Search (1746 results, page 1 of 88)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.26
    0.26003048 = sum of:
      0.016873376 = product of:
        0.067493506 = sum of:
          0.067493506 = weight(_text_:authors in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067493506 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2233335 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2431571 = sum of:
        0.2033328 = weight(_text_:h.c in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2033328 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048989385 = queryNorm
            0.5245427 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
        0.03982431 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03982431 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048989385 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  2. White, H.C.; Carrier, S.; Thompson, A.; Greenberg, J.; Scherle, R.: ¬The Dryad Data Repository : a Singapore framework metadata architecture in a DSpace environment (2008) 0.14
    0.14184165 = product of:
      0.2836833 = sum of:
        0.2836833 = sum of:
          0.2372216 = weight(_text_:h.c in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2372216 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.6119665 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
          0.046461698 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046461698 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.12
    0.1246255 = product of:
      0.249251 = sum of:
        0.249251 = product of:
          0.498502 = sum of:
            0.19452032 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19452032 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41533256 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048989385 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.30398166 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30398166 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.519203 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048989385 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  4. Roussinov, D.; Chen, H.C.: Information navigation on the web by clustering and summarizing query results (2001) 0.12
    0.1186108 = product of:
      0.2372216 = sum of:
        0.2372216 = product of:
          0.4744432 = sum of:
            0.4744432 = weight(_text_:h.c in 14) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4744432 = score(doc=14,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048989385 = queryNorm
                1.223933 = fieldWeight in 14, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=14)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.09
    0.09258888 = sum of:
      0.075995415 = product of:
        0.30398166 = sum of:
          0.30398166 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.30398166 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.519203 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.016593464 = product of:
        0.033186927 = sum of:
          0.033186927 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033186927 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  6. White, H.C.: Exploring evolutionary biologists' use and perceptions of semantic metadata for data curation (2008) 0.08
    0.08105238 = product of:
      0.16210476 = sum of:
        0.16210476 = sum of:
          0.13555521 = weight(_text_:h.c in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13555521 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.34969515 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
          0.026549542 = weight(_text_:22 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026549542 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.07826825 = sum of:
      0.058356095 = product of:
        0.23342438 = sum of:
          0.23342438 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23342438 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41533256 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.019912155 = product of:
        0.03982431 = sum of:
          0.03982431 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03982431 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  8. Hernon, P.; Relyea, H.C.: Information policy: United States (2009) 0.07
    0.067777604 = product of:
      0.13555521 = sum of:
        0.13555521 = product of:
          0.27111042 = sum of:
            0.27111042 = weight(_text_:h.c in 3805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27111042 = score(doc=3805,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048989385 = queryNorm
                0.6993903 = fieldWeight in 3805, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3805)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Ozmutlu, S.; Spink, A.; Ozmutlu, H.C.: ¬A day in the life of Web searching : an exploratory study (2004) 0.06
    0.0593054 = product of:
      0.1186108 = sum of:
        0.1186108 = product of:
          0.2372216 = sum of:
            0.2372216 = weight(_text_:h.c in 2530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2372216 = score(doc=2530,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048989385 = queryNorm
                0.6119665 = fieldWeight in 2530, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2530)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Timelines of creativity : A study of intellectual innovators in information science (2007) 0.06
    0.0593054 = product of:
      0.1186108 = sum of:
        0.1186108 = product of:
          0.2372216 = sum of:
            0.2372216 = weight(_text_:h.c in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2372216 = score(doc=480,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048989385 = queryNorm
                0.6119665 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We explore the relationship between creativity and both chronological and professional age in information science using a novel bibliometric approach that allows us to capture the shape of a scholar's career. Our approach draws on D.W. Galenson's (2006) analyses of artistic creativity, notably his distinction between conceptual and experimental innovation, and also H.C. Lehman's (1953) seminal study of the relationship between stage of career and outstanding performance. The data presented here suggest that creativity is expressed in different ways, at different times, and with different intensities in academic information science.
  11. Ozumutlu, H.C.; Cavdur, F.: ¬Application of automatic topic identification on Excite Web search engine data logs (2005) 0.06
    0.0593054 = product of:
      0.1186108 = sum of:
        0.1186108 = product of:
          0.2372216 = sum of:
            0.2372216 = weight(_text_:h.c in 1047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2372216 = score(doc=1047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048989385 = queryNorm
                0.6119665 = fieldWeight in 1047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Ozmutlu, S.; Spink, A.; Ozmutlu, H.C.: Multimedia Web searching trends : 1997-2001 (2003) 0.06
    0.0593054 = product of:
      0.1186108 = sum of:
        0.1186108 = product of:
          0.2372216 = sum of:
            0.2372216 = weight(_text_:h.c in 1072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2372216 = score(doc=1072,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048989385 = queryNorm
                0.6119665 = fieldWeight in 1072, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1072)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Can, F.; Kocberber, S.; Balcik, E.; Kaynak, C.; Ocalan, H.C.: Information retrieval on Turkish texts (2008) 0.06
    0.0593054 = product of:
      0.1186108 = sum of:
        0.1186108 = product of:
          0.2372216 = sum of:
            0.2372216 = weight(_text_:h.c in 1373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2372216 = score(doc=1373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3876382 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048989385 = queryNorm
                0.6119665 = fieldWeight in 1373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.06
    0.057327323 = sum of:
      0.034096472 = product of:
        0.13638589 = sum of:
          0.13638589 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13638589 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.2233335 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.023230849 = product of:
        0.046461698 = sum of:
          0.046461698 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046461698 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.05
    0.0510705 = sum of:
      0.027839651 = product of:
        0.111358605 = sum of:
          0.111358605 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.111358605 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2233335 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.023230849 = product of:
        0.046461698 = sum of:
          0.046461698 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046461698 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
  16. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.05
    0.045033418 = sum of:
      0.016873376 = product of:
        0.067493506 = sum of:
          0.067493506 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067493506 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2233335 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.028160043 = product of:
        0.056320086 = sum of:
          0.056320086 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056320086 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  17. Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006) 0.04
    0.043774717 = sum of:
      0.02386256 = product of:
        0.09545024 = sum of:
          0.09545024 = weight(_text_:authors in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09545024 = score(doc=5293,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2233335 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.019912155 = product of:
        0.03982431 = sum of:
          0.03982431 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03982431 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:38:51
  18. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.04
    0.043774717 = sum of:
      0.02386256 = product of:
        0.09545024 = sum of:
          0.09545024 = weight(_text_:authors in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09545024 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2233335 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.019912155 = product of:
        0.03982431 = sum of:
          0.03982431 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03982431 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
  19. Kavcic-Colic, A.: Archiving the Web : some legal aspects (2003) 0.04
    0.042916454 = sum of:
      0.019685607 = product of:
        0.07874243 = sum of:
          0.07874243 = weight(_text_:authors in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07874243 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2233335 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.023230849 = product of:
        0.046461698 = sum of:
          0.046461698 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046461698 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Technological developments have changed the concepts of publication, reproduction and distribution. However, legislation, and in particular the Legal Deposit Law has not adjusted to these changes - it is very restrictive in the sense of protecting the rights of authors of electronic publications. National libraries and national archival institutions, being aware of their important role in preserving the written and spoken cultural heritage, try to find different legal ways to live up to these responsibilities. This paper presents some legal aspects of archiving Web pages, examines the harvesting of Web pages, provision of public access to pages, and their long-term preservation.
    Date
    10.12.2005 11:22:13
  20. Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006) 0.04
    0.042916454 = sum of:
      0.019685607 = product of:
        0.07874243 = sum of:
          0.07874243 = weight(_text_:authors in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07874243 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2233335 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.023230849 = product of:
        0.046461698 = sum of:
          0.046461698 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046461698 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17155248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048989385 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:37:49

Languages

Types

  • a 1463
  • m 202
  • el 83
  • s 76
  • b 26
  • x 14
  • i 8
  • r 4
  • n 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications