Search (1632 results, page 1 of 82)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. DeRaedt, L.: Logical settings for concept-learning (1997) 0.07 
    0.06882753 = product of:
  0.24089634 = sum of:
    0.20599218 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20599218 = score(doc=3780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.7903678 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
    0.03490417 = product of:
      0.06980834 = sum of:
        0.06980834 = weight(_text_:22 in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06980834 = score(doc=3780,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Analyzes 3 different formalisations of concept-learning in logic. Learning from interpretations reduces to learning from entailment, which in turn reduces to learning from satisfiability. Discusses the implications for inductive logic programming and computational learning theory and formulates guidelines for choosing a problem-setting method
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    22. 1.1999 18:56:45
  2. Library of Congress rule interpretations : LCRI (1991) 0.05 
    0.050969847 = product of:
  0.3567889 = sum of:
    0.3567889 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 8048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3567889 = score(doc=8048,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        1.3689572 = fieldWeight in 8048, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8048)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Provides all valid LC rule interpretations issued since the AACR2 1988 revision. All rule numbers cited are referenced to AACR2 revision. Rule interpretations are written to ensure uniform and consistent application of cataloging rules set forth in AACR2. A revised index with each quarterly update highlights significant schanges
  3. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.05 
    0.046134636 = product of:
  0.16147122 = sum of:
    0.14419453 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14419453 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
    0.017276684 = product of:
      0.034553368 = sum of:
        0.034553368 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034553368 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  4. Kim, S.H.; Eastman, C.M.: ¬An experiment on node size in a hypermedia system (1999) 0.05 
    0.046134636 = product of:
  0.16147122 = sum of:
    0.14419453 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14419453 = score(doc=3673,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
    0.017276684 = product of:
      0.034553368 = sum of:
        0.034553368 = weight(_text_:22 in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034553368 = score(doc=3673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The node size that should be used in a hypermedia system is an important design issue. 3 interpretations of node size are identified: storage (physical size), window size (presentation size), and length (logical size). an experiment in which presentation size and text length are varied in a HyperCard application is described. The experiment involves student subjects performing a fact retrieval task from a reference handbook. No interaction is found between these 2 independent variables. Performance is significantly better for the longer texts, but no significant difference is found for the 2 different window sizes
    Date
    22. 5.1999 9:35:20
  5. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.05 
    0.046134636 = product of:
  0.16147122 = sum of:
    0.14419453 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14419453 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.017276684 = product of:
      0.034553368 = sum of:
        0.034553368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034553368 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  6. Howarth, L.: AACR2 decision and rule interpretations (1995) 0.04 
    0.041616704 = product of:
  0.29131693 = sum of:
    0.29131693 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29131693 = score(doc=1904,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        1.1177489 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Consolidates the decisions of 4 major national library agencies: LoC, BL, NLC, NLA on the options, alternatives and interpretations of rules that govern their cataloguing under AACR2. It replaces all other editions previously issued and is updated through Oct. 1994
  7. White, H.D.; Bates, M.J.; Wilson, P.: For information specialists : interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (1992) 0.04 
    0.035312947 = product of:
  0.24719062 = sum of:
    0.24719062 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 7742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24719062 = score(doc=7742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.9484414 = fieldWeight in 7742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7742)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  8. Barry, A.; Stanton, D.: Campus wide information system access (1994) 0.03 
    0.029427456 = product of:
  0.20599218 = sum of:
    0.20599218 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20599218 = score(doc=606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.7903678 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Defines a campus wide information system (CWIS) and discusses the following interpretations of its purpose: as a guide to the campus; as a gateway to the Internet; and as a publishing mechanism. Describes CWIS history, content, management, doftware and likely future developments focusing on the Internet Gopher software developed at the University of Minnesota
  9. Gilbert, J.: AACR2 headings for local churches and parishes in Great Britain (1997) 0.03 
    0.029427456 = product of:
  0.20599218 = sum of:
    0.20599218 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20599218 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.7903678 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Examines 2 categories of AACR2 headings where British Library and LoC practices are different: those for local churches and parishes. Suggests some interpretations of the relevant rules to reduce these differences
  10. Muhr, T.: ATLAS/ti : ein Interpretations-Unterstützung-System (1991) 0.03 
    0.029131696 = product of:
  0.20392185 = sum of:
    0.20392185 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20392185 = score(doc=796,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.7824242 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Beitrag stellt das Interpretations-Unterstützungs-System ATLAS/ti (ti=Textinterpretation) vor, das von Psychologen, Informatikern und Linguisten im Rahmen des interdisziplinären Forschungsprojekts ATLAS an der Technischen Universität Berlin entwickelt wird. Ausgangspunkt für die Entwicklung unseres Systems ist die Erfahrung von Sozialwissenschaftlern, in den bei qualitativ orientierten Untersuchungen anfallenden, großen Daten- und Textmengen regelrecht zu ertrinken. ATLAS/ti stellt einen neuartigen Typ von Informationssystem dar, zugeschnitten auf die spezifischen Bedürfnisse von Forschern mit qualitativ-hermeneutischer Ausrichtung. Systematische Auseinandersetzung mit textuellem Material definiert weitere Anwendungsfelder: Akquisition von Expertenwissen aus verbalen Protokollen, vergleichende Literaturanalyse, Kommentierung juristischer Fachtexte, Analyse von Argumentationsstrukturen in Round-Table-Diskussionen
  11. RSWK-Mitteilung Nr.10 : Entwurf (1997) 0.03 
    0.027851269 = product of:
  0.19495887 = sum of:
    0.19495887 = product of:
      0.5848766 = sum of:
        0.5848766 = weight(_text_:rswk_00 in 6540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5848766 = score(doc=6540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40090144 = queryWeight, product of:
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            1.4589037 = fieldWeight in 6540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6540)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Vgl. für den Vorabdruck der Regeln: http://www.dbi-berlin.de/dbi_pub/einzelpu/regelw/rswk/rswk_00.htm
  12. Rabitti, F.; Savino, P.: Automatic image indexation to support content-based retrieval (1992) 0.02 
    0.024970023 = product of:
  0.17479016 = sum of:
    0.17479016 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 3032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17479016 = score(doc=3032,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.6706493 = fieldWeight in 3032, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3032)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The article presents a new approach for the automatic interpretation of the content of graphical and pictorial images and the creation of access structures based on this analysis. The automatic indexation of images is necessary to support the access to a database of images, giving conditions of the semantic image content. The key aspect of the image analysis process is on the composition of objects, in terms of other objects, taking into account different interpretations and different levels of recognition. The image analysis process can be applied to images belonging to specific domains, described in advance to the system. Image analysis is performed in two steps: in the first step, simple objects are recognized starting from basic graphical/pictorial elements; in the second step, complex objects are recognized (applying domain rules) as compositions of simpler objects and different interpretations are generated. The image query language allows the user to express conditions on the objects to be found in the images, on their relative positions, on their interpretation and degree of recognition. A comprehensive example, based on 2D graphical images, is discussed, and the implemented prototype is described.
  13. Park, T.K.: ¬The nature of relevance in information retrieval : an empirical study (1993) 0.02 
    0.024970023 = product of:
  0.17479016 = sum of:
    0.17479016 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 5336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17479016 = score(doc=5336,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.6706493 = fieldWeight in 5336, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5336)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Experimental research in information retrieval (IR) depends on the idea of relevance. Because of its key role in IR, recent questions about relevance have raised issues of methododlogical concern and have shaken the philosophical foundations of IR theory development. Despite an existing set of theoretical definitions of this concept, our understanding of relevance from users' perspectives is still limited. Using naturalistic inquiry methodology, this article reports an emprical study of user-based relevance interpretations. A model is presented that reflects the nature of the thought process of users who are evaluating bibliographic citations produced by a document retrieval system. Three major categories of variables affecting relevance assessments - internal context, external context, and problem context - are idetified and described. Users' relevance assessments involve multiple layers of interpretations that are derived from individuals' experiences, perceptions, and private knowledge related to the particular information problems at hand
  14. Jänsch, W.: Multimedia CD-ROM-Anwendung in der Zukunft (1993) 0.02 
    0.024636947 = product of:
  0.17245862 = sum of:
    0.17245862 = sum of:
      0.11322428 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11322428 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
      0.05923434 = weight(_text_:22 in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05923434 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  15. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.02 
    0.024636947 = product of:
  0.17245862 = sum of:
    0.17245862 = sum of:
      0.11322428 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11322428 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.05923434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05923434 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  16. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02 
    0.024636947 = product of:
  0.17245862 = sum of:
    0.17245862 = sum of:
      0.11322428 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11322428 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.05923434 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05923434 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  17. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02 
    0.024636947 = product of:
  0.17245862 = sum of:
    0.17245862 = sum of:
      0.11322428 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11322428 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.05923434 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05923434 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  18. Goldney, D.: Ecologists, computers and maps (1990) 0.02 
    0.023541965 = product of:
  0.16479374 = sum of:
    0.16479374 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 4582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16479374 = score(doc=4582,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 4582, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4582)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Ecologists are interested in presenting results in forms in which patterns of interpretations are more or less evident such as statistical mapping, conventional mapping, interrelations between patterns and modelling of phenomena. Most of these techniques require the use of computer technology - statistical packages, predictive modelling and geographical information systems. Illustrates a range of mapping techniques used in 4 research projects
  19. Guiles, K.; Ewald, R.; Tillett, B.: ¬The evolution of LCRIs : from de facto standard to? (1996) 0.02 
    0.023541965 = product of:
  0.16479374 = sum of:
    0.16479374 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 8132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16479374 = score(doc=8132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 8132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8132)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Describes the evolution of Library of Congress Rule Interpretations (LCRIs) from what initially was internal documentation prepared for the use of descriptive cataloguers at the Library of Congress to their current status as a de facto national cataloguing standard and explores the role they may play in the cataloguing of the future
  20. Owei, V.; Higa, K.: ¬A paradigm for natural language explanation of database queries : a semantic data model approach (1994) 0.02 
    0.023541965 = product of:
  0.16479374 = sum of:
    0.16479374 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 8189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16479374 = score(doc=8189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 8189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8189)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    An interface that provides the user with automatic feedback in the form of an explanation of how the database management system interprets user specified queries. Proposes an approach that exploits the rich semantics of graphical semantic data models to construct a restricted natural language explanation of database queries that are specified in a very high level declarative form. These interpretations of the specified query represent the system's 'understanding' of the query, and are returned to the user for validation

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1336
  • m 160
  • s 86
  • el 26
  • x 16
  • i 15
  • r 13
  • b 8
  • ? 7
  • p 5
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • h 2
  • l 2
  • au 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications