Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

0.070642374 = product of:
  0.2472483 = sum of:
    0.2338491 = weight(_text_:brain in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2338491 = score(doc=2831,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.2736591 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.854527 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
    0.013399213 = product of:
      0.026798425 = sum of:
        0.026798425 = weight(_text_:22 in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026798425 = score(doc=2831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to develop an ontology-based framework for developing an information retrieval system to cater to specific queries of users. For creating such an ontology, information was obtained from a wide range of information sources involved with brain tumour study and research. The information thus obtained was compiled and analysed to provide a standard, reliable and relevant information base to aid our proposed system. Facet-based methodology has been used for ontology formalization for quite some time. Ontology formalization involves different steps such as identification of the terminology, analysis, synthesis, standardization and ordering. A vast majority of the ontologies being developed nowadays lack flexibility. This becomes a formidable constraint when it comes to interoperability. We found that a facet-based method provides a distinct guideline for the development of a robust and flexible model concerning the domain of brain tumours. Our attempt has been to bridge library and information science and computer science, which itself involved an experimental approach. It was discovered that a faceted approach is really enduring, as it helps in the achievement of properties like navigation, exploration and faceted browsing. Computer-based brain tumour ontology supports the work of researchers towards gathering information on brain tumour research and allows users across the world to intelligently access new scientific information quickly and efficiently.

Date

12. 3.2016 13:21:22

0.027425865 = product of:
  0.09599052 = sum of:
    0.062830016 = product of:
      0.18849005 = sum of:
        0.18849005 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18849005 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3353808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.03316051 = weight(_text_:ed in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03316051 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

Source

Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov

0.02112845 = product of:
  0.14789914 = sum of:
    0.14789914 = weight(_text_:brain in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14789914 = score(doc=3398,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2736591 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.5404503 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Knowledge representation, which is today used in database applications, artificial intelligence (AI), software engineering and many other disciplines of computer science has deep roots in logic and philosophy. In the beginning, there was Aristotle (384 bc-322 bc) who developed logic as a precise method for reasoning about knowledge. Syllogisms were introduced as formal patterns for representing special figures of logical deductions. According to Aristotle, the subject of ontology is the study of categories of things that exist or may exist in some domain. In modern times, Descartes considered the human brain as a store of knowledge representation. Recognition was made possible by an isomorphic correspondence between internal geometrical representations (ideae) and external situations and events. Leibniz was deeply influenced by these traditions. In his mathesis universalis, he required a universal formal language (lingua universalis) to represent human thinking by calculation procedures and to implement them by means of mechanical calculating machines. An ars iudicandi should allow every problem to be decided by an algorithm after representation in numeric symbols. An ars iveniendi should enable users to seek and enumerate desired data and solutions of problems. In the age of mechanics, knowledge representation was reduced to mechanical calculation procedures. In the twentieth century, computational cognitivism arose in the wake of Turing's theory of computability. In its functionalism, the hardware of a computer is related to the wetware of the human brain. The mind is understood as the software of a computer.

