Search (181 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.08
    0.08056636 = product of:
      0.16113272 = sum of:
        0.16113272 = sum of:
          0.11264306 = weight(_text_:z in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11264306 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.048489656 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048489656 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  2. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019) 0.05
    0.046667513 = sum of:
      0.029349778 = product of:
        0.11739911 = sum of:
          0.11739911 = weight(_text_:authors in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11739911 = score(doc=5288,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017317735 = product of:
        0.03463547 = sum of:
          0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03463547 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a new method to improve the analysis of search engine results by considering the provider level as well as the domain level. This approach is tested by conducting a study using queries on the topic of insurance comparisons. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted an empirical study that analyses the results of search queries aimed at comparing insurance companies. The authors used a self-developed software system that automatically queries commercial search engines and automatically extracts the content of the returned result pages for further data analysis. The data analysis was carried out using the KNIME Analytics Platform. Findings Google's top search results are served by only a few providers that frequently appear in these results. The authors show that some providers operate several domains on the same topic and that these domains appear for the same queries in the result lists. Research limitations/implications The authors demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and draw conclusions for further investigations from the empirical study. However, the study is a limited use case based on a limited number of search queries. Originality/value The proposed method allows large-scale analysis of the composition of the top results from commercial search engines. It allows using valid empirical data to determine what users actually see on the search engine result pages.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Lin, Z.; Baoming, Z.: Comparative study of WWW search tools (1998) 0.05
    0.045514673 = product of:
      0.091029346 = sum of:
        0.091029346 = product of:
          0.18205869 = sum of:
            0.18205869 = weight(_text_:z in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18205869 = score(doc=3558,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.66716415 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Chaudiron, S.; Ihadjadene, M.: Studying Web search engines from a user perspective : key concepts and main approaches (2012) 0.04
    0.04273539 = sum of:
      0.025417656 = product of:
        0.10167062 = sum of:
          0.10167062 = weight(_text_:authors in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10167062 = score(doc=109,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017317735 = product of:
        0.03463547 = sum of:
          0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03463547 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter shows that the wider use of Web search engines, reconsidering the theoretical and methodological frameworks to grasp new information practices. Beginning with an overview of the recent challenges implied by the dynamic nature of the Web, this chapter then traces the information behavior related concepts in order to present the different approaches from the user perspective. The authors pay special attention to the concept of "information practice" and other related concepts such as "use", "activity", and "behavior" largely used in the literature but not always strictly defined. The authors provide an overview of user-oriented studies that are meaningful to understand the different contexts of use of electronic information access systems, focusing on five approaches: the system-oriented approaches, the theories of information seeking, the cognitive and psychological approaches, the management science approaches, and the marketing approaches. Future directions of work are then shaped, including social searching and the ethical, cultural, and political dimensions of Web search engines. The authors conclude considering the importance of Critical theory to better understand the role of Web Search engines in our modern society.
    Date
    20. 4.2012 13:22:37
  5. Bouidghaghen, O.; Tamine, L.: Spatio-temporal based personalization for mobile search (2012) 0.04
    0.038391147 = sum of:
      0.017609866 = product of:
        0.070439465 = sum of:
          0.070439465 = weight(_text_:authors in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070439465 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02078128 = product of:
        0.04156256 = sum of:
          0.04156256 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04156256 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The explosion of the information available on the Internet has made traditional information retrieval systems, characterized by one size fits all approaches, less effective. Indeed, users are overwhelmed by the information delivered by such systems in response to their queries, particularly when the latter are ambiguous. In order to tackle this problem, the state-of-the-art reveals that there is a growing interest towards contextual information retrieval (CIR) which relies on various sources of evidence issued from the user's search background and environment, in order to improve the retrieval accuracy. This chapter focuses on mobile context, highlights challenges they present for IR, and gives an overview of CIR approaches applied in this environment. Then, the authors present an approach to personalize search results for mobile users by exploiting both cognitive and spatio-temporal contexts. The experimental evaluation undertaken in front of Yahoo search shows that the approach improves the quality of top search result lists and enhances search result precision.
    Date
    20. 4.2012 13:19:22
  6. ¬The Internet searcher's handbook : locating information, people and software (1996) 0.03
    0.032183733 = product of:
      0.064367466 = sum of:
        0.064367466 = product of:
          0.12873493 = sum of:
            0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 2935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12873493 = score(doc=2935,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 2935, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2935)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Online 20(1996) no.4, S.94 (J.A. Copler); College and research libraries 57(1996) no.4, S.394-395. (B.A. Burg); Managing information 3(1996) nos.7/8, S.47 (Z. Woodley); Special libraries 87(1996) no.3, S.237-238 (M.A. McFarland); JASIS 49(1998) no.6, S.567 (V. Jaffe)
  7. bs: ¬Der gläserne PC (2005) 0.03
    0.032183733 = product of:
      0.064367466 = sum of:
        0.064367466 = product of:
          0.12873493 = sum of:
            0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 3252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12873493 = score(doc=3252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 3252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    A-Z Finder
  8. Kramer, A.: Such, Programm! : Elf kostenlose Desktop-Tools schnüffeln um die Wette (2005) 0.03
    0.032183733 = product of:
      0.064367466 = sum of:
        0.064367466 = product of:
          0.12873493 = sum of:
            0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12873493 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    A-Z Finder 1.08
  9. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.03
    0.03045161 = product of:
      0.06090322 = sum of:
        0.06090322 = product of:
          0.24361289 = sum of:
            0.24361289 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24361289 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43346098 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  10. Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.03
    0.029389173 = product of:
      0.058778346 = sum of:
        0.058778346 = product of:
          0.11755669 = sum of:
            0.11755669 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11755669 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.1996 22:38:41
    Pages
    22 S
  11. Höfer, W.: Detektive im Web (1999) 0.03
    0.029389173 = product of:
      0.058778346 = sum of:
        0.058778346 = product of:
          0.11755669 = sum of:
            0.11755669 = weight(_text_:22 in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11755669 = score(doc=4007,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.1999 20:22:06
  12. Rensman, J.: Blick ins Getriebe (1999) 0.03
    0.029389173 = product of:
      0.058778346 = sum of:
        0.058778346 = product of:
          0.11755669 = sum of:
            0.11755669 = weight(_text_:22 in 4009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11755669 = score(doc=4009,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4009, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4009)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.1999 21:22:59
  13. Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019) 0.03
    0.028160766 = product of:
      0.05632153 = sum of:
        0.05632153 = product of:
          0.11264306 = sum of:
            0.11264306 = weight(_text_:z in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11264306 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschreibt eine Studie zur Entwicklung und Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme. Dazu wurden mögliche Faktoren für das Relevanzranking ausgehend von den Verfahren in Websuchmaschinen identifiziert, auf den Bibliothekskontext übertragen und systematisch evaluiert. Mithilfe eines Testsystems, das auf dem ZBW-Informationsportal EconBiz und einer web-basierten Software zur Evaluierung von Suchsystemen aufsetzt, wurden verschiedene Relevanzfaktoren (z. B. Popularität in Verbindung mit Aktualität) getestet. Obwohl die getesteten Rankingverfahren auf einer theoretischen Ebene divers sind, konnten keine einheitlichen Verbesserungen gegenüber den Baseline-Rankings gemessen werden. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass eine Adaptierung des Rankings auf individuelle Nutzer bzw. Nutzungskontexte notwendig sein könnte, um eine höhere Performance zu erzielen.
  14. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.03
    0.027708376 = product of:
      0.05541675 = sum of:
        0.05541675 = product of:
          0.1108335 = sum of:
            0.1108335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1108335 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  15. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02
    0.024490975 = product of:
      0.04898195 = sum of:
        0.04898195 = product of:
          0.0979639 = sum of:
            0.0979639 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0979639 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  16. Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999) 0.02
    0.024244828 = product of:
      0.048489656 = sum of:
        0.048489656 = product of:
          0.09697931 = sum of:
            0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09697931 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
  17. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.024244828 = product of:
      0.048489656 = sum of:
        0.048489656 = product of:
          0.09697931 = sum of:
            0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09697931 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  18. ap: Suchmaschinen in neuem Gewand : Metaspinner kennt 600 Millionen Seiten (1999) 0.02
    0.024244828 = product of:
      0.048489656 = sum of:
        0.048489656 = product of:
          0.09697931 = sum of:
            0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 4224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09697931 = score(doc=4224,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4224, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  19. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02
    0.024244828 = product of:
      0.048489656 = sum of:
        0.048489656 = product of:
          0.09697931 = sum of:
            0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09697931 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  20. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.02
    0.024244828 = product of:
      0.048489656 = sum of:
        0.048489656 = product of:
          0.09697931 = sum of:
            0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09697931 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20

Years

Languages

  • d 89
  • e 88
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 159
  • m 11
  • el 9
  • x 4
  • p 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…