Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Vision"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Steinhagen, E.N.; Hanson, M.E.; Moynahan, S.A.: Quo vadis, cataloging? (2007) 0.01
    0.013279915 = product of:
      0.10623932 = sum of:
        0.10623932 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10623932 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.46047226 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Under the leadership of Ruth Carter's generation, cooperative, shared cataloging grew and flourished among academic and research libraries. The authors provide an overview of trends and challenges from a golden age of expanding budgets and international cooperation during the 1970's and 1980's and later responses to the economic retrenchment and demographic changes of the 1990's and early 2000's. Responses to current challenges, including the impact of outsourced cataloging, increasing complexity of cataloging rules, and emerging technological options, are discussed.
  2. Rosemann, U.: Auf dem Weg zu dem Kompetenzzentrum für Literaturversorgung : TIB zum Start von GetInfo (2002) 0.00
    0.0039376556 = product of:
      0.031501245 = sum of:
        0.031501245 = product of:
          0.06300249 = sum of:
            0.06300249 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06300249 = score(doc=4204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 12:25:38
  3. Degkwitz, A.: Bologna, University 2.0 : Akademisches Leben als Web-Version? (2008) 0.00
    0.0032484005 = product of:
      0.025987204 = sum of:
        0.025987204 = product of:
          0.05197441 = sum of:
            0.05197441 = weight(_text_:22 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05197441 = score(doc=1423,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2008 13:28:00
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 55(2008) H.1, S.18-22
  4. Gastinger, A.: Von der "electronic library" zur "enhanced library" : ein Bericht von der 9. International Bielefed Konferenz 2009 (2009) 0.00
    0.0032484005 = product of:
      0.025987204 = sum of:
        0.025987204 = product of:
          0.05197441 = sum of:
            0.05197441 = weight(_text_:22 in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05197441 = score(doc=3017,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 13:22:50
  5. Murray, I.: Is the future of the document inextricably linked with the future of the librarian? (2005) 0.00
    0.002883905 = product of:
      0.02307124 = sum of:
        0.02307124 = weight(_text_:work in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02307124 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.16220987 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the ontology of the document and questions whether or not our understanding of the concept of a document has changed now that more and more information is transmitted through increasingly digital means. Moreover, the argument is advanced that the identity of librarians is bound up with the future of the document. Not merely should librarians be changing their roles as a reaction to new technologies but they need to be proactive in embracing change and not in any way resisting it. The paper focuses on the theory of the ontology of documents. A number of ideas will be discussed including the thoughts of Michael Buckland in his seminal paper 'What is a Document' (1997), and further discussion will draw on the work of Michel Foucault (1972), Ludwig Wittgenstein (1958, 1969) and more recently Ziming Liu (2004) among others. Is the concept of a document essentially the same or has the transformation of document to e-document brought about a fundamental change in its nature. The paper goes on to discuss the more practical nature of documents and the role of the librarian. There follows a brief review of a range of types of document, including: E-journals, E-books, and considers the prospect that Extensible Markup Language (XML) offers a technological vehicle for the advent of an E-collection - this being an aggregation of different document mediums. The notion of the delivery of this information to the user (consumer) is then considered and with it the role of librarian. Waaijers (2002) has argued that a consequence of digitisation has brought with it issues of ownership and responsibility, and refers to XML as offering the possibility of "anatomising the internal structure of the document." In the concluding part to this paper some speculative thoughts are advanced on what might be possible outcomes regarding the changing perceptions of what a document might be. Could the Modern Librarian's identity and function be inextricably linked to the concept of the document? Finally it is suggested that further research to gather empirical evidence could involve a comparative study of the providers of information and the users of information focussing on their respective concepts of a document.
  6. Liew, C.L.; Foo, S.; Chennupati, K.R.: ¬A proposed integrated environment for enhanced user interaction and value-adding of electronic documents : an empirical evaluation (2001) 0.00
    0.002625104 = product of:
      0.021000832 = sum of:
        0.021000832 = product of:
          0.042001665 = sum of:
            0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 5196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042001665 = score(doc=5196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.22-35
  7. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.00
    0.002296966 = product of:
      0.018375728 = sum of:
        0.018375728 = product of:
          0.036751457 = sum of:
            0.036751457 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036751457 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Mindlin, A.: ¬The pursuit of knowledge, from Babel to Google (2004) 0.00
    0.002162929 = product of:
      0.017303431 = sum of:
        0.017303431 = weight(_text_:work in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017303431 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.1216574 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    The practical arguments for such a step are irrefutable: quantity, speed, precision, on-demand availability are no doubt important to the scholar: And new technologies need not be exclusionary. The invention of photography did not eliminate painting, it renewed it, and no doubt the screen and the reference books can feed oft Bach other and coexist amicably an the same reader's desk. All we need to do is remember the corollaries tethe arguments in favor of a virtual library:" that reading, in orderto allow reflection, requires slowness, depth and context; that leafing through a material book or roaming through material shelves is an intimate part of the craft; that the omnipresent electronic technology is still fragile and that, as it changes. we keep losing the possibility of retrieving that which was once stored in now outdated containers. We can still read the words an papyrus ashes saved from the charred ruins of Pompeii; we don't know for how lung it will be possible to read a text inscribed in a 2004 CD. This is not a complaint just a reminder. Jorge Luis Berges invented a Bouvard-and-Pécuchet-like charafter who tries to compile a universal encyclopedia so complete that nothing world be excluded from it. In the end, like his French forerunners, he falls. but not entirely. On the evening an which he gives up bis great project. he hires. a horse and buggy and takes a tour of the city. He sees brick walls, ordinary people. houses, a river, a marketplace and feels that somehow all these things are his own work. He realizes that his project was not impossible but merely redundant. The world encyclopedia, the universal library, already exists and is the world itself."
  9. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.00
    0.0019688278 = product of:
      0.015750622 = sum of:
        0.015750622 = product of:
          0.031501245 = sum of:
            0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031501245 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  10. Albrecht, C.: Begrabt die Bibliotheken! : Unser Kulturauftrag ist die Digitalisierung (2002) 0.00
    0.001160143 = product of:
      0.009281144 = sum of:
        0.009281144 = product of:
          0.018562287 = sum of:
            0.018562287 = weight(_text_:22 in 524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018562287 = score(doc=524,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 524, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=524)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    26. 4.2002 11:22:22
  11. Braun, M.: ¬Die Bibliothek der Fünfzigtausend : Eine Wunschphantasie vom Hort, der die wichtigsten Bücher vor Entführung schützt (2004) 0.00
    0.001148483 = product of:
      0.009187864 = sum of:
        0.009187864 = product of:
          0.018375728 = sum of:
            0.018375728 = weight(_text_:22 in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018375728 = score(doc=3556,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
  12. Opaschowski, H.W.: ¬Die digitale Revolution fällt aus (2001) 0.00
    9.844139E-4 = product of:
      0.007875311 = sum of:
        0.007875311 = product of:
          0.015750622 = sum of:
            0.015750622 = weight(_text_:22 in 5745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015750622 = score(doc=5745,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 5745, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    "Für Optimisten wie den amerikanischen Computerwissenschaftler Nicholas Negroponte bricht das kommende Digitalzeitalter wie eine Naturgewalt über uns herein. Als Zukunftsforscher kann ich jedoch nicht in den Tenor der üblichen kühnen Prophezeiungen der Medienbranche einstimmen. In Deutschland und den USA wird zwar viel über E-Commerce spekuliert. In Wirklichkeit nutzen aber die privaten Verbraucher dort Shopping, Reisebuchung und Bücherkauf per PC kaum (je unter 3 %), Hornebanking nur 5 % der Amerikaner und 3 % der Deutschen. Obwohl immer mehr Firmen online gehen, halten die Verbraucher weitgehend an ihren außerhäuslichen Konsumgewohnheiten fest. Bisher bietet das Netz gefühls- und erlebnismäßig einfach zu wenig. Auch 2010 werden über 90 % des privaten Verbrauchs nicht über OnlineGeschäfte getätigt. Selbst wenn sich der E-Commerce-Umsatz der privaten Verbraucher jährlich verdoppeln sollte, werden die Online-Geschäfte in Deutschland auch 2002 keine 3 % des Einzelhandelsumsatzes ausmachen (derzeit: 22 Milliarden Mark Einzelhandelsumsatz zu 2,5 Milliarden aus Online-Geschäften). Die Frage, warum Online-Shopping so wenig Resonanz findet, lässt sich auf folgende Ursachen zurückführen: Erlebniskonsum in den Shopping-Centern ist attraktiver; wachsende Ungeduld bei langem Laden der Website, Unzufriedenheit über verwirrend gestaltete Online-Shops, Enttäuschung über nicht verfügbare Produkte sowie Abbruch der Kaufabsicht, wenn das Shop-System abstürzt. Leider findet die digitale Revolution in Deutschland bisher fast nur auf Unternehmensseite statt, die Fragen nach den Bedürfnissen der Konsumenten bleiben weitgehend unbeantwortet.