0.01641319 = product of:
  0.05744616 = sum of:
    0.038687263 = weight(_text_:ed in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038687263 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
    0.018758897 = product of:
      0.037517793 = sum of:
        0.037517793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037517793 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.015764717 = product of:
  0.055176504 = sum of:
    0.044457134 = weight(_text_:personal in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044457134 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.22285949 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
    0.010719369 = product of:
      0.021438738 = sum of:
        0.021438738 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021438738 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Purpose - Ontologies are prone to wide semantic variability due to subjective points of view of their composers. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new approach for maximal unification of diverse ontologies for controversial domains by their relations. Design/methodology/approach - Effective matching or unification of multiple ontologies for a specific domain is crucial for the success of many semantic web applications, such as semantic information retrieval and organization, document tagging, summarization and search. To this end, numerous automatic and semi-automatic techniques were proposed in the past decade that attempt to identify similar entities, mostly classes, in diverse ontologies for similar domains. Apparently, matching individual entities cannot result in full integration of ontologies' semantics without matching their inter-relations with all other-related classes (and instances). However, semantic matching of ontological relations still constitutes a major research challenge. Therefore, in this paper the authors propose a new paradigm for assessment of maximal possible matching and unification of ontological relations. To this end, several unification rules for ontological relations were devised based on ontological reference rules, and lexical and textual entailment. These rules were semi-automatically implemented to extend a given ontology with semantically matching relations from another ontology for a similar domain. Then, the ontologies were unified through these similar pairs of relations. The authors observe that these rules can be also facilitated to reveal the contradictory relations in different ontologies. Findings - To assess the feasibility of the approach two experiments were conducted with different sets of multiple personal ontologies on controversial domains constructed by trained subjects. The results for about 50 distinct ontology pairs demonstrate a good potential of the methodology for increasing inter-ontology agreement. Furthermore, the authors show that the presented methodology can lead to a complete unification of multiple semantically heterogeneous ontologies. Research limitations/implications - This is a conceptual study that presents a new approach for semantic unification of ontologies by a devised set of rules along with the initial experimental evidence of its feasibility and effectiveness. However, this methodology has to be fully automatically implemented and tested on a larger dataset in future research. Practical implications - This result has implication for semantic search, since a richer ontology, comprised of multiple aspects and viewpoints of the domain of knowledge, enhances discoverability and improves search results. Originality/value - To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study to examine and assess the maximal level of semantic relation-based ontology unification.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.01375036 = product of:
  0.096252516 = sum of:
    0.096252516 = weight(_text_:personal in 3439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096252516 = score(doc=3439,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.48250496 = fieldWeight in 3439, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3439)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Domain experts are skilled in buliding a narrow ontology that reflects their subfield of expertise based on their work experience and personal beliefs. We call this type of ontology a single-viewpoint ontology. There can be a variety of such single viewpoint ontologies that represent a wide spectrum of subfields and expert opinions on the domain. However, to have a complete formal vocabulary for the domain they need to be linked and unified into a multiviewpoint model while having the subjective viewpoint statements marked and distinguished from the objectively true statements. In this study, we propose and implement a two-phase methodology for multiviewpoint ontology construction by nonexpert users. The proposed methodology was implemented for the domain of the effect of diet on health. A large-scale crowdsourcing experiment was conducted with about 750 ontological statements to determine whether each of these statements is objectively true, viewpoint, or erroneous. Typically, in crowdsourcing experiments the workers are asked for their personal opinions on the given subject. However, in our case their ability to objectively assess others' opinions was examined as well. Our results show substantially higher accuracy in classification for the objective assessment approach compared to the results based on personal opinions.

0.0117237065 = product of:
  0.04103297 = sum of:
    0.027633758 = weight(_text_:ed in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027633758 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
    0.013399213 = product of:
      0.026798425 = sum of:
        0.026798425 = weight(_text_:22 in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026798425 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.011227122 = product of:
  0.07858985 = sum of:
    0.07858985 = weight(_text_:personal in 2719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07858985 = score(doc=2719,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.39396363 = fieldWeight in 2719, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2719)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Personalized search is aimed at tailoring the search outcome to users; to this aim user profiles play an important role: the more faithfully a user profile represents the user interests and preferences, the higher is the probability to improve the search process. In the approaches proposed in the literature, user profiles are formally represented as bags of words, as vectors, or as conceptual taxonomies, generally defined based on external knowledge resources (such as the WordNet and the ODP - Open Directory Project). Ontologies have been more recently considered as a powerful expressive means for knowledge representation. The advantage offered by ontological languages is that they allow a more structured and expressive knowledge representation with respect to the above mentioned approaches. A challenging research activity consists in defining user profiles by a knowledge extraction process from an existing ontology, with the main aim of producing a semantically rich representation of the user interests. In this paper a method to automatically define a personal ontology via a knowledge extraction process from the general purpose ontology YAGO is presented; starting from a set of keywords, which are representatives of the user interests, the process is aimed to define a structured and semantically coherent representation of the user topical interests. In the paper the proposed method is described, as well as some evaluations that show its effectiveness.

0.009378965 = product of:
  0.032826375 = sum of:
    0.022107007 = weight(_text_:ed in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022107007 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.15715398 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
    0.010719369 = product of:
      0.021438738 = sum of:
        0.021438738 = weight(_text_:22 in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021438738 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.007938774 = product of:
  0.055571415 = sum of:
    0.055571415 = weight(_text_:personal in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055571415 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.27857435 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The management of knowledge is considered to be one of the most important factors in economic growth today. However, the question of how to deal with knowledge in the most efficient way is still far from answered. We observe two fundamentally different approaches to the question of how we should deal with knowledge. One view sees knowledge as a kind of static object that can be gathered, compiled and distributed; the other view regards knowledge as a dynamic process. This disaccord finds a parallel in an objective-subjective distinction where the first position sees knowledge as independent of personal opinion whereas the second position regards it as interpretative. These discussions are not merely academic but crucially influence the way that knowledge management (KM) is realized, i.e. whether the focus is placed on knowledge artefacts such as documents or on subjective acts. The particular interest of the current essay concerns the question of how KM can be supported by information technology (IT) and which are the fundamental structures that must be regarded. Traditionally, IT-based approaches favour an object-oriented view of knowledge since knowledge artefacts are the objects that can be best processed by IT systems. This even leads to the view that knowledge artefacts represent the only form of knowledge. On the philosophical side this perspective is fostered by analytical investigations that emphasize the primacy of propositional knowledge that is closely related to knowledge artefacts.

0.0078120497 = product of:
  0.054684345 = sum of:
    0.054684345 = weight(_text_:global in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054684345 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.276342 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Robertson and Spärck Jones pioneered experimental probabilistic models (Binary Independence Model) with both a typology generalizing the Boolean model, a frequency counting to calculate elementary weightings, and their combination into a global probabilistic estimation. However, this model did not consider indexing terms dependencies. An extension to mixture models (e.g., using a 2-Poisson law) made it possible to take into account these dependencies from a macroscopic point of view (BM25), as well as a shallow linguistic processing of co-references. New approaches (language models, for example "bag of words" models, probabilistic dependencies between requests and documents, and consequently Bayesian inference using Dirichlet prior conjugate) furnished new solutions for documents structuring (categorization) and for index smoothing. Presently, in these probabilistic models the main issues have been addressed from a formal point of view only. Thus, linguistic properties are neglected in the indexing language. The authors examine how a linguistic and semantic modeling can be integrated in indexing languages and set up a hybrid model that makes it possible to deal with different information retrieval problems in a unified way.

0.0078120497 = product of:
  0.054684345 = sum of:
    0.054684345 = weight(_text_:global in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054684345 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.276342 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

We discuss the needs of a knowledge organization scheme for supporting Web-based software applications. We show how it differs from traditional knowledge organization schemes due to the virtual, dynamic, ad-hoc, userspecific and application-specific nature of Web-based knowledge. The sheer size of Web resources also adds to the complexity of organizing knowledge on the Web. As such, a standard, global scheme such as a single ontology for classifying and organizing all Web-based content is unrealistic. There is nevertheless a strong and immediate need for effective knowledge organization schemes to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Web-based applications. In this context, we propose a novel knowledge organization scheme wherein concepts in the ontology of a domain are semantically interlinked with specific pieces of Web-based content using a rich hyper-linking structure known as Superlinks with well-defined semantic roles. We illustrate how such a knowledge organization scheme improves the efficiency and effectiveness of a Web-based e-commerce retail store.

0.0078120497 = product of:
  0.054684345 = sum of:
    0.054684345 = weight(_text_:global in 3366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054684345 = score(doc=3366,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.276342 = fieldWeight in 3366, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3366)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Documents in rich text corpora usually contain multiple facets of information. For example, an article about a specific disease often consists of different facets such as symptom, treatment, cause, diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention. Thus, documents may have different relations based on different facets. Powerful search tools have been developed to help users locate lists of individual documents that are most related to specific keywords. However, there is a lack of effective analysis tools that reveal the multifaceted relations of documents within or cross the document clusters. In this paper, we present FacetAtlas, a multifaceted visualization technique for visually analyzing rich text corpora. FacetAtlas combines search technology with advanced visual analytical tools to convey both global and local patterns simultaneously. We describe several unique aspects of FacetAtlas, including (1) node cliques and multifaceted edges, (2) an optimized density map, and (3) automated opacity pattern enhancement for highlighting visual patterns, (4) interactive context switch between facets. In addition, we demonstrate the power of FacetAtlas through a case study that targets patient education in the health care domain. Our evaluation shows the benefits of this work, especially in support of complex multifaceted data analysis.

0.0078120497 = product of:
  0.054684345 = sum of:
    0.054684345 = weight(_text_:global in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054684345 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.276342 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) brings the third development wave of the global information industry which makes users, network and perception devices cooperate more closely. However, if IoT has security problems, it may cause a variety of damage and even threaten human lives and properties. To improve the abilities of monitoring, providing emergency response and predicting the development trend of IoT security, a new paradigm called network security situation awareness (NSSA) is proposed. However, it is limited by its ability to mine and evaluate security situation elements from multi-source heterogeneous network security information. To solve this problem, this paper proposes an IoT network security situation awareness model using situation reasoning method based on semantic ontology and user-defined rules. Ontology technology can provide a unified and formalized description to solve the problem of semantic heterogeneity in the IoT security domain. In this paper, four key sub-domains are proposed to reflect an IoT security situation: context, attack, vulnerability and network flow. Further, user-defined rules can compensate for the limited description ability of ontology, and hence can enhance the reasoning ability of our proposed ontology model. The examples in real IoT scenarios show that the ability of the network security situation awareness that adopts our situation reasoning method is more comprehensive and more powerful reasoning abilities than the traditional NSSA methods. [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7999187/]

0.005526752 = product of:
  0.038687263 = sum of:
    0.038687263 = weight(_text_:ed in 4761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038687263 = score(doc=4761,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 4761, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4761)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2010), Poster Volume, Beijing, China. Ed.: Chu-Ren Huang and Dan Jurafsky

0.00394768 = product of:
  0.027633758 = sum of:
    0.027633758 = weight(_text_:ed in 4317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027633758 = score(doc=4317,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 4317, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4317)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Information and communication technologies: international conference; proceedings / ICT 2010, Kochi, Kerala, India, September 7 - 9, 2010. Ed.: V.V. Das

0.00394768 = product of:
  0.027633758 = sum of:
    0.027633758 = weight(_text_:ed in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027633758 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Improving Information retrieval by employing the use of ontologies to overcome the limitations of syntactic search has been one of the inspirations since its emergence. This paper proposes a conceptual framework to exploit ontology based Information retrieval. This framework constitutes of five phases namely Query parsing, word stemming, ontology matching, weight assignment, ranking and Information retrieval. In the first phase, the user query is parsed into sequence of words. The parsed contents are curtailed to identify the significant word by ignoring superfluous terms such as "to", "is","ed", "about" and the like in the stemming phase. The objective of the stemming phase is to throttle feature descriptors to root words, which in turn will increase efficiency; this reduces the time consumed for searching the superfluous terms, which may not significantly influence the effectiveness of the retrieval process. In the third phase ontology matching is carried out by matching the parsed words with the relevant terms in the existing ontology. If the ontology does not exist, it is recommended to generate the required ontology. In the fourth phase the weights are assigned based on the distance between the stemmed words and the terms in the ontology uses improved matchmaking algorithm. The range of weights varies from 0 to 1 based on the level of distance in the ontology (superclass-subclass). The aggregate weights are calculated for the all the combination of stemmed words. The combination with the highest score is ranked as the best and the corresponding information is retrieved. The conceptual workflow is illustrated with an e-governance case study Academic Information System.

0.00394768 = product of:
  0.027633758 = sum of:
    0.027633758 = weight(_text_:ed in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027633758 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, ed. by B. Hjoerland. [http://www.isko.org/cyclo/logical_division]

0.0038283467 = product of:
  0.026798425 = sum of:
    0.026798425 = product of:
      0.05359685 = sum of:
        0.05359685 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05359685 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27

0.0026798425 = product of:
  0.018758897 = sum of:
    0.018758897 = product of:
      0.037517793 = sum of:
        0.037517793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037517793 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 7.2010 19:41:16