Search (1507 results, page 1 of 76)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000) 0.13 
    0.13445678 = product of:
  0.26891357 = sum of:
    0.26891357 = sum of:
      0.21368542 = weight(_text_:discovery in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21368542 = score(doc=628,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.80126756 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
      0.055228144 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055228144 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Charts the history and development of the UK's Resource Discovery Network, which brings together under a common business, technical and service framework a range of subject gateways and other services for the academic and research community. Considers its future relationship to other services, and position within the information ecology
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:36:13
    Object
    Resource Discovery Network
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.10163848 = sum of:
  0.08092792 = product of:
    0.24278377 = sum of:
      0.24278377 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24278377 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43198574 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020710554 = product of:
    0.041421108 = sum of:
      0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041421108 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.10 
    0.10084258 = product of:
  0.20168516 = sum of:
    0.20168516 = sum of:
      0.16026406 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16026406 = score(doc=2556,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.60095066 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
      0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041421108 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
  4. LaBarre, K.: Discovery and access systems for Websites and cultural heritage sites reconsidering the practical application of facets (2008) 0.10 
    0.10049444 = product of:
  0.20098887 = sum of:
    0.20098887 = sum of:
      0.15266424 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15266424 = score(doc=2247,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.5724532 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
      0.048324626 = weight(_text_:22 in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048324626 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Facets are an increasingly common feature of contemporary access and discovery systems. These intuitively adaptable structures seem well suited for application in information architecture and the practice of knowledge management (La Barre, 2006). As browsing and searching devices, facets function equally well on e-commerce sites, digital museum portals, and online library catalogs. This paper argues that clearly articulated principles for facets and facet analysis must draw examples from current practice while building upon heritage principles m order to scaffold the development of robust and fully faceted information infrastructures.
    Date
    27.12.2008 9:50:22
  5. O'Neill, E.T.; Connaway, L.S.; Dickey, T.J.: Estimating the audience level for library resources (2008) 0.09 
    0.08929974 = product of:
  0.17859948 = sum of:
    0.17859948 = sum of:
      0.12337133 = weight(_text_:discovery in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12337133 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.46261203 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
      0.055228144 = weight(_text_:22 in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055228144 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    WorldCat, OCLC's bibliographic database, identifies books and the libraries that hold them. The holdings provide detailed information about the type and number of libraries that have acquired the material. Using this information, it is possible to infer the type of audience for which the material is intended. A quantitative measure, the audience level, is derived from the types of libraries that have selected the resource. The audience level can be used to refine discovery, analyze collections, advise readers, and enhance reference services.
    Date
    8.11.2008 19:22:53
  6. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.09 
    0.08929974 = product of:
  0.17859948 = sum of:
    0.17859948 = sum of:
      0.12337133 = weight(_text_:discovery in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12337133 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.46261203 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
      0.055228144 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055228144 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  7. McIlwaine, I.C.: Trends in knowledge organization research (2003) 0.09 
    0.08929974 = product of:
  0.17859948 = sum of:
    0.17859948 = sum of:
      0.12337133 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12337133 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.46261203 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
      0.055228144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055228144 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper looks at current trends in knowledge organization research, concentrating an universal systems, mapping vocabularies and interoperability concerns, problems of blas, the Internet and search engines, resource discovery, thesauri and visual presentation. Some Problems facing researchers at the present time are discussed. It is accompanied by a bibliography of recent work in the field.
    Date
    10. 6.2004 19:22:56
  8. Bean, C.A.; Corn, M.: Extramural funding opportunities in bioinformatics from the National Library of Medicine : an integrated foundation for discovery (2005) 0.09 
    0.08929974 = product of:
  0.17859948 = sum of:
    0.17859948 = sum of:
      0.12337133 = weight(_text_:discovery in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12337133 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.46261203 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
      0.055228144 = weight(_text_:22 in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055228144 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:59:52
  9. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.09 
    0.086138085 = product of:
  0.17227617 = sum of:
    0.17227617 = sum of:
      0.13085505 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13085505 = score(doc=2239,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.49067414 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
      0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041421108 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Genetic-based evolutionary learning algorithms, such as genetic algorithms (GAs) and genetic programming (GP), have been applied to information retrieval (IR) since the 1980s. Recently, GP has been applied to a new IR taskdiscovery of ranking functions for Web search-and has achieved very promising results. However, in our prior research, only one fitness function has been used for GP-based learning. It is unclear how other fitness functions may affect ranking function discovery for Web search, especially since it is weIl known that choosing a proper fitness function is very important for the effectiveness and efficiency of evolutionary algorithms. In this article, we report our experience in contrasting different fitness function designs an GP-based learning using a very large Web corpus. Our results indicate that the design of fitness functions is instrumental in performance improvement. We also give recommendations an the design of fitness functions for genetic-based information retrieval experiments.
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  10. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.09 
    0.086138085 = product of:
  0.17227617 = sum of:
    0.17227617 = sum of:
      0.13085505 = weight(_text_:discovery in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13085505 = score(doc=3387,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.49067414 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041421108 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  11. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.08 
    0.07813727 = product of:
  0.15627454 = sum of:
    0.15627454 = sum of:
      0.10794991 = weight(_text_:discovery in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10794991 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.4047855 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.048324626 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048324626 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  12. Levinson, R.: Symmetry and the computation of conceptual structures (2000) 0.08 
    0.07813727 = product of:
  0.15627454 = sum of:
    0.15627454 = sum of:
      0.10794991 = weight(_text_:discovery in 5081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10794991 = score(doc=5081,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.4047855 = fieldWeight in 5081, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5081)
      0.048324626 = weight(_text_:22 in 5081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048324626 = score(doc=5081,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5081, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5081)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The discovery and exploitation of symmetry plays a major role in sciences such as crystallography, quantum theory, condensedmatter physics, thermodynamics, chemistry, biology and others. It then should not be surprising then, since Conceptual Structures are proposed as a universal knowledge representation scheme, that symmetry should play a role in their interpretation and their application. In this tutorial style paper, we illustrate the role of symmetry in Conceptual Structures and how algorithms may be constructed that exploit this symmetry in order to achieve computational efficiency
    Date
    3. 9.2000 19:22:45
  13. Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000) 0.08 
    0.07813727 = product of:
  0.15627454 = sum of:
    0.15627454 = sum of:
      0.10794991 = weight(_text_:discovery in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10794991 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.4047855 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
      0.048324626 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048324626 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:37:55
  14. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.08 
    0.07813727 = product of:
  0.15627454 = sum of:
    0.15627454 = sum of:
      0.10794991 = weight(_text_:discovery in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10794991 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.4047855 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
      0.048324626 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048324626 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1.11.2005 18:56:22
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  15. Beccaria, M.; Scott, D.: Fac-Back-OPAC : an open source interface to your library system (2007) 0.08 
    0.07813727 = product of:
  0.15627454 = sum of:
    0.15627454 = sum of:
      0.10794991 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10794991 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.4047855 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
      0.048324626 = weight(_text_:22 in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048324626 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Fac-Back-OPAC is a faceted back­ up OPAC. This advanced catalog offers features that compare favorably with the traditional catalogs for today's library systems. Fac-Back-OPAC represents the convergence of two prominent trends in library tools: the decoupling of discovery tools from the traditional integrated library system and the use of readily available open source components to rapidly produce leading-edge technology for meeting patron and library needs. Built on code that was originally developed by Casey Durfee in February 2007, Fac-Back-OPAC is available for no cost under an open source license to any library that wants to offer an advanced search interface or a backup catalog for its patrons.
    Date
    17. 8.2008 11:22:47
  16. Hsu, C.-N.; Chang, C.-H.; Hsieh, C.-H.; Lu, J.-J.; Chang, C.-C.: Reconfigurable Web wrapper agents for biological information integration (2005) 0.07 
    0.07178174 = product of:
  0.14356348 = sum of:
    0.14356348 = sum of:
      0.109045886 = weight(_text_:discovery in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.109045886 = score(doc=5263,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.40889513 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
      0.03451759 = weight(_text_:22 in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03451759 = score(doc=5263,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A variety of biological data is transferred and exchanged in overwhelming volumes on the World Wide Web. How to rapidly capture, utilize, and integrate the information on the Internet to discover valuable biological knowledge is one of the most critical issues in bioinformatics. Many information integration systems have been proposed for integrating biological data. These systems usually rely on an intermediate software layer called wrappers to access connected information sources. Wrapper construction for Web data sources is often specially hand coded to accommodate the differences between each Web site. However, programming a Web wrapper requires substantial programming skill, and is time-consuming and hard to maintain. In this article we provide a solution for rapidly building software agents that can serve as Web wrappers for biological information integration. We define an XML-based language called Web Navigation Description Language (WNDL), to model a Web-browsing session. A WNDL script describes how to locate the data, extract the data, and combine the data. By executing different WNDL scripts, we can automate virtually all types of Web-browsing sessions. We also describe IEPAD (Information Extraction Based on Pattern Discovery), a data extractor based on pattern discovery techniques. IEPAD allows our software agents to automatically discover the extraction rules to extract the contents of a structurally formatted Web page. With a programming-by-example authoring tool, a user can generate a complete Web wrapper agent by browsing the target Web sites. We built a variety of biological applications to demonstrate the feasibility of our approach.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:36:42
  17. Rapp, B.A.; Wheeler, D.L.: Bioinformatics resources from the National Center for Biotechnology Information : an integrated foundation for discovery (2005) 0.07 
    0.07178174 = product of:
  0.14356348 = sum of:
    0.14356348 = sum of:
      0.109045886 = weight(_text_:discovery in 5265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.109045886 = score(doc=5265,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.40889513 = fieldWeight in 5265, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5265)
      0.03451759 = weight(_text_:22 in 5265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03451759 = score(doc=5265,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5265, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5265)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) provides access to more than 30 publicly available molecular biology resources, offering an effective discovery space through high levels of data integration among large-scale data repositories. The foundation for many services is GenBank®, a public repository of DNA sequences from more than 133,000 different organisms. GenBank is accessible through the Entrez retrieval system, which integrates data from the major DNA and protein sequence databases, along with resources for taxonomy, genome maps, sequence variation, gene expression, gene function and phenotypes, protein structure and domain information, and the biomedical literature via PubMed®. Computational tools allow scientists to analyze vast quantities of diverse data. The BLAST® sequence similarity programs are instrumental in identifying genes and genetic features. Other tools support mapping disease loci to the genome, identifying new genes, comparing genomes, and relating sequence data to model protein structures. A basic research program in computational molecular biology enhances the database and software tool development initiatives. Future plans include further data integration, enhanced genome annotation and protein classification, additional data types, and links to a wider range of resources.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:58:34
  18. Ku, L.-W.; Ho, H.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Opinion mining and relationship discovery using CopeOpi opinion analysis system (2009) 0.07 
    0.07178174 = product of:
  0.14356348 = sum of:
    0.14356348 = sum of:
      0.109045886 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.109045886 = score(doc=2938,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.40889513 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
      0.03451759 = weight(_text_:22 in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03451759 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We present CopeOpi, an opinion-analysis system, which extracts from the Web opinions about specific targets, summarizes the polarity and strength of these opinions, and tracks opinion variations over time. Objects that yield similar opinion tendencies over a certain time period may be correlated due to the latent causal events. CopeOpi discovers relationships among objects based on their opinion-tracking plots and collocations. Event bursts are detected from the tracking plots, and the strength of opinion relationships is determined by the coverage of these plots. To evaluate opinion mining, we use the NTCIR corpus annotated with opinion information at sentence and document levels. CopeOpi achieves sentence- and document-level f-measures of 62% and 74%. For relationship discovery, we collected 1.3M economics-related documents from 93 Web sources over 22 months, and analyzed collocation-based, opinion-based, and hybrid models. We consider as correlated company pairs that demonstrate similar stock-price variations, and selected these as the gold standard for evaluation. Results show that opinion-based and collocation-based models complement each other, and that integrated models perform the best. The top 25, 50, and 100 pairs discovered achieve precision rates of 1, 0.92, and 0.79, respectively.
  19. Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008) 0.07 
    0.06722839 = product of:
  0.13445678 = sum of:
    0.13445678 = sum of:
      0.10684271 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10684271 = score(doc=2657,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.40063378 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.027614072 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027614072 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Social tagging empowers users to categorize content in a personally meaningful way while harnessing their potential to contribute to a collaborative construction of knowledge (Vander Wal, 2007). In addition, social tagging systems offer innovative filtering mechanisms that facilitate resource discovery and browsing (Mathes, 2004). As a result, social tags may support online communication, informal or intended learning as well as the development of online communities. The purpose of this mixed methods study is to examine how undergraduate students participate in social tagging activities in order to learn about their motivations, behaviours and practices. A better understanding of their knowledge, habits and interactions with such systems will help practitioners and developers identify important factors when designing enhancements. In the first phase of the study, students enrolled at a Canadian university completed 103 questionnaires. Quantitative results focusing on general familiarity with social tagging, frequently used Web 2.0 sites, and the purpose for engaging in social tagging activities were compiled. Eight questionnaire respondents participated in follow-up semi-structured interviews that further explored tagging practices by situating questionnaire responses within concrete experiences using popular websites such as YouTube, Facebook, Del.icio.us, and Flickr. Preliminary results of this study echo findings found in the growing literature concerning social tagging from the fields of computer science (Sen et al., 2006) and information science (Golder & Huberman, 2006; Macgregor & McCulloch, 2006). Generally, two classes of social taggers emerge: those who focus on tagging for individual purposes, and those who view tagging as a way to share or communicate meaning to others. Heavy del.icio.us users, for example, were often focused on simply organizing their own content, and seemed to be conscientiously maintaining their own personally relevant categorizations while, in many cases, placing little importance on the tags of others. Conversely, users tagging items primarily to share content preferred to use specific terms to optimize retrieval and discovery by others. Our findings should inform practitioners of how interaction design can be tailored for different tagging systems applications, and how these findings are positioned within the current debate surrounding social tagging among the resource discovery community. We also hope to direct future research in the field to place a greater importance on exploring the benefits of tagging as a socially-driven endeavour rather than uniquely as a means of managing information.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  20. Bradford, R.B.: Relationship discovery in large text collections using Latent Semantic Indexing (2006) 0.07 
    0.06722839 = product of:
  0.13445678 = sum of:
    0.13445678 = sum of:
      0.10684271 = weight(_text_:discovery in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10684271 = score(doc=1163,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.40063378 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
      0.027614072 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027614072 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper addresses the problem of information discovery in large collections of text. For users, one of the key problems in working with such collections is determining where to focus their attention. In selecting documents for examination, users must be able to formulate reasonably precise queries. Queries that are too broad will greatly reduce the efficiency of information discovery efforts by overwhelming the users with peripheral information. In order to formulate efficient queries, a mechanism is needed to automatically alert users regarding potentially interesting information contained within the collection. This paper presents the results of an experiment designed to test one approach to generation of such alerts. The technique of latent semantic indexing (LSI) is used to identify relationships among entities of interest. Entity extraction software is used to pre-process the text of the collection so that the LSI space contains representation vectors for named entities in addition to those for individual terms. In the LSI space, the cosine of the angle between the representation vectors for two entities captures important information regarding the degree of association of those two entities. For appropriate choices of entities, determining the entity pairs with the highest mutual cosine values yields valuable information regarding the contents of the text collection. The test database used for the experiment consists of 150,000 news articles. The proposed approach for alert generation is tested using a counterterrorism analysis example. The approach is shown to have significant potential for aiding users in rapidly focusing on information of potential importance in large text collections. The approach also has value in identifying possible use of aliases.
    Source
    Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1251
  • m 172
  • el 90
  • s 66
  • b 26
  • x 17
  • i 8
  • r 3
  • n 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications