-
Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003)
0.22
0.22060254 = product of:
0.44120508 = sum of:
0.44120508 = sum of:
0.37540954 = weight(_text_:e.n in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.37540954 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40621018 = queryWeight, product of:
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.9241756 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
0.065795526 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065795526 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 7.2006 20:06:22
-
Steinhagen, E.N.; Hanson, M.E.; Moynahan, S.A.: Quo vadis, cataloging? (2007)
0.15
0.15090743 = sum of:
0.019514082 = product of:
0.07805633 = sum of:
0.07805633 = weight(_text_:authors in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07805633 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.13139334 = product of:
0.2627867 = sum of:
0.2627867 = weight(_text_:e.n in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2627867 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40621018 = queryWeight, product of:
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.64692295 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Under the leadership of Ruth Carter's generation, cooperative, shared cataloging grew and flourished among academic and research libraries. The authors provide an overview of trends and challenges from a golden age of expanding budgets and international cooperation during the 1970's and 1980's and later responses to the economic retrenchment and demographic changes of the 1990's and early 2000's. Responses to current challenges, including the impact of outsourced cataloging, increasing complexity of cataloging rules, and emerging technological options, are discussed.
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.12
0.12353961 = product of:
0.24707922 = sum of:
0.24707922 = product of:
0.49415845 = sum of:
0.19282542 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19282542 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.41171366 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.301333 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.301333 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5146791 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Shekhtman, N.A.; Shekhtman, E.N.: Problema predstavleniya znanii i gipertekst (2000)
0.11
0.11262286 = product of:
0.22524571 = sum of:
0.22524571 = product of:
0.45049143 = sum of:
0.45049143 = weight(_text_:e.n in 1391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.45049143 = score(doc=1391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40621018 = queryWeight, product of:
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
1.1090107 = fieldWeight in 1391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Pimenov, E.N.: O faktorah, vliyayushchikh na indeksirivanie : indeksirovanie i predmetnaya oblast' (2000)
0.11
0.11262286 = product of:
0.22524571 = sum of:
0.22524571 = product of:
0.45049143 = sum of:
0.45049143 = weight(_text_:e.n in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.45049143 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40621018 = queryWeight, product of:
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
1.1090107 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Pimenov, E.N.: Normativnost' i nekotorye problem razrabotki tezauruzov i drugikh lingvistiicheskikh sredstv IPS (2000)
0.09
0.093852386 = product of:
0.18770477 = sum of:
0.18770477 = product of:
0.37540954 = sum of:
0.37540954 = weight(_text_:e.n in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.37540954 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40621018 = queryWeight, product of:
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.9241756 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.09
0.09178214 = sum of:
0.07533325 = product of:
0.301333 = sum of:
0.301333 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.301333 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5146791 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.016448881 = product of:
0.032897763 = sum of:
0.032897763 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032897763 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.08
0.077586286 = sum of:
0.057847627 = product of:
0.2313905 = sum of:
0.2313905 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2313905 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.41171366 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019738657 = product of:
0.039477315 = sum of:
0.039477315 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039477315 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Steinhagen, E.N.: Leaders of bibliographic control - the Chilean experience : Maria Teresa Sanz Briso-Montiano and Soledad Fernández-Corugedo (2000)
0.07
0.06569667 = product of:
0.13139334 = sum of:
0.13139334 = product of:
0.2627867 = sum of:
0.2627867 = weight(_text_:e.n in 5402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2627867 = score(doc=5402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40621018 = queryWeight, product of:
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.64692295 = fieldWeight in 5402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006)
0.06
0.056827817 = sum of:
0.033799384 = product of:
0.13519754 = sum of:
0.13519754 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13519754 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023028433 = product of:
0.046056867 = sum of:
0.046056867 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046056867 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bénaud, C.-L.; Steinhagen, E.N.; Moynahan, S.A.: Flexibility in the management of cataloging (2000)
0.06
0.05631143 = product of:
0.11262286 = sum of:
0.11262286 = product of:
0.22524571 = sum of:
0.22524571 = weight(_text_:e.n in 5384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22524571 = score(doc=5384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40621018 = queryWeight, product of:
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.55450535 = fieldWeight in 5384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5384)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006)
0.05
0.050625514 = sum of:
0.02759708 = product of:
0.11038832 = sum of:
0.11038832 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11038832 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023028433 = product of:
0.046056867 = sum of:
0.046056867 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046056867 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:05:39
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.04
0.044641037 = sum of:
0.016726356 = product of:
0.066905424 = sum of:
0.066905424 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066905424 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02791468 = product of:
0.05582936 = sum of:
0.05582936 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05582936 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006)
0.04
0.0433933 = sum of:
0.023654642 = product of:
0.09461857 = sum of:
0.09461857 = weight(_text_:authors in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09461857 = score(doc=5293,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019738657 = product of:
0.039477315 = sum of:
0.039477315 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039477315 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:38:51
-
Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009)
0.04
0.0433933 = sum of:
0.023654642 = product of:
0.09461857 = sum of:
0.09461857 = weight(_text_:authors in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09461857 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019738657 = product of:
0.039477315 = sum of:
0.039477315 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039477315 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:05:07
-
Kavcic-Colic, A.: Archiving the Web : some legal aspects (2003)
0.04
0.042542517 = sum of:
0.019514082 = product of:
0.07805633 = sum of:
0.07805633 = weight(_text_:authors in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07805633 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023028433 = product of:
0.046056867 = sum of:
0.046056867 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046056867 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Technological developments have changed the concepts of publication, reproduction and distribution. However, legislation, and in particular the Legal Deposit Law has not adjusted to these changes - it is very restrictive in the sense of protecting the rights of authors of electronic publications. National libraries and national archival institutions, being aware of their important role in preserving the written and spoken cultural heritage, try to find different legal ways to live up to these responsibilities. This paper presents some legal aspects of archiving Web pages, examines the harvesting of Web pages, provision of public access to pages, and their long-term preservation.
- Date
- 10.12.2005 11:22:13
-
Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006)
0.04
0.042542517 = sum of:
0.019514082 = product of:
0.07805633 = sum of:
0.07805633 = weight(_text_:authors in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07805633 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023028433 = product of:
0.046056867 = sum of:
0.046056867 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046056867 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:37:49
-
Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002)
0.04
0.042542517 = sum of:
0.019514082 = product of:
0.07805633 = sum of:
0.07805633 = weight(_text_:authors in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07805633 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023028433 = product of:
0.046056867 = sum of:
0.046056867 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046056867 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Copeland, A.; Hamburger, S.; Hamilton, J.; Robinson, K.J.: Cataloging and digitizing ephemera : one team's experience with Pennsylvania German broadsides and fraktur (2006)
0.04
0.042542517 = sum of:
0.019514082 = product of:
0.07805633 = sum of:
0.07805633 = weight(_text_:authors in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07805633 = score(doc=768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023028433 = product of:
0.046056867 = sum of:
0.046056867 = weight(_text_:22 in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046056867 = score(doc=768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The growing interest in ephemera collections within libraries will necessitate the bibliographic control of materials that do not easily fall into traditional categories. This paper discusses the many challenges confronting catalogers when approaching a mixed collection of unique materials of an ephemeral nature. Based on their experience cataloging a collection of Pennsylvania German broadsides and Fraktur at the Pennsylvania State University, the authors describe the process of deciphering handwriting, preserving genealogical information, deciding on cataloging approaches at the format and field level, and furthering access to the materials through digitization and the Encoded Archival Description finding aid. Observations are made on expanding the skills of traditional book catalogers to include manuscript cataloging, and on project management.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Feinberg, M.: Classificationist as author : the case of the Prelinger Library (2008)
0.04
0.042542517 = sum of:
0.019514082 = product of:
0.07805633 = sum of:
0.07805633 = weight(_text_:authors in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07805633 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22138755 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023028433 = product of:
0.046056867 = sum of:
0.046056867 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046056867 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17005771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04856253 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Within information science, neutrality and objectivity have been standard design goals for knowledge organization schemes; designers have seen themselves as compilers, rather than as authors or creators. The organization of resources in the Prelinger Library in San Francisco, however, shows a distinct authorial voice, or unique sense of expression and vision. This voice, in turn, works as a persuasive mechanism, facilitating a rhetorical purpose for the collection.
- Pages
- S.22-28
