Search (10285 results, page 1 of 515)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.20 
    0.20290211 = sum of:
  0.19978015 = product of:
    0.4994504 = sum of:
      0.19489041 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19489041 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41612273 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.30455998 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.30455998 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5201908 = queryWeight, product of:
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
    0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.0031219586 = product of:
    0.006243917 = sum of:
      0.006243917 = weight(_text_:a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.006243917 = score(doc=692,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
    Type
    a
  2. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.10 
    0.09776699 = sum of:
  0.060911994 = product of:
    0.30455998 = sum of:
      0.30455998 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.30455998 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5201908 = queryWeight, product of:
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.036854994 = sum of:
    0.0036049266 = weight(_text_:a in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036049266 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.033250067 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033250067 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
    Type
    a
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.095325604 = sum of:
  0.0467737 = product of:
    0.23386848 = sum of:
      0.23386848 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23386848 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41612273 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.048551902 = sum of:
    0.008651825 = weight(_text_:a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008651825 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.039900076 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039900076 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Type
    a
  4. Diederichs, A.: Wissensmanagement ist Macht : Effektiv und kostenbewußt arbeiten im Informationszeitalter (2005) 0.08 
    0.083393335 = product of:
  0.16678667 = sum of:
    0.16678667 = sum of:
      0.016314037 = weight(_text_:a in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016314037 = score(doc=3211,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
      0.15047263 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15047263 = score(doc=3211,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2005 9:16:22
    Type
    a
  5. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.08 
    0.08262065 = sum of:
  0.027329076 = product of:
    0.13664538 = sum of:
      0.13664538 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13664538 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.055291574 = sum of:
    0.008741484 = weight(_text_:a in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008741484 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.04655009 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04655009 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  6. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.08 
    0.081004195 = product of:
  0.16200839 = sum of:
    0.16200839 = sum of:
      0.011535766 = weight(_text_:a in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011535766 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.15047263 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15047263 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
    Type
    a
  7. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.08 
    0.081004195 = product of:
  0.16200839 = sum of:
    0.16200839 = sum of:
      0.011535766 = weight(_text_:a in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011535766 = score(doc=4109,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
      0.15047263 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15047263 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22
    Type
    a
  8. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.08 
    0.07860345 = sum of:
  0.013524383 = product of:
    0.06762192 = sum of:
      0.06762192 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06762192 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.06507906 = sum of:
    0.008651825 = weight(_text_:a in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008651825 = score(doc=101,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.056427237 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056427237 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
    Type
    a
  9. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.08 
    0.07760567 = sum of:
  0.022314096 = product of:
    0.11157048 = sum of:
      0.11157048 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11157048 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.055291574 = sum of:
    0.008741484 = weight(_text_:a in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008741484 = score(doc=5267,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.04655009 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04655009 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
    Type
    a
  10. Education for library cataloging : international perspectives (2006) 0.08 
    0.0775248 = sum of:
  0.04831357 = product of:
    0.12078392 = sum of:
      0.0398466 = weight(_text_:authors in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0398466 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.17807868 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
      0.08093732 = weight(_text_:scotland in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08093732 = score(doc=207,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3792413 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.21341905 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
    0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.029211236 = sum of:
    0.0056998897 = weight(_text_:a in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0056998897 = score(doc=207,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.100714505 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
    0.023511346 = weight(_text_:22 in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023511346 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
    Classification
    025.3/071 22
    Content
    Inhalt: Education and training for cataloguing at the University of Botswana Library : an overview / Rose Tiny Kgosiemang -- The relevance of cataloguing in library science curriculum in Cross River State of Nigeria in this technological age / J.I. Iwe -- The education and training of cataloguing students in South Africa through distance education / Linda M. Cloete -- Education of cataloging and classification in China / Zhanghua Ma -- The status quo and future development of cataloging and classification education in China / Li Si -- Education for knowledge organization : the Indian scene / K.S. Raghavan -- Current status of cataloging and classification education in Japan / Shoichi Taniguchi -- A study on the job training and self-training of the cataloging and classification librarians working in South Korean academic libraries / Chul-Wan Kwak -- Beyond our expectations : a review of an independent learning module in descriptive cataloguing at the Queensland University of for cataloguing and classification in Australia / Ross Harvey, Susan Reynolds -- Education for cataloging and classification in Austria and Germany / Monika Münnich, Heidi Zotter-Straka, Petra Hauke -- Education and training on studies and professional librarianship schools / Anna Sitarska -- Cataloging education on the sunny side of the Alps / Jerry D. Saye, Alenka ^Sauperl -- Education for cataloging in Spanish universities : a descriptive and López-Cózar -- Education and training for cataloguing and classification in the British Isles / J.H. Bowman -- The teaching of information processing in the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina / Elsa E. Barber, Silvia L. Pisano -- Education for cataloging and classification in Mexico / Filiberto Felipe Martínez Arellano -- Education for cataloging and related areas in Peru / Ana María Talavera Ibarra -- Cataloging and classification education in Egypt : stressing the fundamentals while moving toward automated applications / Mohammed Fat'hy Abdel Hady, Ali Kamal Shaker -- An account of cataloging and classification education in Iranian universities / Mortaza Kokabi -- Cataloging instruction in Israel / Snunith Shoham -- Continuing education for catalogers in Saudi Arabia / Zahiruddin Khurshid.
    DDC
    025.3/071 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 33(2006) no.2, S.119-20 (S.S. Intner): "This survey of cataloging education around the world offers readers a rich menu of experiences, educational offerings, and approaches to the subject of cataloging education as it is currently practiced in 24 countries of the world, excluding the United States and Canada. The exclusion does not mean that English-speaking countries are entirely absent from the book, however. Two nations outside North America, South Africa (in one chapter) and Australia (in two chapters), are covered. The chapters are organized geographically, beginning with the African continent, and followed by several each under headings for Asia, Australia (two chapters), Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Nations whose cataloging education programs are described include (in order of presentation) Botswana, Nigeria, South Africa, China (both the People's Republic of China and Taiwan), India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Austria and Germany (described together in one chapter), Poland, Slovenia, Spain, the British Isles (England, Scotland, and Wales), Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Egypt, Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. As readers might expect, many chapters reflect common experiences among the countries, particularly regarding the proliferation of subjects in competition with cataloging and classification in library school curricula. There are also some common problems, such as dealing with the changes in education and training prompted by automation. Generally, computer-based cataloging is not a new issue anywhere, although in some areas of the world, catalogers still work with manual systems. Describing cataloging education in Nigeria, J. I. Iwe states: "... the card catalogue is still being used in all libraries, including the University of Calabar library where the only library school in the state exists (p. 33)." In other places, computer infrastructure has developed to a level that supports coursework online. As Linda M. Cloete writes, "The ultimate goal of the training resource program is to develop an online, fully interactive course: an online virtual cataloging classroom (p. 66)."
    The eternal debate in the teaching of cataloging over theory versus practice emerges in this volume. As Li Si suggests in describing cataloging education in the People's Republic of China, the matter might be laid at the door of the faculty, stating, "Although the majority of teaching faculty members in the library and information science programs have a solid theoretical foundation from their school education and training, they do not normally possess practical work experience in their field of specialty and they are not familiar with the application of technologies in the field. In order to enhance their practical skills, these faculty members should be given the opportunity to work in libraries... This way, they would be able to put theory into practice and gain rich, practical field experience, thus improving the relevance and quality of their teaching (p. 97)." One wonders how warmly faculty members would welcome that kind of opportunity! On the other hand, in many places, onthe-job training is weak, as Shoichi Taniguchi describes it in Japan, "on the job training and continuing education are neither encouraged nor promoted (p. 132)." Among the most interesting and important aspects of this book are the tables of hard data it presents. Almost every chapter reports on surveys done by the authors on the state of library education in general and/or the kinds of offerings in cataloging and classification available within their countries. Some authors also include statistics on the numbers of persons receiving certificates, diplomas, and/or master's degrees, which is useful in understanding the different levels of expertise being developed over time. While one could argue that there are gaps in coverage, with large, influential countries such as France and Italy in Europe, Brazil, Bolivia, and Chile in South America, and Thailand and Myanmar in Asia, left out of the book, for the most part there is good representation from different parts of the globe. Education for Library Cataloging is a good choice as a textbook for coursework in International Librarianship as well as a primer in what to expect if one's information center is affiliated with partners outside the United States and Canada. This book should be seen as an important "must read" for all library students and practitioners concerned about issues of increasing globalization in bibliographic control. It is highly recommended."
  11. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.07 
    0.073434874 = product of:
  0.14686975 = sum of:
    0.14686975 = sum of:
      0.008651825 = weight(_text_:a in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008651825 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.13821793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13821793 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
    Type
    a
  12. Copeland, A.; Hamburger, S.; Hamilton, J.; Robinson, K.J.: Cataloging and digitizing ephemera : one team's experience with Pennsylvania German broadsides and fraktur (2006) 0.07 
    0.07242234 = sum of:
  0.015778448 = product of:
    0.07889224 = sum of:
      0.07889224 = weight(_text_:authors in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07889224 = score(doc=768,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.05664389 = sum of:
    0.010093795 = weight(_text_:a in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010093795 = score(doc=768,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
    0.04655009 = weight(_text_:22 in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04655009 = score(doc=768,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
    Abstract
    The growing interest in ephemera collections within libraries will necessitate the bibliographic control of materials that do not easily fall into traditional categories. This paper discusses the many challenges confronting catalogers when approaching a mixed collection of unique materials of an ephemeral nature. Based on their experience cataloging a collection of Pennsylvania German broadsides and Fraktur at the Pennsylvania State University, the authors describe the process of deciphering handwriting, preserving genealogical information, deciding on cataloging approaches at the format and field level, and furthering access to the materials through digitization and the Encoded Archival Description finding aid. Observations are made on expanding the skills of traditional book catalogers to include manuscript cataloging, and on project management.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  13. Feinberg, M.: Classificationist as author : the case of the Prelinger Library (2008) 0.07 
    0.07242234 = sum of:
  0.015778448 = product of:
    0.07889224 = sum of:
      0.07889224 = weight(_text_:authors in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07889224 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.05664389 = sum of:
    0.010093795 = weight(_text_:a in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010093795 = score(doc=2237,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
    0.04655009 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04655009 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
    Content
    Within information science, neutrality and objectivity have been standard design goals for knowledge organization schemes; designers have seen themselves as compilers, rather than as authors or creators. The organization of resources in the Prelinger Library in San Francisco, however, shows a distinct authorial voice, or unique sense of expression and vision. This voice, in turn, works as a persuasive mechanism, facilitating a rhetorical purpose for the collection.
