-
Liew, C.L.; Foo, S.; Chennupati, K.R.: ¬A proposed integrated environment for enhanced user interaction and value-adding of electronic documents : an empirical evaluation (2001)
0.16
0.16005401 = product of:
0.32010803 = sum of:
0.32010803 = sum of:
0.2669426 = weight(_text_:k.r in 5196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2669426 = score(doc=5196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.69356036 = fieldWeight in 5196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5196)
0.05316544 = weight(_text_:22 in 5196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05316544 = score(doc=5196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.22-35
-
Sawyer, S.; Eschenfelder, K.R.: Social informatics : perspectives, examples, and trends (2002)
0.13
0.1334713 = product of:
0.2669426 = sum of:
0.2669426 = product of:
0.5338852 = sum of:
0.5338852 = weight(_text_:k.r in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.5338852 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
1.3871207 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.12
0.124781236 = product of:
0.24956247 = sum of:
0.24956247 = product of:
0.49912494 = sum of:
0.19476342 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19476342 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4158516 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.30436152 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30436152 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5198518 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Kelton, K.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Wallace, W.A.: Trust in digital information (2008)
0.12
0.123995855 = sum of:
0.02389238 = product of:
0.09556952 = sum of:
0.09556952 = weight(_text_:authors in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09556952 = score(doc=1365,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.100103475 = product of:
0.20020695 = sum of:
0.20020695 = weight(_text_:k.r in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20020695 = score(doc=1365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.5201703 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Trust in information is developing into a vitally important topic as the Internet becomes increasingly ubiquitous within society. Although many discussions of trust in this environment focus on issues like security, technical reliability, or e-commerce, few address the problem of trust in the information obtained from the Internet. The authors assert that there is a strong need for theoretical and empirical research on trust within the field of information science. As an initial step, the present study develops a model of trust in digital information by integrating the research on trust from the behavioral and social sciences with the research on information quality and human- computer interaction. The model positions trust as a key mediating variable between information quality and information usage, with important consequences for both the producers and consumers of digital information. The authors close by outlining important directions for future research on trust in information science and technology.
-
Kegler, K.R.: Technik - Welt - Kultur : Technik im Spannungsfeld von Globalisierung und kultureller Identität (2003)
0.12
0.11678738 = product of:
0.23357476 = sum of:
0.23357476 = product of:
0.46714953 = sum of:
0.46714953 = weight(_text_:k.r in 4816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.46714953 = score(doc=4816,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
1.2137306 = fieldWeight in 4816, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4816)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Eschenfelder, K.R.; Howard, R.G.; Desai, A.C.: Who posts DeCSS and why? : a content analysis of Web sites posting DVD circumvention software (2005)
0.11
0.107804626 = sum of:
0.024385061 = product of:
0.097540244 = sum of:
0.097540244 = weight(_text_:authors in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097540244 = score(doc=4576,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.08341956 = product of:
0.16683912 = sum of:
0.16683912 = weight(_text_:k.r in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16683912 = score(doc=4576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.43347523 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study explored why Web authors post the DVD decryption software known as DeCSS - specifically whether authors post DeCSS to protest changes in copyright law. Data are drawn from content analysis of Web sites posting the software. Most DeCSS posters did not include any content explaining why they posted DeCSS; however, no authors presented DeCSS as a piracy tool. Of sites containing explanatory content, many argued that DeCSS is a legitimate tool to play DVDs an free/open source computers. Other sites asserted that current copyright law is unjust, and that DVD-related corporations are engaging in undesirable behaviors. Based an the data, and theorizing from rhetoric and the collective action literatures, we assert that much DeCSS posting is protest, but it may not be copyright protest-numerous posters protest related issues such as freedom of speech. More research is needed to determine the significance of DeCSS posting to broader copyright policy debates including its relation to off-line protest, and the development of shared identities and cognitive frames. Also, the complexities of circumvention issues raise concerns about whether policy debate will be limited to elftes. Finally, data point to the need to understand both international and local laws, norms, and events when studying copyright protest activity.
-
Eschenfelder, K.R.; Desai, A.C.; Alderman, l.; Sin, S.J.; Vi, S.: ¬The limits of DeCSS posting : a comparison of internet posting of DVD circumvention devices in the European Union and China (2005)
0.10
0.100103475 = product of:
0.20020695 = sum of:
0.20020695 = product of:
0.4004139 = sum of:
0.4004139 = weight(_text_:k.r in 4389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4004139 = score(doc=4389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
1.0403405 = fieldWeight in 4389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4389)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.09
0.09270458 = sum of:
0.07609038 = product of:
0.30436152 = sum of:
0.30436152 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30436152 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5198518 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0166142 = product of:
0.0332284 = sum of:
0.0332284 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0332284 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.08
0.07836606 = sum of:
0.058429025 = product of:
0.2337161 = sum of:
0.2337161 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2337161 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4158516 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019937038 = product of:
0.039874077 = sum of:
0.039874077 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039874077 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Riggs, K.R.: XML and free text (2002)
0.07
0.06673565 = product of:
0.1334713 = sum of:
0.1334713 = product of:
0.2669426 = sum of:
0.2669426 = weight(_text_:k.r in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2669426 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.69356036 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Srivathsan, K.R.: Five laws of information service and architecting knowledge infrastructure for education and development (2006)
0.07
0.06673565 = product of:
0.1334713 = sum of:
0.1334713 = product of:
0.2669426 = sum of:
0.2669426 = weight(_text_:k.r in 1513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2669426 = score(doc=1513,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.69356036 = fieldWeight in 1513, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1513)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sharma, R.K.; Vishwanathan, K.R.: Digital libraries : development and challenges (2001)
0.06
0.05839369 = product of:
0.11678738 = sum of:
0.11678738 = product of:
0.23357476 = sum of:
0.23357476 = weight(_text_:k.r in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23357476 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.6068653 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006)
0.06
0.05739896 = sum of:
0.03413908 = product of:
0.13655633 = sum of:
0.13655633 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13655633 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02325988 = product of:
0.04651976 = sum of:
0.04651976 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04651976 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006)
0.05
0.051134326 = sum of:
0.027874444 = product of:
0.111497775 = sum of:
0.111497775 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111497775 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02325988 = product of:
0.04651976 = sum of:
0.04651976 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04651976 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:05:39
-
Womack, K.R.: Conformity for conformity's sake? : the choice of a classification system and a subject heading system in academic health sciences libraries (2006)
0.05
0.050051738 = product of:
0.100103475 = sum of:
0.100103475 = product of:
0.20020695 = sum of:
0.20020695 = weight(_text_:k.r in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20020695 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38488734 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.5201703 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.05
0.0450897 = sum of:
0.016894463 = product of:
0.067577854 = sum of:
0.067577854 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067577854 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028195234 = product of:
0.056390468 = sum of:
0.056390468 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056390468 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006)
0.04
0.04382942 = sum of:
0.02389238 = product of:
0.09556952 = sum of:
0.09556952 = weight(_text_:authors in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09556952 = score(doc=5293,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019937038 = product of:
0.039874077 = sum of:
0.039874077 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039874077 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:38:51
-
Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009)
0.04
0.04382942 = sum of:
0.02389238 = product of:
0.09556952 = sum of:
0.09556952 = weight(_text_:authors in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09556952 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019937038 = product of:
0.039874077 = sum of:
0.039874077 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039874077 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:05:07
-
Kavcic-Colic, A.: Archiving the Web : some legal aspects (2003)
0.04
0.042970087 = sum of:
0.019710207 = product of:
0.07884083 = sum of:
0.07884083 = weight(_text_:authors in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07884083 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02325988 = product of:
0.04651976 = sum of:
0.04651976 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04651976 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Technological developments have changed the concepts of publication, reproduction and distribution. However, legislation, and in particular the Legal Deposit Law has not adjusted to these changes - it is very restrictive in the sense of protecting the rights of authors of electronic publications. National libraries and national archival institutions, being aware of their important role in preserving the written and spoken cultural heritage, try to find different legal ways to live up to these responsibilities. This paper presents some legal aspects of archiving Web pages, examines the harvesting of Web pages, provision of public access to pages, and their long-term preservation.
- Date
- 10.12.2005 11:22:13
-
Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006)
0.04
0.042970087 = sum of:
0.019710207 = product of:
0.07884083 = sum of:
0.07884083 = weight(_text_:authors in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07884083 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02325988 = product of:
0.04651976 = sum of:
0.04651976 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04651976 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049050607 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:37:49
