Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017) 0.04
    0.035109267 = product of:
      0.07021853 = sum of:
        0.07021853 = product of:
          0.14043707 = sum of:
            0.14043707 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14043707 = score(doc=3871,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6884854 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.
  2. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02
    0.024792334 = product of:
      0.049584668 = sum of:
        0.049584668 = product of:
          0.099169336 = sum of:
            0.099169336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099169336 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  3. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬The international diffusion of RDA : a wide overview on the new guidelines (2016) 0.02
    0.01776404 = product of:
      0.03552808 = sum of:
        0.03552808 = product of:
          0.07105616 = sum of:
            0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07105616 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This issue of Jlis.it is focused on RDA, Resource Description and Access. In light of increasing international acceptance of this new cataloging content standard, the editors of Jlis.it wish to capture the background of how RDA came to be and the implications of its implementation at this time. This special issue offers a wide overview on the new guidelines from their making to their spreading around the world.
  4. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.02
    0.017530829 = product of:
      0.035061657 = sum of:
        0.035061657 = product of:
          0.070123315 = sum of:
            0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070123315 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  5. Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011) 0.02
    0.017354636 = product of:
      0.03470927 = sum of:
        0.03470927 = product of:
          0.06941854 = sum of:
            0.06941854 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06941854 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
    Date
    22. 2.2017 13:00:42
  6. Buttò, S.: RDA: analyses, considerations and activities by the Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian Libraries and Bibliographic Information (ICCU) (2016) 0.02
    0.015701342 = product of:
      0.031402685 = sum of:
        0.031402685 = product of:
          0.06280537 = sum of:
            0.06280537 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06280537 = score(doc=2958,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.3079 = fieldWeight in 2958, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The report aims to analyze the applicability of the Resource Description and Access (RDA) within the Italian public libraries, and also in the archives and museums in order to contribute to the discussion at international level. The Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian libraries (ICCU) manages the online catalogue of the Italian libraries and the network of bibliographic services. ICCU has the institutional task of coordinating the cataloging and the documentation activities for the Italian libraries. On March 31 st 2014, the Institute signed the Agreement with the American Library Association,Publishing ALA, for the Italian translation rights of RDA, now available and published inRDAToolkit. The Italian translation has been carried out and realized by the Technical Working Group, made up of the main national and academic libraries, cultural Institutions and bibliographic agencies. The Group started working from the need of studying the new code in its textual detail, to better understand the principles, purposes, and applicability and finally its sustainability within the national context in relation to the area of the bibliographic control. At international level, starting from the publication of the Italian version of RDA and through the research carried out by ICCU and by the national Working Groups, the purpose is a more direct comparison with the experiences of the other European countries, also within EURIG international context, for an exchange of experiences aimed at strengthening the informational content of the data cataloging, with respect to history, cultural traditions and national identities of the different countries.
  7. Teal, W.: Alma enumerator : automating repetitive cataloging tasks with Python (2018) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=5348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01
    0.014875402 = product of:
      0.029750803 = sum of:
        0.029750803 = product of:
          0.059501607 = sum of:
            0.059501607 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059501607 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  9. Scheven, E.: Geokoordinaten in Bibliotheksdaten : Grundlage für innovative Nachnutzung (2015) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=308,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2015 18:22:47
  10. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  11. Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2016 15:58:46
  12. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  13. Rötzer, F.: Chinesischer Roboter besteht weltweit erstmals Zulassungsprüfung für Mediziner (2017) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 3978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=3978,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3978, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3978)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Issue
    [22. November 2017].
  14. Landwehr, A.: China schafft digitales Punktesystem für den "besseren" Menschen (2018) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:29:46
  15. Rötzer, F.: Psychologen für die Künstliche Intelligenz (2018) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:08:27
  16. Schaat, S.: Von der automatisierten Manipulation zur Manipulation der Automatisierung (2019) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 2.2019 17:22:00
  17. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.01
    0.0133230295 = product of:
      0.026646059 = sum of:
        0.026646059 = product of:
          0.053292118 = sum of:
            0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053292118 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
  18. Edmunds, J.: Zombrary apocalypse!? : RDA, LRM, and the death of cataloging (2017) 0.01
    0.0125610735 = product of:
      0.025122147 = sum of:
        0.025122147 = product of:
          0.050244294 = sum of:
            0.050244294 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050244294 = score(doc=3818,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.24632001 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Equally fallacious is the statement that support for the "clustering bibliographic records to show relationships between works and their creators" is an "important new feature" of RDA. AACR2 bibliographic records and the systems housing them can, did, and do show such relationships. Finally, whether users want or care to be made "more aware of a work's different editions, translations, or physical formats" is debatable. As an aim, it sounds less like what a user wants and more like what a cataloging librarian thinks a user should want. As Amanda Cossham writes in her recently issued doctoral thesis: "The explicit focus on user needs in the FRBR model, the International Cataloguing Principles, and RDA: Resource Description and Access does not align well with the ways that users use, understand, and experience library catalogues nor with the ways that they understand and experience the wider information environment. User tasks, as constituted in the FRBR model and RDA, are insufficient to meet users' needs." (p. 11, emphasis in the original)
  19. Stumpf, G.: "Kerngeschäft" Sacherschließung in neuer Sicht : was gezielte intellektuelle Arbeit und maschinelle Verfahren gemeinsam bewirken können (2015) 0.01
    0.012271579 = product of:
      0.024543159 = sum of:
        0.024543159 = product of:
          0.049086317 = sum of:
            0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049086317 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Es handelt sich um den leicht überarbeiteten Text eines Vortrags bei der VDB-Fortbildungsveranstaltung "Wandel als Konstante: neue Aufgaben und Herausforderungen für sozialwissenschaftliche Bibliotheken" am 22./23. Januar 2015 in Berlin.
  20. Hermsdorf, D.: Zweifel an Franz Hörmanns "Informationsgeld" : https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Zweifel-an-Franz-Hoermanns-Informationsgeld-3730411.html. (2017) 0.01
    0.012271579 = product of:
      0.024543159 = sum of:
        0.024543159 = product of:
          0.049086317 = sum of:
            0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049086317 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 6.2017 11:55:22