    Pages
    S.22-28
    Type
    a
  14. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.07 
    0.072004184 = sum of:
  0.019126369 = product of:
    0.09563184 = sum of:
      0.09563184 = weight(_text_:authors in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09563184 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.052877814 = sum of:
    0.012977737 = weight(_text_:a in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012977737 = score(doc=2751,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
    0.039900076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039900076 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
    Abstract
    Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
    Type
    a
  15. Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006) 0.07 
    0.07107002 = sum of:
  0.015778448 = product of:
    0.07889224 = sum of:
      0.07889224 = weight(_text_:authors in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07889224 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.055291574 = sum of:
    0.008741484 = weight(_text_:a in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008741484 = score(doc=5287,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
    0.04655009 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04655009 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
    Abstract
    Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:37:49
    Type
    a
  16. Dunsire, G.: ¬The Internet as a tool for cataloguing and classification, a view from the UK (2000) 0.07 
    0.07099377 = sum of:
  0.06474986 = product of:
    0.32374927 = sum of:
      0.32374927 = weight(_text_:scotland in 6062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.32374927 = score(doc=6062,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3792413 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.8536762 = fieldWeight in 6062, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6062)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.006243917 = product of:
    0.012487834 = sum of:
      0.012487834 = weight(_text_:a in 6062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012487834 = score(doc=6062,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 6062, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6062)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The use of various Internet services by library cataloguers and subject classifiers is discussed, with special reference to Scotland and the remainder of the United Kingdom. Services include e-mail, FTP, and Websites
    Type
    a
  17. Pesch, K.: ¬Eine gigantische Informationsfülle : "Brockhaus multimedial 2004" kann jedoch nicht rundum überzeugen (2003) 0.07 
    0.07087867 = product of:
  0.14175734 = sum of:
    0.14175734 = sum of:
      0.010093795 = weight(_text_:a in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010093795 = score(doc=502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
      0.13166355 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13166355 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    22. 9.2003 10:02:00
    Type
    a
  18. Hemminger, B.M.: Introduction to the special issue on bioinformatics (2005) 0.07 
    0.07087867 = product of:
  0.14175734 = sum of:
    0.14175734 = sum of:
      0.010093795 = weight(_text_:a in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010093795 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.13166355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13166355 = score(doc=4189,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:19:22
    Type
    a
  19. Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006) 0.07 
    0.069622725 = sum of:
  0.019126369 = product of:
    0.09563184 = sum of:
      0.09563184 = weight(_text_:authors in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09563184 = score(doc=5293,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.050496355 = sum of:
    0.010596277 = weight(_text_:a in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010596277 = score(doc=5293,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
    0.039900076 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039900076 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
    Abstract
    The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:38:51
    Type
    a
  20. Kavcic-Colic, A.: Archiving the Web : some legal aspects (2003) 0.07 
    0.069465935 = sum of:
  0.015778448 = product of:
    0.07889224 = sum of:
      0.07889224 = weight(_text_:authors in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07889224 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.053687483 = sum of:
    0.0071373917 = weight(_text_:a in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071373917 = score(doc=4754,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
    0.04655009 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04655009 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04908259 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
    Abstract
    Technological developments have changed the concepts of publication, reproduction and distribution. However, legislation, and in particular the Legal Deposit Law has not adjusted to these changes - it is very restrictive in the sense of protecting the rights of authors of electronic publications. National libraries and national archival institutions, being aware of their important role in preserving the written and spoken cultural heritage, try to find different legal ways to live up to these responsibilities. This paper presents some legal aspects of archiving Web pages, examines the harvesting of Web pages, provision of public access to pages, and their long-term preservation.
    Date
    10.12.2005 11:22:13
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 9260
  • m 641
  • el 499
  • s 207
  • x 51
  • b 40
  • i 28
  • r 28
  • n 16
  • p 10
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications