Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Batt, C.; Kirby, H.: CLIP: Croydon Libraries Internet Project (1996) 0.05
    0.04801744 = product of:
      0.19206975 = sum of:
        0.19206975 = weight(_text_:assess in 7173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19206975 = score(doc=7173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 7173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7173)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Findings of the Croydon Libraries Internet Project (CLIP), 1994 Mar 96, which aimed to assess the value of the Internet for UK public libraries. Reviews the Internet as a staff tool (the Electronic Reference model), the potential benefits of providing public access and a range of technical issues which will be relevant to public libraries establishing such services
  2. Bringing EDI to book : the impact of EDI in the book industry (1993) 0.04
    0.04201526 = product of:
      0.16806103 = sum of:
        0.16806103 = weight(_text_:assess in 8022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16806103 = score(doc=8022,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 8022, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8022)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Report commissioned by Book Industry Communication (BIC) and carried out by Coopers and Lybrand. The aims of the study were: to identify the current level of usage of electronic data interchange (EDI) across the book industry; to investigate the range of EDI communication; to test the understanding of the benefits that can be obtained from the use of EDI; to identify what users see as key issues for EDI; to assess the costs of EDI and its implementation within various parts of the industry; and to identify the key drivers for change and the potential barriers that could impede such change
  3. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.03
    0.033891086 = product of:
      0.13556434 = sum of:
        0.13556434 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13556434 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  4. Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975) 0.03
    0.029654698 = product of:
      0.118618794 = sum of:
        0.118618794 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118618794 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  5. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks for libraries (1995) 0.03
    0.029654698 = product of:
      0.118618794 = sum of:
        0.118618794 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118618794 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  6. Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995) 0.03
    0.025418311 = product of:
      0.101673245 = sum of:
        0.101673245 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101673245 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
  7. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.03
    0.025418311 = product of:
      0.101673245 = sum of:
        0.101673245 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101673245 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  8. ¬The future of national bibliography (1997) 0.03
    0.025418311 = product of:
      0.101673245 = sum of:
        0.101673245 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101673245 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Select newsletter 1998, no.22, S.8 (P. Robinson)
  9. Carey, K.; Stringer, R.: ¬The power of nine : a preliminary investigation into navigation strategies for the new library with special reference to disabled people (2000) 0.03
    0.025418311 = product of:
      0.101673245 = sum of:
        0.101673245 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101673245 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  10. Intellectual property and the National Information Infrastructure : a preliminary draft of the report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1994) 0.02
    0.021181928 = product of:
      0.08472771 = sum of:
        0.08472771 = weight(_text_:22 in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08472771 = score(doc=7306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:53:48
  11. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.021181928 = product of:
      0.08472771 = sum of:
        0.08472771 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08472771 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  12. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.02
    0.02100763 = product of:
      0.08403052 = sum of:
        0.08403052 = weight(_text_:assess in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08403052 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.22795013 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
  13. Adler, R.; Ewing, J.; Taylor, P.: Citation statistics : A report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS) (2008) 0.02
    0.018006539 = product of:
      0.072026156 = sum of:
        0.072026156 = weight(_text_:assess in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072026156 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.19538583 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Using citation data to assess research ultimately means using citation-based statistics to rank things.journals, papers, people, programs, and disciplines. The statistical tools used to rank these things are often misunderstood and misused. - For journals, the impact factor is most often used for ranking. This is a simple average derived from the distribution of citations for a collection of articles in the journal. The average captures only a small amount of information about that distribution, and it is a rather crude statistic. In addition, there are many confounding factors when judging journals by citations, and any comparison of journals requires caution when using impact factors. Using the impact factor alone to judge a journal is like using weight alone to judge a person's health. - For papers, instead of relying on the actual count of citations to compare individual papers, people frequently substitute the impact factor of the journals in which the papers appear. They believe that higher impact factors must mean higher citation counts. But this is often not the case! This is a pervasive misuse of statistics that needs to be challenged whenever and wherever it occurs. -For individual scientists, complete citation records can be difficult to compare. As a consequence, there have been attempts to find simple statistics that capture the full complexity of a scientist's citation record with a single number. The most notable of these is the h-index, which seems to be gaining in popularity. But even a casual inspection of the h-index and its variants shows that these are naive attempts to understand complicated citation records. While they capture a small amount of information about the distribution of a scientist's citations, they lose crucial information that is essential for the assessment of research.
  14. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.02
    0.016945543 = product of:
      0.06778217 = sum of:
        0.06778217 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06778217 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  15. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.01
    0.014827349 = product of:
      0.059309397 = sum of:
        0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059309397 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
  16. ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998) 0.01
    0.012709156 = product of:
      0.050836623 = sum of:
        0.050836623 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050836623 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  17. McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.012709156 = product of:
      0.050836623 = sum of:
        0.050836623 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050836623 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 18:55:19
  18. Positionspapier zur Weiterentwicklung der Bibliotheksverbünde als Teil einer überregionalen Informationsinfrastruktur (2011) 0.01
    0.010590964 = product of:
      0.042363856 = sum of:
        0.042363856 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042363856 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2011 19:52:22
  19. Förderung von Informationsinfrastrukturen für die Wissenschaft : Ein Positionspapier der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (2018) 0.01
    0.010590964 = product of:
      0.042363856 = sum of:
        0.042363856 = weight(_text_:22 in 4178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042363856 = score(doc=4178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4178)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2018 17:30:43
  20. Wehling, E.: Framing-Manual : Unser gemeinsamer freier Rundfunk ARD (2019) 0.01
    0.010590964 = product of:
      0.042363856 = sum of:
        0.042363856 = weight(_text_:22 in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042363856 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2019 9:26:20