Search (2278 results, page 114 of 114)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Ercegovac, Z.: LEArning portfolio for accessing engineering information for engineers (1999) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 6717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=6717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 6717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6717)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This article describes design considerations of two interrelated programs that together make Learning Portfolio (LEAP) prototype system for accessing engineering information for engineers. The two programs are: Engineering Information Sources and Access (EISA), implemented as a Web-based self-learning prototype system; and Information Sources that Every Engineer should Know; ISEEK adds embedded instructional layer, representative queries, and constitutes the core layer of engineering sources for a beginner engineering student. Of analytical significance, the project has (1) defined indicators of information literacy (IL) for engineering students; (2) developed IL questionnaire to test engineering students' IL skills; (3) developed information literacy profile of engineering students under study; (4) assessed existing information resources, tools and search techniques. Of practical significance, we have: (5) applied students' responses in the design of EISA; (6) implemented the EISA information literacy program for engineers; (7) developed a series of hypertext-based tutorials each dealing with a specific IL issue; and (8) proposed set of the four design principles (i.e., understanding the user; active learning; conceptual model of teaching; and modularity). Finally, the article identifies and discusses future work
  2. Brin, S.; Page, L.: ¬The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine (1998) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=947,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Computer networks. 30(1998) no.1-7, S.107-117
  3. Wood, D.J.: Peer review and the Web : the implications of electronic peer review for biomedical authors, referees and learned society publishers (1998) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 4717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=4717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 4717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4717)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The Internet provides researchers with exciting new opportunities for finding information and communicating with each other. However, the process of peer review is something of a Cinderella in all this. Peer review in biomedical disciplines is still largely carried out using hard copy and the postal system even if the authors' text files are used for the production of the paper or electronic journal. This article introduces one of the Electronic Libraries (eLib) projects, funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). The project - Electronic Submission and Peer Review (ESPERE) - is examining the cultural and technical problems of implementing an electronic peer review process for biomedical academics and learned society publishers. The paper describes preliminary work in doscovering the issues involved and describes interviews with 7 learned society publishers, analysis of a questionnaire sent to 200 editorial board members and a focus group of 5 biomedical academics. Academics and learned publishers were enthusiastic about electronic peer review and the possibilities which it offers for a less costly, more streamlined and more effective process. Use of the Internet makes collaborative and interactive refereeing a practical option and allows academics from countries all over the world to take part
  4. Voorbij, H.: Title keywords and subject descriptors : a comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences (1998) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In order to compare the value of subject descriptors and title keywords as entries to subject searches, two studies were carried out. Both studies concentrated on monographs in the humanities and social sciences, held by the online public access catalogue of the National Library of the Netherlands. In the first study, a comparison was made by subject librarians between the subject descriptors and the title keywords of 475 records. They could express their opinion on a scale from 1 (descriptor is exactly or almost the same as word in title) to 7 (descriptor does not appear in title at all). It was concluded that 37 per cent of the records are considerably enhanced by a subject descriptor, and 49 per cent slightly or considerably enhanced. In the second study, subject librarians performed subject searches using title keywords and subject descriptors on the same topic. The relative recall amounted to 48 per cent and 86 per cent respectively. Failure analysis revealed the reasons why so many records that were found by subject descriptors were not found by title keywords. First, although completely meaningless titles hardly ever appear, the title of a publication does not always offer sufficient clues for title keyword searching. In those cases, descriptors may enhance the record of a publication. A second and even more important task of subject descriptors is controlling the vocabulary. Many relevant titles cannot be retrieved by title keyword searching because of the wide diversity of ways of expressing a topic. Descriptors take away the burden of vocabulary control from the user.
  5. Guerrini, M.: ACOLIT : un progetto in corso (1997) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 5616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=5616,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 5616, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5616)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In June 1995 the ABEI (Italian Catholic Librarians Association) established a working group in order to create an authority list of Catholic authors, (persons and corporate bodies) and of liturgical and religious anonymous works, titled ACOLIT, Autori Cattolici e Opere Liturgiche in Italiano (Catholic Authors and Liturgical Works in Italian). ACOLIT contains: (1) personal authors (particularly of the apostolic period and the Middle Ages); (2) popes and antipopes; (3) religious congregations, orders and societies; (4) Catholic Church and Roman Curia; (5) Catholic associations; (6) the Bible; (7) liturgical works; (8) religious anonymous works. Headings are established according to the RICA (Regole Italiane di Catalogazione per Autori), but also to the Norme per il catalogo degli stampati by the Vatican Library, the AACR2R, the RAK, the Reglas de catalogaci = F3n. Ed. refundita y rev., and the guidelines and decisions of IFLA. The work group has elaborated original considerations, particularly for the Bible. The group argues the choice and forth of the names of popes, Catholic Church and Roman Curia of the RICA and suggests that classical and Medieval writers should be formulated in Italian not in Latin, and that the indirect form, surname-name, should be used for saints who have a surname. ACOLIT has accepted the GARE punctuation (Guidelines for authority and reference entries/ recommended by the Working Group on an International Authority System; approved by the Standing Committees of the IFLA Section on Cataloguing and the IFLA Section on Information Technology). The print edition is planned for June 1997. ACOLIT will present headings in three sections: (1) Personal writers; (2) Corporate bodies; (1) Bible Liturgical and religious anonymous works, ABEI will also publish an electronic edition (CD ROM), periodically revised. The research will extend to Christian writers and -in the future- to writers of all religions.
  6. Fidzani, B.T.: Information needs and information-seeking behaviour of graduate students at the University of Botswana (1998) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library review. 47(1998) no.7, S.329-340
  7. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A new approach to design of document retrieval and indexing systems for OPAC users (1993) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 1300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=1300,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 1300, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1300)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
  8. Allen, R.B.: Navigating and searching in digital library catalogs (1994) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Two interfaces are described for navigating large collections of document and book records. An Online Public Access Catalog interface uses a classification hierarchy to facilitate browsing and searching. The system has been implemented and currently runs with over 50,000 book records. Interface widgets allow the hierarchy to be displayed and traversed easily. For example, the Book Shelf dynamically updates itself to reflect searches and attribute selections. A second interface, not yet fully implemented, allows access to the ACM Computing Reviews classification. By browsing a graphic structure such as a classification hierarchy or term network, the user can select or negate terms to incrementally enlarge or refine the query. A number of systems have been proposed that utilise this type of interface: Allen [1] allows users to traverse sections of a classification hierarchy that are adjacent to documents retrieved by a search; Doyle [6] discusses a graph-based interactive browsing environment; Croft [4] extends Doyle's termbased graph with vertices and edges representing individual documents and their degrees of similarity to each other; Frei and Jauslin [7] use tree structures to represent both system command menus and document indexing structures; and Godin [10] and Pedersen [16] model a collection's conceptual structure with termdocument lattices.
  9. Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999) 0.01 
    0.0056444295 = product of:
  0.028222147 = sum of:
    0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028222147 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:51:28
  10. Toms, E.G.: What motivates the browser? (1999) 0.01 
    0.0056444295 = product of:
  0.028222147 = sum of:
    0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028222147 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:44:47
  11. Ennis, M.; Sutcliffe, A.G.; Watkinson, S.J.: Towards a predictive model of information seeking : empirical studies of end-user-searching (1999) 0.01 
    0.0056444295 = product of:
  0.028222147 = sum of:
    0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028222147 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:54:13
  12. Lissack, M.R.: Chaos and complexity : what does that have to do with knowledge management? (1996) 0.01 
    0.0056444295 = product of:
  0.028222147 = sum of:
    0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028222147 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  13. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.01 
    0.0056444295 = product of:
  0.028222147 = sum of:
    0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028222147 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
  14. Borgman, C.L.: Why are online catalogs still hard to use? (1996) 0.01 
    0.0050514047 = product of:
  0.025257023 = sum of:
    0.025257023 = weight(_text_:7 in 4380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025257023 = score(doc=4380,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.14640506 = fieldWeight in 4380, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4380)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.7, S.493-503
  15. Chen, H.; Houston, A.L.; Sewell, R.R.; Schatz, B.R.: Internet browsing and searching : user evaluations of category map and concept space techniques (1998) 0.01 
    0.0050514047 = product of:
  0.025257023 = sum of:
    0.025257023 = weight(_text_:7 in 869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025257023 = score(doc=869,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.14640506 = fieldWeight in 869, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=869)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.7, S.582-603
  16. Lammers, I.S.; Eijnatten, F.M. van: Improving the management of knowledge in an automation department of a Dutch bank : embarking on action research (1996) 0.00 
    0.004938876 = product of:
  0.02469438 = sum of:
    0.02469438 = weight(_text_:22 in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02469438 = score(doc=906,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  17. Hill, J.S.: ¬The elephant in the catalog : cataloging animals you can't see or touch (1996) 0.00 
    0.004938876 = product of:
  0.02469438 = sum of:
    0.02469438 = weight(_text_:22 in 5606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02469438 = score(doc=5606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5606)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.2006 12:22:06
  18. Cochrane, P.A.: New roles for classification in libraries and information networks (1995) 0.00 
    0.0044199787 = product of:
  0.022099894 = sum of:
    0.022099894 = weight(_text_:7 in 5561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022099894 = score(doc=5561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.12810442 = fieldWeight in 5561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5561)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    1. Exploit technology a. for adding class numbers to materials in digital form. b. for linking subject access systems like LCSH and DDC. c. for providing navigation and retrieval tools based on outlines of knowledge within classification schedules. 2. Extend the use of library classification to Internet resources. 3. Improve presentation of information in library classification schedules, including more lead in vocabulary, more understandable scope notes, better captions, references, and indexes. 4. Share development strategies among and between various classification systems and thesauri, creating the ability to link with one another including multilingual and specialized systems. 5. Work with vendors of Online Catalogs so that these systems will include features where classification systems and thesauri can be used for file partitioning, navigation, and retrieval. 6. Build bridges from the past (e.g., library collections classified by DDC, LCC, etc.) to the future (e.g., digitized full text collections). 7. Educate consumers, administrators, and practitioners about the value of library classification systems beyond mere shelf arrangement. 8. Conduct more end-user research to determine utility of library classification systems new and improved. 9. Reach out to other professions for ideas, stimulation, collaboration, and convergence on the problem of organizing networked information. 10. Challenge the status quo in the realm of library and networked information systems and services. 11. Make the classification schemes more educational so that the user can be guided to see relationships and cognate information they might not otherwise have known. 12. Organize the classification schemes differently for the end-user than for the classifier and provide more than one scheme for users to browse and navigate before and after retrieval

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes