Search (560 results, page 27 of 28)

0.0049489387 = product of:
  0.009897877 = sum of:
    0.009897877 = product of:
      0.019795755 = sum of:
        0.019795755 = weight(_text_:l in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019795755 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.1097853 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Eine exzellente (und durch die Herausgeber kommentierte) Zusammenstellung und Wiedergabe folgender Originalbeiträge: CUTTER, C.A.: Subjects; DEWEY, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index: introduction; HOPWOOD, H.V.: Dewey expanded; HULME, E.W.: Principles of book classification; KAISER, J.O.: Systematic indexing; MARTEL, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice; BLISS, H.E.: A bibliographic classification: principles and definitions; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories; PETTEE, J.: The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information; HAYKIN, D.J.: Subject headings: fundamental concepts; TAUBE, M.: Functional approach to bibliographic organization: a critique and a proposal; VICKERY, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing; FEIBLEMAN, J.K.: Theory of integrative levels; GARFIELD, E.: Citation indexes for science; CRG: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval; LUHN, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature; COATES, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings; FARRADANE, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification; FOSKETT, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels; CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of index language devices; MOOERS, C.N.: The indexing language of an information retrieval system; NEEDHAM, R.M. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Keywords and clumps; ROLLING, L.: The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies; BORKO, H.: Research in computer based classification systems; WILSON, P.: Subjects and the sense of position; LANCASTER, F.W.: Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system; SALTON, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents; FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification; AUSTIN, D. u. J.A. DIGGER: PRECIS: The Preserved Context Index System; FUGMANN, R.: The complementarity of natural and indexing languages

0.0049489387 = product of:
  0.009897877 = sum of:
    0.009897877 = product of:
      0.019795755 = sum of:
        0.019795755 = weight(_text_:l in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019795755 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.1097853 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST. 54(2003) no.9, S.908-909 (L. Ennis): "This is a timely and important addition to the growing body of work an libraries and digital collections. Both Deegan and Tanner bring a wide array of experience and knowledge to the work creating a valuable resource for librarians and digital collection managers. The book is the first in what the authors hope will become a series of volumes covering various issues of digital futures. Digital Futures: Strategies for the Information Age contains nine main chapters divided into sections, an introduction, a conclusion, a bibliography, a glossary, and an index. Each chapter begins with a quote or two and an introduction to help set the stage for the rest of the chapter. The first chapter, "Digital Futures in Current Context," outlines the myriad of changes in information technology from the past 50 years and the impact of those changes an libraries, library practices, and publishing. The book is written for people with little or no prior knowledge of information technology, so technologically savvy readers may find the first chapter a little elementary. For instance, the chapter includes a good bit of the history and workings of the Internet and World Wide Web. However, without the chapter included in the text, the work world lack a real starting point for the narrative and possibly alienate readers just starting their voyage into information science. The second chapter, "Why Digitize?" discusses why libraries and librarians should consider digital projects as a means of providing access. While the concentration is an the benefits of digital projects, the authors are also careful to point out various pitfalls and stumbling blocks to creating, managing, and preserving a digital collection. To help demonstrate their point, the authors include examples of a number of active projects covering newspapers, photo collections, books, and periodicals, and provide URLs so readers can visit the projects an their own. This chapter gives the reader a good overview of the various issues surrounding digitization as well as practical examples. While the first two chapters are a good introduction to the subject and examine theoretical issues, the next two chapters begin take an more practical issues. In Chapter Three, "Developing Collections in the Digital World," and four, "The Economic Factors," the authors explore how digital collections work with traditional library collecfions and how collection development for digital resources differs from collection development of non-digital resources. One of the most interesting topics of these chapters covers the issues surrounding serials using JSTOR and Project MUSE as examples. E-books and their impact an libraries is also discussed. The remaining chapters are by far the most timely and important parts of the work. Chapter Five, "Resource Discovery, Description and Use," examines the growing area of metadata and its importance for libraries and librarians. The chapter begins with a look at how the World Wide Web works and the problems with search engines and then evolves into a discussion of what metadata is, the types of metadata, and metadata creation. The authors explain that one of the biggest problems with the World Wide Web is that the construction and description of web pages is imprecise. The solution for bettering retrieval is metadata.

0.0049489387 = product of:
  0.009897877 = sum of:
    0.009897877 = product of:
      0.019795755 = sum of:
        0.019795755 = weight(_text_:l in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019795755 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.1097853 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: VÖB-Mitteilungen 58(2005) H.3, S.102-104 (R.F. Müller); ZfBB 53(2006) H.5, S.282-283 (L. Svensson): "Das Sammeln und Verzeichnen elektronischer Ressourcen gehört in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken längst zum Alltag. Parallel dazu kündigt sich ein Paradigmenwechsel bei den Findmitteln an: Um einen effizienten und benutzerorientierten Zugang zu den gemischten Kollektionen bieten zu können, experimentieren einige bibliothekarische Diensteanbieter wie z. B. das hbz (http://suchen.hbz-nrw.de/dreilaender/), die Bibliothek der North Carolina State University (www.lib.ncsu.edu/) und demnächst vascoda (www.vascoda.de/) und der Librarians-Internet Index (www.lii.org/) zunehmend mit Suchmaschinentechnologie. Dabei wird angestrebt, nicht nur einen vollinvertierten Suchindex anzubieten, sondern auch das Browsing durch eine hierarchisch geordnete Klassifikation. Von den Daten in den deutschen Verbunddatenbanken ist jedoch nur ein kleiner Teil schon klassifikatorisch erschlossen. Fremddaten aus dem angloamerikanischen Bereich sind oft mit LCC und/oder DDC erschlossen, wobei die Library of Congress sich bei der DDCErschließung auf Titel, die hauptsächlich für die Public Libraries interessant sind, konzentriert. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek wird ab 2007 Printmedien und Hochschulschriften flächendeckend mit DDC erschließen. Es ist aber schon offensichtlich, dass v. a. im Bereich der elektronischen Publikationen die anfallenden Dokumentenmengen mit immer knapperen Personalressourcen nicht intellektuell erschlossen werden können, sondern dass neue Verfahren entwickelt werden müssen. Hier kommt Oberhausers Buch gerade richtig. Seit Anfang der 1990er Jahre sind mehrere Projekte zum Thema automatisches Klassifizieren durchgeführt worden. Wer sich in diese Thematik einarbeiten wollte oder sich für die Ergebnisse der größeren Projekte interessierte, konnte bislang auf keine Überblicksdarstellung zurückgreifen, sondern war auf eine Vielzahl von Einzeluntersuchungen sowie die Projektdokumentationen angewiesen. Oberhausers Darstellung, die auf einer Fülle von publizierter und grauer Literatur fußt, schließt diese Lücke. Das selbst gesetzte Ziel, einen guten Überblick über den momentanen Kenntnisstand und die Ergebnisse der einschlägigen Projekte verständlich zu vermitteln, erfüllt der Autor mit Bravour. Dabei ist anzumerken, dass er ein bibliothekarisches Grundwissen und mindestens grundlegende Kenntnisse über informationswissenschaftliche Grundbegriffe und Fragestellungen voraussetzt, wobei hier für den Einsteiger einige Hinweise auf einführende Darstellungen wünschenswert gewesen wären.

0.0049489387 = product of:
  0.009897877 = sum of:
    0.009897877 = product of:
      0.019795755 = sum of:
        0.019795755 = weight(_text_:l in 65) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019795755 = score(doc=65,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.1097853 = fieldWeight in 65, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=65)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0049489387 = product of:
  0.009897877 = sum of:
    0.009897877 = product of:
      0.019795755 = sum of:
        0.019795755 = weight(_text_:l in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019795755 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.1097853 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

- Caplan, Priscilla. 2003. Metadata fundamentals for all librarians. Chicago: ALA Editions. - Gorman, G.E. and Daniel G. Dorner, eds. 2004. Metadata applications and management. International yearbook of library and information management 2003/2004. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. - Intner, Sheila S., Susan S. Lazinger and Jean Weihs. 2006. Metadata and its impact on libraries. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. - Haynes, David. 2004. Metadata for information management and retrieval. London: Facet. - Hillmann, Diane I. and Elaine L. Westbrooks, eds. 2004. Metadata in practice. Chicago: American Library Association. Metadata: A Cataloger's Primer compares favorably with these texts, and like them has its own special focus and contribution to make to the introductorylevel literature on metadata. Although the focus, purpose, and nature of the contents are different, this volume bears a similarity to the Hillmann and Westbrooks text insofar as it consists of a collection of papers written by various authors tied together by a general, common theme. In conclusion, this volume makes a significant contribution to the handful of books that attempt to present introductory level information about metadata to catalog librarians and students. Although it does not serve fully satisfactorily as a stand-alone textbook for an LIS course nor as a single unified and comprehensive introduction for catalogers, it, like the others mentioned above, could serve as an excellent supplementary LIS course text, and it is highly worthwhile reading for working catalogers who want to learn more about metadata, as well as librarians and instructors already well-versed in metadata topics."

0.0049489387 = product of:
  0.009897877 = sum of:
    0.009897877 = product of:
      0.019795755 = sum of:
        0.019795755 = weight(_text_:l in 1792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019795755 = score(doc=1792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.1097853 = fieldWeight in 1792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Though the book definitely meets a need for an up-to-date introduction to library information systems and associated management issues, and the emphasis an management issues means that it will not date too quickly, there is room for improvement. Some topics are described too briefly to be useful, such as customization/personalization, which is covered in a single paragraph, and does not mention recent developments such as the MyLibrary concept. Other topics seem to have only a peripheral connection to the main chapter theme-for example, it is surprising to find a discussion of information literacy at the end of the chapter an system selection and implementation, and the material an personalization/customization is at the end of the discussion of intranets. Despite these comments, 1 would consider using this as a textbook in an introductory course an library automation or information technology, and practitioners who want to upgrade their knowledge of current practices and issues will also find it useful. People who are primarily interested in a specific topic, such as information systems planning or system selection and implementation are likely to find more specialized books such as Planning for Integrated Systems and Technologies: A How-to-Do-It Manual for Librarians by John M. Cohn, Anne L. Kelsey, and Keith Michael Fiels (New York: Neal-Schuman, 2001) more useful."

0.0049489387 = product of:
  0.009897877 = sum of:
    0.009897877 = product of:
      0.019795755 = sum of:
        0.019795755 = weight(_text_:l in 2487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019795755 = score(doc=2487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.1097853 = fieldWeight in 2487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Zugl.: Wien, Univ., Diss., 2007. - Rez. in: ZfBB 55(2008) H.6, S.360-361 (L. Heller): "Was grenzt eine Bibliographie von einem Bibliothekskatalog oder auch einem Literaturverzeichnis ab? Welche Gegenstände, Personen(gruppen) und Räume sind lohnende Objekte einer jeweils eigenständigen und möglichst umfassenden bibliographischen Erschließung? Wie kann eine solche Erschließung für die Literatursuchenden wirklich nützlich sein? - Fragen wie diese zeigen, wie groß und wie schwer zu fassen das Konzept »Bibliographie« bisher schon immerwar. Wie viel komplexer und anspruchsvoller das Bereitstellen einer zeitgemäßen, nützlichen bibliographischen Dienstleistung im Internetzeitalter ist, hat sich der Bibliothekar Dirk Wissen in seinem Buch »Zukunft der Bibliographie - Bibliographie der Zukunft« gefragt. Es dürfte sich um eine der ersten deutschsprachigen Dissertationsschriften handeln, die explizit den Themenbereich »Bibliothek 2.0« und »Archiv 2.0« behandeln. Diese beiden Stichworte spielen auf das »Web 2.0« an, einen Begriff, mit dem der Computer-Buchverleger Tim O'Reilly 2005 eine grobe begriffliche Zusammenfassung neuerer, partizipativer Entwicklungen im Internet, wie beispielsweise das freie Online-Lexikon Wikipedia, prägte. Wissen versucht, anhand von Einschätzungen und Erwartungen der Leiter einiger bedeutender Archive, Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen im deutschen Sprachraum herauszufinden, wie bibliographische Dienstleistungen der nahen Zukunft aussehen könnten. Kommerzielle Unternehmen sind dabei nur mit einer Institution vertreten, dem ekz, während traditionelle Universitätsbibliotheken recht zahlreich repräsentiert sind. Akkurat und nachvollziehbar führte der Autor über mehrere Runden Interviews mit diesem Personenkreis durch, legt den Befragten Thesen vor und lässt sie diese bewerten.

0.0049489387 = product of:
  0.009897877 = sum of:
    0.009897877 = product of:
      0.019795755 = sum of:
        0.019795755 = weight(_text_:l in 2494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019795755 = score(doc=2494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.1097853 = fieldWeight in 2494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND RETRIEVAL Sabine Mas, L'Hedi Zäher and Manuel Zacklad. Design and Evaluation of Multi-viewed Knowledge System for Administrative Electronic Document Organization. - Xu Chen. The Influence of Existing Consistency Measures on the Relationship Between Indexing Consistency and Exhaustivity. - Michael Buckland and Ryan Shaw. 4W Vocabulary Mapping Across Diverse Reference Genres. - Abdus Sattar Chaudhry and Christopher S. G. Khoo. A Survey of the Top-level Categories in the Structure of Corporate Websites. - Nicolas L. George, Elin K. Jacob, Lijiang Guo, Lala Hajibayova and M Yasser Chuttur. A Case Study of Tagging Patteras in del.icio.us. - Kwan Yi and Lois Mai Chan. A Visualization Software Tool for Library of Congress Subject Headings. - Gercina Angela Borem Oliveira Lima. Hypertext Model - HTXM: A Model for Hypertext Organization of Documents. - Ali Shiri and Thane Chambers. Information Retrieval from Digital Libraries: Assessing the Potential Utility of Thesauri in Supporting Users' Search Behaviour in an Interdisciplinary Domain. - Verönica Vargas and Catalina Naumis. Water-related Language Analysis: The Need for a Thesaurus of Mexican Terminology. - Amanda Hill. What's in a Name?: Prototyping a Name Authority Service for UK Repositories. - Rick Szostak and Claudio Gnoli. Classifying by Phenomena, Theories and Methods: Examples with Focused Social Science Theories.

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2005 15:12:11

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27. 9.2005 14:22:19

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 2301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=2301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2301)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

11. 6.2004 14:52:22

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 2899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=2899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

13. 7.2004 20:22:50

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2008 17:56:19

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Wer wissen will, wie alt ein Wort ist, woher es stammt, welche Bedeutung es ursprünglich hatte und mit welchen anderen Wörtern es zusammenhängt, findet in diesem Nachschlagewerk präzise Angaben über "tó étymon", den "wahren Sinn eines Wortes". In über 8 000 Einträgen gibt das 'Etymologische Wörterbuch des Deutschen' Auskunft über den Grundwortschatz der deutschen Sprache: Herkunft, Entwicklung, Bedeutung und Verwandtschaft von rund 22 000 Wörtern werden erschlossen. Verzeichnet sind das erste Auftreten eines Wortes im Deutschen, verwandte Formen innerhalb des Germanischen, indoeuropäische Wurzeln, kurz die Ursprungsform. Oberregionale Ausdrücke der Umgangssprache fehlen ebensowenig wie fachsprachliche Begriffe oder geläufige Fremdwörter, die in ihre Ursprungssprache zurückverfolgt werden. Bedeutungshinweise verdeutlichen die semantischen Bezüge zwischen Sprach- und Gesellschaftsgeschichte. Ableitungen und Zusammensetzungen eines Stichworts sind mit Angabe ihres Erstbelegs aufgeführt. Innersprachliche Zusammenhänge und lauthistorische Gesetzmäßigkeiten eröffnen sich dadurch dem an Sprache interessierten Leser.

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

11. 5.2008 19:49:22

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 3037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=3037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3037)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2009 13:43:50

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 3034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=3034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3034)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2016 16:08:54

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2018 12:13:57

0.004609831 = product of:
  0.009219662 = sum of:
    0.009219662 = product of:
      0.018439325 = sum of:
        0.018439325 = weight(_text_:22 in 359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018439325 = score(doc=359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 9.2021 16:02:03

0.0043461905 = product of:
  0.008692381 = sum of:
    0.008692381 = product of:
      0.017384762 = sum of:
        0.017384762 = weight(_text_:22 in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017384762 = score(doc=3312,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

303.48/33 22

DDC

303.48/33 22