Search (414 results, page 1 of 21)

0.3648737 = product of:
  0.6254978 = sum of:
    0.03275169 = product of:
      0.09825507 = sum of:
        0.09825507 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09825507 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13895366 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13895366 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.13895366 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13895366 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.011915238 = weight(_text_:information in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011915238 = score(doc=5820,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.025016313 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025016313 = score(doc=5820,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.13895366 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13895366 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.13895366 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13895366 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.5833333 = coord(7/12)

Abstract

The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.3224885 = product of:
  0.644977 = sum of:
    0.049127534 = product of:
      0.1473826 = sum of:
        0.1473826 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1473826 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1473826 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1473826 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.1473826 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1473826 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.0063190092 = weight(_text_:information in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0063190092 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.1473826 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1473826 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.1473826 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1473826 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.5 = coord(6/12)

Abstract

On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.28303987 = product of:
  0.48521122 = sum of:
    0.03275169 = product of:
      0.09825507 = sum of:
        0.09825507 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09825507 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.09825507 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09825507 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.09825507 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09825507 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.012638018 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012638018 = score(doc=701,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.04680124 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04680124 = score(doc=701,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.5001983 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.09825507 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09825507 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.09825507 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09825507 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2622382 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5833333 = coord(7/12)

Abstract

By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.08543378 = product of:
  0.34173512 = sum of:
    0.019504948 = weight(_text_:information in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019504948 = score(doc=4784,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
    0.030956108 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030956108 = score(doc=4784,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
    0.29127407 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29127407 = score(doc=4784,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.20294477 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        1.4352381 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

This book constitutes the proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies held in Kochi, Kerala, India in September 2010.

LCSH

Information storage and retrieval systems
Information systems

RSWK

Telekommunikationsnetz / Netzwerktopologie / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
Informationstechnik / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
Informatik / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
Data Mining / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>

Series

Communications in computer and information science; vol.101

Subject

Telekommunikationsnetz / Netzwerktopologie / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
Informationstechnik / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
Informatik / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
Data Mining / Kongress / Cochin <Kerala, 2010>
Information storage and retrieval systems
Information systems

0.055791404 = product of:
  0.22316562 = sum of:
    0.014129735 = weight(_text_:information in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014129735 = score(doc=439,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
    0.03249715 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03249715 = score(doc=439,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
    0.17653874 = weight(_text_:kongress in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17653874 = score(doc=439,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20294477 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.8698856 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, heldin Heraklion, Crete, Greece in May/June 2005. The 48 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 148 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on semantic Web services, languages, ontologies, reasoning and querying, search and information retrieval, user and communities, natural language for the semantic Web, annotation tools, and semantic Web applications.

LCSH

Information storage and retrieval systems
Information systems

RSWK

Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>

Subject

Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
Information storage and retrieval systems
Information systems

0.043775227 = product of:
  0.17510091 = sum of:
    0.13748828 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 2801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13748828 = score(doc=2801,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.9585204 = fieldWeight in 2801, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2801)
    0.010531682 = weight(_text_:information in 2801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010531682 = score(doc=2801,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2801, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2801)
    0.027080955 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027080955 = score(doc=2801,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 2801, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2801)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

The book covers multimedia ontology in heritage preservation with intellectual explorations of various themes of Indian cultural heritage. The result of more than 15 years of collective research, Multimedia Ontology: Representation and Applications provides a theoretical foundation for understanding the nature of media data and the principles involved in its interpretation. The book presents a unified approach to recent advances in multimedia and explains how a multimedia ontology can fill the semantic gap between concepts and the media world. It relays real-life examples of implementations in different domains to illustrate how this gap can be filled. The book contains information that helps with building semantic, content-based search and retrieval engines and also with developing vertical application-specific search applications. It guides you in designing multimedia tools that aid in logical and conceptual organization of large amounts of multimedia data. As a practical demonstration, it showcases multimedia applications in cultural heritage preservation efforts and the creation of virtual museums. The book describes the limitations of existing ontology techniques in semantic multimedia data processing, as well as some open problems in the representations and applications of multimedia ontology. As an antidote, it introduces new ontology representation and reasoning schemes that overcome these limitations. The long, compiled efforts reflected in Multimedia Ontology: Representation and Applications are a signpost for new achievements and developments in efficiency and accessibility in the field.

Footnote

Rez. in: Annals of Library and Information Studies 62(2015) no.4, S.299-300 (A.K. Das)

LCSH

Multimedia systems
Information storage and retrieval systems

Subject

Multimedia systems
Information storage and retrieval systems

Theme

Multimedia

0.040918104 = product of:
  0.16367242 = sum of:
    0.12187035 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12187035 = score(doc=5732,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.8496376 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
    0.010531682 = weight(_text_:information in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010531682 = score(doc=5732,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
    0.031270392 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031270392 = score(doc=5732,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

Recent technological developments have increased the use of machine learning to solve many problems, including many in information retrieval. Multimedia information retrieval as a problem represents a significant challenge to machine learning as a technological solution, but some problems can still be addressed by using appropriate AI techniques. We review the technological developments and provide a perspective on the use of machine learning in conjunction with knowledge organization to address multimedia IR needs. The semantic gap in multimedia IR remains a significant problem in the field, and solutions to them are many years off. However, new technological developments allow the use of knowledge organization and machine learning in multimedia search systems and services. Specifically, we argue that, the improvement of detection of some classes of lowlevel features in images music and video can be used in conjunction with knowledge organization to tag or label multimedia content for better retrieval performance. We provide an overview of the use of knowledge organization schemes in machine learning and make recommendations to information professionals on the use of this technology with knowledge organization techniques to solve multimedia IR problems. We introduce a five-step process model that extracts features from multimedia objects (Step 1) from both knowledge organization (Step 1a) and machine learning (Step 1b), merging them together (Step 2) to create an index of those multimedia objects (Step 3). We also overview further steps in creating an application to utilize the multimedia objects (Step 4) and maintaining and updating the database of features on those objects (Step 5).

Theme

Multimedia

0.039646015 = product of:
  0.23787607 = sum of:
    0.005265841 = weight(_text_:information in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005265841 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
    0.23261023 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23261023 = score(doc=4706,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.20294477 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        1.146175 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)

Abstract

The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.

RSWK

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

Subject

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

0.031716812 = product of:
  0.19030087 = sum of:
    0.004212673 = weight(_text_:information in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004212673 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
    0.18608819 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18608819 = score(doc=4707,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.20294477 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.91694003 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)

Abstract

The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.

RSWK

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

Subject

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

0.024956098 = product of:
  0.07486829 = sum of:
    0.02939623 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02939623 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.20494029 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
    0.011915238 = weight(_text_:information in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011915238 = score(doc=4399,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
    0.02796909 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02796909 = score(doc=4399,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.29892567 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
    0.0055877343 = product of:
      0.016763203 = sum of:
        0.016763203 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016763203 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108317085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(4/12)

Abstract

Indexing plays a vital role in Information Retrieval. With the availability of huge volume of information, it has become necessary to index the information in such a way to make easier for the end users to find the information they want efficiently and accurately. Keyword-based indexing uses words as indexing terms. It is not capable of capturing the implicit relation among terms or the semantics of the words in the document. To eliminate this limitation, ontology-based indexing came into existence, which allows semantic based indexing to solve complex and indirect user queries. Ontologies are used for document indexing which allows semantic based information retrieval. Existing ontologies or the ones constructed from scratch are used presently for indexing. Constructing ontologies from scratch is a labor-intensive task and requires extensive domain knowledge whereas use of an existing ontology may leave some important concepts in documents un-annotated. Using multiple ontologies can overcome the problem of missing out concepts to a great extent, but it is difficult to manage (changes in ontologies over time by their developers) multiple ontologies and ontology heterogeneity also arises due to ontologies constructed by different ontology developers. One possible solution to managing multiple ontologies and build from scratch is to use modular ontologies for indexing.
Modular ontologies are built in modular manner by combining modules from multiple relevant ontologies. Ontology heterogeneity also arises during modular ontology construction because multiple ontologies are being dealt with, during this process. Ontologies need to be aligned before using them for modular ontology construction. The existing approaches for ontology alignment compare all the concepts of each ontology to be aligned, hence not optimized in terms of time and search space utilization. A new indexing technique is proposed based on modular ontology. An efficient ontology alignment technique is proposed to solve the heterogeneity problem during the construction of modular ontology. Results are satisfactory as Precision and Recall are improved by (8%) and (10%) respectively. The value of Pearsons Correlation Coefficient for degree of similarity, time, search space requirement, precision and recall are close to 1 which shows that the results are significant. Further research can be carried out for using modular ontology based indexing technique for Multimedia Information Retrieval and Bio-Medical information retrieval.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.02263881 = product of:
  0.09055524 = sum of:
    0.044094343 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044094343 = score(doc=4318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.30741042 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
    0.008936428 = weight(_text_:information in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008936428 = score(doc=4318,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
    0.037524473 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037524473 = score(doc=4318,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel hybrid approach for visual information retrieval (VIR) that combines shape analysis of objects in image with their indexing by textual descriptions. The principal goal of presented technique is applying Two Segments Turning Function (2STF) proposed by authors for efficient invariant to spatial variations shape processing and implementation of semantic Web approaches for ontology-based user-oriented annotations of multimedia information. In the proposed approach the user's textual queries are converted to image features, which are used for images searching, indexing, interpretation, and retrieval. A decision about similarity between retrieved image and user's query is taken computing the shape convergence to 2STF combining it with matching the ontological annotations of objects in image and providing in this way automatic definition of the machine-understandable semantics. In order to evaluate the proposed approach the Image Retrieval by Ontological Description of Shapes system has been designed and tested using some standard image domains.

0.019977875 = product of:
  0.0799115 = sum of:
    0.02188969 = weight(_text_:information in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02188969 = score(doc=987,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
    0.04964021 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04964021 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.5305404 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
    0.008381601 = product of:
      0.025144802 = sum of:
        0.025144802 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025144802 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108317085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.

Content

Introduction: envisioning semantic information spacesIndexing and knowledge organization -- Semantic technologies for knowledge representation -- Information retrieval and knowledge exploration -- Approaches to handle heterogeneity -- Problems with establishing semantic interoperability -- Formalization in indexing languages -- Typification of semantic relations -- Inferences in retrieval processes -- Semantic interoperability and inferences -- Remaining research questions.

Date

23. 7.2017 13:49:22

LCSH

Information retrieval
Knowledge representation (Information theory)
Information organization

RSWK

Information Retrieval

Subject

Information retrieval
Knowledge representation (Information theory)
Information organization
Information Retrieval

0.018646387 = product of:
  0.07458555 = sum of:
    0.051965687 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051965687 = score(doc=1434,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.3622867 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
    0.015635196 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015635196 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
    0.006984668 = product of:
      0.020954004 = sum of:
        0.020954004 = weight(_text_:22 in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020954004 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108317085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

Knowledge organization of large-scale content on the Web requires substantial amounts of semantic metadata that is expensive to generate manually. Recent developments in Web technologies have enabled any user to tag documents and other forms of content thereby generating metadata that could help organize knowledge. However, merely adding one or more tags to a document is highly inadequate to capture the aboutness of the document and thereby to support powerful semantic functions such as automatic classification, question answering or true semantic search and retrieval. This is true even when the tags used are labels from a well-designed classification system such as a thesaurus or taxonomy. There is a strong need to develop a semantic tagging mechanism with sufficient expressive power to capture the aboutness of each part of a document or dataset or multimedia content in order to enable applications that can benefit from knowledge organization on the Web. This article proposes a highly expressive mechanism of using ontology snippets as semantic tags that map portions of a document or a part of a dataset or a segment of a multimedia content to concepts and relations in an ontology of the domain(s) of interest.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.017486162 = product of:
  0.104916975 = sum of:
    0.098597966 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.098597966 = score(doc=5993,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.6873907 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
    0.0063190092 = weight(_text_:information in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0063190092 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)

Abstract

The lack of standardization in the production, organization and dissemination of information in documentation centers and institutions alike, as a result from the digitization of collections and their availability on the internet has called for integration efforts. The sheer availability of multimedia content has fostered the development of many distinct and, most of the time, independent metadata standards for its description. This study aims at presenting and comparing the existing standards of metadata, vocabularies and ontologies for multimedia annotation and also tries to offer a synthetic overview of its main strengths and weaknesses, aiding efforts for semantic integration and enhancing the findability of available multimedia resources on the web. We also aim at unveiling the characteristics that could, should and are perhaps not being highlighted in the characterization of multimedia resources.

0.01728757 = product of:
  0.06915028 = sum of:
    0.010425833 = weight(_text_:information in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010425833 = score(doc=4330,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
    0.048945908 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048945908 = score(doc=4330,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
    0.009778535 = product of:
      0.029335603 = sum of:
        0.029335603 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029335603 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108317085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

One vision of the Semantic Web is that it will be much like the Web we know today, except that documents will be enriched by annotations in machine understandable markup. These annotations will provide metadata about the documents as well as machine interpretable statements capturing some of the meaning of document content. We discuss how the information retrieval paradigm might be recast in such an environment. We suggest that retrieval can be tightly bound to inference. Doing so makes today's Web search engines useful to Semantic Web inference engines, and causes improvements in either retrieval or inference to lead directly to improvements in the other.

Date

12. 2.2011 17:35:22

0.01698033 = product of:
  0.06792132 = sum of:
    0.03637598 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03637598 = score(doc=1782,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.2536007 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
    0.016067287 = weight(_text_:information in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016067287 = score(doc=1782,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.29590017 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
    0.015478054 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015478054 = score(doc=1782,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

Logic and the Organization of Information closely examines the historical and contemporary methodologies used to catalogue information objects-books, ebooks, journals, articles, web pages, images, emails, podcasts and more-in the digital era. This book provides an in-depth technical background for digital librarianship, and covers a broad range of theoretical and practical topics including: classification theory, topic annotation, automatic clustering, generalized synonymy and concept indexing, distributed libraries, semantic web ontologies and Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). It also analyzes the challenges facing today's information architects, and outlines a series of techniques for overcoming them. Logic and the Organization of Information is intended for practitioners and professionals working at a design level as a reference book for digital librarianship. Advanced-level students, researchers and academics studying information science, library science, digital libraries and computer science will also find this book invaluable.

Footnote

Rez. in: J. Doc. 70(2014) no.4: "Books on the organization of information and knowledge, aimed at a library/information audience, tend to fall into two clear categories. Most are practical and pragmatic, explaining the "how" as much or more than the "why". Some are theoretical, in part or in whole, showing how the practice of classification, indexing, resource description and the like relates to philosophy, logic, and other foundational bases; the books by Langridge (1992) and by Svenonious (2000) are well-known examples this latter kind. To this category certainly belongs a recent book by Martin Frické (2012). The author takes the reader for an extended tour through a variety of aspects of information organization, including classification and taxonomy, alphabetical vocabularies and indexing, cataloguing and FRBR, and aspects of the semantic web. The emphasis throughout is on showing how practice is, or should be, underpinned by formal structures; there is a particular emphasis on first order predicate calculus. The advantages of a greater, and more explicit, use of symbolic logic is a recurring theme of the book. There is a particularly commendable historical dimension, often omitted in texts on this subject. It cannot be said that this book is entirely an easy read, although it is well written with a helpful index, and its arguments are generally well supported by clear and relevant examples. It is thorough and detailed, but thereby seems better geared to the needs of advanced students and researchers than to the practitioners who are suggested as a main market. For graduate students in library/information science and related disciplines, in particular, this will be a valuable resource. I would place it alongside Svenonious' book as the best insight into the theoretical "why" of information organization. It has evoked a good deal of interest, including a set of essay commentaries in Journal of Information Science (Gilchrist et al., 2013). Introducing these, Alan Gilchrist rightly says that Frické deserves a salute for making explicit the fundamental relationship between the ancient discipline of logic and modern information organization. If information science is to continue to develop, and make a contribution to the organization of the information environments of the future, then this book sets the groundwork for the kind of studies which will be needed." (D. Bawden)

LCSH

Information Systems
Information storage and retrieval systems
Multimedia systems

Subject

Information Systems
Information storage and retrieval systems
Multimedia systems

0.015728042 = product of:
  0.062912166 = sum of:
    0.036745287 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036745287 = score(doc=3958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.25617537 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
    0.010531682 = weight(_text_:information in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010531682 = score(doc=3958,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
    0.015635196 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015635196 = score(doc=3958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

Currently, there is no structured data standard for representing elements commonly found in transmedia fictional worlds. Although there are websites dedicated to individual universes, the information found on these sites separate out the various formats, concentrate on only the bibliographic aspects of the material, and are only searchable with full text. We have created an ontological model that will allow various user groups interested in transmedia to search for and retrieve the information contained in these worlds based upon their structure. We conducted a domain analysis and user studies based on the contents of Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, the Marvel Universe, and Star Wars in order to build a new model using Ontology Web Language (OWL) and an artificial intelligence-reasoning engine. This model can infer connections between transmedia properties such as characters, elements of power, items, places, events, and so on. This model will facilitate better search and retrieval of the information contained within these vast story universes for all users interested in them. The result of this project is an OWL ontology reflecting real user needs based upon user research, which is intuitive for users and can be used by artificial intelligence systems.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.12, S.2771-2782

Theme

Multimedia

0.015014926 = product of:
  0.1801791 = sum of:
    0.1801791 = weight(_text_:kongress in 441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1801791 = score(doc=441,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.20294477 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.88782334 = fieldWeight in 441, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=441)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)

RSWK

Künstliche Intelligenz / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
Soft Computing / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
Expertensystem / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>

Subject

Künstliche Intelligenz / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
Soft Computing / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>
Expertensystem / Kongress / Loughborough <2003>

0.0137521215 = product of:
  0.055008486 = sum of:
    0.014129735 = weight(_text_:information in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014129735 = score(doc=3261,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
    0.03249715 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03249715 = score(doc=3261,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
    0.008381601 = product of:
      0.025144802 = sum of:
        0.025144802 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025144802 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108317085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

Ontologies improve IR systems regarding its retrieval and presentation of information, which make the task of finding information more effective, efficient, and interactive. In this paper we argue that ontologies also greatly improve the engineering of such systems. We created a framework that uses ontology to drive the process of engineering an IR system. We developed a prototype that shows how a domain specialist without knowledge in the IR field can build an IR system with interactive components. The resulting system provides support for users not only to find their information needs but also to extend their state of knowledge. This way, our approach to ontology-enabled information retrieval addresses both the engineering aspect described here and also the usability aspect described elsewhere.

Date

28.11.2016 12:43:22

0.013635601 = product of:
  0.054542404 = sum of:
    0.02939623 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02939623 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14343803 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.20494029 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
    0.012638018 = weight(_text_:information in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012638018 = score(doc=117,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
    0.012508157 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012508157 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)

Abstract

Information management in corporate environments is a growing problem as companies' information assets grow and their need to use them in their operations. Several management models have been practiced with application on the most diverse fronts, practices that integrate the so-called Enterprise Content Management. This study proposes a conceptual model of semantic corporate information ecosystem, based on the Universal Document Model proposed by Dagobert Soergel. It focuses on unstructured information objects, especially multimedia, increasingly used in corporate environments, adding semantics and expanding their recovery potential in the composition and reuse of dynamic documents on demand. The proposed model considers stable elements in the organizational environment, such as actors, processes, business metadata and information objects, as well as some basic infrastructures of the corporate information environment. The main objective is to establish a conceptual model that adds semantic intelligence to information assets, leveraging pre-existing infrastructure in organizations, integrating and relating objects to other objects, actors and business processes. The approach methodology considered the state of the art of Information Organization, Representation and Retrieval, Organizational Content Management and Semantic Web technologies, in the scientific literature, as bases for the establishment of an integrative conceptual model. Therefore, the research will be qualitative and exploratory. The predicted steps of the model are: Environment, Data Type and Source Definition, Data Distillation, Metadata Enrichment, and Storage. As a result, in theoretical terms the extended model allows to process heterogeneous and unstructured data according to the established cut-outs and through the processes listed above, allowing value creation in the composition of dynamic information objects, with semantic aggregations to metadata.