Search (987 results, page 50 of 50)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Jötten, F.: Auf der Suche nach der göttlichen Zahl : Wie ein Spielzeug einen Darmstädter Mathematiker ein Erwachsenenleben lang nicht mehr losließ (2010) 0.00
    0.004624389 = product of:
      0.009248778 = sum of:
        0.009248778 = product of:
          0.018497556 = sum of:
            0.018497556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018497556 = score(doc=3920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  2. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschliessung (2012) 0.00
    0.004624389 = product of:
      0.009248778 = sum of:
        0.009248778 = product of:
          0.018497556 = sum of:
            0.018497556 = weight(_text_:22 in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018497556 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2013 14:53:22
  3. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00
    0.004624389 = product of:
      0.009248778 = sum of:
        0.009248778 = product of:
          0.018497556 = sum of:
            0.018497556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018497556 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
  4. Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015) 0.00
    0.004624389 = product of:
      0.009248778 = sum of:
        0.009248778 = product of:
          0.018497556 = sum of:
            0.018497556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018497556 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschließung (2010) 0.00
    0.004004659 = product of:
      0.008009318 = sum of:
        0.008009318 = product of:
          0.016018637 = sum of:
            0.016018637 = weight(_text_:k in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016018637 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.098602116 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Dieses Jahr bot uns bereits zahlreiche interessante Themen: von der Sacherschließung ausgehend schnupperten wir auch in benachbarte Arbeitsund Forschungsfelder und regten andererseits interessierte Zuhörer/-innen aus diesen Nachbargebieten dazu an, die Aspekte der Inhaltserschließung aus einem für sie relevanten Blickwinkel heraus näher kennenzulernen. Die beiden öffentlichen Kommissionssitzungen des ersten Halbjahres 2010 und das SE-Panel im Rahmen der ODOK´10 in Leoben stießen daher nicht nur im engeren Kreis der Sacherschließer/-innen sondern auch bei Titelaufnehmern/-innen und IT-Experten/-innen auf verdientes Interesse. Sämtliche Vortragsfolien und begleitendes Material sind auf der KofSE- Seite chronologisch zugänglich. Am 29. April traf sich in Wien zunächst der am Grazer Bibliothekartag ins Leben gerufene Arbeitskreis K-KONKORD zum zweiten Mal: wir hörten kurze Berichte über laufende Projektarbeiten und Masterthesen zum Thema Klassifikationen-Konkordanzen und beschlossen, bis zum nächsten Treffen im Herbst unsere bis dahin gesammelten "Mosaiksteine" nach und nach in einem gesonderten Bereich auf der KofSE-Seite innerhalb der VÖB-Homepage abzulegen. Danach begann die KofSE-Sitzung mit einem Kurzbericht von Kurt SCHAEFER aus der UB Wien über seinen unmittelbar davor liegenden Besuch beim EDUG-Meeting 2010 in Alexandria. Nicht nur seine noch ganz vom ägyptischen Klima "aufgeheizten" und durch eine Bilderfolge lebendig dokumentierten Reiseeindrücke sondern v. a. die erste Zusammenfassung aktueller Trends innerhalb der wachsenden europäischen DDC- Community waren - spontan mitkommentiert von Karin Kleiber (Sekretärin der European Dewey Users Group, EDUG) und ebenso spontan ergänzt von Lars Svensson, der mit einer Telekonferenzschaltung von Deutschland aus an dem Meeting teilgenommen hatte - diesmal ein höchst aktueller Einstieg ins Thema Klassifikation. Darauf folgten zwei Gastvorträge:
  6. Haubner, S.: "Als einfacher Benutzer ist man rechtlos" : Unter den freiwilligen Wikipedia-Mitarbeitern regt sich Unmut über die Administratoren (2011) 0.00
    0.003853658 = product of:
      0.007707316 = sum of:
        0.007707316 = product of:
          0.015414632 = sum of:
            0.015414632 = weight(_text_:22 in 4567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015414632 = score(doc=4567,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4567, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4567)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  7. Metoyer, C.A.; Doyle, A.M.: Introduction to a speicial issue on "Indigenous Knowledge Organization" (2015) 0.00
    0.003853658 = product of:
      0.007707316 = sum of:
        0.007707316 = product of:
          0.015414632 = sum of:
            0.015414632 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015414632 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2015 19:22:31

Languages

  • e 722
  • d 258
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 83
  • b 4
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications