Search (416 results, page 1 of 21)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12
    0.124188185 = product of:
      0.24837637 = sum of:
        0.05167041 = product of:
          0.15501122 = sum of:
            0.15501122 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15501122 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.04169473 = product of:
          0.08338946 = sum of:
            0.08338946 = weight(_text_:theory in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08338946 = score(doc=76,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.5136716 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.15501122 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15501122 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  2. Tufte, E.R.: ¬The visual display of quantitative information (1983) 0.12
    0.12020608 = product of:
      0.24041216 = sum of:
        0.018680464 = product of:
          0.03736093 = sum of:
            0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03736093 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.18722291 = weight(_text_:graphic in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18722291 = score(doc=3734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.72424996 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.034508783 = product of:
          0.06901757 = sum of:
            0.06901757 = weight(_text_:methods in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06901757 = score(doc=3734,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.43973273 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Date
    19. 7.2017 13:13:29
    LCSH
    Statistics / Graphic methods
    Subject
    Statistics / Graphic methods
  3. Salton, G.: Thoughts about modern retrieval technologies (1988) 0.05
    0.052262664 = product of:
      0.15678799 = sum of:
        0.1323866 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1323866 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
        0.024401393 = product of:
          0.048802786 = sum of:
            0.048802786 = weight(_text_:methods in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048802786 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the National Federation of Astracting and Information Services, Philadelphia, 28 Feb-2 Mar 88. In recent years, the amount and the variety of available machine-readable data, new technologies have been introduced, such as high density storage devices, and fancy graphic displays useful for information transformation and access. New approaches have also been considered for processing the stored data based on the construction of knowledge bases representing the contents and structure of the information, and the use of expert system techniques to control the user-system interactions. Provides a brief evaluation of the new information processing technologies, and of the software methods proposed for information manipulation.
  4. Bruckmann, D.: Graphic materials and libraries (1988) 0.05
    0.050432988 = product of:
      0.3025979 = sum of:
        0.3025979 = weight(_text_:graphic in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3025979 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            1.1705647 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  5. Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Davidson, C.H.: Improved design of graphic displays in thesauri : through technology and ergonomics (1986) 0.04
    0.044128865 = product of:
      0.2647732 = sum of:
        0.2647732 = weight(_text_:graphic in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2647732 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            1.0242441 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  6. Theory of subject analysis : A sourcebook (1985) 0.03
    0.034590367 = product of:
      0.069180734 = sum of:
        0.01318503 = product of:
          0.02637006 = sum of:
            0.02637006 = weight(_text_:theory in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02637006 = score(doc=3622,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.1624372 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.047280923 = weight(_text_:graphic in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047280923 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.18290073 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
        0.008714783 = product of:
          0.017429566 = sum of:
            0.017429566 = weight(_text_:methods in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017429566 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.11104927 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Eine exzellente (und durch die Herausgeber kommentierte) Zusammenstellung und Wiedergabe folgender Originalbeiträge: CUTTER, C.A.: Subjects; DEWEY, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index: introduction; HOPWOOD, H.V.: Dewey expanded; HULME, E.W.: Principles of book classification; KAISER, J.O.: Systematic indexing; MARTEL, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice; BLISS, H.E.: A bibliographic classification: principles and definitions; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories; PETTEE, J.: The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information; HAYKIN, D.J.: Subject headings: fundamental concepts; TAUBE, M.: Functional approach to bibliographic organization: a critique and a proposal; VICKERY, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing; FEIBLEMAN, J.K.: Theory of integrative levels; GARFIELD, E.: Citation indexes for science; CRG: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval; LUHN, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature; COATES, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings; FARRADANE, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification; FOSKETT, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels; CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of index language devices; MOOERS, C.N.: The indexing language of an information retrieval system; NEEDHAM, R.M. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Keywords and clumps; ROLLING, L.: The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies; BORKO, H.: Research in computer based classification systems; WILSON, P.: Subjects and the sense of position; LANCASTER, F.W.: Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system; SALTON, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents; FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification; AUSTIN, D. u. J.A. DIGGER: PRECIS: The Preserved Context Index System; FUGMANN, R.: The complementarity of natural and indexing languages
  7. Olson, N.B.; Swanson, E.: ¬The year's work in nonbook processing (1989) 0.03
    0.031520616 = product of:
      0.18912369 = sum of:
        0.18912369 = weight(_text_:graphic in 8330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18912369 = score(doc=8330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.7316029 = fieldWeight in 8330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8330)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the literature, published in 1988, covering the cataloguing of audio-visual materials including: computerised files; music and sound recordings; film and video; graphic materials and 3-dimensional objects; maps; and preservation.
  8. Wilkinson, J.: MEDUSA : the use of MINISIS in Building Design Partnership (1989) 0.03
    0.031520616 = product of:
      0.18912369 = sum of:
        0.18912369 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18912369 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.7316029 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the application of the MINISIS text-retrieval software by the Library Building Design Partnership (BDP), the UK's largest multi-discipline building design practice. Notes on 2 related data bases, developed and tested by BDP, te presented; BIBLIO, containing biblio-graphic data; and MAIL, containing names and addresses of relevant organisations.
  9. Orbach, B.: Integrating concepts : corporate main entry and graphic materials (1988) 0.03
    0.03120382 = product of:
      0.18722291 = sum of:
        0.18722291 = weight(_text_:graphic in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18722291 = score(doc=408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.72424996 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    As an illustration of the general concern about how bibliographic records for graphic materials can be integrated most effectively with records for works in other media, this article presents problems associated with applying existing AACR2 guidelines for choice of entry. Characteristics of original items and historical collections of pictures, the role of corporate bodies in creating such materials, and the degree to which AACR2 provisions for entry under the heading for a corporate body accommodate these features are examined. Recommendations regarding extending AACR2 Rule 21.1B2 and, more generally, regarding the need to examine the meaning and objectives of integrating bibliographic records for various media and actors affecting this process, are made.
  10. Devadason, F.J.: Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing Language as a metalanguage for computer-aided generation of information retrieval thesaurus (1983) 0.03
    0.030880976 = product of:
      0.092642926 = sum of:
        0.07677513 = sum of:
          0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044751476 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
          0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032023653 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
        0.01586779 = product of:
          0.03173558 = sum of:
            0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03173558 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29
  11. Dhyani, P.: Universe of subjects and DDC engineering (1987) 0.03
    0.03029783 = product of:
      0.18178698 = sum of:
        0.18178698 = sum of:
          0.11831582 = weight(_text_:methods in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11831582 = score(doc=825,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.7538275 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
          0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06347116 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The article examines the viability of various methods used by DDC for accommodating the universe of subjects. It also provides some suggestions for efficacious use of these methods
    Source
    International classification. 14(1987), S.19-22
  12. Rolling, L.: ¬The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies (1985) 0.03
    0.030188879 = product of:
      0.090566635 = sum of:
        0.014917159 = product of:
          0.029834319 = sum of:
            0.029834319 = weight(_text_:theory in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029834319 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.18377672 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.07564948 = weight(_text_:graphic in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07564948 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.29264116 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
  13. Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983) 0.03
    0.02833744 = product of:
      0.08501232 = sum of:
        0.04269821 = product of:
          0.08539642 = sum of:
            0.08539642 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08539642 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04231411 = product of:
          0.08462822 = sum of:
            0.08462822 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08462822 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29
  14. Hoel, I.A.L.: On the concept of knowledge and its relation to information science (1980) 0.03
    0.025591712 = product of:
      0.15355027 = sum of:
        0.15355027 = sum of:
          0.08950295 = weight(_text_:theory in 1315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08950295 = score(doc=1315,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 1315, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1315)
          0.06404731 = weight(_text_:29 in 1315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06404731 = score(doc=1315,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1315, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1315)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Pages
    S.19-29
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
  15. Kumar, K.: Theory of classification (1989) 0.03
    0.025495686 = product of:
      0.07648706 = sum of:
        0.044751476 = product of:
          0.08950295 = sum of:
            0.08950295 = weight(_text_:theory in 6774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08950295 = score(doc=6774,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 6774, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6774)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03173558 = product of:
          0.06347116 = sum of:
            0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 6774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06347116 = score(doc=6774,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6774, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6774)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2019 18:15:22
  16. Leresche, F.: ¬La normalisation du catalogage en France (1989) 0.03
    0.025216494 = product of:
      0.15129896 = sum of:
        0.15129896 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15129896 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the organisation of the work of cataloguing standardisation in France and in standards published or in preparation. French standards follow IFLA reommendations on rules for bibliographic descriptions and headings. Standardisation of formats is less developed; however MARC is gaininig ground as a national exchange format, whilst USMARC is also used by university and public libraries. French policy on cataloguing standards aims both to promote international exchange of biblio-graphic recordswhile respecting national access requirements, and to simplify cataloguing by promoting the use of medium-level bibliographic records.
  17. Hagen-Lautrup, C.B.: ¬The LA series and cataloguing (1989) 0.03
    0.025216494 = product of:
      0.15129896 = sum of:
        0.15129896 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15129896 = score(doc=1564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 1564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1564)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The library profession and administrators have vastly underestimated the skills needed to catalogue maps and stresses the amount of time and effort thet is required to correct existing cartographic materials must have an adequate working knowledge of acronyms; grids; map projection; the concepts of graphic and numeric scale; principles behind alpha-numerical code systems; and topographic terms and concepts, in English and other languages.
  18. Bauer, G.: Knowledge structures promoting problem solutions : possibilities of graphic representation of knowledge in thesaurus-like fashion (1989) 0.02
    0.02228844 = product of:
      0.13373064 = sum of:
        0.13373064 = weight(_text_:graphic in 5222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13373064 = score(doc=5222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.51732135 = fieldWeight in 5222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5222)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge to be processed for problem solving purposes can best be adapted to the human brain where it is stored in the form of 'concept configurations', by a representation in the manner of a structural diagram. The method discussed here for the graphic representation of knowledge in thesaurus-like fashion (TGW method) promotes the formation of the 'internal problem representation' by transforming the textually available knowledge into a structural diagram-like form. In such a sructural diagram, the concepts of the statements relevant to the problem are preordered with the aid of 'ordering lines' corresponding to the categories (facets) of the knowledge field concerned. In this way an open, discipline-independent ordering system for the knowledge available for the solution of the problem is established, into which even knowledge from quite different disciplines can be integrated. A sort of 'dialogue' between the graphically represented structural diagram of the knowledge available for problem solution and the knowledge stored in the problem's solver memory leads, as more and more knowledge is acquired, to optimization of the structural diagram and thus also to favorable preconditions for the problem-related activation of knowledge in the problem solver's working memory. These structural diagrams of knowledge can also be used as aids toward more effective interaction between man and computer. A typical multidisciplinary problem is used as an example to illustrate the application possibilities of the TGW method
  19. Shneiderman, B.: Designing menu selection systems (1986) 0.02
    0.022064433 = product of:
      0.1323866 = sum of:
        0.1323866 = weight(_text_:graphic in 2076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1323866 = score(doc=2076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 2076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2076)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Menu selection systems reduce training and memorization, simplify entry of choices, and structure the user's task. However, the use of menu selection is no guarantee that novices or experts will be satisfied or able to carry out their work. This article focuses on the multiple design issues in creating successful menu selection systems. These include the primary issue of semantic organization and the host of secondary issues such as response time and display rates, shortcuts for frequent users, titles, phrasing of menu items, graphic layout, and selection mechanisms. Novel approaches such as popup menus and embedded menus are covered. Experimental results and design guidelines are presented
  20. Hill, L.L.: Geographic indexing for bibliographic databases (1989) 0.02
    0.022064433 = product of:
      0.1323866 = sum of:
        0.1323866 = weight(_text_:graphic in 2716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1323866 = score(doc=2716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 2716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2716)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Geographic indexing is usually handled in the same way as other indexing; that is, through the use of controlled vocabulary, often in a hierarchical arrangement from broad region (such as continent) to smaller regions (such as country, county, geologic province, topographic feature, city). But a geographic location can also be described by map reference points (geocoding), such as a set of latitudes and longitudes. This spatial referencing and the use of computer graphic display has many advantages over word-based indexing. Examples of the variation of geographic indexing terminology for on-line bibliographic records are given.

Authors

Languages

  • e 325
  • d 81
  • m 5
  • f 2
  • no 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 341
  • m 45
  • s 20
  • d 3
  • x 3
  • ? 2
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • u 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications