Search (286 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Johnson, J.D.: On contexts of information seeking (2003) 0.01
    0.009589763 = product of:
      0.09589763 = sum of:
        0.08176539 = weight(_text_:760 in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08176539 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1486828 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.5499317 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
        0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012739129 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
        0.0013931128 = product of:
          0.0041793385 = sum of:
            0.0041793385 = weight(_text_:a in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041793385 = score(doc=1082,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    While surprisingly little has been written about context at a meaningful level, context is central to most theoretical approaches to information seeking. In this essay I explore in more detail three senses of context. First, I look at context as equivalent to the situation in which a process is immersed. Second, I discuss contingency approaches that detail active ingredients of the situation that have specific, predictable effects. Third, I examine major frameworks for meaning systems. Then, I discuss how a deeper appreciation of context can enhance our understanding of the process of information seeking by examining two vastly different contexts in which it occurs: organizational and cancer-related, an exemplar of everyday life information seeking. This essay concludes with a discussion of the value that can be added to information seeking research and theory as a result of a deeper appreciation of context, particularly in terms of our current multi-contextual environment and individuals taking an active role in contextualizing.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.5, S.735-760
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  2. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.01
    0.006044409 = product of:
      0.09066613 = sum of:
        0.017152434 = product of:
          0.03430487 = sum of:
            0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03430487 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.073513694 = sum of:
          0.005212551 = weight(_text_:a in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005212551 = score(doc=3339,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03430487 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.033996277 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033996277 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
    Source
    Toward a theory of librarianship. Papers in honor of J.H. Shera. Ed. by H. Rawski
    Type
    a
  3. Xie, I.; Joo, S.: Factors affecting the selection of search tactics : tasks, knowledge, process, and systems (2012) 0.01
    0.0058284737 = product of:
      0.058284737 = sum of:
        0.0073510436 = product of:
          0.014702087 = sum of:
            0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 2739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014702087 = score(doc=2739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.040079206 = weight(_text_:post in 2739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040079206 = score(doc=2739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 2739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2739)
        0.010854486 = product of:
          0.01628173 = sum of:
            0.0015796415 = weight(_text_:a in 2739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0015796415 = score(doc=2739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2739)
            0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 2739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014702087 = score(doc=2739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2739)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated whether and how different factors in relation to task, user-perceived knowledge, search process, and system affect users' search tactic selection. Thirty-one participants, representing the general public with their own tasks, were recruited for this study. Multiple methods were employed to collect data, including pre-questionnaire, verbal protocols, log analysis, diaries, and post-questionnaires. Statistical analysis revealed that seven factors were significantly associated with tactic selection. These factors consist of work task types, search task types, familiarity with topic, search skills, search session length, search phases, and system types. Moreover, the study also discovered, qualitatively, in what ways these factors influence the selection of search tactics. Based on the findings, the authors discuss practical implications for system design to support users' application of multiple search tactics for each factor.
    Date
    29. 1.2016 19:02:38
    Type
    a
  4. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01
    0.0052521373 = product of:
      0.052521374 = sum of:
        0.0073510436 = product of:
          0.014702087 = sum of:
            0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014702087 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012739129 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.0324312 = sum of:
          0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003159283 = score(doc=3612,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014702087 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.014569832 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014569832 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
    Type
    a
  5. Rieh, S.Y.; Kim, Y.-M.; Markey, K.: Amount of invested mental effort (AIME) in online searching (2012) 0.00
    0.0042371894 = product of:
      0.04237189 = sum of:
        0.033399336 = weight(_text_:post in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033399336 = score(doc=2726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
        0.007897745 = product of:
          0.01579549 = sum of:
            0.01579549 = weight(_text_:online in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01579549 = score(doc=2726,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.29038906 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0010748099 = product of:
          0.0032244297 = sum of:
            0.0032244297 = weight(_text_:a in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0032244297 = score(doc=2726,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This research investigates how people's perceptions of information retrieval (IR) systems, their perceptions of search tasks, and their perceptions of self-efficacy influence the amount of invested mental effort (AIME) they put into using two different IR systems: a Web search engine and a library system. It also explores the impact of mental effort on an end user's search experience. To assess AIME in online searching, two experiments were conducted using these methods: Experiment 1 relied on self-reports and Experiment 2 employed the dual-task technique. In both experiments, data were collected through search transaction logs, a pre-search background questionnaire, a post-search questionnaire and an interview. Important findings are these: (1) subjects invested greater mental effort searching a library system than searching the Web; (2) subjects put little effort into Web searching because of their high sense of self-efficacy in their searching ability and their perception of the easiness of the Web; (3) subjects did not recognize that putting mental effort into searching was something needed to improve the search results; and (4) data collected from multiple sources proved to be effective for assessing mental effort in online searching.
    Type
    a
  6. Wilson, T.D.: Exploring models of information behaviour : the 'uncertainty' project (1999) 0.00
    0.0036102103 = product of:
      0.0361021 = sum of:
        0.008576217 = product of:
          0.017152434 = sum of:
            0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017152434 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014862318 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
        0.012663566 = product of:
          0.018995348 = sum of:
            0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.001842915 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
            0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017152434 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2002 9:29:18
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
    Type
    a
  7. Makulowich, J.S.: 10 tips on managing your Internet searching (1995) 0.00
    0.0033604929 = product of:
      0.033604927 = sum of:
        0.0098013915 = product of:
          0.019602783 = sum of:
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=2791,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0072956234 = product of:
          0.014591247 = sum of:
            0.014591247 = weight(_text_:online in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014591247 = score(doc=2791,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016507914 = product of:
          0.02476187 = sum of:
            0.005159087 = weight(_text_:a in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005159087 = score(doc=2791,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=2791,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Offers 10 tips for finding information on the Internet. Define the area and level of expertise. Require end users to complete a request form defining the query. Categorize the Internat in lay terms for casual users. Establich a realistic time for retrieving results. Adopt a disciplined, systematic approach to the search. Understand the operating platform and the major tools available. Maintain a file of important services and addresses and users. Develop bookmarks and home pages. Learn shortcuts. Participate in the Internet Hunt (a monthly series of questions that allows searchers to practice and perfect search skills)
    Date
    14.12.1995 20:51:29
    Source
    Online. 19(1995) no.4, S.32-37
    Type
    a
  8. Manual of online search strategies (1992) 0.00
    0.003122899 = product of:
      0.03122899 = sum of:
        0.009119529 = product of:
          0.018239059 = sum of:
            0.018239059 = weight(_text_:online in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018239059 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021231882 = weight(_text_:u in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021231882 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
        8.775785E-4 = product of:
          0.0026327355 = sum of:
            0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026327355 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Editor
    Armstrong, C.J. u. J.A. Large
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library Association record 94(1992) no.10, S.667 (A. Pinnock); Library review 42(1993) no.5, S.71-72 (P. Millar)
  9. Waschatz, B.: Schmökern ist schwierig : Viele Uni-Bibliotheken ordnen ihre Bücher nicht - Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Suche (2010) 0.00
    0.0029831878 = product of:
      0.029831877 = sum of:
        0.02057963 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02057963 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10548963 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.19508676 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
        0.0038690888 = product of:
          0.0077381777 = sum of:
            0.0077381777 = weight(_text_:online in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0077381777 = score(doc=3206,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.142261 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005383158 = product of:
          0.008074737 = sum of:
            7.8982074E-4 = weight(_text_:a in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              7.8982074E-4 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.03821847 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
            0.007284916 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007284916 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Content
    Im Online-Katalog erfahren Studenten auch, ob das Buch verfügbar oder verliehen ist. Ist es gerade vergriffen, kann man es vormerken lassen, er- klärt Monika Ziller, Vorsitzen- de des Deutschen Bibliotheksverbands in Berlin. Dann werden die Studenten entsprechend benachrichtigt, wenn es zurückgegeben wurde. Außerdem könnten Studenten virtuelle Fachbibliotheken nutzen, erklärt Grau. Um das Thema Slavistik kümmert sich etwa die Staatsbibliothek in Berlin. Auf der Internetseite kann man über Suchbegriffe alle elektronischen Slavistik-Angebote wie Zeitschriften, E-Books oder Bibliografien durchforsten. Die virtuelle Fachbibliothek spuckt dann eine Titelliste aus. Bestenfalls können Studenten gleich auf einzelne Volltexte der Liste zugreifen. Oder sie müssen schauen, ob die eigene Bibliothek das gesuchte Werk hat. Vor allem Zeitschriften sind oft online im Volltext abrufbar, aber auch Enzyklopädien. "Die sind auch aktueller als der Brockhaus von 1990, der zu Hause im Regal steht" sagt Grau. Manchmal ließen sich die Texte aus Gründen des Urheberrechts aber nur auf den Rechnern auf dem Unicampus lesen, ergänzt Hohoff. Findet man ein Buch nicht, ist der Grund dafür oft ein Fehler, der sich bei der Suche eingeschlichen hat. Das fängt bei der Rechtschreibung an: "Bibliothekskataloge verfügen über keine fehlertolerante Suche wie Google", erklärt Ziller.
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    Type
    a
  10. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.00
    0.0029417619 = product of:
      0.044126425 = sum of:
        0.033399336 = weight(_text_:post in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033399336 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
        0.010727088 = product of:
          0.016090631 = sum of:
            0.0039491034 = weight(_text_:a in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039491034 = score(doc=1073,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
            0.012141528 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012141528 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
    Type
    a
  11. Spink, A.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Ellis, D.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 1: theoretical framework and research design (2002) 0.00
    0.002771234 = product of:
      0.041568507 = sum of:
        0.040079206 = weight(_text_:post in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040079206 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
        0.0014893002 = product of:
          0.0044679004 = sum of:
            0.0044679004 = weight(_text_:a in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0044679004 = score(doc=5240,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    In this issue we begin with the first of four parts of a five part series of papers by Spink, Wilson, Ford, Foster, and Ellis. Spink, et alia, in the first section of this report set forth the design of a project to test whether existing models of the information search process are appropriate for an environment of mediated successive searching which they believe characterizes much information seeking behavior. Their goal is to develop an integrated model of the process. Data were collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K., with individuals with real information needs engaged in interaction with operational information retrieval systems by use of transaction logs, recordings of interactions with intermediaries, pre, and post search interviews, questionnaire responses, relevance judgments of retrieved text, and responses to a test of cognitive styles. Questionnaires were based upon the Kuhlthau model, the Saracevic model, the Ellis model, and incorporated a visual analog scale to avoid a consistency bias.
    Type
    a
  12. Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Ellis, D.; Foster, A.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 2: uncertainty and Its correlates (2002) 0.00
    0.0027648215 = product of:
      0.04147232 = sum of:
        0.040079206 = weight(_text_:post in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040079206 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
        0.0013931128 = product of:
          0.0041793385 = sum of:
            0.0041793385 = weight(_text_:a in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041793385 = score(doc=5232,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    In "Part 2. Uncertainty and Its Correlates,'' where Wilson is the primary author, after a review of uncertainty as a concept in information seeking and decision research, it is hypothesized that if the Kuhlthau problem solving stage model is appropriate the searchers will recognize the stage in which they currently are operating. Secondly to test Wilson's contention that operationalized uncertainty would be useful in characterizing users, it is hypothesized that uncertainty will decrease as the searcher proceeds through problem stages and after the completion of the search. A review of pre and post search interviews reveals that uncertainty can be operationalized, and that academic researchers have no difficulty with a stage model of the information seeking process. Uncertainty is unrelated to sex, age, or discipline, but is related to problem stage and domain knowledge. Both concepts appear robust.
