Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Visualisierung"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Leydesdorff, L.: Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals : an online mapping exercise (2007) 0.04
    0.039783288 = product of:
      0.079566576 = sum of:
        0.079566576 = product of:
          0.15913315 = sum of:
            0.15913315 = weight(_text_:journals in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15913315 = score(doc=82,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.6202343 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Aggregated journal-journal citation networks based on the Journal Citation Reports 2004 of the Science Citation Index (5,968 journals) and the Social Science Citation Index (1,712 journals) are made accessible from the perspective of any of these journals. A vector-space model Is used for normalization, and the results are brought online at http://www.leydesdorff.net/jcr04 as input files for the visualization program Pajek. The user is thus able to analyze the citation environment in terms of links and graphs. Furthermore, the local impact of a journal is defined as its share of the total citations in the specific journal's citation environments; the vertical size of the nodes is varied proportionally to this citation impact. The horizontal size of each node can be used to provide the same information after correction for within-journal (self-)citations. In the "citing" environment, the equivalents of this measure can be considered as a citation activity index which maps how the relevant journal environment is perceived by the collective of authors of a given journal. As a policy application, the mechanism of Interdisciplinary developments among the sciences is elaborated for the case of nanotechnology journals.
  2. Samoylenko, I.; Chao, T.-C.; Liu, W.-C.; Chen, C.-M.: Visualizing the scientific world and its evolution (2006) 0.02
    0.021349952 = product of:
      0.042699903 = sum of:
        0.042699903 = product of:
          0.08539981 = sum of:
            0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08539981 = score(doc=5911,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We propose an approach to visualizing the scientific world and its evolution by constructing minimum spanning trees (MSTs) and a two-dimensional map of scientific journals using the database of the Science Citation Index (SCI) during 1994-2001. The structures of constructed MSTs are consistent with the sorting of SCI categories. The map of science is constructed based on our MST results. Such a map shows the relation among various knowledge clusters and their citation properties. The temporal evolution of the scientific world can also be delineated in the map. In particular, this map clearly shows a linear structure of the scientific world, which contains three major domains including physical sciences, life sciences, and medical sciences. The interaction of various knowledge fields can be clearly seen from this scientific world map. This approach can be applied to various levels of knowledge domains.
  3. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie, B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Domain visualization using VxInsight®) [register mark] for science and technology management (2002) 0.02
    0.020128928 = product of:
      0.040257856 = sum of:
        0.040257856 = product of:
          0.08051571 = sum of:
            0.08051571 = weight(_text_:journals in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08051571 = score(doc=5244,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.3138165 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Boyack, Wylie, and Davidson developed VxInsight which transforms information from documents into a landscape representation which conveys information on the implicit structure of the data as context for queries and exploration. From a list of pre-computed similarities it creates on a plane an x,y location for each item, or can compute its own similarities based on direct and co-citation linkages. Three-dimensional overlays are then generated on the plane to show the extent of clustering at particular points. Metadata associated with clustered objects provides a label for each peak from common words. Clicking on an object will provide citation information and answer sets for queries run will be displayed as markers on the landscape. A time slider allows a view of terrain changes over time. In a test on the microsystems engineering literature a review article was used to provide seed terms to search Science Citation Index and retrieve 20,923 articles of which 13,433 were connected by citation to at least one other article in the set. The citation list was used to calculate similarity measures and x.y coordinates for each article. Four main categories made up the landscape with 90% of the articles directly related to one or more of the four. A second test used five databases: SCI, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Engineering Index, INSPEC, and Medline to extract 17,927 unique articles by Sandia, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, with text of abstracts and RetrievalWare 6.6 utilized to generate the similarity measures. The subsequent map revealed that despite some overlap the laboratories generally publish in different areas. A third test on 3000 physical science journals utilized 4.7 million articles from SCI where similarity was the un-normalized sum of cites between journals in both directions. Physics occupies a central position, with engineering, mathematics, computing, and materials science strongly linked. Chemistry is farther removed but strongly connected.
  4. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.01
    0.008653947 = product of:
      0.017307894 = sum of:
        0.017307894 = product of:
          0.03461579 = sum of:
            0.03461579 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03461579 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  5. Spero, S.: LCSH is to thesaurus as doorbell is to mammal : visualizing structural problems in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (2008) 0.01
    0.0069231573 = product of:
      0.0138463145 = sum of:
        0.0138463145 = product of:
          0.027692629 = sum of:
            0.027692629 = weight(_text_:22 in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027692629 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas