Search (1742 results, page 1 of 88)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Notess, G.R.: Government information on the Internet (2004) 0.13
    0.13263077 = product of:
      0.26526153 = sum of:
        0.26526153 = sum of:
          0.21850094 = weight(_text_:g.r in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21850094 = score(doc=871,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.5854432 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
          0.046760585 = weight(_text_:22 in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046760585 = score(doc=871,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 2.2007 19:05:22
  2. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13
    0.12542722 = product of:
      0.25085443 = sum of:
        0.25085443 = product of:
          0.50170887 = sum of:
            0.19577168 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19577168 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4180044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.30593717 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30593717 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.522543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  3. Notess, G.R.: Tracking title search capabilities (2001) 0.12
    0.12485768 = product of:
      0.24971536 = sum of:
        0.24971536 = product of:
          0.49943072 = sum of:
            0.49943072 = weight(_text_:g.r in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.49943072 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                1.3381559 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Notess, G.R.: Searching engine prefixes and shortcuts (2004) 0.12
    0.12485768 = product of:
      0.24971536 = sum of:
        0.24971536 = product of:
          0.49943072 = sum of:
            0.49943072 = weight(_text_:g.r in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.49943072 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                1.3381559 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Notess, G.R.: Search engine relevance : the never-ending quest (2000) 0.11
    0.10925047 = product of:
      0.21850094 = sum of:
        0.21850094 = product of:
          0.43700188 = sum of:
            0.43700188 = weight(_text_:g.r in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.43700188 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                1.1708864 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Notess, G.R.: Up and coming search technologies (2000) 0.11
    0.10925047 = product of:
      0.21850094 = sum of:
        0.21850094 = product of:
          0.43700188 = sum of:
            0.43700188 = weight(_text_:g.r in 5467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.43700188 = score(doc=5467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                1.1708864 = fieldWeight in 5467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5467)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Notess, G.R.: Internet search engine update : new search features, developments, and content (2004) 0.11
    0.10925047 = product of:
      0.21850094 = sum of:
        0.21850094 = product of:
          0.43700188 = sum of:
            0.43700188 = weight(_text_:g.r in 2540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.43700188 = score(doc=2540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                1.1708864 = fieldWeight in 2540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Snow, B.: ¬The Internet's hidden content and how to find it (2000) 0.09
    0.09364326 = product of:
      0.18728653 = sum of:
        0.18728653 = product of:
          0.37457305 = sum of:
            0.37457305 = weight(_text_:g.r in 4801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.37457305 = score(doc=4801,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                1.0036169 = fieldWeight in 4801, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Notess, G.R.: Searching the hidden Internet. in: Database 20(1997) no.3, S.37-40.
  9. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.09
    0.0931845 = sum of:
      0.07648429 = product of:
        0.30593717 = sum of:
          0.30593717 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.30593717 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.522543 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01670021 = product of:
        0.03340042 = sum of:
          0.03340042 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03340042 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  10. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.078771755 = sum of:
      0.058731504 = product of:
        0.23492602 = sum of:
          0.23492602 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23492602 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4180044 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02004025 = product of:
        0.0400805 = sum of:
          0.0400805 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0400805 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  11. Notess, G.R.: On the net : dead search engines (2002) 0.06
    0.06242884 = product of:
      0.12485768 = sum of:
        0.12485768 = product of:
          0.24971536 = sum of:
            0.24971536 = weight(_text_:g.r in 1754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24971536 = score(doc=1754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                0.66907793 = fieldWeight in 1754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Notess, G.R.: Teaching Web search skills : techniques and strategies of top trainers (2006) 0.06
    0.06099223 = product of:
      0.12198446 = sum of:
        0.12198446 = sum of:
          0.09364326 = weight(_text_:g.r in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09364326 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.25090423 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.028341196 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028341196 = score(doc=201,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    025.04071 / 22
    DDC
    025.04071 / 22
  13. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.06
    0.05769611 = sum of:
      0.034315817 = product of:
        0.13726327 = sum of:
          0.13726327 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13726327 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.2247702 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.023380293 = product of:
        0.046760585 = sum of:
          0.046760585 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046760585 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Notess, G.R.: Custom search engines : tools and tips (2008) 0.05
    0.054625235 = product of:
      0.10925047 = sum of:
        0.10925047 = product of:
          0.21850094 = sum of:
            0.21850094 = weight(_text_:g.r in 2145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21850094 = score(doc=2145,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049304534 = queryNorm
                0.5854432 = fieldWeight in 2145, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Dewey, M.: Dewey Decimal Classification and relative index (2003) 0.05
    0.05348083 = product of:
      0.10696166 = sum of:
        0.10696166 = sum of:
          0.07803605 = weight(_text_:g.r in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07803605 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37322313 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.20908685 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
          0.028925613 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028925613 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Mitchell, J.S., J. Beall, W.E. Matthew u. G.R. New
    Footnote
    Changes DDC22 is the second edition prepared by Joan S. Mitchell who took over as editor in 1993. It carries forward the policies and improvements started in DDC21, especially the onslaught an the Christian and western cultural blas in the schedules and tables. The plan for reducing Christian blas in 200 Religion, initiated in DDC21, has now been completed, with some additional provisions in 296 and 297. An outstanding change has been the abrogation of Table 7 Persons. The functions of Table 7 are now filled by using T1-08 and whatever notation is appropriate from 011-999. There are at least six places in the tables and 12 places in the schedules where the use of T7 was prescribed; what good the abolition of T7 has produced is not clear. In fact, it does make number building in some cases a bit circuitous, especially while using Table 3C. It has also resulted in the reuse of many DDC 21 numbers with new meanings. However, some numbers remain the same e.g., Social customs of artists 390.47 (both in DDC21 and DDC22). A few numbers have also become shorter in length. In compliance with the recommendations of D'Elia's survey, all works relating to directories of travel facilities such as hotels, lodges, Motels, inns, have been shifted to 910.46 and to 913/919 whereas 647.94 continues to be in place for general information about hotels. A common practice in previous editions, that is full class or extensive revisions (phoenix schedules), appear to have been discontinued in the preparation of DDC22. But minor changes are numerous. There are more than one thousand relocations and discontiuations of class numbers. Some 40 numbers have been reused. ... However, all these changes are not those projected as slated changes for DDC22 in the DDC21 (1996), namely in 520 Astronomy, 355-359 Military science, 636-639 Animal husbandry and 690 Buildings. Obviously the switch over to the DDC 22 will put less strain an libraries. There has been considerable improvement in the manual, now shifted to volume 1 of the print edition (pp. 1-182). Notes in the manual have been shortened by removing redundant information and by dividing them into smaller sections. Some information from the manual has been transferred to the schedules and tables, in the form of notes. The manual is now clearer and easier to read. Flow Charts, built-in numbers, and see also references should help classifiers achieve greater consistency. The relative index has been beefed up. With its 928 pages, it is 333 pages longer than the previous one, including new built-in numbers and many additional terms. The entry vocabulary is wide-based and current. DDC 22, the first edition of this millennium, has kept pace with the fast changing information environment to map and organize it squarely. To quote our friends at OCLC: knowledge is a big world, and they have organized it."
    Object
    DDC-22
  16. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.05
    0.051399037 = sum of:
      0.028018745 = product of:
        0.11207498 = sum of:
          0.11207498 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11207498 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2247702 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.023380293 = product of:
        0.046760585 = sum of:
          0.046760585 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046760585 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
  17. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.05
    0.04532312 = sum of:
      0.016981924 = product of:
        0.067927696 = sum of:
          0.067927696 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067927696 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2247702 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.028341196 = product of:
        0.056682393 = sum of:
          0.056682393 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056682393 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  18. Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006) 0.04
    0.04405632 = sum of:
      0.024016067 = product of:
        0.09606427 = sum of:
          0.09606427 = weight(_text_:authors in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09606427 = score(doc=5293,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2247702 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02004025 = product of:
        0.0400805 = sum of:
          0.0400805 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0400805 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:38:51
  19. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.04
    0.04405632 = sum of:
      0.024016067 = product of:
        0.09606427 = sum of:
          0.09606427 = weight(_text_:authors in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09606427 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2247702 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02004025 = product of:
        0.0400805 = sum of:
          0.0400805 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0400805 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
  20. Kavcic-Colic, A.: Archiving the Web : some legal aspects (2003) 0.04
    0.043192536 = sum of:
      0.019812245 = product of:
        0.07924898 = sum of:
          0.07924898 = weight(_text_:authors in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07924898 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2247702 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.023380293 = product of:
        0.046760585 = sum of:
          0.046760585 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046760585 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17265607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049304534 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Technological developments have changed the concepts of publication, reproduction and distribution. However, legislation, and in particular the Legal Deposit Law has not adjusted to these changes - it is very restrictive in the sense of protecting the rights of authors of electronic publications. National libraries and national archival institutions, being aware of their important role in preserving the written and spoken cultural heritage, try to find different legal ways to live up to these responsibilities. This paper presents some legal aspects of archiving Web pages, examines the harvesting of Web pages, provision of public access to pages, and their long-term preservation.
    Date
    10.12.2005 11:22:13

Languages

Types

  • a 1459
  • m 202
  • el 83
  • s 76
  • b 26
  • x 14
  • i 8
  • r 4
  • n 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications