Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.01
    0.014191686 = product of:
      0.028383372 = sum of:
        0.028383372 = product of:
          0.085150115 = sum of:
            0.085150115 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085150115 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  2. Peters, C.; Picchi, E.: Across languages, across cultures : issues in multilinguality and digital libraries (1997) 0.01
    0.007868543 = product of:
      0.015737087 = sum of:
        0.015737087 = product of:
          0.04721126 = sum of:
            0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04721126 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.007095843 = product of:
      0.014191686 = sum of:
        0.014191686 = product of:
          0.042575058 = sum of:
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  4. Lynch, C.A.: ¬The Z39.50 information retrieval standard : part I: a strategic view of its past, present and future (1997) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 1262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=1262,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1262, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1262)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper, which will appear in two parts, starting with this issue of D-Lib, looks at several strategic issues surrounding Z39.50. After a relatively brief overview of the function and history of the protocol, I will examine some of the competing visions of the protocol's role, with emphasis on issues of interoperability and the incorporation of semantics. The second installment of the paper will look at questions related to the management of the standard and the standards development process, with emphasis on the scope of the protocol and how that relates back again to interoperability questions. The paper concludes with a discussion of the adoption and deployment of the standard, its relationship to other standards, and some speculations on future directions for the protocol. This paper is not intended to be a tutorial on the details of how current or past versions of Z39.50 work. These technical details are covered not only in the standard itself (which can admittedly be rather difficult reading) but also in an array of tutorial and review papers (see <http://lcweb.loc.gov/z3950/agency> for bibliographies and pointers to on-line information on Z39.50). Instead, the paper's focus is on how and why Z39.50 developed the way it did, and the conceptual debates that have influenced its evolution and use. While a detailed technical knowledge of the operation of Z39.50 is certainly helpful, it should not be necessary in order to follow most of the material here. Some disclaimers are in order. I have been actively involved in the development of Z39.50 since the early 1980s and have been a participant -- and on occasion, even an instigator -- of some of the activities described here. This paper is an attempt to make a critical assessment of the current state of Z39.50 and a review of its development with the full benefit of hindsight. It recounts a number of debates that occurred within the developer community over the past years. In many of these, I advocated specific positions or approaches, sometimes successfully and sometimes unsuccessfully. What is presented here is one person's perspective - mine --, which is sometimes at odds with the current consensus with the developer community; I've tried to represent opposing views fairly, and to differentiate my opinions from fact or consensus. However, others will undoubtedly disagree with many of the comments here.
  5. Zimmer, D.E.: ¬Das Unbehagen an der Autorität : Erziehung: "Respekt und Liebe schließen sich nicht aus" (II) (1996) 0.01
    0.006884975 = product of:
      0.01376995 = sum of:
        0.01376995 = product of:
          0.04130985 = sum of:
            0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04130985 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das Phänomen Autorität macht uns zu schaffen. Es ist aber nicht die eher anthropologische Frage, ob Autorität sein muß, die Ideologen und Philosophen bewegt hat. Es ging, zumal seit dem Triumph Hitlers, um eine speziellere Frage, nämlich: Was bringt den Faschisten hervor? Woher rührt dessen "eigentümliche Mischung aus Aggressivität und hündischer Geducktheit" (Joachim C. Fest)? Was macht den Menschen, der nach oben katzbuckelt, liebedienert und stumm gehorcht und der nach unten tritt? Wie könnte man ihn verhindern? Eine Antwort darauf war die antiautoritäre Erziehung: ein alternatives Programm, aus der keine autoritären Persönlichkeiten, sondern mündige, selbständige, demokratische Menschen hervorgehen sollten.
  6. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.006082151 = product of:
      0.012164302 = sum of:
        0.012164302 = product of:
          0.036492907 = sum of:
            0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036492907 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  7. Payette, S.; Blanchi, C.; Lagoze, C.; Overly, E.A.: Interoperability for digital objects and repositories : the Cornell/CNRI experiments (1999) 0.01
    0.005563901 = product of:
      0.011127802 = sum of:
        0.011127802 = product of:
          0.033383403 = sum of:
            0.033383403 = weight(_text_:c in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033383403 = score(doc=1248,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.21558782 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Oard, D.W.: Alternative approaches for cross-language text retrieval (1997) 0.00
    0.004115903 = product of:
      0.008231806 = sum of:
        0.008231806 = product of:
          0.024695417 = sum of:
            0.024695417 = weight(_text_:i in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024695417 = score(doc=1164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.14585242 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I will not attempt to draw a sharp distinction between retrieval and filtering in this survey. Although my own work on adaptive cross-language text filtering has led me to make this distinction fairly carefully in other presentations (c.f., (Oard 1997b)), such an proach does little to help understand the fundamental techniques which have been applied or the results that have been obtained in this case. Since it is still common to view filtering (detection of useful documents in dynamic document streams) as a kind of retrieval, will simply adopt that perspective here.
  9. Roszkowski, M.; Lukas, C.: ¬A distributed architecture for resource discovery using metadata (1998) 0.00
    0.0039342716 = product of:
      0.007868543 = sum of:
        0.007868543 = product of:
          0.02360563 = sum of:
            0.02360563 = weight(_text_:c in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02360563 = score(doc=1256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Arms, W.Y.; Blanchi, C.; Overly, E.A.: ¬An architecture for information in digital libraries (1997) 0.00
    0.0034424874 = product of:
      0.006884975 = sum of:
        0.006884975 = product of:
          0.020654924 = sum of:
            0.020654924 = weight(_text_:c in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020654924 = score(doc=1260,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Daniel Jr., R.; Lagoze, C.: Extending the Warwick framework : from metadata containers to active digital objects (1997) 0.00
    0.0034424874 = product of:
      0.006884975 = sum of:
        0.006884975 = product of:
          0.020654924 = sum of:
            0.020654924 = weight(_text_:c in 1264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020654924 = score(doc=1264,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1264, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1264)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)