Search (1760 results, page 1 of 88)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13 
    0.12774323 = product of:
  0.25548646 = sum of:
    0.25548646 = product of:
      0.5109729 = sum of:
        0.19938661 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19938661 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42572287 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.31158632 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31158632 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5321918 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.09 
    0.09490516 = sum of:
  0.07789658 = product of:
    0.31158632 = sum of:
      0.31158632 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.31158632 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5321918 = queryWeight, product of:
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01700858 = product of:
    0.03401716 = sum of:
      0.03401716 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03401716 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  3. Holley, R.P.: Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics : Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools (2008) 0.08 
    0.083029255 = product of:
  0.16605851 = sum of:
    0.16605851 = sum of:
      0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.117950976 = score(doc=2553,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
      0.04810753 = weight(_text_:22 in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04810753 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:18
  4. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08 
    0.08022628 = sum of:
  0.059815984 = product of:
    0.23926394 = sum of:
      0.23926394 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23926394 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42572287 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020410296 = product of:
    0.04082059 = sum of:
      0.04082059 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04082059 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  5. Smiraglia, R.P.: ISKO 10's Bookshelf : an editorial (2008) 0.08 
    0.07935843 = sum of:
  0.02038294 = product of:
    0.08153176 = sum of:
      0.08153176 = weight(_text_:authors in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08153176 = score(doc=2333,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.058975488 = product of:
    0.117950976 = sum of:
      0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.117950976 = score(doc=2333,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The 10th International ISKO Conference is now history, and it was a dynamic bit of history at that. Knowledge organization (the domain) is lively and engaged and engaging, and all of us who work in the domain are in a good spot to benefit from the new trajectories provided by the scholars who brought their research forward this year. As is our custom in this journal, I will leave it to the Classification editor to prepare a full report on the conference. But the Proceedings volume (Arsenault and Tennis 2008), as usual, is a rich resource for analysis of the domain at this particular moment in time. By studying the contents, and in particular by applying bibliometric techniques, we can gain useful insight into the direction of the evolution of knowledge organization. Hjørland (2002) includes bibliometric techniques in his list of eleven approaches to domain analysis because, as he says (p. 436), "it is empirical and based on detailed analysis of connections between individual documents." With reference (and due deference) to White's (2003) analysis of authors as citers, I hereby present this brief analysis of what one might find on the bookshelves of this year's ISKO authors.
  6. Holley, R.P.: ¬The Répertoire de Vedettes-matière de l'Université Laval Library, 1946-92 : Francophone subject access in North America and Europe (2002) 0.08 
    0.07598407 = product of:
  0.15196814 = sum of:
    0.15196814 = sum of:
      0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.117950976 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
      0.03401716 = weight(_text_:22 in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03401716 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009) 0.08 
    0.07598407 = product of:
  0.15196814 = sum of:
    0.15196814 = sum of:
      0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.117950976 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
      0.03401716 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03401716 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Bezug zu: Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not?. In: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995. S.231-255.
    Date
    20. 6.2010 14:22:43
  8. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003) 0.07 
    0.073388405 = sum of:
  0.014412914 = product of:
    0.057651658 = sum of:
      0.057651658 = weight(_text_:authors in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057651658 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.058975488 = product of:
    0.117950976 = sum of:
      0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.117950976 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
  9. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003) 0.07 
    0.073388405 = sum of:
  0.014412914 = product of:
    0.057651658 = sum of:
      0.057651658 = weight(_text_:authors in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057651658 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.058975488 = product of:
    0.117950976 = sum of:
      0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.117950976 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
  10. Smiraglia, R.P.: Authority control of works: cataloging's chimera? (2004) 0.07 
    0.073388405 = sum of:
  0.014412914 = product of:
    0.057651658 = sum of:
      0.057651658 = weight(_text_:authors in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057651658 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.058975488 = product of:
    0.117950976 = sum of:
      0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.117950976 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Explicit authority control of works is essentially non-existent. Our catalogs are built on a principle of controlling headings, and primarily headings for names of authors. Our syndetic structure creates a spider's web of networked relationships among forms of headings, but it ends there, despite the potential richness of depth among bibliographic entities. Effective authority control of works could yield richness in the catalog that would enhance retrieval capabilities. Works are considered to constitute the intellectual content of informative artifacts that may be collected and ordered for retrieval. In a 1992 study the author examined a random sample of works drawn from the catalog of the Georgetown University Library. For each progenitor work, an instantiation network (also referred to as a bibliographic family) was constituted. A detailed analysis of the linkages that would be required for authority control of these networks is reviewed here. A new study is also presented, in which Library of Congress authority records for the works in this sample are sought and analyzed. Results demonstrate a near total lack of control, with only 5.6% of works for which authority records were found. From a sample of 410 works, of which nearly half have instantiation networks, only 23 works could be said to have implicit authority control. However, many instantiation networks are made up of successive derivations that can be implicitly linked through collocation. The difficult work of explicitly linking instantiations comes with title changes, translations, and containing relations. The empirical evidence in the present study suggests that explicit control of expressions will provide the best control over instantiation networks because it is instantiations such as translations, abridgments, and adaptations that require explicit linking.
  11. Smiraglia, R.P.: Shelflisting music : guidelines for use with the Library of Congress Classification: M (2008) 0.07 
    0.070770584 = product of:
  0.14154117 = sum of:
    0.14154117 = product of:
      0.28308234 = sum of:
        0.28308234 = weight(_text_:r.p in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28308234 = score(doc=4238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.86453587 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The nature of "a work" : implications for the organization of knowledge (2001) 0.07 
    0.070770584 = product of:
  0.14154117 = sum of:
    0.14154117 = product of:
      0.28308234 = sum of:
        0.28308234 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28308234 = score(doc=5983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.86453587 = fieldWeight in 5983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5983)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Smiraglia, R.P.: Introducing metadata (2005) 0.07 
    0.070770584 = product of:
  0.14154117 = sum of:
    0.14154117 = product of:
      0.28308234 = sum of:
        0.28308234 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28308234 = score(doc=5731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.86453587 = fieldWeight in 5731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5731)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families and superworks (2007) 0.07 
    0.070770584 = product of:
  0.14154117 = sum of:
    0.14154117 = product of:
      0.28308234 = sum of:
        0.28308234 = weight(_text_:r.p in 1674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28308234 = score(doc=1674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.86453587 = fieldWeight in 1674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1674)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.06 
    0.058761477 = sum of:
  0.034949463 = product of:
    0.13979785 = sum of:
      0.13979785 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13979785 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023812013 = product of:
    0.047624025 = sum of:
      0.047624025 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047624025 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.05 
    0.05234813 = sum of:
  0.028536115 = product of:
    0.11414446 = sum of:
      0.11414446 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11414446 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023812013 = product of:
    0.047624025 = sum of:
      0.047624025 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047624025 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
  17. Holley, R.P.; Drabenstott, K.M.: ¬An interview with Karen M. Drabenstott (2001) 0.05 
    0.047180388 = product of:
  0.094360776 = sum of:
    0.094360776 = product of:
      0.18872155 = sum of:
        0.18872155 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18872155 = score(doc=5432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.57635725 = fieldWeight in 5432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5432)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Butler, R.P.: Copyright law and organizing the Internet (2004) 0.05 
    0.047180388 = product of:
  0.094360776 = sum of:
    0.094360776 = product of:
      0.18872155 = sum of:
        0.18872155 = weight(_text_:r.p in 16) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18872155 = score(doc=16,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.57635725 = fieldWeight in 16, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=16)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.05 
    0.046160016 = sum of:
  0.017295497 = product of:
    0.069181986 = sum of:
      0.069181986 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.069181986 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02886452 = product of:
    0.05772904 = sum of:
      0.05772904 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05772904 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  20. Knowledge organization for a global learning society : Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria (2006) 0.05 
    0.045590438 = product of:
  0.091180876 = sum of:
    0.091180876 = sum of:
      0.070770584 = weight(_text_:r.p in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.070770584 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.21613397 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.020410296 = weight(_text_:22 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020410296 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Zins, C.: Knowledge map of information science: issues, principles, implications. - Lin, X., S. Aluker u. W. Zhu u.a.: Dynamic concept representation through a visual concept explorer. - Kohlbacher, F.: Knowledge organization(s) in Japan: empirical evidence from Japanese and western corporations. - Beghtol, C.: The global learning society and the iterative relationship between theory and practice in knowledge organization systems. - Tennis, J.T.: Function, purpose, predication, and context of information organization frameworks. - Doyle, A.: Naming and reclaiming knowledges in public intersections of landscapes and experience. - Qin, J., P. Creticos u. W.Y. Hsiao: Adaptive modeling of workforce domain knowledge. - Gnoli, C.: The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications. - Loehrlein, A., E.K. Jacob u. S. Lee u.a.: Development of heuristics in a hybrid approach to faceted classification. - Thellefsen, M.: The dynamics of information representation and knowledge mediation. - LaBarre, K.: A multi faceted view: use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access. - Smiraglia, R.P.: Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorisation: expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents. - Bean, C.A.: Hierarchical relationships used in mapping between knowledge structures. - Friedman, A.: Concept mapping a measurable sign. - Naumis Pena, C.: Evaluation of educational thesauri. - Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs. - Robert, C.A., A. Davis: Annotation and its application to information research in economic intelligence. - Mcllwaine, I.C., J.S. Mitchel: The new ecumenism: exploration of a DDC / UDC view of religion. - Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages. - Eito Brun, R.: Uncovering hidden clues about geographic visualization in LCC. - Williamson, N.J.: Knowledge structures and the Internet progress and prospects. - Pajarillo, E.J.Y.: A classification scheme to determine medical necessity: a knowledge organization global learning application. - López-Huertas, M.J.: Thematic map of interdisciplinary domains based on their terminological representation: the gender studies. - Rodriguez Bravo, B.: The visibility of women in indexing languages. - Beall, J., D. Vizine-Goetz: Finding fiction: facilitating access to works of the imagination scattered by form and format. - Kwasnik, B.H., Y.L. Chun u. K. Crowston u.a.: Challenges in ceating a taxonomy of genres of digital documents. - Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation: using wikis in science. - Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis: a study. - Lee, H.L.: Navigating hierarchies vs. searching by keyword: two cultural perspectives. - Loehrlein, A., R. Martin u. E.L. Robertson: Integration of international standards in the domain of manufacturing enterprise. -
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:22:36

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1473
  • m 206
  • el 83
  • s 78
  • b 26
  • x 14
  • i 8
  • r 4
  • n 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications