Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.03
    0.026700228 = product of:
      0.053400457 = sum of:
        0.053400457 = product of:
          0.21360183 = sum of:
            0.21360183 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21360183 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38006222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  2. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.02
    0.017800152 = product of:
      0.035600305 = sum of:
        0.035600305 = product of:
          0.14240122 = sum of:
            0.14240122 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14240122 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38006222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  3. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.015184335 = product of:
      0.03036867 = sum of:
        0.03036867 = product of:
          0.06073734 = sum of:
            0.06073734 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06073734 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  4. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.02
    0.015184335 = product of:
      0.03036867 = sum of:
        0.03036867 = product of:
          0.06073734 = sum of:
            0.06073734 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06073734 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
  5. Rosemblat, G.; Resnick, M.P.; Auston, I.; Shin, D.; Sneiderman, C.; Fizsman, M.; Rindflesch, T.C.: Extending SemRep to the public health domain (2013) 0.01
    0.013924128 = product of:
      0.027848257 = sum of:
        0.027848257 = product of:
          0.055696514 = sum of:
            0.055696514 = weight(_text_:2005 in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055696514 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1940735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.2869867 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We describe the use of a domain-independent method to extend a natural language processing (NLP) application, SemRep (Rindflesch, Fiszman, & Libbus, 2005), based on the knowledge sources afforded by the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS®; Humphreys, Lindberg, Schoolman, & Barnett, 1998) to support the area of health promotion within the public health domain. Public health professionals require good information about successful health promotion policies and programs that might be considered for application within their own communities. Our effort seeks to improve access to relevant information for the public health profession, to help those in the field remain an information-savvy workforce. Natural language processing and semantic techniques hold promise to help public health professionals navigate the growing ocean of information by organizing and structuring this knowledge into a focused public health framework paired with a user-friendly visualization application as a way to summarize results of PubMed® searches in this field of knowledge.
  6. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.01
    0.012884336 = product of:
      0.025768671 = sum of:
        0.025768671 = product of:
          0.051537342 = sum of:
            0.051537342 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051537342 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  7. Stock, W.G.: Concepts and semantic relations in information science (2010) 0.01
    0.01160344 = product of:
      0.02320688 = sum of:
        0.02320688 = product of:
          0.04641376 = sum of:
            0.04641376 = weight(_text_:2005 in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04641376 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1940735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.23915559 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Concept-based information retrieval and knowledge representation are in need of a theory of concepts and semantic relations. Guidelines for the construction and maintenance of knowledge organization systems (KOS) (such as ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005 in the U.S.A. or DIN 2331:1980 in Germany) do not consider results of concept theory and theory of relations to the full extent. They are not able to unify the currently different worlds of traditional controlled vocabularies, of the social web (tagging and folksonomies) and of the semantic web (ontologies). Concept definitions as well as semantic relations are based on epistemological theories (empiricism, rationalism, hermeneutics, pragmatism, and critical theory). A concept is determined via its intension and extension as well as by definition. We will meet the problem of vagueness by introducing prototypes. Some important definitions are concept explanations (after Aristotle) and the definition of family resemblances (in the sense of Wittgenstein). We will model concepts as frames (according to Barsalou). The most important paradigmatic relation in KOS is hierarchy, which must be arranged into different classes: Hyponymy consists of taxonomy and simple hyponymy, meronymy consists of many different part-whole-relations. For practical application purposes, the transitivity of the given relation is very important. Unspecific associative relations are of little help to our focused applications and should be replaced by generalizable and domain-specific relations. We will discuss the reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity of paradigmatic relations as well as the appearance of specific semantic relations in the different kinds of KOS (folksonomies, nomenclatures, classification systems, thesauri, and ontologies). Finally, we will pick out KOS as a central theme of the Semantic Web.
  8. Öttl, S.; Streiff, D.; Stettler, N.; Studer, M.: Aufbau einer Testumgebung zur Ermittlung signifikanter Parameter bei der Ontologieabfrage (2010) 0.01
    0.01160344 = product of:
      0.02320688 = sum of:
        0.02320688 = product of:
          0.04641376 = sum of:
            0.04641376 = weight(_text_:2005 in 4257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04641376 = score(doc=4257,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1940735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.23915559 = fieldWeight in 4257, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4257)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der Einsatz von semantischen Technologien ist mittlerweile ein etabliertes Mittel zur Optimierung von Information-Retrieval-Systemen. Obwohl der Einsatz von Ontologien für verschiedene Anwendungsbereiche wie beispielsweise zur Query-Expansion (Bhogal et al. 2007), zur Strukturierung von Benutzeroberflächen bzw. zur Dialoggestaltung (z. B. Garcia & Sicilia 2003; Liu et al. 2005; Lopez et al. 2006; Paulheim 2009; Paulheim & Probst 2010), in Recommendersystemen (z. B. Taehee et al. 2006; Cantador et al. 2008; Middleton et al. 2001; Middleton et al. 2009) usw. rege erforscht wird, gibt es noch kaum Bestrebungen, die einzelnen Abfragemethodiken für Ontologien systematisch zu untersuchen. Bei der Abfrage von Ontologien geht es in erster Linie darum, Zusammenhänge zwischen Begriffen zu ermitteln, indem hierarchische (Classes und Individuals), semantische (Object Properties) und ergänzende (Datatype Properties) Beziehungen abgefragt oder logische Verknüpfungen abgeleitet werden. Hierbei werden sogenannte Reasoner für die Ableitungen und als Abfragesprache SPARQL (seltener auch XPath) eingesetzt. Ein weiterer, weniger oft eingesetzter, vielversprechender Ansatz findet sich bei Hoser et al. (2006) und Weng & Chang (2008), die Techniken der Sozialen Netzwerkanalyse zur Auswertung von Ontologien miteinsetzen (Semantic Network Analysis). Um die Abfrage von Ontologien sowie Kombinationen der unterschiedlichen Abfragemöglichkeiten systematisch untersuchen zu können, wurde am SII eine entsprechende Testumgebung entwickelt, die in diesem Beitrag genauer vorgestellt werden soll.
  9. Frické, M.: Logical division (2016) 0.01
    0.01160344 = product of:
      0.02320688 = sum of:
        0.02320688 = product of:
          0.04641376 = sum of:
            0.04641376 = weight(_text_:2005 in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04641376 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1940735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.23915559 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Division is obviously important to Knowledge Organization. Typically, an organizational infrastructure might acknowledge three types of connecting relationships: class hierarchies, where some classes are subclasses of others, partitive hierarchies, where some items are parts of others, and instantiation, where some items are members of some classes (see Z39.19 ANSI/NISO 2005 as an example). The first two of these involve division (the third, instantiation, does not involve division). Logical division would usually be a part of hierarchical classification systems, which, in turn, are central to shelving in libraries, to subject classification schemes, to controlled vocabularies, and to thesauri. Partitive hierarchies, and partitive division, are often essential to controlled vocabularies, thesauri, and subject tagging systems. Partitive hierarchies also relate to the bearers of information; for example, a journal would typically have its component articles as parts and, in turn, they might have sections as their parts, and, of course, components might be arrived at by partitive division (see Tillett 2009 as an illustration). Finally, verbal division, disambiguating homographs, is basic to controlled vocabularies. Thus Division is a broad and relevant topic. This article, though, is going to focus on Logical Division.
  10. Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010) 0.01
    0.010629035 = product of:
      0.02125807 = sum of:
        0.02125807 = product of:
          0.04251614 = sum of:
            0.04251614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04251614 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:41:16
  11. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01
    0.010629035 = product of:
      0.02125807 = sum of:
        0.02125807 = product of:
          0.04251614 = sum of:
            0.04251614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04251614 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  12. Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014) 0.01
    0.010629035 = product of:
      0.02125807 = sum of:
        0.02125807 = product of:
          0.04251614 = sum of:
            0.04251614 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04251614 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  13. Baker, T.; Bermès, E.; Coyle, K.; Dunsire, G.; Isaac, A.; Murray, P.; Panzer, M.; Schneider, J.; Singer, R.; Summers, E.; Waites, W.; Young, J.; Zeng, M.: Library Linked Data Incubator Group Final Report (2011) 0.01
    0.009282753 = product of:
      0.018565506 = sum of:
        0.018565506 = product of:
          0.03713101 = sum of:
            0.03713101 = weight(_text_:2005 in 4796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03713101 = score(doc=4796,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1940735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.19132447 = fieldWeight in 4796, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4796)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld-20111025/
  14. Hohmann, G.: ¬Die Anwendung des CIDOC-CRM für die semantische Wissensrepräsentation in den Kulturwissenschaften (2010) 0.01
    0.009110601 = product of:
      0.018221201 = sum of:
        0.018221201 = product of:
          0.036442403 = sum of:
            0.036442403 = weight(_text_:22 in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036442403 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  15. Semenova, E.: Ontologie als Begriffssystem : Theoretische Überlegungen und ihre praktische Umsetzung bei der Entwicklung einer Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen (2010) 0.01
    0.009110601 = product of:
      0.018221201 = sum of:
        0.018221201 = product of:
          0.036442403 = sum of:
            0.036442403 = weight(_text_:22 in 4095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036442403 = score(doc=4095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  16. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.01
    0.009110601 = product of:
      0.018221201 = sum of:
        0.018221201 = product of:
          0.036442403 = sum of:
            0.036442403 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036442403 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  17. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.009110601 = product of:
      0.018221201 = sum of:
        0.018221201 = product of:
          0.036442403 = sum of:
            0.036442403 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036442403 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
  18. Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015) 0.01
    0.009110601 = product of:
      0.018221201 = sum of:
        0.018221201 = product of:
          0.036442403 = sum of:
            0.036442403 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036442403 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
  19. Cui, H.: Competency evaluation of plant character ontologies against domain literature (2010) 0.01
    0.0075921677 = product of:
      0.015184335 = sum of:
        0.015184335 = product of:
          0.03036867 = sum of:
            0.03036867 = weight(_text_:22 in 3466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03036867 = score(doc=3466,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3466, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3466)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2010 9:55:22
  20. Kless, D.: Erstellung eines allgemeinen Standards zur Wissensorganisation : Nutzen, Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen, Wege (2010) 0.01
    0.0075921677 = product of:
      0.015184335 = sum of:
        0.015184335 = product of:
          0.03036867 = sum of:
            0.03036867 = weight(_text_:22 in 4422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03036867 = score(doc=4422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04482917 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

Languages

  • e 26
  • d 7

Types

  • a 26
  • el 5
  • m 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…