Search (84 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Vogt, T.: ¬Die Transformation des renommierten Informationsservices zbMATH zu einer Open Access-Plattform für die Mathematik steht vor dem Abschluss. (2020) 0.02 
    0.015709538 = product of:
  0.109966755 = sum of:
    0.041237533 = product of:
      0.20618767 = sum of:
        0.20618767 = weight(_text_:c3 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20618767 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23923214 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.06872922 = product of:
      0.20618767 = sum of:
        0.20618767 = weight(_text_:c3 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20618767 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23923214 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Content
    "Mit Beginn des Jahres 2021 wird der umfassende internationale Informationsservice zbMATH in eine Open Access-Plattform überführt. Dann steht dieser bislang kostenpflichtige Dienst weltweit allen Interessierten kostenfrei zur Verfügung. Die Änderung des Geschäftsmodells ermöglicht, die meisten Informationen und Daten von zbMATH für Forschungszwecke und zur Verknüpfung mit anderen nicht-kommerziellen Diensten frei zu nutzen, siehe: https://www.mathematik.de/dmv-blog/2772-transformation-von-zbmath-zu-einer-open-access-plattform-f%C3%BCr-die-mathematik-kurz-vor-dem-abschluss."
  2. Huurdeman, H.C.; Kamps, J.: Designing multistage search systems to support the information seeking process (2020) 0.01 
    0.008069902 = product of:
  0.03765954 = sum of:
    0.013444485 = weight(_text_:system in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013444485 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
    0.011813596 = weight(_text_:information in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011813596 = score(doc=5882,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
    0.012401459 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012401459 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Due to the advances in information retrieval in the past decades, search engines have become extremely efficient at acquiring useful sources in response to a user's query. However, for more prolonged and complex information seeking tasks, these search engines are not as well suited. During complex information seeking tasks, various stages may occur, which imply varying support needs for users. However, the implications of theoretical information seeking models for concrete search user interfaces (SUI) design are unclear, both at the level of the individual features and of the whole interface. Guidelines and design patterns for concrete SUIs, on the other hand, provide recommendations for feature design, but these are separated from their role in the information seeking process. This chapter addresses the question of how to design SUIs with enhanced support for the macro-level process, first by reviewing previous research. Subsequently, we outline a framework for complex task support, which explicitly connects the temporal development of complex tasks with different levels of support by SUI features. This is followed by a discussion of concrete system examples which include elements of the three dimensions of our framework in an exploratory search and sensemaking context. Moreover, we discuss the connection of navigation with the search-oriented framework. In our final discussion and conclusion, we provide recommendations for designing more holistic SUIs which potentially evolve along with a user's information seeking process.
    Source
    Understanding and improving information search [Vgl. unter: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341747751_Designing_Multistage_Search_Systems_to_Support_the_Information_Seeking_Process]
  3. Bach, N.: ¬Die nächste PID-Evolution : selbstsouverän, datenschutzfreundlich, dezentral (2021) 0.01 
    0.007914054 = product of:
  0.055398375 = sum of:
    0.013444485 = weight(_text_:system in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013444485 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
    0.041953888 = product of:
      0.083907776 = sum of:
        0.083907776 = weight(_text_:datenmodell in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083907776 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19304088 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.43466327 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag behandelt den zuletzt vom W3C hervorgebrachten Standard für dezentrale Identi­fikatoren (Decentralized Identifiers, kurz: DIDs) in Bezug auf den Bereich des Forschungsdatenmanagements. Es wird dargelegt, dass die aktuell im wissenschaftlichen Publikationswesen häufig verwendeten persistenten Identifikatorensysteme (Persistent Identifiers, PIDs) wie Handle, DOI, ORCID und ROR aufgrund ihrer Zentralisierung fundamentale Probleme hinsichtlich der Daten­sicherheit, dem Datenschutz und bei der Sicherstellung der Datenintegrität aufweisen. Dem werden als mögliche Lösung das System der DIDs gegenübergestellt: eine neuartige Form von weltweit eindeutigen Identifikatoren, die durch jedes Individuum oder jede Organisation selbst generiert und auf jeder als vertrauenswürdig erachteten Plattform betrieben werden können. Blockchains oder andere Distributed-Legder-Technologien können dabei als vertrauenswürdige Datenregister fungieren, aber auch direkte Peer-to-Peer-Verbindungen, auf bestehende Internetprotokolle aufsetzende Methoden oder statische DIDs sind möglich. Neben dem Schema wird die technische Spezifikation im Sinne von Datenmodell und die Anwendung von DIDs erläutert sowie im Vergleich die Unterschiede zu zentralisierten PID-Systemen herausgestellt. Zuletzt wird der Zusammenhang mit dem zugrundeliegenden neuen Paradigma einer dezentralen Identität, der Self-Sovereign Identity, hergestellt. SSI repräsentiert ein gesamtes Ökosystem, in dem Entitäten ein kryptografisch gesichertes Vertrauensnetzwerk auf der Basis von DIDs und digitalen Identitätsnachweisen bilden, um dezentral manipulationsgesichert und datenschutzgerecht identitätsbezogene Daten auszutauschen. Zum Schluss der Abhandlung stellt der Autor fünf zuvor herausgearbeitete Anforderungen in Bezug auf eine zeitgemäße Umsetzung von persistenten Identifikatoren vor.
