-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.13
0.1262747 = product of:
0.2525494 = sum of:
0.2525494 = product of:
0.5050988 = sum of:
0.19709449 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19709449 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4208288 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.30800432 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30800432 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.52607375 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Orzano, A.J.; McInerney, C.R.; Scharf, D.; Tallia, A.F.; Crabtree, B.F.: ¬A knowledge management model : implications for enhancing quality in health care (2008)
0.10
0.10231836 = sum of:
0.017096668 = product of:
0.068386674 = sum of:
0.068386674 = weight(_text_:authors in 1371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068386674 = score(doc=1371,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1371, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1371)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.08522169 = product of:
0.17044339 = sum of:
0.17044339 = weight(_text_:a.j in 1371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17044339 = score(doc=1371,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.47710335 = fieldWeight in 1371, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1371)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Improving health care delivery is a pressing societal goal, and information scientists have a role in effecting change. Information science research has led to understanding theories and practices of information use within the informing professions, but information science and one of its subspecialties, Knowledge Management (KM), also have the potential to influence and enhance other professional disciplines. This concept paper makes the argument that KM is a beneficial framework to help health care clinicians manage their practices and ultimately administer quality care to their patients. The central argument is predicated on the assumption that medicine is a knowledge-based profession and that finding, sharing, and developing clinicians' knowledge is necessary for effective primary health care practice. The authors make the case that in an environment of a burgeoning body of health care research and the adoption of technology tools, physicians can benefit from understanding effective KM practice. The model as presented here borrows from recent information science scholarship in KM and is intended to inform intervention protocols for effective KM to improve quality of care.
-
Duineveld, A.J.: Wondertools? : A comparative study of ontological engineering tools (2000)
0.10
0.0994253 = product of:
0.1988506 = sum of:
0.1988506 = product of:
0.3977012 = sum of:
0.3977012 = weight(_text_:a.j in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3977012 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
1.1132411 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wolpert, A.J.: Information service to remote users (2002)
0.10
0.0994253 = product of:
0.1988506 = sum of:
0.1988506 = product of:
0.3977012 = sum of:
0.3977012 = weight(_text_:a.j in 4249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3977012 = score(doc=4249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
1.1132411 = fieldWeight in 4249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.09
0.093814135 = sum of:
0.07700108 = product of:
0.30800432 = sum of:
0.30800432 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30800432 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.52607375 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.016813051 = product of:
0.033626102 = sum of:
0.033626102 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033626102 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Kwon, N.; Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: Modeling the factors affecting individuals' use of community networks : a theoretical explanation of community-based information and communication technology use (2005)
0.09
0.08526529 = sum of:
0.014247224 = product of:
0.056988895 = sum of:
0.056988895 = weight(_text_:authors in 4817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056988895 = score(doc=4817,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4817, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4817)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07101807 = product of:
0.14203614 = sum of:
0.14203614 = weight(_text_:a.j in 4817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14203614 = score(doc=4817,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.3975861 = fieldWeight in 4817, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4817)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Understanding users' attitudes and perceptions and their influence an behavior is crucial to predict the use of community information and communication technology. In this study, the authors attempt to uncover this process by elaborating an I. Ajzen's (1985, 1991) theory of planned behavior (TPB), a widely applied social behavior model. The developed structural equation model (SEM) was tested using a sample of 417 users of a community network. The final selected model, which was called the community network use model, included seven predictors of use: three behavioral beliefs (i.e., Learning, Social Interactions, and Community Connection), Normative Beliefs Individuals, Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Intention. In particular, Intention moderated the relationships between Use and the other six variables. Further, beliefs in both Community Connection and Social Interactions were directly related to community network use, as was Attitude. Belief in Community Connection was indirectly and positively related to community network use via Intention; Belief in Community Connection was directly and negatively related to Use. These latter two findings suggest that Belief in Community Connection serves as both a facilitator and inhibitor of community network use depending an whether belief is followed by intention. Implications are discussed.
-
Saye, J.D.; Bohannan, A.J.; Saye, T.O.: Mannheimer's cataloging and classification (2000)
0.09
0.08522169 = product of:
0.17044339 = sum of:
0.17044339 = product of:
0.34088677 = sum of:
0.34088677 = weight(_text_:a.j in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34088677 = score(doc=3840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.9542067 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.08
0.079304 = sum of:
0.059128344 = product of:
0.23651338 = sum of:
0.23651338 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23651338 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4208288 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02017566 = product of:
0.04035132 = sum of:
0.04035132 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04035132 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005)
0.07
0.0702649 = product of:
0.1405298 = sum of:
0.1405298 = sum of:
0.11362892 = weight(_text_:a.j in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11362892 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.3180689 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.026900882 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026900882 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 6.2005 20:40:22
-
Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006)
0.06
0.058085956 = sum of:
0.034547683 = product of:
0.13819073 = sum of:
0.13819073 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13819073 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023538271 = product of:
0.047076542 = sum of:
0.047076542 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047076542 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gilliland-Swetland, A.J.; Kafai, Y.B.; Landis, W.E.: Application of Dublin Core metadata in the description of digital primary sources in elementary school classrooms (2000)
0.06
0.05681446 = product of:
0.11362892 = sum of:
0.11362892 = product of:
0.22725783 = sum of:
0.22725783 = weight(_text_:a.j in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22725783 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.6361378 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schimizzi, A.J.: Enhancement of research library print material through the use of component cataloging : an OCLC user's perspective (2004)
0.06
0.05681446 = product of:
0.11362892 = sum of:
0.11362892 = product of:
0.22725783 = sum of:
0.22725783 = weight(_text_:a.j in 5532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22725783 = score(doc=5532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.6361378 = fieldWeight in 5532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5532)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006)
0.05
0.051746335 = sum of:
0.028208064 = product of:
0.112832256 = sum of:
0.112832256 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112832256 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023538271 = product of:
0.047076542 = sum of:
0.047076542 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047076542 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:05:39
-
Meadows, A.J.: ¬The citation characteristics of astronomical research literature (2004)
0.05
0.04971265 = product of:
0.0994253 = sum of:
0.0994253 = product of:
0.1988506 = sum of:
0.1988506 = weight(_text_:a.j in 4416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1988506 = score(doc=4416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.55662054 = fieldWeight in 4416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.05
0.045629364 = sum of:
0.017096668 = product of:
0.068386674 = sum of:
0.068386674 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068386674 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028532695 = product of:
0.05706539 = sum of:
0.05706539 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05706539 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006)
0.04
0.044354 = sum of:
0.024178341 = product of:
0.096713364 = sum of:
0.096713364 = weight(_text_:authors in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096713364 = score(doc=5293,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02017566 = product of:
0.04035132 = sum of:
0.04035132 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04035132 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:38:51
-
Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009)
0.04
0.044354 = sum of:
0.024178341 = product of:
0.096713364 = sum of:
0.096713364 = weight(_text_:authors in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096713364 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02017566 = product of:
0.04035132 = sum of:
0.04035132 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04035132 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:05:07
-
Kavcic-Colic, A.: Archiving the Web : some legal aspects (2003)
0.04
0.043484382 = sum of:
0.019946113 = product of:
0.07978445 = sum of:
0.07978445 = weight(_text_:authors in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07978445 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023538271 = product of:
0.047076542 = sum of:
0.047076542 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047076542 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Technological developments have changed the concepts of publication, reproduction and distribution. However, legislation, and in particular the Legal Deposit Law has not adjusted to these changes - it is very restrictive in the sense of protecting the rights of authors of electronic publications. National libraries and national archival institutions, being aware of their important role in preserving the written and spoken cultural heritage, try to find different legal ways to live up to these responsibilities. This paper presents some legal aspects of archiving Web pages, examines the harvesting of Web pages, provision of public access to pages, and their long-term preservation.
- Date
- 10.12.2005 11:22:13
-
Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006)
0.04
0.043484382 = sum of:
0.019946113 = product of:
0.07978445 = sum of:
0.07978445 = weight(_text_:authors in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07978445 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023538271 = product of:
0.047076542 = sum of:
0.047076542 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047076542 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:37:49
-
Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002)
0.04
0.043484382 = sum of:
0.019946113 = product of:
0.07978445 = sum of:
0.07978445 = weight(_text_:authors in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07978445 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023538271 = product of:
0.047076542 = sum of:
0.047076542 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047076542 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04963768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
