Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006) 0.05
    0.048132036 = product of:
      0.09626407 = sum of:
        0.09626407 = sum of:
          0.053210527 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053210527 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045395818 = queryNorm
              0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
          0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043053545 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045395818 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:30:09
  2. Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001) 0.04
    0.038633395 = product of:
      0.07726679 = sum of:
        0.07726679 = sum of:
          0.052664764 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052664764 = score(doc=168,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045395818 = queryNorm
              0.2979991 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
          0.024602026 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024602026 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045395818 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The effect that content and layout of bibliographic displays had on the ability of end-users to process catalog information was tested using a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design. Participants were asked to perform two related tasks during the course of the experiment. In the first task, they were asked to select a set of items that they would examine further for a hypothetical paper they must write, using a simulated online catalog to make their assessments of relevance. In the second task, they were asked to examine 20 bibliographic records, decide whether they would choose to examine these items further on the shelf, and identify the data elements that they used to formulate their relevance decision. One group viewed bibliographic records on an interface similar to current online catalogs, one that used data labels and contained data elements commonly found. A second group viewed these records on an interface in which the labels had been removed, but the data elements were the same as those in the first. The third group viewed these records on a labeled display that included enhanced data elements on the brief record display. The final group viewed these records with the same brief record data elements as the third group, but with the labels removed, using ISBD and AACR2 punctuation standards. For the first task, participants using enhanced brief screen interfaces viewed more brief screens and fewer full screens than their counterparts. Screen durations for the second 10 screens were found to have dropped from those of the first 10 screens. Statistical analyses comparing demographic variables to the screen frequencies uncovered many significant differences. Participants using the enhanced-content interfaces made fewer selections from index and full screens, and more selections from brief screens. For the second task, participants who used enhanced-content interfaces were able to make some sort of relevance judgment more frequently than those who used standard-content interfaces.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.03
    0.03195897 = product of:
      0.06391794 = sum of:
        0.06391794 = product of:
          0.12783588 = sum of:
            0.12783588 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12783588 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
  4. Chen, C.: Top Ten Problems in Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries (2002) 0.03
    0.026094392 = product of:
      0.052188784 = sum of:
        0.052188784 = product of:
          0.10437757 = sum of:
            0.10437757 = weight(_text_:22 in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10437757 = score(doc=4840,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:13:11
  5. Shen, R.; Wang, J.; Fox, E.A.: ¬A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems (2002) 0.03
    0.026094392 = product of:
      0.052188784 = sum of:
        0.052188784 = product of:
          0.10437757 = sum of:
            0.10437757 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10437757 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:15:14
  6. Börner, K.; Chen, C.: Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries : Motivation, Utilization, and Socio-technical Challenges (2002) 0.03
    0.026094392 = product of:
      0.052188784 = sum of:
        0.052188784 = product of:
          0.10437757 = sum of:
            0.10437757 = weight(_text_:22 in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10437757 = score(doc=1359,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:20:07
  7. Christoffel, M.; Schmitt, B.: Accessing Libraries as Easy as a Game (2002) 0.03
    0.026094392 = product of:
      0.052188784 = sum of:
        0.052188784 = product of:
          0.10437757 = sum of:
            0.10437757 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10437757 = score(doc=1361,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:19:01
  8. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.02
    0.021745324 = product of:
      0.04349065 = sum of:
        0.04349065 = product of:
          0.0869813 = sum of:
            0.0869813 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0869813 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
  9. Lange, M.; Sandholzer, U.; Wiegandt, B.: Neue Oberfläche und Funktionalitäten für die GBV-Datenbanken (2008) 0.02
    0.01739626 = product of:
      0.03479252 = sum of:
        0.03479252 = product of:
          0.06958504 = sum of:
            0.06958504 = weight(_text_:22 in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06958504 = score(doc=1849,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.10.2008 19:31:22
    Source
    Mitteilungsblatt der Bibliotheken in Niedersachsen und Sachsen-Anhalt. 2008, H.139, S.22-24
  10. Miller, D.H.: User perception and the online catalogue : public library OPAC users "think aloud" (2004) 0.02
    0.016997479 = product of:
      0.033994958 = sum of:
        0.033994958 = product of:
          0.067989916 = sum of:
            0.067989916 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067989916 = score(doc=2659,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.3847152 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper presents findings based on user feedback and opinion of online public access catalogues as tools for finding, identifying, and selecting bibliographic materials in a public library setting. Participants spoke their thoughts aloud while conducting known-item searches. The findings describe an iterative process of action, observation, identification, and emotion.
    Content
    1. Introduction Significant research in the design and use of online public access catalogues (OPACs) has been conducted by professionals in library and information science (Borgman, 1996; Carlyle, 2001, Carlyle & Timmons, 2002; Hancock, 1987). However, only limited research has addressed actual library user interaction with and perceptions of online catalogue displays and bibliographic elements (Abrera, 1986; Luk, 1996; Markey, 1983). Retrieval systems, specifically online library catalogues, should consider user perceptions and expectations as an important aspect of design and implementation for improved catalogue efficiency (Hert, 1996). Therefore, it is necessary to examine the online catalogue from a user perspective to determine if it is currently succeeding in meeting the bibliographic needs of users in terms of description, display, navigation, and to provide principles for design of future OPACs. A study seeking to understand better how public library users interact with general OPAC displays and the more specific displays of bibliographic information was conducted in 2003. Research questions focused an 1) user perceptions of the OPAC, 2) the elements in a bibliographic display standing out as most important in selection and identification, and 3) user feedback an the process of using the OPAC. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the larger study findings having implications for future research and online catalogue design.
  11. Vaughan, M.W.; Resnick, M.L.: Search user interfaces : best practices and future visions (2006) 0.02
    0.015376267 = product of:
      0.030752534 = sum of:
        0.030752534 = product of:
          0.061505068 = sum of:
            0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061505068 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:37:31
  12. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02
    0.015221728 = product of:
      0.030443456 = sum of:
        0.030443456 = product of:
          0.060886912 = sum of:
            0.060886912 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060886912 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
  13. Mi, J.; Weng, C.: Revitalizing the library OPAC : interface, searching and display challenges (2008) 0.01
    0.013302632 = product of:
      0.026605263 = sum of:
        0.026605263 = product of:
          0.053210527 = sum of:
            0.053210527 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053210527 = score(doc=2255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The behavior of academic library users has drastically changed in recent years. Internet search engines have become the preferred tool over the library online public access catalog (OPAC) for finding information. Libraries are losing ground to online search engines. In this paper, two aspects of OPAC use are studied: (1) the current OPAC interface and searching capabilities, and (2) the OPAC bibliographic display. The purpose of the study is to find answers to the following questions: Why is the current OPAC ineffective? What can libraries and librarians do to deliver an OPAC that is as good as search engines to better serve our users? Revitalizing the library OPAC is one of the pressing issues that has to be accomplished.
  14. Crüger, I.: Farbentheorie und Farbgestaltung (2000) 0.01
    0.012301013 = product of:
      0.024602026 = sum of:
        0.024602026 = product of:
          0.04920405 = sum of:
            0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04920405 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15.12.2000 20:22:37
  15. Davis, L.: Designing a search user interface for a digital library (2006) 0.01
    0.012301013 = product of:
      0.024602026 = sum of:
        0.024602026 = product of:
          0.04920405 = sum of:
            0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04920405 = score(doc=5294,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:48:54
  16. Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006) 0.01
    0.012301013 = product of:
      0.024602026 = sum of:
        0.024602026 = product of:
          0.04920405 = sum of:
            0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04920405 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:17:44
  17. Roto, V.: Search on mobile phones. (2006) 0.01
    0.012301013 = product of:
      0.024602026 = sum of:
        0.024602026 = product of:
          0.04920405 = sum of:
            0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04920405 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:35:39
  18. Poo, D.C.C.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Online Catalog Subject Searching (2009) 0.01
    0.011402255 = product of:
      0.02280451 = sum of:
        0.02280451 = product of:
          0.04560902 = sum of:
            0.04560902 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04560902 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) is an information retrieval system characterized by short bibliographic records, mainly of books, journals, and audiovisual materials available in a particular library. This, coupled with a Boolean search interface and a heterogeneous user population with diverse needs, presents special problems for subject searching by end users. To perform effective subject searching in the OPAC system requires a wide range of knowledge and skills. Various approaches to improving the OPAC design for subject searching have been proposed and are reviewed in this entry. The trend toward Web-based OPAC interfaces and the developments in Internet and digital library technologies present fresh opportunities for enhancing the effectiveness of the OPAC system for subject searching.
  19. Dorner, D.G.; Curtis, A.M.: ¬A comparative review of common user interface products (2004) 0.01
    0.010763386 = product of:
      0.021526773 = sum of:
        0.021526773 = product of:
          0.043053545 = sum of:
            0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043053545 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.182-197
  20. Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006) 0.01
    0.010763386 = product of:
      0.021526773 = sum of:
        0.021526773 = product of:
          0.043053545 = sum of:
            0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043053545 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:37:49