Search (1092 results, page 54 of 55)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Freyberg, L.: ¬Die Lesbarkeit der Welt : Rezension zu 'The Concept of Information in Library and Information Science. A Field in Search of Its Boundaries: 8 Short Comments Concerning Information'. In: Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 22 (2015), 1, 57-80. Kurzartikel von Luciano Floridi, Søren Brier, Torkild Thellefsen, Martin Thellefsen, Bent Sørensen, Birger Hjørland, Brenda Dervin, Ken Herold, Per Hasle und Michael Buckland (2016) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  3. Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  4. Jamali, H.R.; Shahbaztabar, P.: ¬The effects of internet filtering on users' information-seeking behaviour and emotions (2017) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=4052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Rötzer, F.: KI-Programm besser als Menschen im Verständnis natürlicher Sprache (2018) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=4217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:32:44
  6. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Torres-Salinas, D.; Gorraiz, J.; Robinson-Garcia, N.: ¬The insoluble problems of books : what does Altmetric.com have to offer? (2018) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Jäger, L.: Von Big Data zu Big Brother (2018) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 5234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=5234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5234)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:33:49
  10. Greiner-Petter, A.; Schubotz, M.; Cohl, H.S.; Gipp, B.: Semantic preserving bijective mappings for expressions involving special functions between computer algebra systems and document preparation systems (2019) 0.00 
    0.0040115733 = product of:
  0.008023147 = sum of:
    0.008023147 = product of:
      0.02406944 = sum of:
        0.02406944 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02406944 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  11. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschließung (2010) 0.00 
    0.0035779492 = product of:
  0.0071558985 = sum of:
    0.0071558985 = product of:
      0.021467695 = sum of:
        0.021467695 = weight(_text_:29 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021467695 = score(doc=4314,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.13740966 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Dieses Jahr bot uns bereits zahlreiche interessante Themen: von der Sacherschließung ausgehend schnupperten wir auch in benachbarte Arbeitsund Forschungsfelder und regten andererseits interessierte Zuhörer/-innen aus diesen Nachbargebieten dazu an, die Aspekte der Inhaltserschließung aus einem für sie relevanten Blickwinkel heraus näher kennenzulernen. Die beiden öffentlichen Kommissionssitzungen des ersten Halbjahres 2010 und das SE-Panel im Rahmen der ODOK´10 in Leoben stießen daher nicht nur im engeren Kreis der Sacherschließer/-innen sondern auch bei Titelaufnehmern/-innen und IT-Experten/-innen auf verdientes Interesse. Sämtliche Vortragsfolien und begleitendes Material sind auf der KofSE- Seite chronologisch zugänglich. Am 29. April traf sich in Wien zunächst der am Grazer Bibliothekartag ins Leben gerufene Arbeitskreis K-KONKORD zum zweiten Mal: wir hörten kurze Berichte über laufende Projektarbeiten und Masterthesen zum Thema Klassifikationen-Konkordanzen und beschlossen, bis zum nächsten Treffen im Herbst unsere bis dahin gesammelten "Mosaiksteine" nach und nach in einem gesonderten Bereich auf der KofSE-Seite innerhalb der VÖB-Homepage abzulegen. Danach begann die KofSE-Sitzung mit einem Kurzbericht von Kurt SCHAEFER aus der UB Wien über seinen unmittelbar davor liegenden Besuch beim EDUG-Meeting 2010 in Alexandria. Nicht nur seine noch ganz vom ägyptischen Klima "aufgeheizten" und durch eine Bilderfolge lebendig dokumentierten Reiseeindrücke sondern v. a. die erste Zusammenfassung aktueller Trends innerhalb der wachsenden europäischen DDC- Community waren - spontan mitkommentiert von Karin Kleiber (Sekretärin der European Dewey Users Group, EDUG) und ebenso spontan ergänzt von Lars Svensson, der mit einer Telekonferenzschaltung von Deutschland aus an dem Meeting teilgenommen hatte - diesmal ein höchst aktueller Einstieg ins Thema Klassifikation. Darauf folgten zwei Gastvorträge:
    Date
    9. 2.2011 18:59:29
  12. Höhn, S.: Stalins Badezimmer in Wikipedia : Die Macher der Internet-Enzyklopädie diskutieren über Verantwortung und Transparenz. Der Brockhaus kehrt dagegen zur gedruckten Ausgabe zurück. (2012) 0.00 
    0.0035457634 = product of:
  0.007091527 = sum of:
    0.007091527 = product of:
      0.02127458 = sum of:
        0.02127458 = weight(_text_:22 in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02127458 = score(doc=2171,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Der neue Herausgeber des Brockhaus, ein Tochterverlag von Bertelsmann, hat unterdessen angekündigt, zum gedruckten Lexikon zurückzukehren. Etwa Anfang 2015 soll die 22. Auflage erscheinen. In Zeiten des virtuellen Informationsoverkills gebe es einen Bedarf an Orientierung, an Relevanzvorgaben, sagt Geschäftsführer Christoph Hünermann. Ausgerechnet Bertelsmann druckte 2008 ein knapp 1 000 Seiten langes Wikipedia-Lexikon mit den 50 000 meist gesuchten Begriffen. Eine Experten-Redaktion überprüfte die Einträge sicherheitshalber zuvor - soll allerdings kaum Fehler gefunden haben."
    Source
    Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.76 vom 29.3.2012, S.22-23
  13. Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014) 0.00 
    0.0035101266 = product of:
  0.007020253 = sum of:
    0.007020253 = product of:
      0.02106076 = sum of:
        0.02106076 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02106076 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  14. Shah, T.A.; Gul, S.; Gaur, R.C.: Authors self-citation behaviour in the field of Library and Information Science (2015) 0.00 
    0.0035101266 = product of:
  0.007020253 = sum of:
    0.007020253 = product of:
      0.02106076 = sum of:
        0.02106076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02106076 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  15. Walther, R.: Abschied von einem Relikt der Print-Ära : MEDIENgedanken: Ende des gedruckten Brockhaus-Lexikons (2013) 0.00 
    0.0030359905 = product of:
  0.006071981 = sum of:
    0.006071981 = product of:
      0.018215943 = sum of:
        0.018215943 = weight(_text_:29 in 1030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018215943 = score(doc=1030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1030)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Ökonomisch gesehen sind die Konversationslexika des 19.Jahrhunderts die Erben der Enzyklopädien des 18. Jahrhunderts. Diese großen Universallexika waren allein von ihrem Umfang, intellektuellen Anspruch und Preis her nicht für ein breites Publikum bestimmt. Genau darauf schielte jedoch der Geschäftsmann Brockhaus mit seiner schlichten Rechnung: von den 100 Millionen deutschsprachigen Europäern entfielen ihm zufolge 75 Millionen auf Frauen, Kinder, Arme und Al- te. Diese schieden als Käufer aus. Vom Rest sollte ein Viertel also rund sechs Millionen Bildungs- und Besitzbürger - ein Lexikon kaufen, um »eine Art von Schlüssel« zu erwerben, mit dem sie sich »den Eingang in gebildete Zirkel« verschaffen konnten. Daher der Name »Konversationslexikon«. Neben diesem prosaischen ökonomischen Kalkül gab es ein konzeptionelles Dilemma für die in dem Jahrhundert der Aufklärung entstandenen großen Enzyklopädien oder Universallexika. Sie beanspruchten, das gesamte verfügbare Wissen zu sammeln. Aus diesem enzyklopädischen Geist - das griechische Wort bedeutet wörtlich »Kreis der Wissenschaften« - entstand Johann Heinrich Zedlers 68 Bände starkes »Großes vollständiges Universallexikon aller Wissenschaften und Künste« (1732-1754), wobei das Wort »vollständig« im Titel wörtlich verstanden wurde. Denis Diderot und Jean Le Rond d'Alembert publizierten die 35 Bände der »Encyclopédie ou dictionnaire raisonnée des sciences, des arts et des metiers« innerhalb von 29 Jahren - zwischen 1751 und 1780. Das konzeptionelle Dilemma für diese Enzyklopädien entstand, weil sich das Wissen viel schneller vermehrte und veränderte, als es gedruckt werden konnte. Die »Allgemeine Enzyklopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste« von Johann Samuel Ersch und Johann Gottfried Gruber wurde deshalb mit dem 167. Band beim Buchstaben P 1889 abgebrochen.
  16. Waschatz, B.: Schmökern ist schwierig : Viele Uni-Bibliotheken ordnen ihre Bücher nicht - Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Suche (2010) 0.00 
    0.00300868 = product of:
  0.00601736 = sum of:
    0.00601736 = product of:
      0.018052079 = sum of:
        0.018052079 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018052079 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  17. Averesch, D.: Googeln ohne Google : Mit alternativen Suchmaschinen gelingt ein neutraler Überblick (2010) 0.00 
    0.00300868 = product of:
  0.00601736 = sum of:
    0.00601736 = product of:
      0.018052079 = sum of:
        0.018052079 = weight(_text_:22 in 3374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018052079 = score(doc=3374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3374)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  18. Jötten, F.: Auf der Suche nach der göttlichen Zahl : Wie ein Spielzeug einen Darmstädter Mathematiker ein Erwachsenenleben lang nicht mehr losließ (2010) 0.00 
    0.00300868 = product of:
  0.00601736 = sum of:
    0.00601736 = product of:
      0.018052079 = sum of:
        0.018052079 = weight(_text_:22 in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018052079 = score(doc=3920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  19. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschliessung (2012) 0.00 
    0.00300868 = product of:
  0.00601736 = sum of:
    0.00601736 = product of:
      0.018052079 = sum of:
        0.018052079 = weight(_text_:22 in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018052079 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 1.2013 14:53:22
  20. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00 
    0.00300868 = product of:
  0.00601736 = sum of:
    0.00601736 = product of:
      0.018052079 = sum of:
        0.018052079 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018052079 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.

Authors

Languages

  • e 854
  • d 235
  • a 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 72
  • b 4
  • More… Less…

Themes