-
Malak, P.: Is the Artificial Intelligence applicable for the libraries purposes? (2005)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 3006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=3006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 3006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3006)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Lee, Y.-H.; Wei, C.-P.; Hu, P.J.-H.: ¬An ontology-based technique for preserving user preferences in document-category evolutions (2011)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 4353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=4353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 4353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4353)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Reimer, U.; Brockhausen, P.; Lau, T.; Reich, J.R.: Ontology-based knowledge management at work : the Swiss life case studies (2004)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Clough, P.; Tang, J.; Hall, M.H.; Warner, A.: Linking archival data to location : a case study at the UK National Archives (2011)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 4534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=4534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 4534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4534)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Doerr, M.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR entities : identity and identification (2012)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 1917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=1917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 1917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1917)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Riva, P.; Oliver, C.: Evaluation of RDA as an implementation of FRBR and FRAD (2012)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 1918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=1918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 1918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Lin, Y,-l.; Trattner, C.; Brusilovsky, P.; He, D.: ¬The impact of image descriptions on user tagging behavior : a study of the nature and functionality of crowdsourced tags (2015)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 2159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=2159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 2159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2159)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Borlund, P.: ¬A study of the use of simulated work task situations in interactive information retrieval evaluations : a meta-evaluation (2016)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 2880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=2880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 2880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2880)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Sud, P.; Thelwall, M.: Not all international collaboration is beneficial : the Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration (2016)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 3048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=3048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 3048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3048)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Koopman, B.; Zuccon, G.; Bruza, P.; Sitbon, L.; Lawley, M.: Information retrieval as semantic inference : a graph Inference model applied to medical search (2016)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 3260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=3260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 3260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3260)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Barrio, P.; Gravano, L.: Sampling strategies for information extraction over the deep web (2017)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 3412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=3412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 3412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3412)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Leiva-Mederos, A.; Senso, J.A.; Hidalgo-Delgado, Y.; Hipola, P.: Working framework of semantic interoperability for CRIS with heterogeneous data sources (2017)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Edmunds, J.: Zombrary apocalypse!? : RDA, LRM, and the death of cataloging (2017)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=3818,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Abstract
- Equally fallacious is the statement that support for the "clustering bibliographic records to show relationships between works and their creators" is an "important new feature" of RDA. AACR2 bibliographic records and the systems housing them can, did, and do show such relationships. Finally, whether users want or care to be made "more aware of a work's different editions, translations, or physical formats" is debatable. As an aim, it sounds less like what a user wants and more like what a cataloging librarian thinks a user should want. As Amanda Cossham writes in her recently issued doctoral thesis: "The explicit focus on user needs in the FRBR model, the International Cataloguing Principles, and RDA: Resource Description and Access does not align well with the ways that users use, understand, and experience library catalogues nor with the ways that they understand and experience the wider information environment. User tasks, as constituted in the FRBR model and RDA, are insufficient to meet users' needs." (p. 11, emphasis in the original)
-
Tononi, G.: Integrated information theory of consciousness : an updated account (2012)
0.00
1.7430348E-4 = product of:
0.0041832835 = sum of:
0.0041832835 = product of:
0.01254985 = sum of:
0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01254985 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Source
- Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 150(2012), p.290-326
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: On sameness and difference : an editorial (2008)
0.00
1.5500501E-4 = product of:
0.00372012 = sum of:
0.00372012 = product of:
0.00744024 = sum of:
0.00744024 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00744024 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 12. 6.2008 20:18:22
-
Metoyer, C.A.; Doyle, A.M.: Introduction to a speicial issue on "Indigenous Knowledge Organization" (2015)
0.00
1.5500501E-4 = product of:
0.00372012 = sum of:
0.00372012 = product of:
0.00744024 = sum of:
0.00744024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00744024 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 26. 8.2015 19:22:31
-
Dron, J.; Boyne, C.; Mitchell, R.; Siviter, P.: Darwin among the indices : a report on COFIND, a self-organising resource base (2000)
0.00
1.5251554E-4 = product of:
0.003660373 = sum of:
0.003660373 = product of:
0.010981118 = sum of:
0.010981118 = weight(_text_:p in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010981118 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.13903812 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Chen, H.: Intelligence and security informatics : Introduction to the special topic issue (2005)
0.00
1.5251554E-4 = product of:
0.003660373 = sum of:
0.003660373 = product of:
0.010981118 = sum of:
0.010981118 = weight(_text_:p in 3232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010981118 = score(doc=3232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.13903812 = fieldWeight in 3232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3232)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Abstract
- Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism The commitment of the scientific, engineering, and health communities to helping the United States and the world respond to security challenges became evident after September 11, 2001. The U.S. National Research Council's report an "Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism," (National Research Council, 2002, p. 1) explains the context of such a new commitment: Terrorism is a serious threat to the Security of the United States and indeed the world. The vulnerability of societies to terrorist attacks results in part from the proliferation of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons of mass destruction, but it also is a consequence of the highly efficient and interconnected systems that we rely an for key services such as transportation, information, energy, and health care. The efficient functioning of these systems reflects great technological achievements of the past century, but interconnectedness within and across systems also means that infrastructures are vulnerable to local disruptions, which could lead to widespread or catastrophic failures. As terrorists seek to exploit these vulnerabilities, it is fitting that we harness the nation's exceptional scientific and technological capabilities to Counter terrorist threats. A committee of 24 of the leading scientific, engineering, medical, and policy experts in the United States conducted the study described in the report. Eight panels were separately appointed and asked to provide input to the committee. The panels included: (a) biological sciences, (b) chemical issues, (c) nuclear and radiological issues, (d) information technology, (e) transportation, (f) energy facilities, Cities, and fixed infrastructure, (g) behavioral, social, and institutional issues, and (h) systems analysis and systems engineering. The focus of the committee's work was to make the nation safer from emerging terrorist threats that sought to inflict catastrophic damage an the nation's people, its infrastructure, or its economy. The committee considered nine areas, each of which is discussed in a separate chapter in the report: nuclear and radiological materials, human and agricultural health systems, toxic chemicals and explosive materials, information technology, energy systems, transportation systems, Cities and fixed infrastructure, the response of people to terrorism, and complex and interdependent systems. The chapter an information technology (IT) is particularly relevant to this special issue. The report recommends that "a strategic long-term research and development agenda should be established to address three primary counterterrorismrelated areas in IT: information and network security, the IT needs of emergency responders, and information fusion and management" (National Research Council, 2002, pp. 11 -12). The MD in information and network security should include approaches and architectures for prevention, identification, and containment of cyber-intrusions and recovery from them. The R&D to address IT needs of emergency responders should include ensuring interoperability, maintaining and expanding communications capability during an emergency, communicating with the public during an emergency, and providing support for decision makers. The R&D in information fusion and management for the intelligence, law enforcement, and emergency response communities should include data mining, data integration, language technologies, and processing of image and audio data. Much of the research reported in this special issue is related to information fusion and management for homeland security.
-
Cornelius, I.: Theorizing information for information science (2002)
0.00
1.5251554E-4 = product of:
0.003660373 = sum of:
0.003660373 = product of:
0.010981118 = sum of:
0.010981118 = weight(_text_:p in 4244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010981118 = score(doc=4244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.13903812 = fieldWeight in 4244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4244)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Abstract
- Shannon provides a model whereby an information source selects a desired message, out of a set of possible messages, that is then formed into a signal. The signal is sent over the communication channel to a receiver, which then transforms the signal back to a message that is relayed to its destination (Shannon & Weaver, 1949/1963, p. 7). Problems connected with this model have remained with us. Some of the concepts are ambiguous; the identification of information with a process has spancelled the debate; the problems of measuring the amount of information, the relation of information to meaning, and questions about the truth value of information have remained. Balancing attention between the process and the act of receiving information, and deterrnining the character of the receiver, has also been the focus of work and debate. Information science has mined work from other disciplines involving information theory and has also produced its own theory. The desire for theory remains (Hjorland, 1998; Saracevic, 1999), but what theory will deliver is unclear. The distinction between data and information, or communication and information, is not of concern here. The convention that data, at some point of use, become information, and that information is transferred in a process of communication suffices for this discussion. Substitution of any of these terms is not a problem. More problematic is the relationship between information and knowledge. It seems accepted that at some point the data by perception, or selection, become information, which feeds and alters knowledge structures in a human recipient. What that process of alteration is, and its implications, remain problematic. This review considers the following questions: 1. What can be gleaned from the history of reviews of information in information science? 2. What current maps, guides, and surveys are available to elaborate our understanding of the issues? 3. Is there a parallel development of work outside information science an information theory of use to us? 4. Is there a dominant view of information within information science? 5. What can we say about issues like measurement, meaning, and misinformation? 6. Is there other current work of relevance that can assist attempts, in information science, to develop a theory of information?
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.00
1.5251554E-4 = product of:
0.003660373 = sum of:
0.003660373 = product of:
0.010981118 = sum of:
0.010981118 = weight(_text_:p in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010981118 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.13903812 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Abstract
- The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
