Search (194 results, page 2 of 10)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Guerrini, M.: Metadata: the dimension of cataloging in the digital age (2022) 0.03
    0.030423954 = product of:
      0.09127186 = sum of:
        0.09127186 = weight(_text_:resources in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09127186 = score(doc=735,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.48898637 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata creation is the process of recording metadata, that is data essential to the identification and retrieval of any type of resource, including bibliographic resources. Metadata capable of identifying characteristics of an entity have always existed. However, the triggering event that has rewritten and enhanced their value is the digital revolution. Cataloging is configured as an action of creating metadata. While cataloging produces a catalog, that is a list of records relating to various types of resources, ordered and searchable, according to a defined criterion, the metadata process produces the metadata of the resources.
  2. Qin, H.; Wang, H.; Johnson, A.: Understanding the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of new-generation engineering designers for effective knowledge management (2020) 0.03
    0.030199762 = product of:
      0.09059928 = sum of:
        0.09059928 = sum of:
          0.06288765 = weight(_text_:management in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06288765 = score(doc=181,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.3648795 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
          0.027711634 = weight(_text_:22 in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027711634 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper aims to explore the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. A survey study is used to approach what their information needs are, how these needs change during an engineering design project and how their information-seeking behaviours have been influenced by the newly developed information technologies (ITs). Through an in-depth analysis of the survey results, the key functions have been identified for the next-generation management systems. Design/methodology/approach The paper first proposed four hypotheses on the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of young engineers. Then, a survey study was undertaken to understand their information usage in terms of the information needs and information-seeking behaviours during a complete engineering design process. Through analysing the survey results, several findings were obtained and on this basis, further comparisons were made to discuss and evaluate the hypotheses. Findings The paper has revealed that the engineering designers' information needs will evolve throughout the engineering design project; thus, they should be assisted at several different levels. Although they intend to search information and knowledge on know-what and know-how, what they really require is the know-why knowledge in order to help them complete design tasks. Also, the paper has shown how the newly developed ITs and web-based applications have influenced the engineers' information-seeking practices. Research limitations/implications The research subjects chosen in this study are engineering students in universities who, although not as experienced as engineers in companies, do go through a complete design process with the tasks similar to industrial scenarios. In addition, the focus of this study is to understand the information-seeking behaviours of a new generation of design engineers, so that the development of next-generation information and knowledge management systems can be well informed. In this sense, the results obtained do reveal some new knowledge about the information-seeking behaviours during a general design process. Practical implications This paper first identifies the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. On this basis, the varied ways to meet these needs and behaviours are discussed and elaborated. This intends to provide the key characteristics for the development of the next-generation knowledge management system for engineering design projects. Originality/value This paper proposes a novel means of exploring the future engineers' information needs and information-seeking behaviours in a collaborative working environment. It also characterises the key features and functions for the next generation of knowledge management systems for engineering design.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.853-868
  3. Manzoni, L.: Nuovo Soggettario and semantic indexing of cartographic resources in Italy : an exploratory study (2022) 0.03
    0.028389778 = product of:
      0.08516933 = sum of:
        0.08516933 = weight(_text_:resources in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08516933 = score(doc=1138,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper focuses on the potential use of Nuovo soggettario, the semantic indexing tool adopted by the National Central Library of Florence (Biblioteca nazionale centrale di Firenze), for indexing cartographic resources. Particular attention is paid to the treatment of place names, the use of formal subjects, and the different ways of constructing subject strings for general and thematic maps.
  4. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03
    0.027071282 = product of:
      0.08121385 = sum of:
        0.08121385 = product of:
          0.24364153 = sum of:
            0.24364153 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24364153 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43351194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  5. Lorentzen, D.G.: Bridging polarised Twitter discussions : the interactions of the users in the middle (2021) 0.03
    0.026692703 = product of:
      0.08007811 = sum of:
        0.08007811 = sum of:
          0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03851066 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
          0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04156745 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.1, S.129-143
  6. Park, Y.J.: ¬A socio-technological model of search information divide in US cities (2021) 0.03
    0.026692703 = product of:
      0.08007811 = sum of:
        0.08007811 = sum of:
          0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03851066 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
          0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04156745 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2 S.144-159
  7. Bergman, O.; Israeli, T.; Whittaker, S.: Factors hindering shared files retrieval (2020) 0.03
    0.026674932 = product of:
      0.080024794 = sum of:
        0.080024794 = sum of:
          0.045385253 = weight(_text_:management in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045385253 = score(doc=5843,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Personal information management (PIM) is an activity in which people store information items in order to retrieve them later. The purpose of this paper is to test and quantify the effect of factors related to collection size, file properties and workload on file retrieval success and efficiency. Design/methodology/approach In the study, 289 participants retrieved 1,557 of their shared files in a naturalistic setting. The study used specially developed software designed to collect shared files' names and present them as targets for the retrieval task. The dependent variables were retrieval success, retrieval time and misstep/s. Findings Various factors compromise shared files retrieval including: collection size (large number of files), file properties (multiple versions, size of team sharing the file, time since most recent retrieval and folder depth) and workload (daily e-mails sent and received). The authors discuss theoretical reasons for these negative effects and suggest possible ways to overcome them. Originality/value Retrieval is the main reason people manage personal information. It is essential for retrieval to be successful and efficient, as information cannot be used unless it can be re-accessed. Prior PIM research has assumed that factors related to collection size, file properties and workload affect file retrieval. However, this is the first study to systematically quantify the negative effects of these factors. As each of these factors is expected to be exacerbated in the future, this study is a necessary first step toward addressing these problems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.1, S.130-147
  8. Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023) 0.03
    0.026674932 = product of:
      0.080024794 = sum of:
        0.080024794 = sum of:
          0.045385253 = weight(_text_:management in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045385253 = score(doc=884,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:43:02
  9. Rocha Souza, R.; Lemos, D.: a comparative analysis : Knowledge organization systems for the representation of multimedia resources on the Web (2020) 0.03
    0.026077677 = product of:
      0.078233026 = sum of:
        0.078233026 = weight(_text_:resources in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078233026 = score(doc=5993,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.4191312 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The lack of standardization in the production, organization and dissemination of information in documentation centers and institutions alike, as a result from the digitization of collections and their availability on the internet has called for integration efforts. The sheer availability of multimedia content has fostered the development of many distinct and, most of the time, independent metadata standards for its description. This study aims at presenting and comparing the existing standards of metadata, vocabularies and ontologies for multimedia annotation and also tries to offer a synthetic overview of its main strengths and weaknesses, aiding efforts for semantic integration and enhancing the findability of available multimedia resources on the web. We also aim at unveiling the characteristics that could, should and are perhaps not being highlighted in the characterization of multimedia resources.
  10. Schreur, P.E.: ¬The use of Linked Data and artificial intelligence as key elements in the transformation of technical services (2020) 0.02
    0.024841055 = product of:
      0.074523166 = sum of:
        0.074523166 = weight(_text_:resources in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074523166 = score(doc=125,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.39925572 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.
  11. Walker, J.M.: Faceted vocabularies in catalog searches : provenance evidence vocabulary as search terms or limiters for a personal library collection (2023) 0.02
    0.024841055 = product of:
      0.074523166 = sum of:
        0.074523166 = weight(_text_:resources in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074523166 = score(doc=1173,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.39925572 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Genre/Form headings are an important means by which librarians provide users with contextual or descriptive information. To facilitate the discovery of resources with important provenance characteristics, the Marion E. Wade Center added terms from a controlled vocabulary to bibliographic records representing items in the C. S. Lewis personal library collection. The selected terms focus on features that have historically been of interest to visitors. The addition of these headings in the bibliographic records allows users to use these keywords to conduct a search or narrow their results, resulting in more flexibility to locate and select the resources that best meet their needs.
  12. Rha, E.Y.; Belkin, N.: Exploring social aspects of task perception using cognitive sociology : a social cognitive perspective (2020) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.4, S.525-543
  13. Kang, M.: Dual paths to continuous online knowledge sharing : a repetitive behavior perspective (2020) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=5985,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=5985,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.2, S.159-178
  14. Zhou, Q.; Lee, C.S.; Sin, S.-C.J.; Lin, S.; Hu, H.; Ismail, M.F.F. Bin: Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource : a social cognitive perspective (2020) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.3, S.339-359
  15. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.945-962
  16. Ilhan, A.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.: Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA (2021) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2, S.180-200
  17. Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.: Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Compared to previous studies that generally detect scientific breakthroughs based on citation patterns, this article proposes a knowledge entity-based disruption indicator by quantifying the change of knowledge directly created and inspired by scientific breakthroughs to their evolutionary trajectories. Two groups of analytic units, including MeSH terms and their co-occurrences, are employed independently by the indicator to measure the change of knowledge. The effectiveness of the proposed indicators was evaluated against the four datasets of scientific breakthroughs derived from four recognition trials. In terms of identifying scientific breakthroughs, the proposed disruption indicator based on MeSH co-occurrences outperforms that based on MeSH terms and three earlier citation-based disruption indicators. It is also shown that in our indicator, measuring the change of knowledge inspired by the focal paper in its evolutionary trajectory is a larger contributor than measuring the change created by the focal paper. Our study not only offers empirical insights into conceptual understanding of scientific breakthroughs but also provides practical disruption indicator for scientists and science management agencies searching for valuable research.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:37:33
  18. Dobreski, B.: Descriptive cataloging : the history and practice of describing library resources (2021) 0.02
    0.021292333 = product of:
      0.063876994 = sum of:
        0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063876994 = score(doc=706,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 706, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=706)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Descriptive cataloging is the process of representing resources by recording their identifying traits and selecting specific names and titles to serve as access points. It is a key component of the larger cataloging process alongside subject cataloging, authority work, and encoding. Descriptive cataloging practices have existed for centuries and, over time, have become standardized through the use of cataloging codes. These documents guide this process by prescribing a consistent set of elements, providing directions on how to record these elements, and offering instructions on how to select and format access points. The goal of descriptive cataloging is not to create perfect representations but to provide data to serve users. The international cataloging standard Resource Description and Access (RDA) is now bringing more institutions under the same set of descriptive practices than ever before. This, along with recent technological developments, promises increased sharing and reuse of descriptive cataloging data.
  19. Franke, T.; Zoubir, M.: Technology for the people? : humanity as a compass for the digital transformation (2020) 0.02
    0.021292333 = product of:
      0.063876994 = sum of:
        0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063876994 = score(doc=830,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    How do we define what technology is for humans? One perspective suggests that it is a tool enabling the use of valuable resources such as time, food, health and mobility. One could say that in its cultural history, humanity has developed a wide range of artefacts which enable the effective utilisation of these resources for the fulfilment of physiological, but also psychological, needs. This paper explores how this perspective may be used as an orientation for future technological innovation. Hence, the goal is to provide an accessible discussion of such a psychological perspective on technology development that could pave the way towards a truly human-centred digital transformation.
  20. Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020) 0.02
    0.017795136 = product of:
      0.053385407 = sum of:
        0.053385407 = sum of:
          0.025673775 = weight(_text_:management in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025673775 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
          0.027711634 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027711634 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.4, S.671-685

Languages

  • e 167
  • d 26
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 22
  • p 1
  • More… Less…