Search (1494 results, page 1 of 75)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Kuhlmann, U.; Monnerjahn, P.: Sprache auf Knopfdruck : Sieben automatische Übersetzungsprogramme im Test (2000) 0.22 
    0.21622846 = product of:
  0.4324569 = sum of:
    0.4324569 = sum of:
      0.3549209 = weight(_text_:translating in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3549209 = score(doc=5428,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.82777834 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
      0.07753602 = weight(_text_:22 in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07753602 = score(doc=5428,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    Simply Translating
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.220-229
  2. Haverty, M.: Information architexture without internal theory : an inductive design process (2002) 0.15 
    0.15135992 = product of:
  0.30271983 = sum of:
    0.30271983 = sum of:
      0.24844462 = weight(_text_:translating in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24844462 = score(doc=975,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.5794448 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
      0.05427521 = weight(_text_:22 in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05427521 = score(doc=975,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article suggests that Information Architecture (IA) design is primarily an inductive process. Although toplevel goals, user attributes and available content are periodically considered, the process involves bottom-up design activities. IA is inductive partly because it lacks internal theory, and partly because it is an activity that supports emergent phenomena (user experiences) from basic design components. The nature of IA design is well described by Constructive Induction (CI), a design process that involves locating the best representational framework for the design problem, identifying a solution within that framework and translating it back to the design problem at hand. The future of IA, if it remains inductive or develops a body of theory (or both), is considered.
    Date
    3.10.2002 17:22:41
  3. Chen, H.-H.; Lin, W.-C.; Yang, C.; Lin, W.-H.: Translating-transliterating named entities for multilingual information access (2006) 0.15 
    0.15135992 = product of:
  0.30271983 = sum of:
    0.30271983 = sum of:
      0.24844462 = weight(_text_:translating in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24844462 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.5794448 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.05427521 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05427521 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 6.2006 19:52:22
  4. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.13 
    0.12973708 = product of:
  0.25947416 = sum of:
    0.25947416 = sum of:
      0.21295255 = weight(_text_:translating in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21295255 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.046521608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046521608 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  5. Booth, P.F.: Translating and indexing : some thoughts on their relationship (2006) 0.12 
    0.12422231 = product of:
  0.24844462 = sum of:
    0.24844462 = product of:
      0.49688923 = sum of:
        0.49688923 = weight(_text_:translating in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49688923 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            1.1588897 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.11415401 = sum of:
  0.09089321 = product of:
    0.27267963 = sum of:
      0.27267963 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.27267963 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.48517948 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.023260804 = product of:
    0.046521608 = sum of:
      0.046521608 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046521608 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  7. Shafer, K.E.: Translating Mathematical Markup for Electronic Journals (2001) 0.11 
    0.10647628 = product of:
  0.21295255 = sum of:
    0.21295255 = product of:
      0.4259051 = sum of:
        0.4259051 = weight(_text_:translating in 1030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4259051 = score(doc=1030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            0.99333405 = fieldWeight in 1030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1030)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Greenberg, J.: Advancing Semantic Web via library functions (2006) 0.11 
    0.10647628 = product of:
  0.21295255 = sum of:
    0.21295255 = product of:
      0.4259051 = sum of:
        0.4259051 = weight(_text_:translating in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4259051 = score(doc=244,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            0.99333405 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article explores the applicability primary library functions (collection development, cataloging, reference, and circulation) to the Semantic Web. The article defines the Semantic Web, identifies similarities between the library institution and the Semantic Web, and presents research questions guiding the inquiry. The article addresses each library function and demonstrates the applicability of each function's polices to Semantic Web development. Results indicate that library functions are applicable to Semantic Web, with "collection development" translating to "Semantic Web selection;" "cataloging" translating to "Semantic Web 'semantic' representation;" "reference" translating to "Semantic Web service," and circulation translating to "Semantic Web resource use." The last part of this article includes a discussion about the lack of embrace between the library and the Semantic Web communities, recommendations for improving this gap, and research conclusions.
  9. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.10 
    0.098376475 = sum of:
  0.06736207 = product of:
    0.2020862 = sum of:
      0.2020862 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2020862 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30417082 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.031014407 = product of:
    0.062028814 = sum of:
      0.062028814 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062028814 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  10. SIGIR'04 : Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2004) 0.09 
    0.09480026 = sum of:
  0.023816086 = product of:
    0.07144826 = sum of:
      0.07144826 = weight(_text_:objects in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07144826 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30417082 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.07098418 = product of:
    0.14196835 = sum of:
      0.14196835 = weight(_text_:translating in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14196835 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.33111134 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: Liu, S., F. Liu u. C. Yu u.a.: An effective approach to document retrieval via utilizing WordNet and recognizing phrases; Lau, R.Y.K., P.D. Bruza u. D. Song: Belief revision for adaptive information retrieval; Kokiopoulou, E., Y. Saad: Polynomial filtering in Latent semantic indexing for information retrieval; He, X., D. Cai u. H. Liu u.a.: Locality preserving indexing for document representation; Tang, C., S. Dwarkadas u. Z. Xu u.a.: On scaling Latent semantic indexing for large peer-to peer systems; Yu, W., Y. Gong: Document clustering by concept factorization; Kazai, G., M. Lalmas: The overlap problem in content-oriented XML retrieval evaluation; Kamps, J., M. de Rijke u. B. Sigurbjörnsson: Length normalization in XML retrieval; Liu, A., Q. Zou u. W.W. Chu: Configurable indexing and ranking for XML information retrieval; Zhang, L., Y. Pan u. T. Zhang: Focused named entity recognition using machine learning; Xu, J., R. Weischedel u. A. Licuanan: Evaluation of an extraction-based approach to answering definitional questions; Chieu, H.L., Y.K. Lee: Query based event extraction along a timeline; Yu, K., V. Tresp u. S. Yu: A nonparametric hierarchical Bayesian framework for information filtering; Liu, X., W.B. Croft: Cluster-based retrieval using language models; Silvestri, F., A. Orlando u. R. Perego: Assigning identifters to documents to enhance the clustering property of fulltext indexes; Amitay, E., D. Carmel u. R. Lempel u.a.: Scaling IR-system evaluation using Term Relevance Sets; Buckley, C., E.M. Voorhees: Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information; Cheng, P.J., J.W. Teng u. R.C. Chen u.a.: Translating unknown queries with Web corpora for cross-language information languages; Fan, J., Y. Gao u. H. Luo u.a.: Automatic image automation by using concept-sensitive salient objects for image content representation; Amitay, E., N. Har'El u. R. Sivian u.a.: Web-a-Where: geotagging web content; Shen, D., Z. Chen u. Q. Yang u.a.: Web page classification through summarization; McLaughlin, M.R., J.L. Herlocker: A collaborative filtering algorithm and evaluation metric that accurately model the user experience; Fan, W., M. Luo u. L. Wang u.a.: Tuning before feedback: combining ranking discovery and blind feedback for robust retrieval.
  11. Cheng, P.J.; Teng, J.W.; Chen, R.C.; Wang, J.H.; Lu, W.H.; Chien, L.F.: Translating unknown queries with Web corpora for cross-language information languages (2004) 0.09 
    0.08873022 = product of:
  0.17746045 = sum of:
    0.17746045 = product of:
      0.3549209 = sum of:
        0.3549209 = weight(_text_:translating in 4131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3549209 = score(doc=4131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            0.82777834 = fieldWeight in 4131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.09 
    0.08595199 = sum of:
  0.06656799 = product of:
    0.19970396 = sum of:
      0.19970396 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19970396 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.30417082 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.019384004 = product of:
    0.03876801 = sum of:
      0.03876801 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03876801 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  13. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.08 
    0.08005652 = sum of:
  0.041678146 = product of:
    0.12503444 = sum of:
      0.12503444 = weight(_text_:objects in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12503444 = score(doc=2746,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30417082 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.038378373 = product of:
    0.076756746 = sum of:
      0.076756746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.076756746 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Fundamental forms of information, as well as the term information itself, are defined and developed for the purposes of information science/studies. Concepts of natural and represented information (taking an unconventional sense of representation), encoded and embodied information, as well as experienced, enacted, expressed, embedded, recorded, and trace information are elaborated. The utility of these terms for the discipline is illustrated with examples from the study of information-seeking behavior and of information genres. Distinctions between the information and curatorial sciences with respect to their social (and informational) objects of study are briefly outlined.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  14. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.08 
    0.07864658 = sum of:
  0.047632173 = product of:
    0.14289652 = sum of:
      0.14289652 = weight(_text_:objects in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14289652 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30417082 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.031014407 = product of:
    0.062028814 = sum of:
      0.062028814 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062028814 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
  15. Jaaranen, K.; Lehtola, A.; Tenni, J.; Bounsaythip, C.: Webtran tools for in-company language support (2000) 0.08 
    0.07529009 = product of:
  0.15058018 = sum of:
    0.15058018 = product of:
      0.30116037 = sum of:
        0.30116037 = weight(_text_:translating in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30116037 = score(doc=5553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            0.70239323 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Webtran tools for authoring and translating domain specific texts can make the multilingual text production in a company more efficient and less expensive. Tile tools have been in production use since spring 2000 for checking and translating product article texts of a specific domain, namely an in-company language in sales catalogues of a mail-order company. Webtran tools have been developed by VTT Information Technology. Use experiences have shown that an automatic translation process is faster than phrase-lexicon assisted manual translation, if an in-company language model is created to control and support the language used within the company
  16. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.07 
    0.073782355 = sum of:
  0.05052155 = product of:
    0.15156464 = sum of:
      0.15156464 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15156464 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30417082 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.023260804 = product of:
    0.046521608 = sum of:
      0.046521608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046521608 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  17. Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004) 0.07 
    0.06881575 = sum of:
  0.041678146 = product of:
    0.12503444 = sum of:
      0.12503444 = weight(_text_:objects in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12503444 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30417082 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.027137605 = product of:
    0.05427521 = sum of:
      0.05427521 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05427521 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
  18. Turner, J.M.; Mathieu, S.: Audio description text for indexing films (2007) 0.06 
    0.062111154 = product of:
  0.12422231 = sum of:
    0.12422231 = product of:
      0.24844462 = sum of:
        0.24844462 = weight(_text_:translating in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24844462 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            0.5794448 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Access to audiovisual materials should be as open and free as access to print-based materials. However, we have not yet achieved such a reality. Methods useful for organising print-based materials do not necessarily work well when applied to audiovisual and multimedia materials. In this project, we studied using audio description text and written descriptions to generate keywords for indexing moving images. We found that such sources are fruitful and helpful. In the second part of the study, we looked at the possibility of automatically translating keywords from audio description text into other languages to use them as indexing. Here again, the results are encouraging.
  19. Hall, P.: Disorderly reasoning in information design (2009) 0.06 
    0.062111154 = product of:
  0.12422231 = sum of:
    0.12422231 = product of:
      0.24844462 = sum of:
        0.24844462 = weight(_text_:translating in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24844462 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            0.5794448 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The importance of information visualization as a means of transforming data into visual, understandable form is now embraced across university campuses and research institutes world-wide. Yet, the role of designers in this field of activity is often overlooked by the dominant scientific and technological interests in data visualization, and a corporate culture reliant on off-the-shelf visualization tools. This article is an attempt to describe the value of design thinking in information visualization with reference to Horst Rittel's ([1988]) definition of disorderly reasoning, and to frame design as a critical act of translating between scientific, technical, and aesthetic interests.
  20. Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000) 0.06 
    0.061485294 = sum of:
  0.04210129 = product of:
    0.12630387 = sum of:
      0.12630387 = weight(_text_:objects in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12630387 = score(doc=187,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30417082 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.019384004 = product of:
    0.03876801 = sum of:
      0.03876801 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03876801 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1257
  • m 158
  • el 93
  • s 59
  • b 26
  • x 15
  • i 8
  • n 3
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications