Search (1745 results, page 1 of 88)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Lunin, L.F.: Design: the vision and the plans : additional resources (2009) 0.23
    0.23200035 = product of:
      0.4640007 = sum of:
        0.4640007 = sum of:
          0.38399044 = weight(_text_:l.f in 3104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.38399044 = score(doc=3104,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              1.0171115 = fieldWeight in 3104, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3104)
          0.08001028 = weight(_text_:22 in 3104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08001028 = score(doc=3104,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17233144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3104, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3104)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 9.2009 14:03:22
  2. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13
    0.12519138 = product of:
      0.25038275 = sum of:
        0.25038275 = product of:
          0.5007655 = sum of:
            0.19540359 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19540359 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41721845 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.30536193 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30536193 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.5215605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  3. Perspectives on MPEG-7 : metadata for multimedia (2007) 0.10
    0.09599761 = product of:
      0.19199522 = sum of:
        0.19199522 = product of:
          0.38399044 = sum of:
            0.38399044 = weight(_text_:l.f in 2361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38399044 = score(doc=2361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                1.0171115 = fieldWeight in 2361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Lunin, L.F., C. Jörgensen u. A.B. Benitez
  4. Lunin, L.F.; Martin, K.; Hastings, S.K.: Design: information technologies and creative practices (2009) 0.10
    0.09599761 = product of:
      0.19199522 = sum of:
        0.19199522 = product of:
          0.38399044 = sum of:
            0.38399044 = weight(_text_:l.f in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38399044 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                1.0171115 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Image access : bridging multiple needs and multiple perspectives (2001) 0.10
    0.09599761 = product of:
      0.19199522 = sum of:
        0.19199522 = product of:
          0.38399044 = sum of:
            0.38399044 = weight(_text_:l.f in 6515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38399044 = score(doc=6515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                1.0171115 = fieldWeight in 6515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Lunin, L.F. u. C. Jörgensen
  6. Normore, L.F.: Using Visualization to Understand Phrase Structure (2001) 0.10
    0.09599761 = product of:
      0.19199522 = sum of:
        0.19199522 = product of:
          0.38399044 = sum of:
            0.38399044 = weight(_text_:l.f in 1060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38399044 = score(doc=1060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                1.0171115 = fieldWeight in 1060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1060)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Normore, L.F.: Understanding Collections : Description and Access (2001) 0.10
    0.09599761 = product of:
      0.19199522 = sum of:
        0.19199522 = product of:
          0.38399044 = sum of:
            0.38399044 = weight(_text_:l.f in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38399044 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                1.0171115 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Normore, L.F.: Reference in Context Project (2001) 0.10
    0.09599761 = product of:
      0.19199522 = sum of:
        0.19199522 = product of:
          0.38399044 = sum of:
            0.38399044 = weight(_text_:l.f in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38399044 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                1.0171115 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.09
    0.09300929 = sum of:
      0.07634048 = product of:
        0.30536193 = sum of:
          0.30536193 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.30536193 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.5215605 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01666881 = product of:
        0.03333762 = sum of:
          0.03333762 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03333762 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17233144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  10. O'Connor, B.C.; Kearns, J.; Anderson, R.L.: Doing things with information : beyond indexing and abstracting (2008) 0.09
    0.0865984 = sum of:
      0.022599991 = product of:
        0.090399966 = sum of:
          0.090399966 = weight(_text_:authors in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.090399966 = score(doc=4297,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.22434758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.06399841 = product of:
        0.12799682 = sum of:
          0.12799682 = weight(_text_:l.f in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12799682 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.33903718 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    The authors state that this book emerged from a proposal to do a second edition of Explorations in Indexing and Abstracting (O'Connor 1996); much of its content is the result of the authors' reaction to the reviews of this first edition and their realization for "the necessity to address some more fundamental questions". Rez. in: KO 38(2011) no.1, S.62-64 (L.F. Spiteri): "This book provides a good overview of the relationship between the document and the user; in this regard, it reinforces the importance of the clientcentred approach to the design of document representation systems. In the final chapter, the authors state: "We have offered examples of new ways to think about messages in all sorts of media and how they might be discovered, analyzed, synthesized, and generated. We brought together philosophical, scientific, and engineering notions into a fundamental model for just how we might understand doing this with information" (p. 225). The authors have certainly succeeded in highlighting the complex processes, nature, and implications of document representation systems, although, as has been seen, the novelty of some of their discussions and suggestions is sometimes limited. With further explanation, the FOC model may serve as a useful way to understand how to build document representation systems to better meet user needs."; vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_38_2011_1e.pdf.
  11. Cheng, P.J.; Teng, J.W.; Chen, R.C.; Wang, J.H.; Lu, W.H.; Chien, L.F.: Translating unknown queries with Web corpora for cross-language information languages (2004) 0.08
    0.07999801 = product of:
      0.15999602 = sum of:
        0.15999602 = product of:
          0.31999204 = sum of:
            0.31999204 = weight(_text_:l.f in 4131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.31999204 = score(doc=4131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                0.84759295 = fieldWeight in 4131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.07862364 = sum of:
      0.05862107 = product of:
        0.23448429 = sum of:
          0.23448429 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23448429 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41721845 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02000257 = product of:
        0.04000514 = sum of:
          0.04000514 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04000514 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17233144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  13. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.06
    0.057587627 = sum of:
      0.034251295 = product of:
        0.13700518 = sum of:
          0.13700518 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13700518 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.22434758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.023336332 = product of:
        0.046672665 = sum of:
          0.046672665 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046672665 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17233144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. ¬The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision (2004) 0.06
    0.056473803 = sum of:
      0.008474997 = product of:
        0.03389999 = sum of:
          0.03389999 = weight(_text_:authors in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03389999 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22434758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.15110476 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.047998805 = product of:
        0.09599761 = sum of:
          0.09599761 = weight(_text_:l.f in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09599761 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.25427788 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Spiteri, L.F.: Word association testing and thesaurus construction: a pilot study. Aitchison, J., S.G. Dextre-Clarke: The Thesaurus: a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future. Thomas, A.R.: Teach yourself thesaurus: exercises, reading, resources. Shearer, J.R.: A practical exercise in building a thesaurus. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction: key issues and selected readings. Riesland, M.A.: Tools of the trade: vocabulary management software. Will, L.: Thesaurus consultancy. Owens, L.A., P.A. Cochrane: Thesaurus evaluation. Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri. Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services. Thomas, A.R., S.K. Roe: An interview with Dr. Amy J. Warner. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access: the linking approach of MACS.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.2, S.95-97 (A. Gilchrist):"It might be thought unfortunate that the word thesaurus is assonant with prehistoric beasts but as this book clearly demonstrates, the thesaurus is undergoing a notable revival, and we can remind ourselves that the word comes from the Greek thesaurus, meaning a treasury. This is a useful and timely source book, bringing together ten chapters, following an Editorial introduction and culminating in an interview with a member of the team responsible for revising the NISO Standard Guidelines for the construction, format and management of monolingual thesauri; formal proof of the thesaural renaissance. Though predominantly an American publication, it is good to see four English authors as well as one from Canada and one from Denmark; and with a good balance of academics and practitioners. This has helped to widen the net in the citing of useful references. While the techniques of thesaurus construction are still basically sound, the Editors, in their introduction, point out that the thesaurus, in its sense of an information retrieval tool is almost exactly 50 years old, and that the information environment of today is radically different. They claim three purposes for the compilation: "to acquaint or remind the Library and Information Science community of the history of the development of the thesaurus and standards for thesaurus construction. to provide bibliographies and tutorials from which any reader can become more grounded in her or his understanding of thesaurus construction, use and evaluation. to address topics related to thesauri but that are unique to the current digital environment, or network of networks." This last purpose, understandably, tends to be the slightly more tentative part of the book, but as Rosenfeld and Morville said in their book Information architecture for the World Wide Web "thesauri [will] become a key tool for dealing with the growing size and importance of web sites and intranets". The evidence supporting their belief has been growing steadily in the seven years since the first edition was published.
  15. Spiteri, L.F.: Word association testing and thesaurus construction : a pilot study (2005) 0.06
    0.055998605 = product of:
      0.11199721 = sum of:
        0.11199721 = product of:
          0.22399442 = sum of:
            0.22399442 = weight(_text_:l.f in 5216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22399442 = score(doc=5216,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                0.59331506 = fieldWeight in 5216, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5216)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.05
    0.051302396 = sum of:
      0.027966062 = product of:
        0.11186425 = sum of:
          0.11186425 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11186425 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22434758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.023336332 = product of:
        0.046672665 = sum of:
          0.046672665 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046672665 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17233144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
  17. Spiteri, L.F.: Causality and conceptual coherence in assessments of similarity (2008) 0.05
    0.047998805 = product of:
      0.09599761 = sum of:
        0.09599761 = product of:
          0.19199522 = sum of:
            0.19199522 = weight(_text_:l.f in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19199522 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                0.50855577 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Spiteri, L.F.: ¬The impact of social cataloguing sites on the construction of bibliographic records in the public library catalogue (2009) 0.05
    0.047998805 = product of:
      0.09599761 = sum of:
        0.09599761 = product of:
          0.19199522 = sum of:
            0.19199522 = weight(_text_:l.f in 2975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19199522 = score(doc=2975,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3775303 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04921183 = queryNorm
                0.50855577 = fieldWeight in 2975, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.6715355 = idf(docFreq=55, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2975)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.05
    0.045237903 = sum of:
      0.016949994 = product of:
        0.06779998 = sum of:
          0.06779998 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06779998 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22434758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.028287908 = product of:
        0.056575816 = sum of:
          0.056575816 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056575816 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17233144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  20. Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006) 0.04
    0.043973483 = sum of:
      0.023970911 = product of:
        0.095883645 = sum of:
          0.095883645 = weight(_text_:authors in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.095883645 = score(doc=5293,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22434758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02000257 = product of:
        0.04000514 = sum of:
          0.04000514 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04000514 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17233144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04921183 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:38:51

Languages

Types

  • a 1459
  • m 203
  • el 83
  • s 79
  • b 26
  • x 14
  • i 8
  • r 4
  • n 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications