Search (2102 results, page 1 of 106)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Agarwal, M.L.; Sharma, S.G.: Classificatory language : an artificial / technical language (1994) 0.13 
    0.13349438 = product of:
  0.26698875 = sum of:
    0.26698875 = sum of:
      0.19685227 = weight(_text_:language in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19685227 = score(doc=518,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.96926105 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
      0.07013648 = weight(_text_:22 in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07013648 = score(doc=518,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the unsuitability of natural language for use as a language in classification schemes and notes the advantages of technical and artificial languages. Considers the various aspects of classificatory language and its components such as significant digits, connecting symbols, canons and principles underlying its grammar
    Source
    Annals of library science and documentation. 41(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  2. Evans, R.; Gazdar, G.: DATR: a language for lexical knowledge representation (1996) 0.13 
    0.12653719 = product of:
  0.25307438 = sum of:
    0.25307438 = sum of:
      0.14085601 = weight(_text_:language in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14085601 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
      0.11221837 = weight(_text_:22 in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11221837 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.167-216
  3. Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996) 0.12 
    0.12122209 = product of:
  0.24244419 = sum of:
    0.24244419 = sum of:
      0.186335 = weight(_text_:language in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.186335 = score(doc=7415,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.9174761 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly
  4. McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996) 0.11 
    0.11072004 = product of:
  0.22144008 = sum of:
    0.22144008 = sum of:
      0.123249 = weight(_text_:language in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.123249 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.60685337 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
      0.098191075 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.098191075 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
  5. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.11 
    0.11072004 = product of:
  0.22144008 = sum of:
    0.22144008 = sum of:
      0.123249 = weight(_text_:language in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.123249 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.60685337 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.098191075 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.098191075 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  6. Yazdani, M.; Maeling, S.: Communicating through pictures (1995) 0.10 
    0.097318396 = product of:
  0.19463679 = sum of:
    0.19463679 = sum of:
      0.124500304 = weight(_text_:language in 3676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.124500304 = score(doc=3676,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.6130145 = fieldWeight in 3676, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3676)
      0.07013648 = weight(_text_:22 in 3676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07013648 = score(doc=3676,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3676, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3676)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents desing consideration for a visual language which may allow users with different linguistic backgrounds to communicate freely. This cross language communication uses icons which are graphically clear, semantically unambiguous, adaptable and, above all, simple
    Date
    30. 3.1996 19:22:06
  7. Jascó, P.: Don't kiss Boolean goodbye : it's AND not OR, let alone XOR (1994) 0.09 
    0.09490289 = product of:
  0.18980578 = sum of:
    0.18980578 = sum of:
      0.105642 = weight(_text_:language in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.105642 = score(doc=7159,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.52016 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
      0.08416378 = weight(_text_:22 in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08416378 = score(doc=7159,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Gently criticizes the recent trend away from Boolean searching and towards natural language searching in online systems
    Source
    Information today. 11(1994) no.2, S.22-24
  8. Schubert, K.: Parameters for the design of an intermediate language for multilingual thesauri (1995) 0.09 
    0.09344607 = product of:
  0.18689214 = sum of:
    0.18689214 = sum of:
      0.1377966 = weight(_text_:language in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1377966 = score(doc=2092,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.6784828 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049095538 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The architecture of multilingual software systems is sometimes centred around an intermediate language. The question is analyzed to what extent this approach can be useful for multilingual thesauri, in particular regarding the functionality the thesaurus is designed to fulfil. Both the runtime use, and the construction and maintenance of the system is taken into consideration. Using the perspective of general language technology enables to draw on experience from a broader range of fields beyond thesaurus design itself as well as to consider the possibility of using a thesaurus as a knowledge module in various systems which process natural language. Therefore the features which thesauri and other natural-language processing systems have in common are emphasized, especially at the level of systems design and their core functionality
