoXa search engine enables topic related opinion and sentiment extraction beyond positive and negative polarity using rich linguistic resources. Centering the work on two distinct business use cases, the authors analyze both unstructured Web 2.0 contents (e.g., blogs and forums) and structured questionnaire data sets. The focus is on discovering hidden patterns in the data. To this end, the authors present work in progress on opinion topic relation extraction and visual analytics, linguistic resource construction as well as the combination of OLAP technology with semantic search.
  5. Khopkar, Y.; Spink, A.; Giles, C.L.; Shah, P.; Debnath, S.: Search engine personalization : An exploratory study (2003) 0.06
    0.056095954 = product of:
      0.11219191 = sum of:
        0.11219191 = product of:
          0.22438382 = sum of:
            0.22438382 = weight(_text_:y in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22438382 = score(doc=384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.8507202 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015) 0.05
    0.05362425 = product of:
      0.1072485 = sum of:
        0.1072485 = sum of:
          0.07011994 = weight(_text_:y in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07011994 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
          0.037128557 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037128557 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22
  7. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019) 0.05
    0.050026678 = sum of:
      0.031462397 = product of:
        0.12584959 = sum of:
          0.12584959 = weight(_text_:authors in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12584959 = score(doc=5288,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018564278 = product of:
        0.037128557 = sum of:
          0.037128557 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037128557 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a new method to improve the analysis of search engine results by considering the provider level as well as the domain level. This approach is tested by conducting a study using queries on the topic of insurance comparisons. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted an empirical study that analyses the results of search queries aimed at comparing insurance companies. The authors used a self-developed software system that automatically queries commercial search engines and automatically extracts the content of the returned result pages for further data analysis. The data analysis was carried out using the KNIME Analytics Platform. Findings Google's top search results are served by only a few providers that frequently appear in these results. The authors show that some providers operate several domains on the same topic and that these domains appear for the same queries in the result lists. Research limitations/implications The authors demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and draw conclusions for further investigations from the empirical study. However, the study is a limited use case based on a limited number of search queries. Originality/value The proposed method allows large-scale analysis of the composition of the top results from commercial search engines. It allows using valid empirical data to determine what users actually see on the search engine result pages.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Zhang, D.; Dong, Y.: ¬An effective algorithm to rank Web resources (2000) 0.05
    0.04908396 = product of:
      0.09816792 = sum of:
        0.09816792 = product of:
          0.19633584 = sum of:
            0.19633584 = weight(_text_:y in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19633584 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.7443802 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Head, M.; Archer, N.; Yuan, Y.: World Wide Web navigation aid (2000) 0.05
    0.04908396 = product of:
      0.09816792 = sum of:
        0.09816792 = product of:
          0.19633584 = sum of:
            0.19633584 = weight(_text_:y in 6228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19633584 = score(doc=6228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.7443802 = fieldWeight in 6228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Chaudiron, S.; Ihadjadene, M.: Studying Web search engines from a user perspective : key concepts and main approaches (2012) 0.05
    0.045811515 = sum of:
      0.027247237 = product of:
        0.10898895 = sum of:
          0.10898895 = weight(_text_:authors in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10898895 = score(doc=109,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018564278 = product of:
        0.037128557 = sum of:
          0.037128557 = weight(_text_:22 in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037128557 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter shows that the wider use of Web search engines, reconsidering the theoretical and methodological frameworks to grasp new information practices. Beginning with an overview of the recent challenges implied by the dynamic nature of the Web, this chapter then traces the information behavior related concepts in order to present the different approaches from the user perspective. The authors pay special attention to the concept of "information practice" and other related concepts such as "use", "activity", and "behavior" largely used in the literature but not always strictly defined. The authors provide an overview of user-oriented studies that are meaningful to understand the different contexts of use of electronic information access systems, focusing on five approaches: the system-oriented approaches, the theories of information seeking, the cognitive and psychological approaches, the management science approaches, and the marketing approaches. Future directions of work are then shaped, including social searching and the ethical, cultural, and political dimensions of Web search engines. The authors conclude considering the importance of Critical theory to better understand the role of Web Search engines in our modern society.
    Date
    20. 4.2012 13:22:37
  11. Bouidghaghen, O.; Tamine, L.: Spatio-temporal based personalization for mobile search (2012) 0.04
    0.04115457 = sum of:
      0.018877437 = product of:
        0.07550975 = sum of:
          0.07550975 = weight(_text_:authors in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07550975 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.022277132 = product of:
        0.044554263 = sum of:
          0.044554263 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044554263 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05480788 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The explosion of the information available on the Internet has made traditional information retrieval systems, characterized by one size fits all approaches, less effective. Indeed, users are overwhelmed by the information delivered by such systems in response to their queries, particularly when the latter are ambiguous. In order to tackle this problem, the state-of-the-art reveals that there is a growing interest towards contextual information retrieval (CIR) which relies on various sources of evidence issued from the user's search background and environment, in order to improve the retrieval accuracy. This chapter focuses on mobile context, highlights challenges they present for IR, and gives an overview of CIR approaches applied in this environment. Then, the authors present an approach to personalize search results for mobile users by exploiting both cognitive and spatio-temporal contexts. The experimental evaluation undertaken in front of Yahoo search shows that the approach improves the quality of top search result lists and enhances search result precision.
    Date
    20. 4.2012 13:19:22
  12. Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.03
    0.031504624 = product of:
      0.06300925 = sum of:
        0.06300925 = product of:
          0.1260185 = sum of:
            0.1260185 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1260185 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.1996 22:38:41
    Pages
    22 S
  13. Höfer, W.: Detektive im Web (1999) 0.03
    0.031504624 = product of:
      0.06300925 = sum of:
        0.06300925 = product of:
          0.1260185 = sum of:
            0.1260185 = weight(_text_:22 in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1260185 = score(doc=4007,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.1999 20:22:06
  14. Rensman, J.: Blick ins Getriebe (1999) 0.03
    0.031504624 = product of:
      0.06300925 = sum of:
        0.06300925 = product of:
          0.1260185 = sum of:
            0.1260185 = weight(_text_:22 in 4009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1260185 = score(doc=4009,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4009, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4009)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.1999 21:22:59
  15. Wu, L.-L.; Chuang, Y.-L.; Chen, P.-Y.: Motivation for using search engines : a two-factor model (2008) 0.03
    0.030362826 = product of:
      0.06072565 = sum of:
        0.06072565 = product of:
          0.1214513 = sum of:
            0.1214513 = weight(_text_:y in 3324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1214513 = score(doc=3324,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.46046585 = fieldWeight in 3324, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3324)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Wu, L.-L., A. Chuang u. P.-Y. Chen: Correction to Wu, L., Chuang, A., & Chen, P. (2008). Motivation for using search engines: A two factor model. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1829-1840. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.214-216.
  16. Song, R.; Luo, Z.; Nie, J.-Y.; Yu, Y.; Hon, H.-W.: Identification of ambiguous queries in web search (2009) 0.03
    0.029749371 = product of:
      0.059498742 = sum of:
        0.059498742 = product of:
          0.118997484 = sum of:
            0.118997484 = weight(_text_:y in 2441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.118997484 = score(doc=2441,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.45116252 = fieldWeight in 2441, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.03
    0.029702844 = product of:
      0.05940569 = sum of:
        0.05940569 = product of:
          0.11881138 = sum of:
            0.11881138 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11881138 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  18. Pulido, J.R.V.: Recupracion de la information en Internet : motores y otros agentes des busqueda (1997) 0.03
    0.028047977 = product of:
      0.056095954 = sum of:
        0.056095954 = product of:
          0.11219191 = sum of:
            0.11219191 = weight(_text_:y in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11219191 = score(doc=2879,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.03
    0.026253853 = product of:
      0.052507706 = sum of:
        0.052507706 = product of:
          0.10501541 = sum of:
            0.10501541 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10501541 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  20. Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999) 0.03
    0.025989987 = product of:
      0.051979974 = sum of:
        0.051979974 = product of:
          0.10395995 = sum of:
            0.10395995 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10395995 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05480788 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28

Years

Languages

  • e 104
  • d 80
  • f 2
  • nl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 165
  • el 12
  • m 12
  • x 3
  • p 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…