Search (198 results, page 1 of 10)

0.0830093 = product of:
  0.3320372 = sum of:
    0.12210159 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12210159 = score(doc=2500,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20143479 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.6061594 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
    0.20993562 = sum of:
      0.17546423 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17546423 = score(doc=2500,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.80416155 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
      0.03447139 = weight(_text_:22 in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03447139 = score(doc=2500,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12728016 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Semantische Netze unterstützen den Suchvorgang im Information Retrieval. Sie bestehen aus relationierten Begriffen und helfen dem Nutzer das richtige Vokabular zur Fragebildung zu finden. Eine leicht und intuitiv erfassbare Darstellung und eine interaktive Bedienungsmöglichkeit optimieren den Suchprozess mit der Begriffsstruktur. Als Interaktionsform bietet sich Hy-pertext mit dem etablierte Point- und Klickverfahren an. Eine Visualisierung zur Unterstützung kognitiver Fähigkeiten kann durch eine Darstellung der Informationen mit Hilfe von Punkten und Linien erfolgen. Vorgestellt wer-den die Anwendungsbeispiele Wissensnetz im Brockhaus multimedial, WordSurfer der Firma BiblioMondo, SpiderSearch der Firma BOND und Topic Maps Visualization in dandelon.com und im Portal Informationswis-senschaft der Firma AGI - Information Management Consultants.

Date

30. 1.2007 18:22:41

Theme

Visualisierung

0.06851451 = product of:
  0.27405804 = sum of:
    0.12210159 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12210159 = score(doc=3734,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20143479 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.6061594 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
    0.15195645 = product of:
      0.3039129 = sum of:
        0.3039129 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3039129 = score(doc=3734,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            1.3928485 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

RSWK

Statistik / Graphische Darstellung / Diagramm / Visualisierung
Gebrauchsgrafik / Daten / Visualisierung
Daten / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik
Information / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik

Subject

Statistik / Graphische Darstellung / Diagramm / Visualisierung
Gebrauchsgrafik / Daten / Visualisierung
Daten / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik
Information / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik

Theme

Visualisierung

0.06289381 = product of:
  0.25157523 = sum of:
    0.2106421 = weight(_text_:graphischen in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2106421 = score(doc=5002,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3162588 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.66604346 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
    0.04093312 = product of:
      0.08186624 = sum of:
        0.08186624 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08186624 = score(doc=5002,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.3751972 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Content

Gegenstand dieser Arbeit ist die Anforderungsanalyse, die Modellierung, der Entwurf und die exemplarische Realisierung, Integration und Bewertung eines Interaktiven Informationsvisualisierungsmodells zur Unterstützung von Informationsdialogen mit Information-Retrieval-Systemen, von darauf aufbauenden interaktiven Informationsvisualisierungsbeispielen, den dazu korrespondierenden Softwarekomponenten sowie deren integriertem Einsatz und Bewertung in einer exemplarischen Anwendungslösung für die Unterstützung interaktiver visuelldirekt manipulative Informationsdialoge mit einem Informations-Retrieval-System. Die Arbeit enthält den Entwurf und die Implementierung der prototypischen Anwendung LyberWorld zur computergraphischen Visualisierung von inhaltsorientierten Informationsdialogen zwischen naiven Benutzern und Datenbanksystemen mit Information-Retrieval-Funktionen. Im Vordergrund steht dabei das Ziel, naiven Benutzern innerhalb eines visuell direkt manipulativen Informationsdialoges eine Unterstützung bei der Benutzung von Information-Retrieval- und Data-Mining-Funktionen auf der Basis von interaktiven Informationsvisualisierungskomponenten zur Verfügung zu stellen. Bezüglich der kognitiven Effizienz der Benutzung solcher Informationsvisualisierungskomponenten durch einen naiven Benutzer, ist es die Grundannahme der Arbeit, daß bei unveränderter Informations-Retrieval-Basisfunktionalität mit Hilfe einer geeigneten graphischen Benutzungsschnittstelle durch Ausnutzung der menschlichen Fähigkeit zur visuellen Wahrnehmung und direktmanipulativen Interaktion ein natürlicherer und kognitiv effizienterer Informationsdialog erzielt wird, als dies mit herkömmlichen z.B. Formblatt oder formalsprachlich orientierten Interaktionsparadigmen der Fall ist. Aus diesem Grund werden in der Arbeit visuell direkt manipulative Informationsvisualisierungs- und Darstellungsmethoden sowie visuell direkt manipulative Metaphern für elementare Funktionen des Informationsdialoges hergeleitet, implementiert und miteinander integriert.
Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen, die Kommando-, Menü- oder Formblatt-orientierte Interaktionsparadigmen verwenden, schlagen wir für die Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle von Informationssystemen eine interaktive Informationsvisualisierung vor, bei der den geometrischen, räumlichen und graphischen Attributen der dargestellten Informationsobjekte besondere Bedeutung zukommt. Mehrdimensionale, computergraphische Informationsvisualisierungen des informationellen Kontextes des Informationsdialoges bilden das gemeinsame Kommunikations- und Interaktionsmedium zwischen den konzeptuellen Informationsmodellen und den Information-Retrieval-Funktionen des Systems sowie dem mentalen Modell, das der Benutzer von der Informationsmenge und den Informationsfunktionen des Informationssystems hat. Dabei besteht zwischen den visuell direkt manipulativen computergraphischen Informationsvisualisierungsobjekten der Benutzungsschnittstelle und den Informationsobjekten der Datenbasis eine funktionale Verknüpfung, die dem Benutzer durch die visuelle Ausprägung der graphischen Visualisierungsobjekte und die Verwendung von visuellen Metaphern vermittelt wird. Die automatischen Such- und Bewertungsfunktionen des Datenbank- oder Information-Retrieval-Systems werden ebenfalls in Form visuell direkt manipulativer Interaktionsmechanismen zur Verfügung gestellt.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.06010866 = product of:
  0.24043465 = sum of:
    0.18254647 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18254647 = score(doc=3887,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27398202 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.6662717 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
    0.057888176 = product of:
      0.11577635 = sum of:
        0.11577635 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11577635 = score(doc=3887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.53060895 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Although extremely useful for visualizing high-dimensional data, t-SNE plots can sometimes be mysterious or misleading. By exploring how it behaves in simple cases, we can learn to use it more effectively. We'll walk through a series of simple examples to illustrate what t-SNE diagrams can and cannot show. The t-SNE technique really is useful-but only if you know how to interpret it.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.059826072 = product of:
  0.23930429 = sum of:
    0.1811147 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1811147 = score(doc=3035,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.27398202 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.66104597 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
    0.058189582 = sum of:
      0.04341613 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04341613 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.19897836 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.014773452 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014773452 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12728016 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Content

Bill Howe and his colleagues at the University of Washington, in Seattle, decided to find out. First, they trained a computer algorithm to distinguish between various sorts of figures-which they defined as diagrams, equations, photographs, plots (such as bar charts and scatter graphs) and tables. They exposed their algorithm to between 400 and 600 images of each of these types of figure until it could distinguish them with an accuracy greater than 90%. Then they set it loose on the more-than-650,000 papers (containing more than 10m figures) stored on PubMed Central, an online archive of biomedical-research articles. To measure each paper's influence, they calculated its article-level Eigenfactor score-a modified version of the PageRank algorithm Google uses to provide the most relevant results for internet searches. Eigenfactor scoring gives a better measure than simply noting the number of times a paper is cited elsewhere, because it weights citations by their influence. A citation in a paper that is itself highly cited is worth more than one in a paper that is not.
As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
Dr Howe and his colleagues do, however, believe that the study of diagrams can result in new insights. A figure showing new metabolic pathways in a cell, for example, may summarise hundreds of experiments. Since illustrations can convey important scientific concepts in this way, they think that browsing through related figures from different papers may help researchers come up with new theories. As Dr Howe puts it, "the unit of scientific currency is closer to the figure than to the paper." With this thought in mind, the team have created a website (viziometrics.org (http://viziometrics.org/) ) where the millions of images sorted by their program can be searched using key words. Their next plan is to extract the information from particular types of scientific figure, to create comprehensive "super" figures: a giant network of all the known chemical processes in a cell for example, or the best-available tree of life. At just one such superfigure per paper, though, the citation records of articles containing such all-embracing diagrams may very well undermine the correlation that prompted their creation in the first place. Call it the ultimate marriage of chart and science.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.058259312 = product of:
  0.23303725 = sum of:
    0.20409316 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20409316 = score(doc=3646,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.27398202 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.7449144 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
    0.028944088 = product of:
      0.057888176 = sum of:
        0.057888176 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057888176 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.26530448 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

The use of diagrams to express relationships in classification is not new. Many classificationists have used this approach, but usually in a minor display to make a point or for part of a difficult relational situation. Ranganathan, for example, used diagrams for some of his more elusive concepts. The thesaurus in particular and subject headings in general, with direct and indirect crossreferences or equivalents, need many more diagrams than normally are included to make relationships and even semantics clear. A picture very often is worth a thousand words. Rolling has used directed graphs (arrowgraphs) to join terms as a practical method for rendering relationships between indexing terms lucid. He has succeeded very weIl in this endeavor. Four diagrams in this selection are all that one needs to explain how to employ the system; from initial listing to completed arrowgraph. The samples of his work include illustration of off-page connectors between arrowgraphs. The great advantage to using diagrams like this is that they present relations between individual terms in a format that is easy to comprehend. But of even greater value is the fact that one can use his arrowgraphs as schematics for making three-dimensional wire-and-ball models, in which the relationships may be seen even more clearly. In fact, errors or gaps in relations are much easier to find with this methodology. One also can get across the notion of the threedimensionality of classification systems with such models. Pettee's "hand reaching up and over" (q.v.) is not a figment of the imagination. While the actual hand is a wire or stick, the concept visualized is helpful in illuminating the three-dimensional figure that is latent in all systems that have cross-references or "broader," "narrower," or, especially, "related" terms. Classification schedules, being hemmed in by the dimensions of the printed page, also benefit from such physical illustrations. Rolling, an engineer by conviction, was the developer of information systems for the Cobalt Institute, the European Atomic Energy Community, and European Coal and Steel Community. He also developed and promoted computer-aided translation at the Commission of the European Communities in Luxembourg. One of his objectives has always been to increase the efficiency of mono- and multilingual thesauri for use in multinational information systems.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.050434984 = product of:
  0.20173994 = sum of:
    0.104658514 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.104658514 = score(doc=3733,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20143479 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.5195652 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
    0.09708143 = product of:
      0.19416286 = sum of:
        0.19416286 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19416286 = score(doc=3733,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.88985837 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Classification

Geo A 287 / Graphische Darstellung

RSWK

Information / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik
Daten / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik

SBB

Geo A 287 / Graphische Darstellung

Subject

Information / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik
Daten / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik

Theme

Visualisierung

0.045081493 = product of:
  0.18032597 = sum of:
    0.13690984 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13690984 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27398202 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.49970376 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
    0.04341613 = product of:
      0.08683226 = sum of:
        0.08683226 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08683226 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.39795673 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Document retrieval is a highly interactive process dealing with large amounts of information. Visual representations can provide both a means for managing the complexity of large information structures and an interface style well suited to interactive manipulation. The system we have designed utilizes visually displayed graphic structures and a direct manipulation interface style to supply an integrated environment for retrieval. A common visually displayed network structure is used for query, document content, and term relations. A query can be modified through direct manipulation of its visual form by incorporating terms from any other information structure the system displays. An associative thesaurus of terms and an inter-document network provide information about a document collection that can complement other retrieval aids. Visualization of these large data structures makes use of fisheye views and overview diagrams to help overcome some of the inherent difficulties of orientation and navigation in large information structures.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.043517746 = product of:
  0.17407098 = sum of:
    0.08633886 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08633886 = score(doc=790,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20143479 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.4286194 = fieldWeight in 790, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=790)
    0.087732114 = product of:
      0.17546423 = sum of:
        0.17546423 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17546423 = score(doc=790,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.80416155 = fieldWeight in 790, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=790)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Semantische Netze unterstützen den Suchvorgang im Information Retrieval. Sie bestehen aus relationierten Begriffen und helfen dem Nutzer, das richtige Vokabular zur Fragebildung zu finden. Eine leicht und intuitiv erfassbare Darstellung und eine interaktive Bedienungsmöglichkeit optimieren den Suchprozess mit der Begriffsstruktur. Als Interaktionsform bietet sich Hypertext mit seinem Point- und Klickverfahren an. Die Visualisierung erfolgt als Netzstruktur aus Punkten und Linien. Es werden die Anwendungsbeispiele Wissensnetz im Brockhaus multimedial, WordSurfer der Firma BiblioMondo, SpiderSearch der Firma BOND und Topic Maps Visualization in dandelon.com und im Portal Informationswissenschaft der Firma AGI - Information Management Consultants vorgestellt.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.043188438 = product of:
  0.17275375 = sum of:
    0.12210159 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12210159 = score(doc=3176,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20143479 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.6061594 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
    0.050652154 = product of:
      0.10130431 = sum of:
        0.10130431 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10130431 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.46428284 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Bei der Analyse von Informationsströmen und -systemen mit statistischen Methoden werden die Ergebnisse gerne in Grafiken dargestellt, da diese intuitiv schneller zu erfassen sind und auch Laien ohne tiefere statistische Vorbildung eine Anschauung bekommen können. Klassisches Beispiel ist etwa die graphische Darstellung der Verluste des napoleonischen Heeres in Russland (Abb. 1). Unbeachtet bleibt dabei oft, dass trotz Einfachheit der Darstellung meist große Mengen von Daten herangezogen werden und diese dann lediglich nach wenigen Gesichtspunkten in eine Grafik projiziert werdens, was leicht auch zu Fehleinschätzungen führen kann. Es sind darum geeignete Verfahren auszuwählen, die eine adäquate und möglichst 'objektive' Interpretation ermöglichen.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.03564295 = product of:
  0.1425718 = sum of:
    0.061670616 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061670616 = score(doc=791,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20143479 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.30615672 = fieldWeight in 791, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=791)
    0.08090119 = product of:
      0.16180238 = sum of:
        0.16180238 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16180238 = score(doc=791,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.7415486 = fieldWeight in 791, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=791)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Die Visualisierung digitaler Datenbestände mit dem Computer ist heute alltäglich geworden. Spätestens seit der COVID-19-Pandemie sind computergenerierte Datenvisualisierungen und deren Interpretation durch den Menschen nicht mehr nur Expert*innen für Statistik und Datenanalyse vorbehalten. Stattdessen sind interaktive Visualisierungen zur Darstellung von Trends, Mustern oder Vergleichen in Daten zu festen Bestandteilen unseres medialen Alltags geworden, ob im (Daten-)Journalismus, in den sozialen Medien oder bei der Kommunikation von Behörden mit der Bevölkerung. Wie bereits von Reiterer und Jetter (2013) in einer früheren Auflage dieses Beitrags thematisiert wurde, bietet dieser Trend zur interaktiven und narrativen Visualisierung in den Massenmedien den Benutzer*innen neue Möglichkeiten des datenbasierten Erkenntnisgewinns. Seitdem popularisiert zusätzlich die Vielzahl verfügbarer "Tracker"-Apps mit dem Ziel der Verhaltensoptimierung (z. B. im Bereich Fitness oder Energiekonsum) die interaktive Visualisierung und Analyse persönlicher und privater Daten. Auch im beruflichen Alltag haben sich einstige Nischenwerkzeuge, wie z. B. die Visualisierungssoftware Tableau, in äußerst populäre Anwendungen verwandelt und sind zum Gegenstand zweistelliger Milliardeninvestitionen geworden, insbesondere für die Visualisierung und Analyse von Geschäftsdaten. Im Lichte dieser Entwicklungen soll dieser Beitrag daher im Folgenden einerseits grundlegende Begriffe und Konzepte der Informationsvisualisierung vermitteln, andererseits auch Alltagsformen und Zukunftstrends wie Visual Analytics thematisieren.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.033623323 = product of:
  0.13449329 = sum of:
    0.06977234 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06977234 = score(doc=3543,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20143479 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.3463768 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
    0.06472095 = product of:
      0.1294419 = sum of:
        0.1294419 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1294419 = score(doc=3543,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.5932389 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

RSWK

Naturwissenschaften / Visualisierung
Naturwissenschaften / Visualisierung / Wissenschaftsforschung / Wissensrepräsentation / Aufsatzsammlung / Bildliche Darstellung / Methodologie (BVB)

Subject

Naturwissenschaften / Visualisierung
Naturwissenschaften / Visualisierung / Wissenschaftsforschung / Wissensrepräsentation / Aufsatzsammlung / Bildliche Darstellung / Methodologie (BVB)

Theme

Visualisierung

0.029493563 = product of:
  0.2359485 = sum of:
    0.2359485 = sum of:
      0.19416286 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19416286 = score(doc=3355,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.88985837 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.041785635 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041785635 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.12728016 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56

RSWK

Visualisierung / Wissen
Wissen / Daten / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik / Informationsgrafik / Thematische Karte

Subject

Visualisierung / Wissen
Wissen / Daten / Visualisierung / Gebrauchsgrafik / Informationsgrafik / Thematische Karte

Theme

Visualisierung

0.02629754 = product of:
  0.10519016 = sum of:
    0.07986408 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 4276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07986408 = score(doc=4276,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27398202 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.29149386 = fieldWeight in 4276, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4276)
    0.025326077 = product of:
      0.050652154 = sum of:
        0.050652154 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 4276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050652154 = score(doc=4276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.23214142 = fieldWeight in 4276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Advanced technology has resulted in the generation of about one million terabytes of information every year. Ninety-reine percent of this is available in digital format (Keim, 2001). More information will be generated in the next three years than was created during all of previous human history (Keim, 2001). Collecting information is no longer a problem, but extracting value from information collections has become progressively more difficult. Various search engines have been developed to make it easier to locate information of interest, but these work well only for a person who has a specific goal and who understands what and how information is stored. This usually is not the Gase. Visualization was commonly thought of in terms of representing human mental processes (MacEachren, 1991; Miller, 1984). The concept is now associated with the amplification of these mental processes (Card, Mackinlay, & Shneiderman, 1999). Human eyes can process visual cues rapidly, whereas advanced information analysis techniques transform the computer into a powerful means of managing digitized information. Visualization offers a link between these two potent systems, the human eye and the computer (Gershon, Eick, & Card, 1998), helping to identify patterns and to extract insights from large amounts of information. The identification of patterns is important because it may lead to a scientific discovery, an interpretation of clues to solve a crime, the prediction of catastrophic weather, a successful financial investment, or a better understanding of human behavior in a computermediated environment. Visualization technology shows considerable promise for increasing the value of large-scale collections of information, as evidenced by several commercial applications of TreeMap (e.g., http://www.smartmoney.com) and Hyperbolic tree (e.g., http://www.inxight.com) to visualize large-scale hierarchical structures. Although the proliferation of visualization technologies dates from the 1990s where sophisticated hardware and software made increasingly faster generation of graphical objects possible, the role of visual aids in facilitating the construction of mental images has a long history. Visualization has been used to communicate ideas, to monitor trends implicit in data, and to explore large volumes of data for hypothesis generation. Imagine traveling to a strange place without a map, having to memorize physical and chemical properties of an element without Mendeleyev's periodic table, trying to understand the stock market without statistical diagrams, or browsing a collection of documents without interactive visual aids. A collection of information can lose its value simply because of the effort required for exhaustive exploration. Such frustrations can be overcome by visualization.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.024679108 = product of:
  0.09871643 = sum of:
    0.06977234 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06977234 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20143479 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.3463768 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
    0.028944088 = product of:
      0.057888176 = sum of:
        0.057888176 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057888176 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.26530448 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

RSWK

Statistik / Unsicherheit / Graphische Darstellung (BVB)

Subject

Statistik / Unsicherheit / Graphische Darstellung (BVB)

Theme

Visualisierung

0.02424566 = product of:
  0.19396529 = sum of:
    0.19396529 = sum of:
      0.14472044 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14472044 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.6632612 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.049244843 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049244843 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12728016 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

30. 5.2010 16:22:35

Theme

Visualisierung

0.02424566 = product of:
  0.19396529 = sum of:
    0.19396529 = sum of:
      0.14472044 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14472044 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.6632612 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
      0.049244843 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049244843 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12728016 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Theme

Visualisierung

0.022540746 = product of:
  0.090162985 = sum of:
    0.06845492 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06845492 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27398202 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03634676 = queryNorm
        0.24985188 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
    0.021708066 = product of:
      0.04341613 = sum of:
        0.04341613 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04341613 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            0.19897836 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

But what happens to this awareness in a digital library? Can discursive formations be represented in cyberspace, perhaps through diagrams in a visualization interface? And would such a schema be helpful to a digital library user? To approach this question, it is worth taking a moment to reconsider what Radford is looking at. First, he looks at titles to see how the books cluster. To illustrate, I scanned one hundred books on the shelves of a college library under subclass HT 101-395, defined by the LCC subclass caption as Urban groups. The City. Urban sociology. Of the first 100 titles in this sequence, fifty included the word "urban" or variants (e.g. "urbanization"). Another thirty-five used the word "city" or variants. These keywords appear to mark their titles as the heart of this discursive formation. The scattering of titles not using "urban" or "city" used related terms such as "town," "community," or in one case "skyscrapers." So we immediately see some empirical correlation between keywords and classification. But we also see a problem with the commonly used search technique of title-keyword. A student interested in urban studies will want to know about this entire subclass, and may wish to browse every title available therein. A title-keyword search on "urban" will retrieve only half of the titles, while a search on "city" will retrieve just over a third. There will be no overlap, since no titles in this sample contain both words. The only place where both words appear in a common string is in the LCC subclass caption, but captions are not typically indexed in library Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs). In a traditional library, this problem is mitigated when the student goes to the shelf looking for any one of the books and suddenly discovers a much wider selection than the keyword search had led him to expect. But in a digital library, the issue of non-retrieval can be more problematic, as studies have indicated. Micco and Popp reported that, in a study funded partly by the U.S. Department of Education, 65 of 73 unskilled users searching for material on U.S./Soviet foreign relations found some material but never realized they had missed a large percentage of what was in the database.

Theme

Visualisierung

0.02046656 = product of:
  0.16373248 = sum of:
    0.16373248 = product of:
      0.32746497 = sum of:
        0.32746497 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 4081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32746497 = score(doc=4081,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03634676 = queryNorm
            1.5007888 = fieldWeight in 4081, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4081)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Theme

Visualisierung

0.019043285 = product of:
  0.15234628 = sum of:
    0.15234628 = sum of:
      0.122799374 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.122799374 = score(doc=1709,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21819524 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.5627958 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
      0.029546903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029546903 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12728016 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03634676 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Methoden und Techniken der Informationsvisualisierung werden seit ungefähr zwanzig Jahren im Bereich der Informationssuche eingesetzt. In dieser Literaturstudie werden ausgewählte Visualisierungsanwendungen der letzten Jahre vorgestellt. Sie betreffen zum einen den Retrievalprozess, das Boolesche Retrieval, die facettierte Suche, Dokumentbeziehungen, die Zufallssuche und Ergebnisanzeige, zum anderen spezielle Anwendungen wie die kartenbasierte und adaptive Visualisierung, Zitationsnetzwerke und Wissensordnungen. Die Einsatzszenarien für Applikationen der Informationsvisualisierung sind vielfältig. Sie reichen von mobilen kleinformatigen Anwendungen bis zu großformatigen Darstellungen auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen, von integrativen Arbeitsplätzen für den einzelnen Nutzer bis zur Nutzung interaktiver Oberflächen für das kollaborative Retrieval. Das Konzept der Blended Library wird vorgestellt. Die Übertragbarkeit von Visualisierungsanwendungen auf Bibliothekskataloge wird im Hinblick auf die Nutzung des Kataloginputs und des Angebots an Sucheinstiegen geprüft. Perspektivische Überlegungen zu zukünftigen Entwicklungsschritten von Bibliothekskatalogen sowie zum Einfluss von Visualisierungsanwendungen auf die Informationspraxis werden angestellt.

Date

4. 2.2015 9:22:39

Theme

Visualisierung