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.136-140
  9. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.08 
    0.07908574 = product of:
  0.15817147 = sum of:
    0.15817147 = sum of:
      0.088035 = weight(_text_:language in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.088035 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.07013648 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07013648 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  10. Bonhomme, S.; Roisin, C.: Interactively restructuring HTML documents (1996) 0.08 
    0.07908574 = product of:
  0.15817147 = sum of:
    0.15817147 = sum of:
      0.088035 = weight(_text_:language in 5862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.088035 = score(doc=5862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 5862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5862)
      0.07013648 = weight(_text_:22 in 5862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07013648 = score(doc=5862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5862)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents a solution to the problem of trasnforming the document structure in a HTML editor. Describes a tool based on a transformation language. Techniques that have been designed for general structured documents have been adapted to take into account the specific structure of the HTML DTD
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  11. Lezius, W.; Rapp, R.; Wettler, M.: ¬A morphology-system and part-of-speech tagger for German (1996) 0.08 
    0.07908574 = product of:
  0.15817147 = sum of:
    0.15817147 = sum of:
      0.088035 = weight(_text_:language in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.088035 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
      0.07013648 = weight(_text_:22 in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07013648 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2015 9:37:18
    Source
    Natural language processing and speech technology: Results of the 3rd KONVENS Conference, Bielefeld, October 1996. Ed.: D. Gibbon
  12. Olson, C.: Cataloging Southeast Asian language materials : the case of the Thai language (1996) 0.08 
    0.07791616 = product of:
  0.15583232 = sum of:
    0.15583232 = sum of:
      0.10673678 = weight(_text_:language in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10673678 = score(doc=5112,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.5255505 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
      0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049095538 = score(doc=5112,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Cataloging and accessing non-roman languages, such as the languages in the JACKPHY group, have been better served because of the inclusion of vernacular languages in their bibliographic records. However, Southeast Asian languages such as Thai, Lao or even Burmese present other problems for catalogers because only romanized versions of these languages are present in current bibliographic records. The problems in cataloging and accessing the materials in these languages occur not only because of the romanization system but also due to the nature of the languages themselves. This paper presents a number of problems related to the cataloging of Thai language materials.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.10-28
  13. Yt, H.: Indexing languages : new progress in China (1995) 0.08 
    0.077854715 = product of:
  0.15570943 = sum of:
    0.15570943 = sum of:
      0.09960024 = weight(_text_:language in 1090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09960024 = score(doc=1090,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 1090, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1090)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 1090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=1090,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1090, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1090)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper highlights the current situation in the field of indexing language research and practice in China, covering a variety of classifications and thesauri as well as such matters as: standardization and compatibility of indexing languages, natural language processing, Chinese PRECIS, etc. The author points out various problems and future trends in the Chinese indexing languages field
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.30-32
  14. Dimitrova, N.; Golshani, F.: Motion recovery for video content classification (1995) 0.08 
    0.077854715 = product of:
  0.15570943 = sum of:
    0.15570943 = sum of:
      0.09960024 = weight(_text_:language in 3834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09960024 = score(doc=3834,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 3834, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3834)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=3834,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3834, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3834)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the analysis of video for the classification of images in order to develop a video database. Covers compression; motion recovery in digital video; low-level motion extraction; single macroblock tracing; intermediate-level motion analysis; high-level motion analysis; spatiotemporal hierarchical representation; information filtering and digital video; content filtering opertaors; the query language; querying video contents; an architecture for video classification and retrieval; the visual query language VEVA; and implementation of macroblock tracing
    Date
    8. 4.1996 9:22:36
  15. Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.08 
    0.077854715 = product of:
  0.15570943 = sum of:
    0.15570943 = sum of:
      0.09960024 = weight(_text_:language in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09960024 = score(doc=6751,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents a system for summarizing quantitative data in natural language, focusing on the use of a corpus of basketball game summaries, drawn from online news services, to empirically shape the system design and to evaluate the approach. Initial corpus analysis revealed characteristics of textual summaries that challenge the capabilities of current language generation systems. A revision based corpus analysis was used to identify and encode the revision rules of the system. Presents a quantitative evaluation, using several test corpora, to measure the robustness of the new revision based model
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  16. Basili, R.; Pazienza, M.T.; Velardi, P.: ¬An empirical symbolic approach to natural language processing (1996) 0.08 
    0.077854715 = product of:
  0.15570943 = sum of:
    0.15570943 = sum of:
      0.09960024 = weight(_text_:language in 6753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09960024 = score(doc=6753,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 6753, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6753)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 6753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=6753,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6753, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6753)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Describes and evaluates the results of a large scale lexical learning system, ARISTO-LEX, that uses a combination of probabilisitc and knowledge based methods for the acquisition of selectional restrictions of words in sublanguages. Presents experimental data obtained from different corpora in different doamins and languages, and shows that the acquired lexical data not only have practical applications in natural language processing, but they are useful for a comparative analysis of sublanguages
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  17. Barker, A.L.: DataStar Web : a comparison with 'classic' DataStar command language searching (1998) 0.08 
    0.077854715 = product of:
  0.15570943 = sum of:
    0.15570943 = sum of:
      0.09960024 = weight(_text_:language in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09960024 = score(doc=7691,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=7691,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Compares and contrasts online searching on DataStar using the 'classic' command language, with access via the more recent Web interface (DataStar Web). The search functionality of the 2 interfaces is not identical, although both use the same retrieval software and access the same databases. Many of the differences affect retrieval effectiveness and may trip up novice and experienced searchers alike
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.155-167
  18. AAAI 1997 Spring symposium series reports (1997) 0.08 
    0.077854715 = product of:
  0.15570943 = sum of:
    0.15570943 = sum of:
      0.09960024 = weight(_text_:language in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09960024 = score(doc=2742,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Summarizes 7 symposia that were conducted: artificial intelligence in knowledge management; computational models for mixed initiative interaction; cross-language text and speech retrieval; intelligent integration and use of text, image video, and audio corporate; natural language processing for the WWW; ontological engineering; and qualitative preferences in deliberation and practical reasoning
    Date
    22. 1.1999 19:01:49
  19. Green, E.; Head, A.J.: Web-based catalogs : is their design language anything to talk about? (1998) 0.08 
    0.077854715 = product of:
  0.15570943 = sum of:
    0.15570943 = sum of:
      0.09960024 = weight(_text_:language in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09960024 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Stanford University's Socrates II and University of California at Berkeley's Pathfinder are 2 USA World Wide Web based online publication access catalogues under development. They differ in their design language (how an interface functionally and visually communicates to the users). Evaluates each system's interface design and their ability to communicate functionality to users: analyzes design in terms of: colour, buttons, metaphors, layout, and basic and advanced search modes. Concludes that the design languages of both systems have the right directive and have the potential to evolve
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.98-105
  20. Ruge, G.: Sprache und Computer : Wortbedeutung und Termassoziation. Methoden zur automatischen semantischen Klassifikation (1995) 0.08 
    0.077854715 = product of:
  0.15570943 = sum of:
    0.15570943 = sum of:
      0.09960024 = weight(_text_:language in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09960024 = score(doc=1534,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: (1) Motivation; (2) Language philosophical foundations; (3) Structural comparison of extensions; (4) Earlier approaches towards term association; (5) Experiments; (6) Spreading-activation networks or memory models; (7) Perspective. Appendices: Heads and modifiers of 'car'. Glossary. Index. Language and computer. Word semantics and term association. Methods towards an automatic semantic classification
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.182-184 (M.T. Rolland)

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1784
  • m 183
  • s 99
  • el 31
  • i 19
  • b 14
  • r 13
  • x 7
  • ? 5
  • d 4
  • n 3
  • p 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications