-
Arndt, O.: Erosion der bürgerlichen Freiheiten (2020)
0.01
0.013681978 = product of:
0.034204945 = sum of:
0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006095233 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
0.02810971 = product of:
0.05621942 = sum of:
0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05621942 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 6.2020 19:16:24
- Type
- a
-
Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021)
0.01
0.013681978 = product of:
0.034204945 = sum of:
0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006095233 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.02810971 = product of:
0.05621942 = sum of:
0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05621942 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 7. 5.2021 22:10:24
- Type
- a
-
Eyert, F.: Mathematische Wissenschaftskommunikation in der digitalen Gesellschaft (2023)
0.01
0.013681978 = product of:
0.034204945 = sum of:
0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006095233 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.02810971 = product of:
0.05621942 = sum of:
0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05621942 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25
- Type
- a
-
Wüllner, J.: Obsidian - das Organisationstalent : Ideen, Notizen, Planungen, Projekte - diese App kann für Schule, Uni und Beruf hilfreich sein (2023)
0.01
0.013681978 = product of:
0.034204945 = sum of:
0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006095233 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.02810971 = product of:
0.05621942 = sum of:
0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05621942 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 27. 1.2023 16:22:55
- Type
- a
-
Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022)
0.01
0.013681978 = product of:
0.034204945 = sum of:
0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006095233 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.02810971 = product of:
0.05621942 = sum of:
0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05621942 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 18. 8.2022 19:22:57
- Type
- a
-
Zilm, G.: "Kl ist ein glorifizierter Taschenrechner" (2023)
0.01
0.013681978 = product of:
0.034204945 = sum of:
0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 1129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006095233 = score(doc=1129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1129)
0.02810971 = product of:
0.05621942 = sum of:
0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 1129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05621942 = score(doc=1129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 27. 1.2023 16:22:55
- Type
- a
-
Oh, D.-G.: Comparative analysis of national classification systems : cases of Korean Decimal Classification (KDC) and Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) (2023)
0.01
0.013623391 = product of:
0.034058478 = sum of:
0.0030476165 = weight(_text_:a in 1121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030476165 = score(doc=1121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1121)
0.031010862 = product of:
0.062021725 = sum of:
0.062021725 = weight(_text_:dewey in 1121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062021725 = score(doc=1121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.2873517 = fieldWeight in 1121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The Korean Decimal Classification (KDC) and Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) are national classification systems of Korea and Japan. They have been used widely in many libraries of each country and maintained successfully by each national library associations of Korean Library Association (KLA) and Japan Library Association (JLA). This study compares the general characteristics of these two national classification systems using their latest editions of KDC 6 and NDC 10. After reviewing the former research, their origins, general history and development, and usages were briefly compared. Various aspects including classification by discipline, not by subjects, decimal expansion of the classes using pure notations of Arabic, hierarchical structure, and mnemonics quality are checked for both systems. Results of the comparative analyses of major auxiliary tables, main classes and 100 divisions of schedules of two systems are suggested one by one with special regards to Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). The analyses focus on the differences between both systems as well as the characteristics which reflect the local situations of both countries. It suggests some ideas for future developments and research based on the results of their strengths and weaknesses.
- Type
- a
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.012386131 = product of:
0.030965328 = sum of:
0.01128853 = weight(_text_:a in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01128853 = score(doc=40,freq=14.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.019676797 = product of:
0.039353594 = sum of:
0.039353594 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039353594 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
- Type
- a
-
Wu, P.F.: Veni, vidi, vici? : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023)
0.01
0.011284049 = product of:
0.028210122 = sum of:
0.008533326 = weight(_text_:a in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008533326 = score(doc=896,freq=8.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
0.019676797 = product of:
0.039353594 = sum of:
0.039353594 = weight(_text_:22 in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039353594 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- JASIST has in recent years received many submissions reporting data analytics based on "Big Data" of online reviews scraped from various platforms. By outlining major issues in this type of scape-and-report scholarship and providing a set of recommendations, this essay encourages online reviews researchers to look at Big Data with a critical eye and treat online reviews as a sociotechnical "thing" produced within the fabric of sociomaterial life.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:33:53
- Type
- a
-
Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020)
0.01
0.010945583 = product of:
0.027363956 = sum of:
0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004876186 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
0.022487769 = product of:
0.044975538 = sum of:
0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044975538 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 2. 3.2020 19:04:22
- Type
- a
-
Heisig, P.: Informationswissenschaft für Wissensmanager : Was Wissensmanager von der informationswissenschaftlichen Forschung lernen können (2021)
0.01
0.010945583 = product of:
0.027363956 = sum of:
0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004876186 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
0.022487769 = product of:
0.044975538 = sum of:
0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044975538 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2021 14:38:21
- Type
- a
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021)
0.01
0.010945583 = product of:
0.027363956 = sum of:
0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004876186 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.022487769 = product of:
0.044975538 = sum of:
0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044975538 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
- Type
- a
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021)
0.01
0.010945583 = product of:
0.027363956 = sum of:
0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004876186 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.022487769 = product of:
0.044975538 = sum of:
0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044975538 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
- Type
- a
-
Bager, J.: ¬Die Text-KI ChatGPT schreibt Fachtexte, Prosa, Gedichte und Programmcode (2023)
0.01
0.010945583 = product of:
0.027363956 = sum of:
0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004876186 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.022487769 = product of:
0.044975538 = sum of:
0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044975538 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 29.12.2022 18:22:55
- Type
- a
-
Rieger, F.: Lügende Computer (2023)
0.01
0.010945583 = product of:
0.027363956 = sum of:
0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004876186 = score(doc=912,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 912, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=912)
0.022487769 = product of:
0.044975538 = sum of:
0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044975538 = score(doc=912,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 912, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=912)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 16. 3.2023 19:22:55
- Type
- a
-
Bargmann, S.; Blumesberger, S.; Gruber, A.; Luef, E.; Steltzer, R.: Sacherschließung geschlechtergerecht?! : Rückblick auf den Online-Workshop am 11. Mai 2022 und Aufruf zu gemeinsamen Aktivitäten (2022)
0.01
0.010826751 = product of:
0.027066875 = sum of:
0.0073900777 = weight(_text_:a in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073900777 = score(doc=172,freq=6.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
0.019676797 = product of:
0.039353594 = sum of:
0.039353594 = weight(_text_:22 in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039353594 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 15. 2.2023 14:30:22
- Location
- A
- Type
- a
-
Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020)
0.01
0.010616684 = product of:
0.02654171 = sum of:
0.009675884 = weight(_text_:a in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009675884 = score(doc=5996,freq=14.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.016865825 = product of:
0.03373165 = sum of:
0.03373165 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03373165 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper contains a report of two interdependent knowledge organization (KO) projects for an LGBT2QIA+ library. The authors, in the context of volunteer library work for an independent library, redesigned the classification system and subject cataloguing guidelines to centre LGBT2QIA+ subjects. We discuss the priorities of creating and maintaining knowledge organization systems for a historically marginalized community and address the challenge that queer subjectivity poses to the goals of KO. The classification system features a focus on identity and physically reorganizes the library space in a way that accounts for the multiple and overlapping labels that constitute the currently articulated boundaries of this community. The subject heading system focuses on making visible topics and elements of identity made invisible by universal systems and by the newly implemented classification system. We discuss how this project may inform KO for other marginalized subjects, particularly through process and documentation that prioritizes transparency and the acceptance of an unfinished endpoint for queer KO.
- Date
- 6.10.2020 21:22:33
- Type
- a
-
Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023)
0.01
0.010329581 = product of:
0.02582395 = sum of:
0.008958126 = weight(_text_:a in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008958126 = score(doc=1181,freq=12.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
0.016865825 = product of:
0.03373165 = sum of:
0.03373165 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03373165 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
- Date
- 26.11.2023 18:59:22
- Type
- a
-
Candela, G.: ¬An automatic data quality approach to assess semantic data from cultural heritage institutions (2023)
0.01
0.010284308 = product of:
0.02571077 = sum of:
0.0060339733 = weight(_text_:a in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060339733 = score(doc=997,freq=4.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.019676797 = product of:
0.039353594 = sum of:
0.039353594 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039353594 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In recent years, cultural heritage institutions have been exploring the benefits of applying Linked Open Data to their catalogs and digital materials. Innovative and creative methods have emerged to publish and reuse digital contents to promote computational access, such as the concepts of Labs and Collections as Data. Data quality has become a requirement for researchers and training methods based on artificial intelligence and machine learning. This article explores how the quality of Linked Open Data made available by cultural heritage institutions can be automatically assessed. The results obtained can be useful for other institutions who wish to publish and assess their collections.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:23:31
- Type
- a
-
Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020)
0.01
0.010017375 = product of:
0.02504344 = sum of:
0.008177614 = weight(_text_:a in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008177614 = score(doc=5620,freq=10.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.016865825 = product of:
0.03373165 = sum of:
0.03373165 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03373165 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- There is a mutual resemblance between the behavior of users of the Stack Exchange and the dynamics of the citations accumulation process in the scientific community, which enabled us to tackle the outwardly intractable problem of assessing the impact of introducing "negative" citations. Although the most frequent reason to cite an article is to highlight the connection between the 2 publications, researchers sometimes mention an earlier work to cast a negative light. While computing citation-based scores, for instance, the h-index, information about the reason why an article was mentioned is neglected. Therefore, it can be questioned whether these indices describe scientific achievements accurately. In this article we shed insight into the problem of "negative" citations, analyzing data from Stack Exchange and, to draw more universal conclusions, we derive an approximation of citations scores. Here we show that the quantified influence of introducing negative citations is of lesser importance and that they could be used as an indicator of where the attention of the scientific community is allocated.
- Date
- 6. 1.2020 18:10:22
- Type
- a
