Search (1731 results, page 1 of 87)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.25 
    0.24660383 = product of:
  0.41100636 = sum of:
    0.29202214 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29202214 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5195957 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.0691626 = weight(_text_:cd in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0691626 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.04982162 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04982162 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Li, X.: Designing an interactive Web tutorial with cross-browser dynamic HTML (2000) 0.18 
    0.18175289 = product of:
  0.30292147 = sum of:
    0.11477465 = weight(_text_:objects in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11477465 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
    0.1383252 = weight(_text_:cd in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1383252 = score(doc=4897,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.54702604 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
    0.04982162 = weight(_text_:22 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04982162 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Texas A&M University Libraries developed a Web-based training (WBT) application for LandView III, a federal depository CD-ROM publication using cross-browser dynamic HTML (DHTML) and other Web technologies. The interactive and self-paced tutorial demonstrates the major features of the CD-ROM and shows how to navigate the programs. The tutorial features dynamic HTML techniques, such as hiding, showing and moving layers; dragging objects; and windows-style drop-down menus. It also integrates interactive forms, common gateway interface (CGI), frames, and animated GIF images in the design of the WBT. After describing the design and implementation of the tutorial project, an evaluation of usage statistics and user feedback was conducted, as well as an assessment of its strengths and weaknesses, and a comparison of this tutorial with other common types of training methods. The present article describes an innovative approach for CD-ROM training using advanced Web technologies such as dynamic HTML, which can simulate and demonstrate the interactive use of the CD-ROM, as well as the actual search process of a database.
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:21:22
  3. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.11 
    0.11314 = product of:
  0.28285 = sum of:
    0.21642117 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21642117 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.066428825 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066428825 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  4. ak: ¬Der Umwelt zuliebe ... (2000) 0.11 
    0.11307651 = product of:
  0.28269127 = sum of:
    0.19965523 = weight(_text_:cd in 4745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19965523 = score(doc=4745,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.78956413 = fieldWeight in 4745, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4745)
    0.083036035 = weight(_text_:22 in 4745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083036035 = score(doc=4745,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4745, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4745)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Unter dem Titel Ökobase präsentiert die Fa. Clemes Hölter 2 neue Umwelt CD-ROMs, die in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Umweltbundesamt entwickelt worden sind. Der Umweltatlas 2.0 ist eher für Firmen und Personen vom Fach interessant, die CD 'Multimedia 8.0' hingegen ist für das breite Publikum konzoiert
    Source
    CD-Info. 2000, H.6, S.22
  5. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.10 
    0.102155186 = product of:
  0.25538796 = sum of:
    0.21386996 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21386996 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.041518018 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041518018 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  6. bs: 23 Bände auf einer Scheibe (2001) 0.10 
    0.09842154 = product of:
  0.24605384 = sum of:
    0.16301781 = weight(_text_:cd in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16301781 = score(doc=5665,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.6446764 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
    0.083036035 = weight(_text_:22 in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083036035 = score(doc=5665,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Gute Nachrichten für Literatur-Interessierte: alle 23 Bände des Kindler Literatur-Lexikons sind jetzt auf einer einzigen CD-ROM erschienen. Und bei gleichem Inhalt beträgt der Preis nur ein Zehntel der Buchausgabe
    Source
    CD-Info. 2001, H.4, S.22-23
  7. Kucianová, A.; Psohlavec, S.: Bilingual Slovak/English UDC Master Reference File on CD-ROM (2000) 0.10 
    0.09518738 = product of:
  0.23796844 = sum of:
    0.1383252 = weight(_text_:cd in 388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1383252 = score(doc=388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.54702604 = fieldWeight in 388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=388)
    0.09964324 = weight(_text_:22 in 388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09964324 = score(doc=388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=388)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.35-37
  8. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.09 
    0.09350354 = product of:
  0.15583923 = sum of:
    0.076516435 = weight(_text_:objects in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076516435 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
    0.0461084 = weight(_text_:cd in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0461084 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.18234201 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
    0.033214413 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033214413 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Content
    1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  9. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.09 
    0.08778468 = product of:
  0.2194617 = sum of:
    0.15303287 = weight(_text_:objects in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15303287 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
    0.066428825 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066428825 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
  10. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.09 
    0.0864421 = product of:
  0.21610524 = sum of:
    0.13390376 = weight(_text_:objects in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13390376 = score(doc=2746,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
    0.08220148 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08220148 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Fundamental forms of information, as well as the term information itself, are defined and developed for the purposes of information science/studies. Concepts of natural and represented information (taking an unconventional sense of representation), encoded and embodied information, as well as experienced, enacted, expressed, embedded, recorded, and trace information are elaborated. The utility of these terms for the discipline is illustrated with examples from the study of information-seeking behavior and of information genres. Distinctions between the information and curatorial sciences with respect to their social (and informational) objects of study are briefly outlined.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  11. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.08 
    0.084855 = product of:
  0.21213749 = sum of:
    0.16231588 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16231588 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
    0.04982162 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04982162 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  12. as: XML: Extensible Markup Language : I: Was ist XML? (2001) 0.08 
    0.079322815 = product of:
  0.19830704 = sum of:
    0.115270995 = weight(_text_:cd in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.115270995 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.455855 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
    0.083036035 = weight(_text_:22 in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083036035 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    30. 3.2003 11:06:22
    Source
    CD-Info. 2001, H.6, S.98-100
  13. Poggendorff, J.C.: Biographisch-literarisches Handwörterbuch der exakten Naturwissenschaften (2000) 0.08 
    0.079322815 = product of:
  0.19830704 = sum of:
    0.115270995 = weight(_text_:cd in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.115270995 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.455855 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
    0.083036035 = weight(_text_:22 in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083036035 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    3. 4.1996 15:41:22
    Pages
    6 CD-ROMs
  14. Grimm, J.; Grimm, W.: Deutsches Wörterbuch - Der digitale Grimm : Elektronische Ausgabe der Erstbearbeitung (2004) 0.08 
    0.079322815 = product of:
  0.19830704 = sum of:
    0.115270995 = weight(_text_:cd in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.115270995 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.455855 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
    0.083036035 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083036035 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:54:37
    Pages
    131 S. + Benutzerhandbuch + 2 CD-ROMs
  15. ¬Der große Gratis-Führer (2005) 0.08 
    0.079322815 = product of:
  0.19830704 = sum of:
    0.115270995 = weight(_text_:cd in 3250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.115270995 = score(doc=3250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.455855 = fieldWeight in 3250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3250)
    0.083036035 = weight(_text_:22 in 3250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083036035 = score(doc=3250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3250)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    6. 6.2005 20:11:22
    Source
    CD-Info. 2005, H.7, S.90-93
  16. ws: Universalwissen für jedermann : das neue Bertelsmann-Lexikon setzt vermehrt auf Online-Anbindung (2002) 0.08 
    0.07873723 = product of:
  0.19684307 = sum of:
    0.13041425 = weight(_text_:cd in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13041425 = score(doc=971,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.5157411 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
    0.066428825 = weight(_text_:22 in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066428825 = score(doc=971,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Zahlreiche Lexikas auf CD-ROM sind in den letzten Jahren erschienen. Viele orientieren sich an geläufigen Metaphern und Benutzerkonzepten aus Multimedia und Internet und legen - wie das Universallexikon 2002 von Bertelsmann - Wert auf einfachste Bedienung. Nur wenige können aber auf eine vergleichbare Informationsfülle verweisen
    Source
    CD-Info. 2002, H.1, S.22
  17. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.08 
    0.077872574 = product of:
  0.38936287 = sum of:
    0.38936287 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38936287 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5195957 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  18. Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004) 0.08 
    0.0768116 = product of:
  0.19202898 = sum of:
    0.13390376 = weight(_text_:objects in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13390376 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
    0.058125224 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058125224 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
  19. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.07 
    0.07456557 = product of:
  0.18641391 = sum of:
    0.15183261 = weight(_text_:objects in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15183261 = score(doc=1195,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.4661057 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
    0.0345813 = weight(_text_:cd in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0345813 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.13675651 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
  20. Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000) 0.07 
    0.0707125 = product of:
  0.17678125 = sum of:
    0.13526323 = weight(_text_:objects in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13526323 = score(doc=187,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
    0.041518018 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041518018 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1396
  • m 211
  • el 126
  • s 68
  • x 37
  • i 34
  • b 27
  • r 4
  • n 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications