Search (1303 results, page 65 of 66)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Averesch, D.: Googeln ohne Google : Mit alternativen Suchmaschinen gelingt ein neutraler Überblick (2010) 0.00 
    0.004637117 = product of:
  0.009274234 = sum of:
    0.009274234 = product of:
      0.018548468 = sum of:
        0.018548468 = weight(_text_:22 in 3374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018548468 = score(doc=3374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  2. Jötten, F.: Auf der Suche nach der göttlichen Zahl : Wie ein Spielzeug einen Darmstädter Mathematiker ein Erwachsenenleben lang nicht mehr losließ (2010) 0.00 
    0.004637117 = product of:
  0.009274234 = sum of:
    0.009274234 = product of:
      0.018548468 = sum of:
        0.018548468 = weight(_text_:22 in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018548468 = score(doc=3920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  3. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschliessung (2012) 0.00 
    0.004637117 = product of:
  0.009274234 = sum of:
    0.009274234 = product of:
      0.018548468 = sum of:
        0.018548468 = weight(_text_:22 in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018548468 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 1.2013 14:53:22
  4. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00 
    0.004637117 = product of:
  0.009274234 = sum of:
    0.009274234 = product of:
      0.018548468 = sum of:
        0.018548468 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018548468 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
  5. Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015) 0.00 
    0.004637117 = product of:
  0.009274234 = sum of:
    0.009274234 = product of:
      0.018548468 = sum of:
        0.018548468 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018548468 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Tetzchner, J. von: As a monopoly in search and advertising Google is not able to resist the misuse of power : is the Internet turning into a battlefield of propaganda? How Google should be regulated (2017) 0.00 
    0.004454254 = product of:
  0.008908508 = sum of:
    0.008908508 = product of:
      0.017817017 = sum of:
        0.017817017 = weight(_text_:j in 3891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017817017 = score(doc=3891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.12287348 = fieldWeight in 3891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Schreiber, A.: Ars combinatoria (2010) 0.00 
    0.0038642643 = product of:
  0.0077285287 = sum of:
    0.0077285287 = product of:
      0.015457057 = sum of:
        0.015457057 = weight(_text_:22 in 3976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015457057 = score(doc=3976,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 3976, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3976)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Kürzlich bat mich ein Anhänger der Numerologie, ihm mein Geburtsdatum zu nennen. Wiederholte Quersummenbildung ergab 4, meine ,Geburtszahl`. Auf dieselbe Weise addierte er auch die Alphabet-Positionen der Vokale in meinem Namen zu 8, meiner ,Herzzahl`. Das nennt sich Gematrie. Einer Tabelle waren dann Charakter und Schicksal zu entnehmen, soweit sie mir aus kosmischen Einflüssen vorbestimmt sind. Kein Zweifel, Okkultes braucht den großen Rahmen. Der Kosmos darf es da schon sein - oder die Pythagoräer, auf die man sich gerne beruft, weil sie Zahlen und Dinge geradezu identifiziert haben. Ich ließ meinen Gesprächspartner wissen, dass ich diesen Umgang mit Zahlen und Zeichen für spekulatives, ja abergläubisches Wunschdenken halte. "Aber Sie sind doch Mathematiker", gab er triumphierend zurück, "dann beweisen Sie mir erst einmal, dass die Numerologie nicht funktioniert!". Das, natürlich, konnte ich nicht. Als weitere Quelle geheimer Gewissheiten diente ihm die jüdische Kabbalah. Gematrische Verfahren hat sie durch kombinatorische Zeichenmanipulationen erweitert wie Zeruph (Permutation) oder Temurah (zyklisches Vertauschen). Die Welt wird als Buch vorgestellt, vom Schöpfer geschrieben mit den 22 Buchstaben des hebräischen Alphabets und den 10 dekadischen Ziffern (den "Sephiroth" eines urbildlichen Lebensbaums, mit denen Umberto Eco in seinem Roman Das Foucaultsche Pendel noch ein postmodernes Spiel treibt). Einer magischen Richtung zufolge wirken Um- und Zusammenstellungen von Buchstaben und Ziffern auf die Dinge selbst ein. So kann der Bestand verborgener Beziehungen ungehemmt wachsen. Doch "nur solche Beziehungen und Feststellungen haben objektive Bedeutung, die nicht durch irgend einen Wechsel in der Wahl der Etiketten ... beeinflußt werden". Dieses "Relativitätsprinzip" formulierte Hermann Weyl - ohne auf die Kabbalah anzuspielen - in dem Anhang Ars combinatoria zur 3. Auflage seiner Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft. Ihren Operationen verlieh die Kabbalah denn auch keine objektive, vielmehr eine mystische, in reiner Innenschau gewonnene Bedeutung.
  8. Haubner, S.: "Als einfacher Benutzer ist man rechtlos" : Unter den freiwilligen Wikipedia-Mitarbeitern regt sich Unmut über die Administratoren (2011) 0.00 
    0.0038642643 = product of:
  0.0077285287 = sum of:
    0.0077285287 = product of:
      0.015457057 = sum of:
        0.015457057 = weight(_text_:22 in 4567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015457057 = score(doc=4567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4567)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  9. Metoyer, C.A.; Doyle, A.M.: Introduction to a speicial issue on "Indigenous Knowledge Organization" (2015) 0.00 
    0.0038642643 = product of:
  0.0077285287 = sum of:
    0.0077285287 = product of:
      0.015457057 = sum of:
        0.015457057 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015457057 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 8.2015 19:22:31
  10. Borst, T.; Löhden, A.; Neubert, J.; Pohl, A.: "Linked Open Data" im Fokus : Spannende Themen und Diskussionen bei der SWIB12 (2013) 0.00 
    0.0038179322 = product of:
  0.0076358644 = sum of:
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = weight(_text_:j in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015271729 = score(doc=3352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.105320126 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Schmidt, V.: Gut kombiniert, Watson : Was ist so schwer daran, ein Quiz zu gewinnen, wenn man die komplette Wikipedia im Kopf hat? Die FR erklärt den Jeopardy-Sieg (2011) 0.00 
    0.0038179322 = product of:
  0.0076358644 = sum of:
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = weight(_text_:j in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015271729 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.105320126 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    - Was also ist neu an Watson? Im Prinzip nichts. Die verwendeten Techniken zur Sprachanalyse, für Suchmaschinen und Datenbanken gab es für sich genommen schon vorher. Die IBM-Techniker haben die Techniken aber nun clever kombiniert und auf leistungsstarke Rechner gepackt, die viele Operationen parallel und dadurch rasend schnell ausführen können. - Warum tritt Watson nicht gegen andere Rechner an? IBM hat aus früheren Jeopardy-Shows ermittelt, dass das kombinierte Wissen zweier menschlicher Spieler reicht, um rund 85 bis 90 Prozent der Fragen zu beantworten. Selbstbewusst schreiben die Techniker: "IBM hat dieses Leistungsniveau noch bei keinem anderen Computersystem gesehen. Andere Firmen mögen an ähnlichen Techniken arbeiten, aber derzeit sind die besten menschlichen Jeopardy-Spieler die Leute, die man schlagen muss." - Warum heißt Watson Watson? Der Anklang an Doktor Watson, den Assistenten von Sherlock Holmes mag gewollt sein, aber das eigentliche Vorbild trägt keinen Doktortitel. Thomas J. Watson war von 1914 bis 1956 IBM-Präsident."
  12. Borst, T.; Neubert, J.; Seiler, A.: Bibliotheken auf dem Weg in das Semantic Web : Bericht von der SWIB2010 in Köln - unterschiedliche Entwicklungsschwerpunkte (2011) 0.00 
    0.0038179322 = product of:
  0.0076358644 = sum of:
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = weight(_text_:j in 4532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015271729 = score(doc=4532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.105320126 = fieldWeight in 4532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4532)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Hildebrandt, J.; Beuth, P.: Macht Wikipedia schlau oder dumm? : die FR gibt Orientierungshilfen in der grenzenlosen Fundgrube (2010) 0.00 
    0.00318161 = product of:
  0.00636322 = sum of:
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = weight(_text_:j in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01272644 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Hubrich, J.: Concepts in Context - Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization : Internationale Fachtagung und Abschlussworkshop des DFGProjekts CrissCross in Köln (2010) 0.00 
    0.00318161 = product of:
  0.00636322 = sum of:
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = weight(_text_:j in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01272644 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Borst, T.; Fingerle, B.; Neubert, J.; Seiler, A.: Auf dem Weg in das Semantic Web : Anwendungsbeispiele und Lösungsszenarien in Bibliotheken / Eine Veranstaltung von hbz und ZBW (2010) 0.00 
    0.00318161 = product of:
  0.00636322 = sum of:
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = weight(_text_:j in 4398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01272644 = score(doc=4398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 4398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4398)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Berg, L.; Metzner, J.; Thrun, S.: Studieren im Netz - Das Ende der Uni? : Kostenloser Online-Unterricht (2012) 0.00 
    0.00318161 = product of:
  0.00636322 = sum of:
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = weight(_text_:j in 227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01272644 = score(doc=227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=227)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Rest, J.: ¬Die Neuvermessung der Welt : Google maps (2012) 0.00 
    0.00318161 = product of:
  0.00636322 = sum of:
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = weight(_text_:j in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01272644 = score(doc=409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Hartel, J.: ¬The case against Information and the Body in Library and Information Science (2018) 0.00 
    0.00318161 = product of:
  0.00636322 = sum of:
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = weight(_text_:j in 5523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01272644 = score(doc=5523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 5523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! (2010) 0.00 
    0.0030914114 = product of:
  0.006182823 = sum of:
    0.006182823 = product of:
      0.012365646 = sum of:
        0.012365646 = weight(_text_:22 in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012365646 = score(doc=173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. die Erwiderungs- und Fortsetzungsbeiträge: Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4). [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23. Vgl.: http://www.faz.net/s/RubCF3AEB154CE64960822FA5429A182360/Doc~E384DC40FFB99469F8C26751F979BFCBF~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent~Afor~Eprint.html.
  20. Roth, G.; Merkel, G.: Haltet den Richter! : Schuld und Strafe (2010) 0.00 
    0.0030914114 = product of:
  0.006182823 = sum of:
    0.006182823 = product of:
      0.012365646 = sum of:
        0.012365646 = weight(_text_:22 in 3682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012365646 = score(doc=3682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045634337 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3682)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In:FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Vgl. die Erwiderung: Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Vgl. auch: Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4). [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23. Vgl.: http://www.fr-online.de/in_und_ausland/kultur_und_medien/themen/?em_cnt=2788472&em_loc=3643.

Authors

Languages

  • e 986
  • d 313
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 98
  • b 4
  • More… Less…

Themes