-
Mehl, S.: Systematic alternatives in lexicalization : the cases of gerund translation (1996)
0.28
0.2836219 = product of:
0.5672438 = sum of:
0.5672438 = sum of:
0.4518693 = weight(_text_:translation in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4518693 = score(doc=532,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
1.4568976 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
0.11537449 = weight(_text_:22 in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11537449 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 11(1996) nos.1-3, S.185-216
-
Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999)
0.25
0.24816915 = product of:
0.4963383 = sum of:
0.4963383 = sum of:
0.39538562 = weight(_text_:translation in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.39538562 = score(doc=6672,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
1.2747854 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
0.10095268 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10095268 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 14(1999) no.2, S.113-157
-
Horacek, H.: On expressing metonymic relations in multiple languages (1996)
0.22
0.21744716 = product of:
0.43489432 = sum of:
0.43489432 = sum of:
0.31951982 = weight(_text_:translation in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31951982 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
1.0301821 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.11537449 = weight(_text_:22 in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11537449 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 11(1996) nos.1-3, S.109-158
-
Elhadad, M.: Lexical choice for complex noun phrases : structure, modifiers, and determiners (1996)
0.22
0.21744716 = product of:
0.43489432 = sum of:
0.43489432 = sum of:
0.31951982 = weight(_text_:translation in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31951982 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
1.0301821 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
0.11537449 = weight(_text_:22 in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11537449 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 11(1996) nos.1-3, S.159-184
-
Stede, M.: Lexical paraphrases in multilingual sentence generation (1996)
0.22
0.21744716 = product of:
0.43489432 = sum of:
0.43489432 = sum of:
0.31951982 = weight(_text_:translation in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31951982 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
1.0301821 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
0.11537449 = weight(_text_:22 in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11537449 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 11(1996) nos.1-3, S.75-107
-
Kay, M.: ¬The proper place of men and machines in language translation (1997)
0.20
0.19644517 = product of:
0.39289033 = sum of:
0.39289033 = sum of:
0.342414 = weight(_text_:translation in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.342414 = score(doc=1178,freq=12.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
1.1039965 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
0.05047634 = weight(_text_:22 in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05047634 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Machine translation stands no chance of filling actual needs for translation because, although there has been progress in relevant areas of computer science, advance in linguistics have not touched the core problems. Cooperative man-machine systems need to be developed, Proposes a translator's amanuensis, incorporating into a word processor some simple facilities peculiar to translation. Gradual enhancements of such a system could lead to the original goal of machine translation
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 12(1997) nos.1/2, S.3-23
-
Melby, A.: Some notes on 'The proper place of men and machines in language translation' (1997)
0.20
0.19644517 = product of:
0.39289033 = sum of:
0.39289033 = sum of:
0.342414 = weight(_text_:translation in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.342414 = score(doc=330,freq=12.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
1.1039965 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.05047634 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05047634 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Responds to Kay, M.: The proper place of men and machines in language translation. Examines the appropriateness of machine translation (MT) under the following special circumstances: controlled domain-specific text and high-quality output; controlled domain-specific text and indicative output; dynamic general text and indicative output and dynamic general text and high-quality output. MT is appropriate in the 1st 3 cases but the 4th case requires human translation. Examines how MT research could be more useful for aiding human translation
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 12(1997) nos.1/2, S.29-34
-
Dorr, B.J.; Olsen, M.B.: Multilingual generation : the role of telicity in lexical choice and syntactic realization (1996)
0.19
0.19026627 = product of:
0.38053253 = sum of:
0.38053253 = sum of:
0.27957985 = weight(_text_:translation in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27957985 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.9014094 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
0.10095268 = weight(_text_:22 in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10095268 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 11(1996) nos.1-3, S.37-74
-
Hutchins, J.: From first conception to first demonstration : the nascent years of machine translation, 1947-1954. A chronology (1997)
0.18
0.17726368 = product of:
0.35452735 = sum of:
0.35452735 = sum of:
0.2824183 = weight(_text_:translation in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2824183 = score(doc=1463,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.910561 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
0.07210906 = weight(_text_:22 in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07210906 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 12(1997) no.3, S.195-252
-
Bian, G.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Cross-language information access to multilingual collections on the Internet (2000)
0.17
0.16838157 = product of:
0.33676314 = sum of:
0.33676314 = sum of:
0.2934977 = weight(_text_:translation in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2934977 = score(doc=4436,freq=12.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.94628274 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
0.043265432 = weight(_text_:22 in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043265432 = score(doc=4436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Language barrier is the major problem that people face in searching for, retrieving, and understanding multilingual collections on the Internet. This paper deals with query translation and document translation in a Chinese-English information retrieval system called MTIR. Bilingual dictionary and monolingual corpus-based approaches are adopted to select suitable tranlated query terms. A machine transliteration algorithm is introduced to resolve proper name searching. We consider several design issues for document translation, including which material is translated, what roles the HTML tags play in translation, what the tradeoff is between the speed performance and the translation performance, and what from the translated result is presented in. About 100.000 Web pages translated in the last 4 months of 1997 are used for quantitative study of online and real-time Web page translation
- Date
- 16. 2.2000 14:22:39
-
Wanner, L.: Lexical choice in text generation and machine translation (1996)
0.17
0.16719979 = product of:
0.33439958 = sum of:
0.33439958 = sum of:
0.27671233 = weight(_text_:translation in 8521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27671233 = score(doc=8521,freq=6.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.892164 = fieldWeight in 8521, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8521)
0.057687245 = weight(_text_:22 in 8521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057687245 = score(doc=8521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents the state of the art in lexical choice research in text generation and machine translation. Discusses the existing implementations with respect to: the place of lexical choice in the overall generation rates; the information flow within the generation process and the consequences thereof for lexical choice; the internal organization of the lexical choice process; and the phenomena covered by lexical choice. Identifies possible future directions in lexical choice research
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 11(1996) nos.1-3, S.3-35
-
Hammwöhner, R.: TransRouter revisited : Decision support in the routing of translation projects (2000)
0.17
0.1650281 = product of:
0.3300562 = sum of:
0.3300562 = sum of:
0.27957985 = weight(_text_:translation in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27957985 = score(doc=5483,freq=8.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.9014094 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
0.05047634 = weight(_text_:22 in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05047634 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper gives an outline of the final results of the TransRouter project. In the scope of this project a decision support system for translation managers has been developed, which will support the selection of appropriate routes for translation projects. In this paper emphasis is put on the decision model, which is based on a stepwise refined assessment of translation routes. The workflow of using this system is considered as well
- Date
- 10.12.2000 18:22:35
-
Dorr, B.J.: Large-scale dictionary construction for foreign language tutoring and interlingual machine translation (1997)
0.13
0.12539983 = product of:
0.25079966 = sum of:
0.25079966 = sum of:
0.20753424 = weight(_text_:translation in 3244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20753424 = score(doc=3244,freq=6.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.669123 = fieldWeight in 3244, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3244)
0.043265432 = weight(_text_:22 in 3244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043265432 = score(doc=3244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes techniques for automatic construction of dictionaries for use in large-scale foreign language tutoring (FLT) and interlingual machine translation (MT) systems. The dictionaries are based on a language independent representation called lexical conceptual structure (LCS). Demonstrates that synonymous verb senses share distribution patterns. Shows how the syntax-semantics relation can be used to develop a lexical acquisition approach that contributes both toward the enrichment of existing online resources and toward the development of lexicons containing more complete information than is provided in any of these resources alone. Describes the structure of the LCS and shows how this representation is used in FLT and MT. Focuses on the problem of building LCS dictionaries for large-scale FLT and MT. Describes authoring tools for manual and semi-automatic construction of LCS dictionaries. Presents an approach that uses linguistic techniques for building word definitions automatically. The techniques have been implemented as part of a set of lixicon-development tools used in the MILT FLT project
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 12(1997) no.4, S.271-322
-
Gazan, R.: Metadata as a realm of translation : merging knowledge domains in the design of an environmental information system (2003)
0.13
0.12539983 = product of:
0.25079966 = sum of:
0.25079966 = sum of:
0.20753424 = weight(_text_:translation in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20753424 = score(doc=3012,freq=6.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.669123 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
0.043265432 = weight(_text_:22 in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043265432 = score(doc=3012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Bringing together document collections in merged information resources is becoming more common, but presents the problem of integratiog content and metadata that have been created in different knowledge domains, using different classification schemes. This paper describes how a multidisciplinary team attempted to integrate metadata structures from several different collections in the development of an environmental information system. The results of this qualitative study suggest that though designers and users from diverse backgrounds Gould conceptualize and articulate the potential new knowledge the merged system might reveal, the perceived informational value of different access points varied with disciplinary membership, and the compromises forced by this merged collection created barriers and missed opportunities for the creation of new knowledge. However, people with a variety of backgrounds were able to contribute to negotiations about metadata decisions, suggesting that this may be a key realm of translation between diverse individuals in future collaborative environments. Consequences for domain-specific knowledge organization, and for a translation and integration role for those in the field of information science, are discussed.
- Date
- 5.12.2004 18:22:26
-
Seo, H.-C.; Kim, S.-B.; Rim, H.-C.; Myaeng, S.-H.: lmproving query translation in English-Korean Cross-language information retrieval (2005)
0.13
0.12539983 = product of:
0.25079966 = sum of:
0.25079966 = sum of:
0.20753424 = weight(_text_:translation in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20753424 = score(doc=1023,freq=6.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.669123 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.043265432 = weight(_text_:22 in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043265432 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Query translation is a viable method for cross-language information retrieval (CLIR), but it suffers from translation ambiguities caused by multiple translations of individual query terms. Previous research has employed various methods for disambiguation, including the method of selecting an individual target query term from multiple candidates by comparing their statistical associations with the candidate translations of other query terms. This paper proposes a new method where we examine all combinations of target query term translations corresponding to the source query terms, instead of looking at the candidates for each query term and selecting the best one at a time. The goodness value for a combination of target query terms is computed based on the association value between each pair of the terms in the combination. We tested our method using the NTCIR-3 English-Korean CLIR test collection. The results show some improvements regardless of the association measures we used.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 20:22:38
-
Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997)
0.12
0.12408458 = product of:
0.24816915 = sum of:
0.24816915 = sum of:
0.19769281 = weight(_text_:translation in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19769281 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.6373927 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
0.05047634 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05047634 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Chen, H.-H.; Lin, W.-C.; Yang, C.; Lin, W.-H.: Translating-transliterating named entities for multilingual information access (2006)
0.12
0.12408458 = product of:
0.24816915 = sum of:
0.24816915 = sum of:
0.19769281 = weight(_text_:translation in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19769281 = score(doc=1080,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.6373927 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.05047634 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05047634 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Named entities are major constituents of a document but are usually unknown words. This work proposes a systematic way of dealing with formulation, transformation, translation, and transliteration of multilingual-named entities. The rules and similarity matrices for translation and transliteration are learned automatically from parallel-named-entity corpora. The results are applied in cross-language access to collections of images with captions. Experimental results demonstrate that the similarity-based transliteration of named entities is effective, and runs in which transliteration is considered outperform the runs in which it is neglected.
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 19:52:22
-
Larkey, L.S.; Connell, M.E.: Structured queries, language modelling, and relevance modelling in cross-language information retrieval (2005)
0.12
0.1178772 = product of:
0.2357544 = sum of:
0.2357544 = sum of:
0.19969988 = weight(_text_:translation in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19969988 = score(doc=1022,freq=8.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.6438638 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
0.03605453 = weight(_text_:22 in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03605453 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Two probabilistic approaches to cross-lingual retrieval are in wide use today, those based on probabilistic models of relevance, as exemplified by INQUERY, and those based on language modeling. INQUERY, as a query net model, allows the easy incorporation of query operators, including a synonym operator, which has proven to be extremely useful in cross-language information retrieval (CLIR), in an approach often called structured query translation. In contrast, language models incorporate translation probabilities into a unified framework. We compare the two approaches on Arabic and Spanish data sets, using two kinds of bilingual dictionaries--one derived from a conventional dictionary, and one derived from a parallel corpus. We find that structured query processing gives slightly better results when queries are not expanded. On the other hand, when queries are expanded, language modeling gives better results, but only when using a probabilistic dictionary derived from a parallel corpus. We pursue two additional issues inherent in the comparison of structured query processing with language modeling. The first concerns query expansion, and the second is the role of translation probabilities. We compare conventional expansion techniques (pseudo-relevance feedback) with relevance modeling, a new IR approach which fits into the formal framework of language modeling. We find that relevance modeling and pseudo-relevance feedback achieve comparable levels of retrieval and that good translation probabilities confer a small but significant advantage.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 20:22:11
-
Tsujii, J.-I.: Automatic acquisition of semantic collocation from corpora (1995)
0.11
0.10872358 = product of:
0.21744716 = sum of:
0.21744716 = sum of:
0.15975991 = weight(_text_:translation in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15975991 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.51509106 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
0.057687245 = weight(_text_:22 in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057687245 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
- Source
- Machine translation. 10(1995) no.3, S.219-258
-
Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996)
0.11
0.10872358 = product of:
0.21744716 = sum of:
0.21744716 = sum of:
0.15975991 = weight(_text_:translation in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15975991 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31015858 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.51509106 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8275905 = idf(docFreq=353, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
0.057687245 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057687245 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18637592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05322244 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly
