-
Harzing, A.-W.: Comparing the Google Scholar h-index with the ISI Journal Impact Factor (2008)
0.04
0.035225622 = product of:
0.070451245 = sum of:
0.070451245 = product of:
0.14090249 = sum of:
0.14090249 = weight(_text_:journals in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14090249 = score(doc=855,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.54917884 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Publication in academic journals is a key criterion for appointment, tenure and promotion in universities. Many universities weigh publications according to the quality or impact of the journal. Traditionally, journal quality has been assessed through the ISI Journal Impact Factor (JIF). This paper proposes an alternative metric - Hirsch's h-index - and data source - Google Scholar - to assess journal impact. Using a systematic comparison between the Google Scholar h-index and the ISI JIF for a sample of 838 journals in Economics & Business, we argue that the former provides a more accurate and comprehensive measure of journal impact.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024477057 = product of:
0.048954114 = sum of:
0.048954114 = product of:
0.09790823 = sum of:
0.09790823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09790823 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Brand, A.: CrossRef turns one (2001)
0.02
0.023869973 = product of:
0.047739945 = sum of:
0.047739945 = product of:
0.09547989 = sum of:
0.09547989 = weight(_text_:journals in 1222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09547989 = score(doc=1222,freq=10.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.3721406 = fieldWeight in 1222, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1222)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- CrossRef, the only full-blown application of the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®) System to date, is now a little over a year old. What started as a cooperative effort among publishers and technologists to prototype DOI-based linking of citations in e-journals evolved into an independent, non-profit enterprise in early 2000. We have made considerable headway during our first year, but there is still much to be done. When CrossRef went live with its collaborative linking service last June, it had enabled reference links in roughly 1,100 journals from a member base of 33 publishers, using a functional prototype system. The DOI-X prototype was described in an article published in D-Lib Magazine in February of 2000. On the occasion of CrossRef's first birthday as a live service, this article provides a non-technical overview of our progress to date and the major hurdles ahead. The electronic medium enriches the research literature arena for all players -- researchers, librarians, and publishers -- in numerous ways. Information has been made easier to discover, to share, and to sell. To take a simple example, the aggregation of book metadata by electronic booksellers was a huge boon to scholars seeking out obscure backlist titles, or discovering books they would never otherwise have known to exist. It was equally a boon for the publishers of those books, who saw an unprecedented surge in sales of backlist titles with the advent of centralized electronic bookselling. In the serials sphere, even in spite of price increases and the turmoil surrounding site licenses for some prime electronic content, libraries overall are now able to offer more content to more of their patrons. Yet undoubtedly, the key enrichment for academics and others navigating a scholarly corpus is linking, and in particular the linking that takes the reader out of one document and into another in the matter of a click or two. Since references are how authors make explicit the links between their work and precedent scholarship, what could be more fundamental to the reader than making those links immediately actionable? That said, automated linking is only really useful from a research perspective if it works across publications and across publishers. Not only do academics think about their own writings and those of their colleagues in terms of "author, title, rough date" -- the name of the journal itself is usually not high on the list of crucial identifying features -- but they are oblivious as to the identity of the publishers of all but their very favorite books and journals.
Citation linking is thus also a huge benefit to journal publishers, because, as with electronic bookselling, it drives readers to their content in yet another way. In step with what was largely a subscription-based economy for journal sales, an "article economy" appears to be emerging. Journal publishers sell an increasing amount of their content on an article basis, whether through document delivery services, aggregators, or their own pay-per-view systems. At the same time, most research-oriented access to digitized material is still mediated by libraries. Resource discovery services must be able to authenticate subscribed or licensed users somewhere in the process, and ensure that a given user is accessing as a default the version of an article that their library may have already paid for. The well-known "appropriate copy" issue is addressed below. Another benefit to publishers from including outgoing citation links is simply the value they can add to their own journals. Publishers carry out the bulk of the technological prototyping and development that has produced electronic journals and the enhanced functionality readers have come to expect. There is clearly competition among them to provide readers with the latest features. That a number of publishers would agree to collaborate in the establishment of an infrastructure for reference linking was thus by no means predictable. CrossRef was incorporated in January of 2000 as a collaborative venture among 12 of the world's top scientific and scholarly publishers, both commercial and not-for-profit, to enable cross-publisher reference linking throughout the digital journal literature. The founding members were Academic Press, a Harcourt Company; the American Association for the Advancement of Science (the publisher of Science); American Institute of Physics (AIP); Association for Computing Machinery (ACM); Blackwell Science; Elsevier Science; The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE); Kluwer Academic Publishers (a Wolters Kluwer Company); Nature; Oxford University Press; Springer-Verlag; and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Start-up funds for CrossRef were provided as loans from eight of the original publishers.
-
Pika, J.: Universal Decimal Classification at the ETH-Bibliothek Zürich : a Swiss perspective (2007)
0.02
0.021349952 = product of:
0.042699903 = sum of:
0.042699903 = product of:
0.08539981 = sum of:
0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 5899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08539981 = score(doc=5899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 5899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The ETH library has been using the UDC for the past twenty-five years and yet most of the users had almost never taken a single notice about it. The query in today's NEBIS-OPAC (former ETHICS) is based on verbal search with three-lingual descriptors and corresponding related search-terms including e.g. synonyma as well as user-friendly expressions from scientific journals - scientific jargon - to facilitate the dialog with OPAC. A single UDC number, standing behind these descriptors, connects them to the related document-titles, regardless of language. Thus the user actually works with the UDC, without realizing it. This paper describes the experience with this OPAC and the work behind it.
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.02
0.020769471 = product of:
0.041538943 = sum of:
0.041538943 = product of:
0.083077885 = sum of:
0.083077885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083077885 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
-
Cazan, C.: Medizinische Ontologien : das Ende des MeSH (2006)
0.01
0.014233301 = product of:
0.028466603 = sum of:
0.028466603 = product of:
0.056933206 = sum of:
0.056933206 = weight(_text_:journals in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056933206 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.22190176 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Dieser Aufsatz ist kein Abgesang auf MeSH (= Medical Subject Headings in Medline/PubMed), wie man/frau vielleicht vermuten könnte. Vielmehr wird - ohne informatiklastiges Fachchinesisch - an Hand des von der National Library of Medicine entwickelten Unified Medical Language System erklärt, worin die Anforderungen an Ontologien bestehen, die im Zusammenhang mit dem Semantic Web allerorten eingefordert und herbeigewünscht werden. Eine Lektüre für Einsteigerinnen, die zum Vertiefen der gewonnenen Begriffssicherheit an Hand der weiterführenden Literaturhinweise anregt. Da das UMLS hier vor allem als Beispiel verwendet wird, werden auch Bibliothekarlnnen, Dokumentarlnnen und Informationsspezialistinnen anderer Fachbereiche den Aufsatz mit Gewinn lesen - und erfahren, dass unser Fachwissen aus der Sacherschließung und der Verwendung und Mitgestaltung von Normdateien und Thesauri bei der Entwicklung von Ontologien gefragt ist! (Eveline Pipp, Universitätsbibliothek Innsbruck). - Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/en/journals/mbi/2006-6/mbi000049.shtml.
-
Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (2002)
0.01
0.012238529 = product of:
0.024477057 = sum of:
0.024477057 = product of:
0.048954114 = sum of:
0.048954114 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048954114 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.
-
Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000)
0.01
0.012115525 = product of:
0.02423105 = sum of:
0.02423105 = product of:
0.0484621 = sum of:
0.0484621 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0484621 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 5.2013 19:22:18
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.01
0.010384736 = product of:
0.020769471 = sum of:
0.020769471 = product of:
0.041538943 = sum of:
0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041538943 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.010384736 = product of:
0.020769471 = sum of:
0.020769471 = product of:
0.041538943 = sum of:
0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041538943 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Atran, S.; Medin, D.L.; Ross, N.: Evolution and devolution of knowledge : a tale of two biologies (2004)
0.01
0.010384736 = product of:
0.020769471 = sum of:
0.020769471 = product of:
0.041538943 = sum of:
0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041538943 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 1.2022 10:22:18
-
Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005)
0.01
0.008653947 = product of:
0.017307894 = sum of:
0.017307894 = product of:
0.03461579 = sum of:
0.03461579 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03461579 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 1.2016 10:22:28
-
Baeza-Yates, R.; Boldi, P.; Castillo, C.: Generalizing PageRank : damping functions for linkbased ranking algorithms (2006)
0.01
0.008653947 = product of:
0.017307894 = sum of:
0.017307894 = product of:
0.03461579 = sum of:
0.03461579 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03461579 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 1.2016 10:22:28
-
Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000)
0.01
0.0069231573 = product of:
0.0138463145 = sum of:
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027692629 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 14:01:22
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung bibliografischer Titeldatensätze der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie (2009)
0.01
0.0069231573 = product of:
0.0138463145 = sum of:
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = weight(_text_:22 in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027692629 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 14:41:24
-
Bradford, R.B.: Relationship discovery in large text collections using Latent Semantic Indexing (2006)
0.01
0.0069231573 = product of:
0.0138463145 = sum of:
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027692629 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]
-
Foerster, H. von; Müller, A.; Müller, K.H.: Rück- und Vorschauen : Heinz von Foerster im Gespräch mit Albert Müller und Karl H. Müller (2001)
0.01
0.005192368 = product of:
0.010384736 = sum of:
0.010384736 = product of:
0.020769471 = sum of:
0.020769471 = weight(_text_:22 in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020769471 = score(doc=5988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2006 17:22:54
-
Lavoie, B.; Connaway, L.S.; Dempsey, L.: Anatomy of aggregate collections : the example of Google print for libraries (2005)
0.01
0.005192368 = product of:
0.010384736 = sum of:
0.010384736 = product of:
0.020769471 = sum of:
0.020769471 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020769471 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 14:08:22