    Type
    a
  13. Choi, Y.; Rasmussen, E.M.: Searching for images : the analysis of users' queries for image retrieval in American history (2003) 0.00
    0.0027215905 = product of:
      0.040823855 = sum of:
        0.040079206 = weight(_text_:post in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040079206 = score(doc=5160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
        7.446501E-4 = product of:
          0.0022339502 = sum of:
            0.0022339502 = weight(_text_:a in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0022339502 = score(doc=5160,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Choi and Rasmussen collect queries to the Library of Congress's American Memory photo archive from 48 scholars in American History by way of interviews and pre and post search questionnaires. Their interest is in the types of information need common in the visual domain, and the categories of terms most often used or indicated as appropriate for the description of image contents. Each search resulted in the provision of 20 items for evaluation by the searcher. Terms in queries and acceptable retrievals were categorized by a who, what, when, where faceted classification and queries into four needs categories; specific, general, abstract, and subjective. Two out of three analysts assigned all 38 requests into the same one of the four categories and in 19 cases all three agreed. General/nameable needs accounted for 60.5%, specific needs 26.3%, 7.9% for general/abstract, and 5.3% for subjective needs. The facet analysis indicated most content was of the form person/thing or event/condition limited by geography or time.
    Type
    a
  14. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00
    0.0026601837 = product of:
      0.039902754 = sum of:
        0.021231882 = weight(_text_:u in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021231882 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
        0.018670872 = product of:
          0.028006306 = sum of:
            0.0037232507 = weight(_text_:a in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0037232507 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
            0.024283055 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024283055 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
    Type
    a
  15. Slone, D.J.: ¬The influence of mental models and goals on search patterns during Web interaction (2002) 0.00
    0.0024153767 = product of:
      0.024153767 = sum of:
        0.00612587 = product of:
          0.01225174 = sum of:
            0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01225174 = score(doc=5229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007897745 = product of:
          0.01579549 = sum of:
            0.01579549 = weight(_text_:online in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01579549 = score(doc=5229,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.29038906 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010130152 = product of:
          0.015195228 = sum of:
            0.002943488 = weight(_text_:a in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002943488 = score(doc=5229,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
            0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01225174 = score(doc=5229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Thirty-one patrons, who were selected by Slone to provide a range of age and experience, agreed when approached while using the catalog of the Wake County library system to try searching via the Internet. Fifteen searched the Wake County online catalog in this manner and 16 searched the World Wide Web, including that catalog. They were subjected to brief pre-structured taped interviews before and after their searches and observed during the searching process resulting in a log of behaviors, comments, pages accessed, and time spent. Data were analyzed across participants and categories. Web searches were characterized as linking, URL, search engine, within a site domain, and searching a web catalog; and participants by the number of these techniques used. Four used only one, 13 used two, 11 used three, two used four, and one all five. Participant experience was characterized as never used, used search engines, browsing experience, email experience, URL experience, catalog experience, and finally chat room/newsgroup experience. Sixteen percent of the participants had never used the Internet, 71% had used search engines, 65% had browsed, 58% had used email, 39% had used URLs, 39% had used online catalogs, and 32% had used chat rooms. The catalog was normally consulted before the web, where both were used, and experience with an online catalog assists in web use. Scrolling was found to be unpopular and practiced halfheartedly.
    Date
    21. 7.2006 11:26:29
    Type
    a
  16. Verberne, S.; Heijden, M. van der; Hinne, M.; Sappelli, M.; Koldijk, S.; Hoenkamp, E.; Kraaij, W.: Reliability and validity of query intent assessments (2013) 0.00
    0.0022772895 = product of:
      0.03415934 = sum of:
        0.033399336 = weight(_text_:post in 1104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033399336 = score(doc=1104,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 1104, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1104)
        7.6000544E-4 = product of:
          0.0022800162 = sum of:
            0.0022800162 = weight(_text_:a in 1104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0022800162 = score(doc=1104,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1104, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1104)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    In most intent recognition studies, annotations of query intent are created post hoc by external assessors who are not the searchers themselves. It is important for the field to get a better understanding of the quality of this process as an approximation for determining the searcher's actual intent. Some studies have investigated the reliability of the query intent annotation process by measuring the interassessor agreement. However, these studies did not measure the validity of the judgments, that is, to what extent the annotations match the searcher's actual intent. In this study, we asked both the searchers themselves and external assessors to classify queries using the same intent classification scheme. We show that of the seven dimensions in our intent classification scheme, four can reliably be used for query annotation. Of these four, only the annotations on the topic and spatial sensitivity dimension are valid when compared with the searcher's annotations. The difference between the interassessor agreement and the assessor-searcher agreement was significant on all dimensions, showing that the agreement between external assessors is not a good estimator of the validity of the intent classifications. Therefore, we encourage the research community to consider using query intent classifications by the searchers themselves as test data.
    Type
    a
  17. Shah, G.A.; Desai, A.T.; Nagarkar, S.A.: Search strategies : their importance in IR process (1992) 0.00
    0.0021674698 = product of:
      0.032512046 = sum of:
        0.01225174 = product of:
          0.02450348 = sum of:
            0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02450348 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020260304 = product of:
          0.030390456 = sum of:
            0.005886976 = weight(_text_:a in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005886976 = score(doc=3806,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.28486365 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
            0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02450348 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how users' questions should be analysed and appropriate search strategies should be formulated with a view to enhancing the capabilities of a system in retrieval of the most relevant information with a high degree of precision
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National IASLIC Conference, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India, 26-29 December 1992. Ed. by. A. Chatterjee et al
    Type
    a
  18. Sanfilippo, M.; Yang, S.; Fichman, P.: Trolling here, there, and everywhere : perceptions of trolling behaviors in context (2017) 0.00
    0.0021221957 = product of:
      0.021221956 = sum of:
        0.0077381777 = product of:
          0.015476355 = sum of:
            0.015476355 = weight(_text_:online in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015476355 = score(doc=3823,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.284522 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012739129 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
        7.446501E-4 = product of:
          0.0022339502 = sum of:
            0.0022339502 = weight(_text_:a in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0022339502 = score(doc=3823,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Online trolling has become increasingly prevalent and visible in online communities. Perceptions of and reactions to trolling behaviors varies significantly from one community to another, as trolling behaviors are contextual and vary across platforms and communities. Through an examination of seven trolling scenarios, this article intends to answer the following questions: how do trolling behaviors differ across contexts; how do perceptions of trolling differ from case to case; and what aspects of context of trolling are perceived to be important by the public? Based on focus groups and interview data, we discuss the ways in which community norms and demographics, technological features of platforms, and community boundaries are perceived to impact trolling behaviors. Two major contributions of the study include a codebook to support future analysis of trolling and formal concept analysis surrounding contextual perceptions of trolling.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  19. Pejtersen, A.M.: Search strategies and database design (1988) 0.00
    0.0020635498 = product of:
      0.030953245 = sum of:
        0.029724635 = weight(_text_:u in 3110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029724635 = score(doc=3110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 3110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3110)
        0.00122861 = product of:
          0.00368583 = sum of:
            0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 3110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00368583 = score(doc=3110,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3110, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3110)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Tasks, error and models. Ed.: L.P. Goddstein, H.B. Andersen u. S.E. Olsen
    Type
    a
  20. Verlic, Z.; Repinc, U.: Informacijsko vedenje z iskalno strategijo (2000) 0.00
    0.0020635498 = product of:
      0.030953245 = sum of:
        0.029724635 = weight(_text_:u in 7863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029724635 = score(doc=7863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 7863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7863)
        0.00122861 = product of:
          0.00368583 = sum of:
            0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 7863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00368583 = score(doc=7863,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7863, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7863)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 275
  • d 8
  • ja 1
  • slv 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 271
  • m 11
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…