  4. Strecker, D.: Dataset Retrieval : Informationsverhalten von Datensuchenden und das Ökosystem von Data-Retrieval-Systemen (2022) 0.01 
    0.007293084 = product of:
  0.051051587 = sum of:
    0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 4021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006682779 = score(doc=4021,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4021, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4021)
    0.044368807 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044368807 = score(doc=4021,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 4021, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4021)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Verschiedene Stakeholder fordern eine bessere Verfügbarkeit von Forschungsdaten. Der Erfolg dieser Initiativen hängt wesentlich von einer guten Auffindbarkeit der publizierten Datensätze ab, weshalb Dataset Retrieval an Bedeutung gewinnt. Dataset Retrieval ist eine Sonderform von Information Retrieval, die sich mit dem Auffinden von Datensätzen befasst. Dieser Beitrag fasst aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse über das Informationsverhalten von Datensuchenden zusammen. Anschließend werden beispielhaft zwei Suchdienste verschiedener Ausrichtung vorgestellt und verglichen. Um darzulegen, wie diese Dienste ineinandergreifen, werden inhaltliche Überschneidungen von Datenbeständen genutzt, um den Metadatenaustausch zu analysieren.
  5. Aizawa, A.; Kohlhase, M.: Mathematical information retrieval (2021) 0.01 
    0.0066312784 = product of:
  0.046418946 = sum of:
    0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011694863 = score(doc=667,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
    0.034724083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034724083 = score(doc=667,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    We present an overview of the NTCIR Math Tasks organized during NTCIR-10, 11, and 12. These tasks are primarily dedicated to techniques for searching mathematical content with formula expressions. In this chapter, we first summarize the task design and introduce test collections generated in the tasks. We also describe the features and main challenges of mathematical information retrieval systems and discuss future perspectives in the field.
    Series
    ¬The Information retrieval series, vol 43
    Source
    Evaluating information retrieval and access tasks. Eds.: Sakai, T., Oard, D., Kando, N. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5554-1_12]
  6. Qi, Q.; Hessen, D.J.; Heijden, P.G.M. van der: Improving information retrieval through correspondenceanalysis instead of latent semantic analysis (2023) 0.01 
    0.0058529805 = product of:
  0.040970862 = sum of:
    0.011207362 = weight(_text_:information in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011207362 = score(doc=1045,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
    0.029763501 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029763501 = score(doc=1045,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The initial dimensions extracted by latent semantic analysis (LSA) of a document-term matrixhave been shown to mainly display marginal effects, which are irrelevant for informationretrieval. To improve the performance of LSA, usually the elements of the raw document-term matrix are weighted and the weighting exponent of singular values can be adjusted.An alternative information retrieval technique that ignores the marginal effects is correspon-dence analysis (CA). In this paper, the information retrieval performance of LSA and CA isempirically compared. Moreover, it is explored whether the two weightings also improve theperformance of CA. The results for four empirical datasets show that CA always performsbetter than LSA. Weighting the elements of the raw data matrix can improve CA; however,it is data dependent and the improvement is small. Adjusting the singular value weightingexponent often improves the performance of CA; however, the extent of the improvementdepends on the dataset and the number of dimensions. (PDF) Improving information retrieval through correspondence analysis instead of latent semantic analysis.
    Source
    Journal of intelligent information systems [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-023-00815-y]
  7. Tramullas, J.; Garrido-Picazo, P.; Sánchez-Casabón, A.I.: Use of Wikipedia categories on information retrieval research : a brief review (2020) 0.01 
    0.005683953 = product of:
  0.03978767 = sum of:
    0.0100241685 = weight(_text_:information in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0100241685 = score(doc=5365,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
    0.029763501 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029763501 = score(doc=5365,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Wikipedia categories, a classification scheme built for organizing and describing Wikpedia articles, are being applied in computer science research. This paper adopts a systematic literature review approach, in order to identify different approaches and uses of Wikipedia categories in information retrieval research. Several types of work are identified, depending on the intrinsic study of the categories structure, or its use as a tool for the processing and analysis of other documentary corpus different to Wikipedia. Information retrieval is identified as one of the major areas of use, in particular its application in the refinement and improvement of search expressions, and the construction of textual corpus. However, the set of available works shows that in many cases research approaches applied and results obtained can be integrated into a comprehensive and inclusive concept of information retrieval.
  8. Almeida, P. de; Gnoli, C.: Fiction in a phenomenon-based classification (2021) 0.00 
    0.0044307336 = product of:
  0.031015133 = sum of:
    0.016133383 = weight(_text_:system in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016133383 = score(doc=712,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
    0.014881751 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014881751 = score(doc=712,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    In traditional classification, fictional works are indexed only by their form, genre, and language, while their subject content is believed to be irrelevant. However, recent research suggests that this may not be the best approach. We tested indexing of a small sample of selected fictional works by Integrative Levels Classification (ILC2), a freely faceted system based on phenomena instead of disciplines and considered the structure of the resulting classmarks. Issues in the process of subject analysis, such as selection of relevant vs. non-relevant themes and citation order of relevant ones, are identified and discussed. Some phenomena that are covered in scholarly literature can also be identified as relevant themes in fictional literature and expressed in classmarks. This can allow for hybrid search and retrieval systems covering both fiction and nonfiction, which will result in better leveraging of the knowledge contained in fictional works.
  9. Petersohn, S.: Neue Version 1.3. des KDSF-Standard für Forschungsinformationen veröffentlicht (2022) 0.00 
    0.004237983 = product of:
  0.05933176 = sum of:
    0.05933176 = product of:
      0.11866352 = sum of:
        0.11866352 = weight(_text_:datenmodell in 4219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11866352 = score(doc=4219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19304088 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.6147067 = fieldWeight in 4219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Content
    "es gab viel Bewegung rund um den KDSF - Standard für Forschungsinformationen (Kerndatensatz Forschung) im Jahr 2022. Die Kommission für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland (KFiD), ein aus 17 ehrenamtlichen Mitgliedern bestehendes Gremium zur Förderung des KDSF und Professionalisierung des Forschungsinformationswesens, hat eine Weiterentwicklung des KDSF zur Version 1.3 beschlossen und sich intensiv mit ihrem Arbeitsprogramm für die erste Amtsperiode befasst. In diesem Zuge wurden drei neue Arbeitsgruppen ins Leben gerufen: Die AG Weiterentwicklung des KDSF, die AG Datenabfragen im KDSF-Format und die AG Forschungsinformationsmanagement. Diese befassen sich mit der Aktualisierung und Ergänzung des KDSF sowie der Erstellung von mittel- und langfristigen Weiterentwicklungsplänen, der Stärkung von Datenabfragen im KDSF-Format sowie dem Abgleich von Informationsbedürfnissen mit der potentiellen Anwendbarkeit des KDSF in Berichtslegungsprozessen. Schließlich sollen die Mehrwerte des KDSF in beispielhaften, einrichtungs- und systemspezifischen Implementierungsvorhaben demonstriert werden. Ein erstes Ergebnis der AG Weiterentwicklung ist die bereits von Praktiker:innen und Anwender:innen lange erwartete Integration der Forschungsfeldklassifikation in den Kern des KDSF. Dadurch können Hochschulen und Forschungseinrichtungen zukünftig nicht nur ihre Forschungsaktivitäten entlang von Forschungsdisziplinen ausweisen, sondern auch interdisziplinäre bzw. gegenstands- und problembezogene Forschung abbilden. Dazu gehören zum Beispiel Forschung zu Nachhaltigkeit oder zur Digitalen Wirtschaft. Hierfür stehen nun insgesamt 72 Forschungsfelder zur Verfügung. Die Version 1.3 ist auf dem gewohnten Webauftritt des KDSF und das zugehörige Datenmodell nun auch auf Github zu finden. Spezifikation: https://www.kerndatensatz-forschung.de/index.php?id=spezifikation bzw. https://www.kerndatensatz-forschung.de/version1/Spezifikation_KDSF_v1_3.pdf Datenmodell: https://github.com/KFiD-G/KDSF Informationen zur KFiD finden Sie auf einem neuen Webauftritt unter www.kfid-online.de.
  10. Jansen, B.; Browne, G.M.: Navigating information spaces : index / mind map / topic map? (2021) 0.00 
    0.0037893022 = product of:
  0.026525114 = sum of:
    0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006682779 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
    0.019842334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019842334 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  11. Gladun, A.; Rogushina, J.: Development of domain thesaurus as a set of ontology concepts with use of semantic similarity and elements of combinatorial optimization (2021) 0.00 
    0.0036616514 = product of:
  0.025631558 = sum of:
    0.008269517 = weight(_text_:information in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008269517 = score(doc=572,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
    0.017362041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017362041 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    We consider use of ontological background knowledge in intelligent information systems and analyze directions of their reduction in compliance with specifics of particular user task. Such reduction is aimed at simplification of knowledge processing without loss of significant information. We propose methods of generation of task thesauri based on domain ontology that contain such subset of ontological concepts and relations that can be used in task solving. Combinatorial optimization is used for minimization of task thesaurus. In this approach, semantic similarity estimates are used for determination of concept significance for user task. Some practical examples of optimized thesauri application for semantic retrieval and competence analysis demonstrate efficiency of proposed approach.
  12. Patriarca, S.: Information literacy gives us the tools to check sources and to verify factual statements : What does Popper`s "Es gibt keine Autoritäten" mean? (2021) 0.00 
    0.0031139941 = product of:
  0.021797959 = sum of:
    0.013444485 = weight(_text_:system in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013444485 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
    0.008353474 = weight(_text_:information in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008353474 = score(doc=331,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    I wonder if you would consider an English perspective on the exchange between Bernd Jörs and Hermann Huemer. In my career in the independent education sector I can recall many discussions and Government reports about cross-curricular issues such as logical reasoning and critical thinking, In the IB system this led to the inclusion in the Diploma of "Theory of Knowledge." In the UK we had "key skills" and "critical thinking." One such key skill is what we now call "information literacy." "In his parody of Information literacy, Dr Jörs seems to have confused a necessary condition for a sufficient condition. The fact that information competence may be necessary for serious academic study does not of course make it sufficient. When that is understood the joke about the megalomaniac rather loses its force. (We had better pass over the rant which follows, the sneer at "earth sciences" and the German prejudice towards Austrians)."
  13. Pielmeier, S.; Voß, V.; Carstensen, H.; Kahl, B.: Online-Workshop "Computerunterstützte Inhaltserschließung" 2020 (2021) 0.00 
    0.003020781 = product of:
  0.021145467 = sum of:
    0.016133383 = weight(_text_:system in 4409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016133383 = score(doc=4409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 4409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4409)
    0.0050120843 = weight(_text_:information in 4409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050120843 = score(doc=4409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4409)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Zum ersten Mal in digitaler Form und mit 230 Teilnehmer*innen fand am 11. und 12. November 2020 der 4. Workshop "Computerunterstützte Inhaltserschließung" statt, organisiert von der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB), der Firma Eurospider Information Technology, der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz (SBB), der UB Stuttgart und dem Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ). Im Mittelpunkt stand der "Digitale Assistent DA-3": In elf Vorträgen wurden Anwendungsszenarien und Erfahrungen mit dem System vorgestellt, das Bibliotheken und andere Wissenschafts- und Kultureinrichtungen bei der Inhaltserschließung unterstützen soll. Die Begrüßung und Einführung in die beiden Workshop-Tage übernahm Frank Scholze (Generaldirektor der DNB). Er sieht den DA-3 als Baustein für die Verzahnung der intellektuellen und der maschinellen Erschließung.
  14. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification in support of diversity : the role of concepts and terms in representing religion (2020) 0.00 
    0.003020781 = product of:
  0.021145467 = sum of:
    0.016133383 = weight(_text_:system in 5992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016133383 = score(doc=5992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5992)
    0.0050120843 = weight(_text_:information in 5992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050120843 = score(doc=5992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5992)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The paper examines the development of facet analysis as a methodology and the role it plays in building classifications and other knowledge-organization tools. The use of categorical analysis in areas other than library and information science is also considered. The suitability of the faceted approach for humanities documentation is explored through a critical description of the FATKS (Facet Analytical Theory in Managing Knowledge Structure for Humanities) project carried out at University College London. This research focused on building a conceptual model for the subject of religion together with a relational database and search-and-browse interfaces that would support some degree of automatic classification. The paper concludes with a discussion of the differences between the conceptual model and the vocabulary used to populate it, and how, in the case of religion, the choice of terminology can create an apparent bias in the system.
  15. Harari, Y.N.: ¬[Yuval-Noah-Harari-argues-that] AI has hacked the operating system of human civilisation (2023) 0.00 
    0.0027161965 = product of:
  0.03802675 = sum of:
    0.03802675 = weight(_text_:system in 953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03802675 = score(doc=953,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.49211764 = fieldWeight in 953, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=953)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2023/04/28/yuval-noah-harari-argues-that-ai-has-hacked-the-operating-system-of-human-civilisation?giftId=6982bba3-94bc-441d-9153-6d42468817ad
  16. Jörs, B.: ¬Ein kleines Fach zwischen "Daten" und "Wissen" II : Anmerkungen zum (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" (ISI 2021", Regensburg) (2021) 0.00 
    0.0023805113 = product of:
  0.016663577 = sum of:
    0.008353474 = weight(_text_:information in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008353474 = score(doc=330,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
    0.008310104 = product of:
      0.016620208 = sum of:
        0.016620208 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016620208 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Nur noch Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz und Information Assessment? Doch gerade die Abschottung von anderen Disziplinen verstärkt die Isolation des "kleinen Faches" Informationswissenschaft in der Scientific Community. So bleiben ihr als letzte "eigenständige" Forschungsrandgebiete nur die, die Wolf Rauch als Keynote Speaker bereits in seinem einführenden, historisch-genetischen Vortrag zur Lage der Informationswissenschaft auf der ISI 2021 benannt hat: "Wenn die universitäre Informationswissenschaft (zumindest in Europa) wohl kaum eine Chance hat, im Bereich der Entwicklung von Systemen und Anwendungen wieder an die Spitze der Entwicklung vorzustoßen, bleiben ihr doch Gebiete, in denen ihr Beitrag in der kommenden Entwicklungsphase dringend erforderlich sein wird: Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz, Information Assessment" (Wolf Rauch: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist; in: Thomas Schmidt; Christian Wolff (Eds): Information between Data and Knowledge. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft 74, Regensburg, 2021, Seiten 20-22 - siehe auch die Rezeption des Beitrages von Rauch durch Johannes Elia Panskus, Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist. Sie ist in der Realität angekommen, in: Open Password, 17. März 2021). Das ist alles? Ernüchternd.
  17. Machado, L.M.O.: Ontologies in knowledge organization (2021) 0.00 
    0.0016297178 = product of:
  0.022816047 = sum of:
    0.022816047 = weight(_text_:system in 198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022816047 = score(doc=198,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 198, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=198)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Within the knowledge organization systems (KOS) set, the term "ontology" is paradigmatic of the terminological ambiguity in different typologies. Contributing to this situation is the indiscriminate association of the term "ontology", both as a specific type of KOS and as a process of categorization, due to the interdisciplinary use of the term with different meanings. We present a systematization of the perspectives of different authors of ontologies, as representational artifacts, seeking to contribute to terminological clarification. Focusing the analysis on the intention, semantics and modulation of ontologies, it was possible to notice two broad perspectives regarding ontologies as artifacts that coexist in the knowledge organization systems spectrum. We have ontologies viewed, on the one hand, as an evolution in terms of complexity of traditional conceptual systems, and on the other hand, as a system that organizes ontological rather than epistemological knowledge. The focus of ontological analysis is the item to model and not the intentions that motivate the construction of the system.
  18. Melzer, N.: «Vor unseren Augen kreiert sich ein mörderisches System» (2020) 0.00 
    0.0015365126 = product of:
  0.021511177 = sum of:
    0.021511177 = weight(_text_:system in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021511177 = score(doc=5482,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
  19. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: Stellungnahme des Präsidiums der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) zum Einfluss generativer Modelle für die Text- und Bilderstellung auf die Wissenschaften und das Förderhandeln der DFG (2023) 0.00 
    0.0015365126 = product of:
  0.021511177 = sum of:
    0.021511177 = weight(_text_:system in 991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021511177 = score(doc=991,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 991, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=991)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Die Einsatzmöglichkeiten von "Künstlicher Intelligenz" (KI) beschäftigen derzeit große Teile der Gesellschaft. Anlass ist insbesondere die Entwicklung generativer Modelle für die Text- und Bilderstellung wie "ChatGPT" und "DALL-E", die eine Interaktion zwischen Mensch und technischem System in gesprochener oder Text-/Bildsprache ermöglichen, und ihre Bereitstellung für die Allgemeinheit.
  20. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.00 
    0.0014245893 = product of:
  0.019944249 = sum of:
    0.019944249 = product of:
      0.039888497 = sum of:
        0.039888497 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039888497 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22

Authors

Languages

  • d 55
  • e 27
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 65
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes