Search (222 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.48 
    0.4834491 = product of:
  0.9668982 = sum of:
    0.09668982 = product of:
      0.29006946 = sum of:
        0.29006946 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29006946 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.29006946 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29006946 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.29006946 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29006946 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.29006946 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29006946 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.39 
    0.38675925 = product of:
  0.7735185 = sum of:
    0.07735185 = product of:
      0.23205556 = sum of:
        0.23205556 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23205556 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.23205556 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23205556 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.23205556 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23205556 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.23205556 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23205556 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.24 
    0.24172455 = product of:
  0.4834491 = sum of:
    0.04834491 = product of:
      0.14503473 = sum of:
        0.14503473 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14503473 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14503473 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14503473 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.14503473 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14503473 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.14503473 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14503473 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30967274 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. Wattenberg, M.; Viégas, F.; Johnson, I.: How to use t-SNE effectively (2016) 0.06 
    0.060406033 = product of:
  0.24162413 = sum of:
    0.18344957 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18344957 = score(doc=3887,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2753375 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.6662717 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
    0.058174565 = product of:
      0.11634913 = sum of:
        0.11634913 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11634913 = score(doc=3887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21927473 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.53060895 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Although extremely useful for visualizing high-dimensional data, t-SNE plots can sometimes be mysterious or misleading. By exploring how it behaves in simple cases, we can learn to use it more effectively. We'll walk through a series of simple examples to illustrate what t-SNE diagrams can and cannot show. The t-SNE technique really is useful-but only if you know how to interpret it.
    Theme
    Visualisierung
  5. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.06 
    0.06012205 = product of:
  0.2404882 = sum of:
    0.18201074 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18201074 = score(doc=3035,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.2753375 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.66104597 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
    0.05847747 = sum of:
      0.043630928 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043630928 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21927473 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03652658 = queryNorm
          0.19897836 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.014846541 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014846541 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12790985 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03652658 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Content
    Bill Howe and his colleagues at the University of Washington, in Seattle, decided to find out. First, they trained a computer algorithm to distinguish between various sorts of figures-which they defined as diagrams, equations, photographs, plots (such as bar charts and scatter graphs) and tables. They exposed their algorithm to between 400 and 600 images of each of these types of figure until it could distinguish them with an accuracy greater than 90%. Then they set it loose on the more-than-650,000 papers (containing more than 10m figures) stored on PubMed Central, an online archive of biomedical-research articles. To measure each paper's influence, they calculated its article-level Eigenfactor score-a modified version of the PageRank algorithm Google uses to provide the most relevant results for internet searches. Eigenfactor scoring gives a better measure than simply noting the number of times a paper is cited elsewhere, because it weights citations by their influence. A citation in a paper that is itself highly cited is worth more than one in a paper that is not.
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
    Dr Howe and his colleagues do, however, believe that the study of diagrams can result in new insights. A figure showing new metabolic pathways in a cell, for example, may summarise hundreds of experiments. Since illustrations can convey important scientific concepts in this way, they think that browsing through related figures from different papers may help researchers come up with new theories. As Dr Howe puts it, "the unit of scientific currency is closer to the figure than to the paper." With this thought in mind, the team have created a website (viziometrics.org (http://viziometrics.org/) ) where the millions of images sorted by their program can be searched using key words. Their next plan is to extract the information from particular types of scientific figure, to create comprehensive "super" figures: a giant network of all the known chemical processes in a cell for example, or the best-available tree of life. At just one such superfigure per paper, though, the citation records of articles containing such all-embracing diagrams may very well undermine the correlation that prompted their creation in the first place. Call it the ultimate marriage of chart and science.
    Theme
    Visualisierung
  6. Fowler, R.H.; Wilson, B.A.; Fowler, W.A.L.: Information navigator : an information system using associative networks for display and retrieval (1992) 0.05 
    0.045304526 = product of:
  0.1812181 = sum of:
    0.13758717 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13758717 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2753375 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.49970376 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
    0.043630928 = product of:
      0.087261856 = sum of:
        0.087261856 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087261856 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21927473 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.39795673 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Document retrieval is a highly interactive process dealing with large amounts of information. Visual representations can provide both a means for managing the complexity of large information structures and an interface style well suited to interactive manipulation. The system we have designed utilizes visually displayed graphic structures and a direct manipulation interface style to supply an integrated environment for retrieval. A common visually displayed network structure is used for query, document content, and term relations. A query can be modified through direct manipulation of its visual form by incorporating terms from any other information structure the system displays. An associative thesaurus of terms and an inter-document network provide information about a document collection that can complement other retrieval aids. Visualization of these large data structures makes use of fisheye views and overview diagrams to help overcome some of the inherent difficulties of orientation and navigation in large information structures.
    Theme
    Visualisierung
  7. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.04 
    0.044608705 = product of:
  0.17843482 = sum of:
    0.14874174 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14874174 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.73477614 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
    0.029693082 = product of:
      0.059386164 = sum of:
        0.059386164 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059386164 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12790985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Content
    Darstellung zu verschiedenen search engines des Internet
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  8. Cranefield, S.: Networked knowledge representation and exchange using UML and RDF (2001) 0.03 
    0.02837591 = product of:
  0.22700728 = sum of:
    0.22700728 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22700728 = score(doc=5896,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2753375 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.8244692 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web
  9. Schneider, R.: Bibliothek 1.0, 2.0 oder 3.0? (2008) 0.03 
    0.026021745 = product of:
  0.10408698 = sum of:
    0.08676601 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08676601 = score(doc=6122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.4286194 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
    0.017320964 = product of:
      0.03464193 = sum of:
        0.03464193 = weight(_text_:22 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03464193 = score(doc=6122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12790985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Noch ist nicht entschieden mit welcher Vehemenz das sogenannte Web 2.0 die Bibliotheken verändern wird. Allerdings wird hier und da bereits mit Bezugnahme auf das sogenannte Semantic Web von einer dritten und mancherorts von einer vierten Generation des Web gesprochen. Der Vortrag hinterfragt kritisch, welche Konzepte sich hinter diesen Bezeichnungen verbergen und geht der Frage nach, welche Herausforderungen eine Übernahme dieser Konzepte für die Bibliothekswelt mit sich bringen würde. Vgl. insbes. Folie 22 mit einer Darstellung von der Entwicklung vom Web 1.0 zum Web 4.0
  10. Kasprzik, A.; Kett, J.: Vorschläge für eine Weiterentwicklung der Sacherschließung und Schritte zur fortgesetzten strukturellen Aufwertung der GND (2018) 0.02 
    0.024583708 = product of:
  0.098334834 = sum of:
    0.061975725 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061975725 = score(doc=4599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.30615672 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
    0.036359105 = product of:
      0.07271821 = sum of:
        0.07271821 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07271821 = score(doc=4599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21927473 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.3316306 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Aufgrund der fortgesetzten Publikationsflut stellt sich immer dringender die Frage, wie die Schwellen für die Titel- und Normdatenpflege gesenkt werden können - sowohl für die intellektuelle als auch die automatisierte Sacherschließung. Zu einer Verbesserung der Daten- und Arbeitsqualität in der Sacherschließung kann beigetragen werden a) durch eine flexible Visualisierung der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) und anderer Wissensorganisationssysteme, so dass deren Graphstruktur intuitiv erfassbar wird, und b) durch eine investigative Analyse ihrer aktuellen Struktur und die Entwicklung angepasster automatisierter Methoden zur Ermittlung und Korrektur fehlerhafter Muster. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) prüft im Rahmen des GND-Entwicklungsprogramms 2017-2021, welche Bedingungen für eine fruchtbare community-getriebene Open-Source-Entwicklung entsprechender Werkzeuge gegeben sein müssen. Weiteres Potential steckt in einem langfristigen Übergang zu einer Darstellung von Titel- und Normdaten in Beschreibungssprachen im Sinne des Semantic Web (RDF; OWL, SKOS). So profitiert die GND von der Interoperabilität mit anderen kontrollierten Vokabularen und von einer erleichterten Interaktion mit anderen Fach-Communities und kann umgekehrt auch außerhalb des Bibliothekswesens zu einem noch attraktiveren Wissensorganisationssystem werden. Darüber hinaus bieten die Ansätze aus dem Semantic Web die Möglichkeit, stärker formalisierte, strukturierende Satellitenvokabulare rund um die GND zu entwickeln. Daraus ergeben sich nicht zuletzt auch neue Perspektiven für die automatisierte Sacherschließung. Es wäre lohnend, näher auszuloten, wie und inwieweit semantisch-logische Verfahren den bestehenden Methodenmix bereichern können.
  11. Beagle, D.: Visualizing keyword distribution across multidisciplinary c-space (2003) 0.02 
    0.022652263 = product of:
  0.09060905 = sum of:
    0.06879359 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06879359 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2753375 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.24985188 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
    0.021815464 = product of:
      0.043630928 = sum of:
        0.043630928 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043630928 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21927473 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.19897836 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    But what happens to this awareness in a digital library? Can discursive formations be represented in cyberspace, perhaps through diagrams in a visualization interface? And would such a schema be helpful to a digital library user? To approach this question, it is worth taking a moment to reconsider what Radford is looking at. First, he looks at titles to see how the books cluster. To illustrate, I scanned one hundred books on the shelves of a college library under subclass HT 101-395, defined by the LCC subclass caption as Urban groups. The City. Urban sociology. Of the first 100 titles in this sequence, fifty included the word "urban" or variants (e.g. "urbanization"). Another thirty-five used the word "city" or variants. These keywords appear to mark their titles as the heart of this discursive formation. The scattering of titles not using "urban" or "city" used related terms such as "town," "community," or in one case "skyscrapers." So we immediately see some empirical correlation between keywords and classification. But we also see a problem with the commonly used search technique of title-keyword. A student interested in urban studies will want to know about this entire subclass, and may wish to browse every title available therein. A title-keyword search on "urban" will retrieve only half of the titles, while a search on "city" will retrieve just over a third. There will be no overlap, since no titles in this sample contain both words. The only place where both words appear in a common string is in the LCC subclass caption, but captions are not typically indexed in library Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs). In a traditional library, this problem is mitigated when the student goes to the shelf looking for any one of the books and suddenly discovers a much wider selection than the keyword search had led him to expect. But in a digital library, the issue of non-retrieval can be more problematic, as studies have indicated. Micco and Popp reported that, in a study funded partly by the U.S. Department of Education, 65 of 73 unskilled users searching for material on U.S./Soviet foreign relations found some material but never realized they had missed a large percentage of what was in the database.
    Theme
    Visualisierung
  12. Koch, T.: Browsing and searching Internet resources (1996) 0.02 
    0.021691503 = product of:
  0.17353202 = sum of:
    0.17353202 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17353202 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.8572388 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Darstellung zu den verschiedenen Möglichkeiten der inhaltlichen Suche im Internet
  13. Zhang, A.: Multimedia file formats on the Internet : a beginner's guide for PC users (1995) 0.02 
    0.018592717 = product of:
  0.14874174 = sum of:
    0.14874174 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14874174 = score(doc=3212,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.73477614 = fieldWeight in 3212, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3212)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Darstellung der verschiedenen Dateiformate, wie sie im Internet verwendet werden sowie die Möglichkeiten, die Dateien zu nutzen (einschl. Angaben zu Software etc.)
  14. Koch, T.: Suchmaschinen im Internet (1996) 0.02 
    0.018592717 = product of:
  0.14874174 = sum of:
    0.14874174 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 5281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14874174 = score(doc=5281,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.73477614 = fieldWeight in 5281, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5281)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Darstellung zu den verschiedenen Möglichkeiten der inhaltlichen Suche im Internet
  15. Kuhn, H.C.: eJournals, Suchmaschinen und die Katalogisierung des WWW (1996) 0.02 
    0.018592717 = product of:
  0.14874174 = sum of:
    0.14874174 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 5282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14874174 = score(doc=5282,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.73477614 = fieldWeight in 5282, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5282)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Darstellung der verschiedenen Möglichkeiten zur sachlichen Suche im Internet
  16. Graf, K.: DNB, die "schlechteste Nationalbibliothek der Galaxis" (Graf), laesst einmal mehr URN-Links ins Leere laufen (2023) 0.02 
    0.018592717 = product of:
  0.14874174 = sum of:
    0.14874174 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14874174 = score(doc=978,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.73477614 = fieldWeight in 978, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=978)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Ausführliche Darstellung zu Problemen des URN Resolvings bei der DNB.
  17. Christophersen, H.: Alphabetisierung auf Computer : Prinzipien, Probleme und eine Lösungsverbesserung 0.02 
    0.017529383 = product of:
  0.14023507 = sum of:
    0.14023507 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 2194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14023507 = score(doc=2194,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.6927536 = fieldWeight in 2194, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2194)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel werde ich einige Probleme der rechnergestützten Alphabetisierung beschreiben, die aufkommen, wenn die zu sortierenden Zeichenfolgen nationale Sonderzeichen beinhalten. Die von mir untersuchten kommerziellen Softwareprogramme sind alle unzulänglich, indem die jeweiligen länderspezifischen lexikographischen Alphabetisierungsregeln nicht ausreichend - wenn überhaupt - berücksichtigt sind, was unbefriedigend ist. Nach der Beschreibung von Alphabetisierungsprinzipien und einer Darstellung einiger der im Computerbereich zu bewältigenden Probleme lege ich meinen Vorschlag zu einem Algorithmus vor, der möglichst viele der lösbaren Probleme berücksichtigen sollte. Ich habe aus Rücksicht auf Sprachwissenschaftler ohne größere Programmierkenntnisse versucht, einen großen Teil meiner Darstellung allgemein verständlich zu halten, und habe die schwierigsten computertechnischen Beschreibungen zuletzt kommen lassen.
  18. Deutsche Nationalbibliographie : CD-ROM-Ausgabe (1992-) 0.02 
    0.015493931 = product of:
  0.12395145 = sum of:
    0.12395145 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12395145 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.61231345 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Footnote
    Ursprünglich: Deutsche Bibliographie: CD-ROM-Ausgabe. -Rez. in: IfB 2(1994) H.3/4, S.486-490 (B. Hoffmann). - Vgl. auch die einleitenden Bemerkungen von K. Schreiber sowie die Darstellung über die laufenden Nationalbibliographien in Deutschland in IfB 1(1993) H.3/4, S.159-200
  19. Hesse, W.: Informationsbegriff in Natur- und Kulturwissenschaften : Vorlesung/Seminar im WS 2004/05 (2004) 0.02 
    0.015493931 = product of:
  0.12395145 = sum of:
    0.12395145 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12395145 = score(doc=3058,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.61231345 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Enthält eine Darstellung des semiotischen Tetraeders und das Konzept der FRISCO-Gruppe
  20. Gillitzer, B.: Yewno (2017) 0.01 
    0.014869568 = product of:
  0.05947827 = sum of:
    0.049580578 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049580578 = score(doc=3447,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20243137 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03652658 = queryNorm
        0.24492538 = fieldWeight in 3447, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3447)
    0.009897694 = product of:
      0.019795388 = sum of:
        0.019795388 = weight(_text_:22 in 3447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019795388 = score(doc=3447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12790985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03652658 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    "Die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek testet den semantischen "Discovery Service" Yewno als zusätzliche thematische Suchmaschine für digitale Volltexte. Der Service ist unter folgendem Link erreichbar: https://www.bsb-muenchen.de/recherche-und-service/suchen-und-finden/yewno/. Das Identifizieren von Themen, um die es in einem Text geht, basiert bei Yewno alleine auf Methoden der künstlichen Intelligenz und des maschinellen Lernens. Dabei werden sie nicht - wie bei klassischen Katalogsystemen - einem Text als Ganzem zugeordnet, sondern der jeweiligen Textstelle. Die Eingabe eines Suchwortes bzw. Themas, bei Yewno "Konzept" genannt, führt umgehend zu einer grafischen Darstellung eines semantischen Netzwerks relevanter Konzepte und ihrer inhaltlichen Zusammenhänge. So ist ein Navigieren über thematische Beziehungen bis hin zu den Fundstellen im Text möglich, die dann in sogenannten Snippets angezeigt werden. In der Test-Anwendung der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek durchsucht Yewno aktuell 40 Millionen englischsprachige Dokumente aus Publikationen namhafter Wissenschaftsverlage wie Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Wiley, Sage und Springer, sowie Dokumente, die im Open Access verfügbar sind. Nach der dreimonatigen Testphase werden zunächst die Rückmeldungen der Nutzer ausgewertet. Ob und wann dann der Schritt von der klassischen Suchmaschine zum semantischen "Discovery Service" kommt und welche Bedeutung Anwendungen wie Yewno in diesem Zusammenhang einnehmen werden, ist heute noch nicht abzusehen. Die Software Yewno wurde vom gleichnamigen Startup in Zusammenarbeit mit der Stanford University entwickelt, mit der auch die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek eng kooperiert. [Inetbib-Posting vom 22.02.2017].
    Date
    22. 2.2017 10:16:49

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 113
  • e 102
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 101
  • i 13
  • m 7
  • r 4
  • x 4
  • b 3
  • s 2
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects