Search (58 results, page 2 of 3)

0.012041737 = product of:
  0.04816695 = sum of:
    0.04816695 = weight(_text_:digital in 5908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04816695 = score(doc=5908,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.2436283 = fieldWeight in 5908, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5908)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Das Nutzererlebnis im Flughafen hat sich in den vergangenen zehn Jahren mit der Einführung biometrischer Sicherheitstechnik, mobilen Check-ins und der Gepäckverfolgung drastisch gewandelt. Im nächsten Jahrzehnt erleben wir ein exponentiell beschleunigtes Tempo des Wandels, da wir für "Digital Native Passagiere und Mitarbeiter" transformative Technologien einführen - von fliegenden Taxis bis zu eigenständig denkenden Flughäfen. Laut der International Air Transport Association (IATA) verdoppeln sich die Passagierzahlen in nächsten zwanzig Jahren, doch die Flughäfen wachsen nicht mit. Fluggäste erwarten jedoch zu Recht eine reibungslose und angenehme Abfertigung am Flughafen. Diesen geschmeidigen Ablauf können wir nur sicherstellen, indem wir neue Technologien entwickeln und einführen, die nicht nur die Effizienz, sondern auch den Komfort für die Passagiere steigern. Im Folgenden zehn Vorhersagen, wie die Zukunft in zehn Jahren aussehen wird.

Content

5. Flughäfen denken eigenständig. Der Schlüssel zur Effizienz sind Algorithmen der künstlichen Intelligenz (KI), wobei eine ausgeklügelte KI zum Erfolgsrezept für Flughäfen wird. Flughäfen nutzen die Digital-Twin-Technologie, um den Echtzeitbetrieb für alle Interessenvertreter zu realisieren und die operative Effizienz sowie das Fluggasterlebnis zu verbessern. Ein Digital Twin ist eine fortgeschrittene Computersimulation, die Daten aus dem gesamten Flughafen- und Fluglinienbetrieb extrahiert, um mit ihrer Hilfe zu veranschaulichen, zu simulieren und vorherzusagen, was als Nächstes geschieht. Diese Prognosedaten werden anschließend dazu verwendet, betriebliche Aktivitäten zu bündeln und nach Möglichkeit zu automatisieren. Automatisierte Meldungen können beispielsweise so aussehen: "Aufgrund von Verspätung landen zwei A380 gleichzeitig: Dafür sorgen, dass genügend Personal an den Einreiseschaltern bereitsteht." Oder: "Negatives Feedback zu den Toiletten im zweiten Stock: Reinigungspersonal senden." Ein schneller Datenaustausch ermöglicht, dass man sich proaktiv auf jede Sachlage einstellen kann und Flughäfen und Fluggesellschaften besser, schneller und genauer planen. 6. Zusammenarbeit wird der Schlüssel zum Erfolg. Für jede einzelne Reise gibt es mindestens zehn unterschiedliche Einheiten, die an der erfolgreichen praktischen Umsetzung beteiligt sind. Die einzige Möglichkeit, alle erforderlichen Daten zu sammeln, um die Transportwege reibungslos zu gestalten, ist eine enge Zusammenarbeit aller auf dem Flughafen tätigen Mitarbeiter - des Flughafenpersonals, des Fluglinienpersonals, derBehördenmitarbeiter, des Bodenpersonals sowie der Einzelhandels- und Restaurantmitarbeiter. Darüber hinaus ist die Zusammenarbeit aller Beteiligten im gesamten Ökosystem der miteinander vernetzten Flughäfen gefragt. Überall in diesem riesigen Netzwerk werden betriebliche Daten unter Berücksichtigung von Datenschutzvorschriften ausgetauscht, wobei Interessenvertreter lediglich einzelne für sie relevante Datenquellen austauschen dürfen. Auf diese Weise werden Flughäfen viel effizienter, indem beispielsweise Passagierströme digital gesteuert werden und dafür gesorgt wird, dass die Flugzeuge möglichst bald wieder abheben. Neueste Technologien wie Blockchain erleichtern den abgesicherten Datenaustausch ungemein.
9. Mobilität wird zur Dienstleistung auf Anfrage. Flughäfen werden zu riesigen Park-und-Ride-Zentren, die Zugang zu einer breiten Palette von Transportmöglichkeiten bieten. Bis 2030 wird es Innovationen wie Flugtaxis geben, die Passagiere viel wirtschaftlicher vom und zum Flughafen bringen. Sie können sogar am Wettbewerb auf Kurzstrecken teilnehmen. Damit machen wir das Fliegen wirklich für jeden interessant. 10.Für alles, was im Flughafen geschieht, gibt es eine Schnittstelle. Da die Reisenden von morgen Digital Natives sind, müssen auch die Flughafenbetreiber mit der digitalen Technik vertraut sein. Eine komplexe Institution wie ein Flughafen wird in digitale Dienstleistungen aufgeteilt, die als Anwendungsprogrammierschnittstellen (APIs) miteinander geteilt werden. So entsteht ein Ökosystem, das Zusammenarbeit und Neuerungen hervorbringt und für alle leicht nutzbar ist. Beispielsweise ermöglichen KI und neue Syntaxen die Anfragen nach branchenspezifischen Erkenntnissen in menschlicher Sprache, etwa so: "Steht eine rosa Reisetasche an Gate B34?" Oder: "Die Schlange an Eingang A wird zu lang, schickt mehr Taxis."

0.012041737 = product of:
  0.04816695 = sum of:
    0.04816695 = weight(_text_:digital in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04816695 = score(doc=423,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.2436283 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In 2021, sharing content is easier than ever. Our lingua franca is visual: memes, infographics, TikToks. Our references cross borders and platforms, shared and remixed a hundred different ways in minutes. Digital culture is collective by default and has us together all around the world. But as the internet reaches its "dirty 30s," what happens when pieces of digital culture that have been saved, screenshotted, and reposted for years need to retire? Let's dig into the story of one of these artifacts: The Lenna image. The Lenna image may be relatively unknown in pop culture today, but in the engineering world, it remains an icon. I first encountered the image in an undergrad class, then grad school, and then all over the sites and software I use every day as a tech worker like Github, OpenCV, Stack Overflow, and Quora. To understand where the image is today, you have to understand how it got here. So, I decided to scrape Google scholar, search, and reverse image search results to track down thousands of instances of the image across the internet (see more in the methods section).
Lena Forsén, the real human behind the Lenna image, was first published in Playboy in 1972. Soon after, USC engineers searching for a suitable test image for their image processing research sought inspiration from the magazine. They deemed Lenna the right fit and scanned the image into digital, RGB existence. From here, the story of the image follows the story of the internet. Lenna was one of the first inhabitants of ARPANet, the internet's predecessor, and then the world wide web. While the image's reach was limited to a few research papers in the '70s and '80s, in 1991, Lenna was featured on the cover of an engineering journal alongside another popular test image, Peppers. This caught the attention of Playboy, which threatened a copyright infringement lawsuit. Engineers who had grown attached to Lenna fought back. Ultimately, they prevailed, and as a Playboy VP reflected on the drama: "We decided we should exploit this because it is a phenomenon." The Playboy controversy canonized Lenna in engineering folklore and prompted an explosion of conversation about the image. Image hits on the internet rose to a peak number in 1995.
But despite this progress, almost 2 years later, the use of Lenna continues. The image appears on the internet in 30+ different languages in the last decade, including 10+ languages in 2021. The image's spread across digital geographies has mirrored this geographical growth, moving from mostly .org domains before 1990 to over 100 different domains today, notably .com and .edu, along with others. Within the .edu world, the Lenna image continues to appear in homework questions, class slides and to be hosted on educational and research sites, ensuring that it is passed down to new generations of engineers. Whether it's due to institutional negligence or defiance, it seems that for now, the image is here to stay.

Content

"Having known Lenna for almost a decade, I have struggled to understand what the story of the image means for what tech culture is and what it is becoming. To me, the crux of the Lenna story is how little power we have over our data and how it is used and abused. This threat seems disproportionately higher for women who are often overrepresented in internet content, but underrepresented in internet company leadership and decision making. Given this reality, engineering and product decisions will continue to consciously (and unconsciously) exclude our needs and concerns. While social norms are changing towards non-consensual data collection and data exploitation, digital norms seem to be moving in the opposite direction. Advancements in machine learning algorithms and data storage capabilities are only making data misuse easier. Whether the outcome is revenge porn or targeted ads, surveillance or discriminatory AI, if we want a world where our data can retire when it's outlived its time, or when it's directly harming our lives, we must create the tools and policies that empower data subjects to have a say in what happens to their data. including allowing their data to die."

0.010770457 = product of:
  0.043081827 = sum of:
    0.043081827 = weight(_text_:digital in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043081827 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Wenn ein Programmkomitee für ein wissenschaftliches Symposium mit 65 Personen besetzt wird, dann darf man sich auf ein breites und qualitativ fundiertes Programm und Symposium freuen, auch wenn der Abstimmungsbedarf zwischen den 65 Komiteemitgliedern extrem aufwendig gewesen sein muss. Coronabedingt musste das dreitätige Symposium virtuell stattfinden und organisiert werden. Dennoch wurde als offizieller Tagungsort Regensburg gewählt und wohl auch in Erinnerung an den leider viel zu früh verstorbenen Rainer Hammwöhner das Thema "Information Science and its Neighbours from Data Science to Digital Humanities" im Subtitel des Tagungsthemas "Information between Data and Knowledge" gewählt. Schließlich war es Rainer Hammwöhner (in Zusammenarbeit mit David Elsweiler und Christian Wolff), der schon 2015 auf den für die deutschsprachige Informationswissenschaft erschreckenden Tatbestand einer langjährig naiv anmutenden Ignoranz des internationalen "Information Behavior"-Forschungsfeldes hinwies: "Man wird der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft nicht wirklich unrecht tun, wenn man sie in Sachen Informationsverhalten als Spätentwickler charakterisiert. Einem der Herausgeber dieses Themenheftes ist diesbezüglich noch gut in Erinnerung, wie er 2007 im Rahmen des informationswissenschaftlichen Symposiums in Köln von einem Kollegen aus Down Under gefragt wurde, warum es denn in Deutschland keine Forschung zu diesem Thema gebe, wo dies doch in der englischsprachigen Community seit Jahren ein heißes Thema sei" (David Elsweiler, Rainer Hammwöhner und Christian Wolff, Regensburg: Informationsverhalten als Forschungsgegenstand, in: Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis 2015; 66(1): 1-2).

0.010464822 = product of:
  0.041859288 = sum of:
    0.041859288 = product of:
      0.083718576 = sum of:
        0.083718576 = weight(_text_:project in 5959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083718576 = score(doc=5959,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.39571697 = fieldWeight in 5959, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The labor market is a system that is complex and difficult to manage. To overcome this challenge, the European Union has launched the ESCO project which is a language that aims to describe this labor market. In order to support the spread of this project, its dataset was presented as linked open data (LOD). Since LOD is usable and reusable, a set of conditions have to be met. First, LOD must be feasible and high quality. In addition, it must provide the user with the right answers, and it has to be built according to a clear and correct structure. This study investigates the LOD of ESCO, focusing on data quality and data structure. The former is evaluated through applying a set of SPARQL queries. This provides solutions to improve its quality via a set of rules built in first order logic. This process was conducted based on a new proposed ESCO ontology.

0.01018615 = product of:
  0.0407446 = sum of:
    0.0407446 = product of:
      0.0814892 = sum of:
        0.0814892 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0814892 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

2. 3.2020 14:08:22

0.009866329 = product of:
  0.039465316 = sum of:
    0.039465316 = product of:
      0.07893063 = sum of:
        0.07893063 = weight(_text_:project in 850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07893063 = score(doc=850,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 850, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=850)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This is a short project that serves as an inspiration for a forthcoming paper, which will explore the technical side of ChatGPT and the ethical issues it presents for academic researchers, which will result in a peer-reviewed publication. This demonstrates that capacities of ChatGPT as a "chatbot" that is far more advanced than many alternatives available today and may even be able to be used to draft entire academic manuscripts for researchers. ChatGPT is available via https://chat.openai.com/chat.

0.009475192 = product of:
  0.03790077 = sum of:
    0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03790077 = score(doc=697,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The content of master's programs accredited by the American Library Association was examined to assess the status of knowledge organization (KO) as a subject in current training. Data collected show that KO remains very visible in a majority of programs, mainly in the form of required and electives courses focusing on descriptive cataloging, classification, and metadata. Observed tendencies include, however, the recent elimination of the required KO course in several programs, the reality that one third of KO electives listed in course catalogs have not been scheduled in the past three years, and the fact that two-thirds of those teaching KO specialize in other areas of information science.

0.008488459 = product of:
  0.033953834 = sum of:
    0.033953834 = product of:
      0.06790767 = sum of:
        0.06790767 = weight(_text_:22 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06790767 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

4. 5.2020 17:22:28

0.008488459 = product of:
  0.033953834 = sum of:
    0.033953834 = product of:
      0.06790767 = sum of:
        0.06790767 = weight(_text_:22 in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06790767 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 6.2020 19:11:24

0.008488459 = product of:
  0.033953834 = sum of:
    0.033953834 = product of:
      0.06790767 = sum of:
        0.06790767 = weight(_text_:22 in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06790767 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 6.2020 19:16:24

0.008488459 = product of:
  0.033953834 = sum of:
    0.033953834 = product of:
      0.06790767 = sum of:
        0.06790767 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06790767 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

7. 5.2021 22:10:24

0.008488459 = product of:
  0.033953834 = sum of:
    0.033953834 = product of:
      0.06790767 = sum of:
        0.06790767 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06790767 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25

0.008121594 = product of:
  0.032486375 = sum of:
    0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032486375 = score(doc=713,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 713, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=713)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Cataloging practices, as exemplified by the five user tasks of the IFLA Library Reference Model, can support information literacy practices. The six frames of the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education are used as lenses to examine the user tasks. Two themes emerge from this examination: context matters, and catalogers must tailor bibliographic descriptions to meet users' expectations and information needs. Catalogers need to solicit feedback from various user communities to reform cataloging practices to remain current and viable. Such conversations will enrich the catalog and enhance (reclaim?) its position as a primary tool for research and learning. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1939828.

0.0076571116 = product of:
  0.030628446 = sum of:
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 4021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=4021,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4021, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4021)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.42, 2022

0.0076571116 = product of:
  0.030628446 = sum of:
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Beitrag in enem Themenheft 'Critical Library Perspectives'.

0.006976548 = product of:
  0.027906192 = sum of:
    0.027906192 = product of:
      0.055812385 = sum of:
        0.055812385 = weight(_text_:project in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055812385 = score(doc=829,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.26381132 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In the United States, soon after its emergence, constructivism became "mainstreamed" by having its analysis of norms reduced to "variable research." In such research, positive examples of for instance the spread of norms were included, but strangely empirical evidence of counterexamples of norm "deaths" (preventive strikes, unlawful combatants, drone strikes, extrajudicial killings) were not. The elective affinity of constructivism and humanitarianism seemed to have transformed the former into the Enlightenment project of "progress." Even Kant was finally pressed into the service of "liberalism" in the U.S. discussion, and his notion of the "practical interest of reason" morphed into the political project of an "end of history." This "slant" has prevented a serious conceptual engagement with the "history" of law and (inter-)national politics and the epistemological problems that are raised thereby. This bowdlerization of constructivism is further buttressed by the fact that in the "knowledge industry" none of the "leading" U.S. departments has a constructivist on board, ensuring thereby the narrowness of conceptual and methodological choices to which the future "professionals" are exposed. This article contextualizes constructivism and its emergence within a changing world and within the evolution of the discipline. The aim is not to provide a definition or a typology of constructivism, since such efforts go against the critical dimension of constructivism. An application of this critique on constructivism itself leads to a reflection on truth, knowledge, and the need for (re-)orientation.

0.0067907665 = product of:
  0.027163066 = sum of:
    0.027163066 = product of:
      0.054326132 = sum of:
        0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054326132 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 5.2021 12:43:05

0.0067907665 = product of:
  0.027163066 = sum of:
    0.027163066 = product of:
      0.054326132 = sum of:
        0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054326132 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 1.2022 14:01:14

0.0067907665 = product of:
  0.027163066 = sum of:
    0.027163066 = product of:
      0.054326132 = sum of:
        0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054326132 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

29.12.2022 18:22:55

0.0067907665 = product of:
  0.027163066 = sum of:
    0.027163066 = product of:
      0.054326132 = sum of:
        0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054326132 = score(doc=912,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 912, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=912)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

16. 3.2023 19:22:55