Search (3219 results, page 1 of 161)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Scott, M.L.: Dewey Decimal Classification, 22nd edition : a study manual and number building guide (2005) 0.38 
    0.3815056 = product of:
  0.953764 = sum of:
    0.8578508 = weight(_text_:22nd in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.8578508 = score(doc=4594,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.6234299 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        1.376018 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
    0.09591324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09591324 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This work has been fully updated for the 22nd edition of DDC, and is used as reference for the application of Dewey coding or as a course text in the Dewey System
    Object
    DDC-22
  2. Dewey, M.: Dewey Decimal Classification and relative index (2003) 0.20 
    0.20201847 = product of:
  0.33669743 = sum of:
    0.2626621 = weight(_text_:22nd in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2626621 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.6234299 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.4213178 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
    0.032503664 = weight(_text_:21 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032503664 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.14820991 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
    0.041531652 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041531652 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Zu einigen Änderungen im Vergleich zur 21. Aufl. vgl. nachstehende Rezension.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 31(2004) no.2, S.112-114 (M.P. Satija) : "With nearly 130 years of eventful and checkered history, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is the oldest living yet thriving modern library classification. Having undergone 21 revisions, it is the most applied library classification structure all over the world. Apart from its use in libraries in more than 135 countries across six continents, many national and trade bibliographies use it for content organization. Furthermore, it is now making successful forays into the world of electronic documents and networked information. The print version of the 22nd edition was released in September 2003, two months later than the scheduled time of July 2003, and two months after the release of the electronic version, WebDewey. The period between print editions now seems settled to seven years as a matter of policy. As WebDewey, an the other hand, is updated an a quarterly basis, what really constitutes a new edition is problematic; edition is rolling, always in a flux without much fixity. The last half century, and more specifically the tenure of Benjamin A. Custer as editor (1956-1980; Editions 16-19), has been an era of structural changes in the DDC, backed by professional management and organizational planning. Custer was instrumental in not only resuscitating the system, but also in putting DDC back an the path of progress. His able successor, Dr. John P. Comaromi, edited the 20`h edition (1989) and ushered in a period of simplification and consolidation. Following the acquisition of Forest Press by OCLC in 1988, much more research has gone into making new editions of the DDC. The OCLC Office of Research has involved itself in classification research, especially in the harmonization of various knowledge classification systems and mapping of DDC numbers to subject headings, above all to make DDC capable of organizing electronic information of every sort. The acquisition of DDC by OCLC has also inaugurated an era of new products and services, along with organized marketing. DDC21 (1996) was a product of high IT, and the 22nd edition can safely be termed a child of network technology. It is indeed the first edition produced in the web environment. To stay abreast of current developments an knowledge practices, the editors relied an the Internet and electronic databases for new topics and terms. Editors and policy makes got constant feedback and suggestions via the Internet to add new features and to achieve accuracy and efficiency. In addition to the feedback and expert advice, this edition, as usual, is based an actual classification of three quarters of a million current books in the Decimal Classification Division of the Library of Congress since 1996.
    Changes DDC22 is the second edition prepared by Joan S. Mitchell who took over as editor in 1993. It carries forward the policies and improvements started in DDC21, especially the onslaught an the Christian and western cultural blas in the schedules and tables. The plan for reducing Christian blas in 200 Religion, initiated in DDC21, has now been completed, with some additional provisions in 296 and 297. An outstanding change has been the abrogation of Table 7 Persons. The functions of Table 7 are now filled by using T1-08 and whatever notation is appropriate from 011-999. There are at least six places in the tables and 12 places in the schedules where the use of T7 was prescribed; what good the abolition of T7 has produced is not clear. In fact, it does make number building in some cases a bit circuitous, especially while using Table 3C. It has also resulted in the reuse of many DDC 21 numbers with new meanings. However, some numbers remain the same e.g., Social customs of artists 390.47 (both in DDC21 and DDC22). A few numbers have also become shorter in length. In compliance with the recommendations of D'Elia's survey, all works relating to directories of travel facilities such as hotels, lodges, Motels, inns, have been shifted to 910.46 and to 913/919 whereas 647.94 continues to be in place for general information about hotels. A common practice in previous editions, that is full class or extensive revisions (phoenix schedules), appear to have been discontinued in the preparation of DDC22. But minor changes are numerous. There are more than one thousand relocations and discontiuations of class numbers. Some 40 numbers have been reused. ... However, all these changes are not those projected as slated changes for DDC22 in the DDC21 (1996), namely in 520 Astronomy, 355-359 Military science, 636-639 Animal husbandry and 690 Buildings. Obviously the switch over to the DDC 22 will put less strain an libraries. There has been considerable improvement in the manual, now shifted to volume 1 of the print edition (pp. 1-182). Notes in the manual have been shortened by removing redundant information and by dividing them into smaller sections. Some information from the manual has been transferred to the schedules and tables, in the form of notes. The manual is now clearer and easier to read. Flow Charts, built-in numbers, and see also references should help classifiers achieve greater consistency. The relative index has been beefed up. With its 928 pages, it is 333 pages longer than the previous one, including new built-in numbers and many additional terms. The entry vocabulary is wide-based and current. DDC 22, the first edition of this millennium, has kept pace with the fast changing information environment to map and organize it squarely. To quote our friends at OCLC: knowledge is a big world, and they have organized it."
    Issue
    22nd ed.
    Object
    DDC-22
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.16 
    0.15794273 = product of:
  0.3948568 = sum of:
    0.33730885 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33730885 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6001744 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.05754794 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05754794 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.15 
    0.1529389 = product of:
  0.38234726 = sum of:
    0.33730885 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33730885 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6001744 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.045038395 = weight(_text_:21 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045038395 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  5. Li, X.: Designing an interactive Web tutorial with cross-browser dynamic HTML (2000) 0.14 
    0.14109613 = product of:
  0.23516022 = sum of:
    0.13257387 = weight(_text_:objects in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13257387 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
    0.045038395 = weight(_text_:21 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045038395 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
    0.05754794 = weight(_text_:22 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05754794 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Texas A&M University Libraries developed a Web-based training (WBT) application for LandView III, a federal depository CD-ROM publication using cross-browser dynamic HTML (DHTML) and other Web technologies. The interactive and self-paced tutorial demonstrates the major features of the CD-ROM and shows how to navigate the programs. The tutorial features dynamic HTML techniques, such as hiding, showing and moving layers; dragging objects; and windows-style drop-down menus. It also integrates interactive forms, common gateway interface (CGI), frames, and animated GIF images in the design of the WBT. After describing the design and implementation of the tutorial project, an evaluation of usage statistics and user feedback was conducted, as well as an assessment of its strengths and weaknesses, and a comparison of this tutorial with other common types of training methods. The present article describes an innovative approach for CD-ROM training using advanced Web technologies such as dynamic HTML, which can simulate and demonstrate the interactive use of the CD-ROM, as well as the actual search process of a database.
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:21:22
  6. DiMarco, J.: Examining Bloom's Taxonomy and Peschl's Modes of Knowing for Classification of Learning Objects on the PBS.org/teachersource Website (2008) 0.14 
    0.14000465 = product of:
  0.35001162 = sum of:
    0.31247962 = weight(_text_:objects in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31247962 = score(doc=2496,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.83047986 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
    0.037531994 = weight(_text_:21 in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037531994 = score(doc=2496,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    The delivery of learning objects, small chunks of stand alone core components of reusable instruction (Nugent 2005) are used extensively in k-12 environments. Learning objects are videos and animated clips which are deployed in classrooms through public television companion websites. One such site is PBS. org/teachersource. Scholars and institutional reports (Schaffer & Douglas 2004, Nugent 2005, and PBS 2003) have identified challenges with learning objects lacking reliable pedagogical and curricular context due to the need for interpretation of raw materials by teachers and students (Nugent 2005). Technical challenges in learning objects include pedagogy and context relationships, issues with metadata in digital portals, and digital rights to content. This is a study of metadata representations of learning objects. The goal of this study was to propose and apply a comparative taxonomy to classify learning objects based on Bloom's Taxonomy in 2006 and Peschl's modes of knowing in 2007, thus adding to the discourse on taxonomies present in learning object repositories and knowledge-oriented educational processes existing in public broadcasting and educational new media content domains. In an effort to re-examine the data and conclusions, I matched Bloom's model against modes of knowing keywords put forth by Peschl (2006). Matching the Peschl model against the Bloom model provided a new template to use in determining the cognitive level of learning objectives embedded in PBS TeacherSource website learning objects.
    Pages
    S.15-21
  7. Kaushik, S.K.: DDC 22 : a practical approach (2004) 0.14 
    0.13765675 = product of:
  0.34414187 = sum of:
    0.24263683 = weight(_text_:22nd in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24263683 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6234299 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.38919666 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
    0.10150503 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10150503 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.
    Content
    1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons
    Object
    DDC-22
  8. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.13 
    0.13068572 = product of:
  0.32671428 = sum of:
    0.2499837 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2499837 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.076730594 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076730594 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  9. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.12 
    0.1179974 = product of:
  0.2949935 = sum of:
    0.24703686 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24703686 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.04795662 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04795662 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  10. Lorenz, B.: Inhaltserschließung 2006 : Sitzungen der bibliothekarischen Arbeitsgruppen bei der Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation an der FU Berlin, 8. und 9. März 2006 (2006) 0.12 
    0.1166354 = product of:
  0.19439232 = sum of:
    0.15164801 = weight(_text_:22nd in 5144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15164801 = score(doc=5144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6234299 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.24324791 = fieldWeight in 5144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5144)
    0.018765997 = weight(_text_:21 in 5144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018765997 = score(doc=5144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.085569024 = fieldWeight in 5144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5144)
    0.02397831 = weight(_text_:22 in 5144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02397831 = score(doc=5144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 5144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5144)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Content
    Dem Grundsatzreferat folgte ein Sachstandsbericht: Stefan Wolf (BSZ Konstanz) sprach über "Neues zur Sacherschließung im Südwestverbund". Er erinnerte an die Übernahme der Sacherschließungsdaten aus dem Bibliotheksverbund Bayern 2003, an die Übernahme von DDC-Notationen aus dem Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund 2004 und an den Beginn der Arbeit an der RVK-Normdatei im Jahr 2005. Aus der Fülle von angebotenem Material sei hier darauf verwiesen, dass der Südwestverbund inzwischen 25 Prozent seines Bestandes mit Schlagwörtern gemäß RSWK und Schlagwortnormdatei sowie 22 Prozent seines Bestandes mit Notationen gemäß RVK, aber auch DDC bzw. LCC erschlossen hat. Seit Dezember 2005 ist dominierendes Arbeitsthema die Migration zu PICA. Danach berichtete Dipl.-Math. Andreas Neumann (Karlsruhe) über RecommenderSysteme auf dem Hintergrund der Arbeit an der UB Karlsruhe. So konnte u.a. dank des Einsatzes dieser Expertensysteme festgestellt werden, dass 8o Prozent der Anfragen auf 14 Prozent des Bestandes gerichtet sind. Ein weiterer Arbeitsbericht wurde von Wladimir Rudyuk (Kiew) vorgelegt: Kriterien des Klassifizierens auf Dokumentebene im elektronischen Rechtsverkehr. Hier wurde die Brücke zur Erschließung in Archiven geschlagen und festgestellt, dass angesichts der vorhandenen Fülle von Einzellösungen erst noch Kriterien für institutionenübergreifende Klassifizierung zu erarbeiten sind. Der folgende Vortrag "Bibliometrische Anwendungen. Beispiel: Datenbankvergleiche" von Dirk Tunger (Jülich) erwies an einer Menge von Material die Bedeutung bibliometrischer Arbeit. Verglichen wurden dabei SCI und SCOPUS, wobei sich unterschiedliche Akzentsetzungen in der Erschließung und Unterschiede im Datenmaterial zeigten. Hervorstechendes Ergebnis der Untersuchung ist, dass die Bibliometrie nicht zur Qualitätsmessung geeignet ist, sondern zur Wahrnehmung von Publikationen. Dr. Hans-J. Hermes sprach danach über: Auch ein Job des Fachreferenten: ,,Titelfrüherkennung" - kann Klassifikation dabei helfen? Hier wurden am Beispiel der Recherche von Titeln mit dem "Publikationsjahr" 2007 (und folgende!) die Grenzen der Erschließung gezeigt.
    Den zweiten Tag der Jahrestagung begann Dr. Bernd Lorenz mit einem kurzen Literaturauswahlbericht. Zunächst gab er zwei allgemeine Hinweise: - Die Briefe zur Klassifikation Nr. 58, Nov. 2005 S. 8 f. enthalten einen Bericht über die AG DK während der GfKl-Tagung Magdeburg 2005. - Gemäß den "Zehn Punkten von Cottbus 2003" wird Frau Dr. Federica Paradisi ein Referat halten über "Applications of the DDC in Italy". Beim Literaturauswahlbericht wurden folgende Titel genannt: - Scott, Mona L.: Dewey Decimal Classification, 22nd edition: a study manual and number building guide (Westport/CT, 2005; XI, 348 S.) besonders S. 7 (offiziöser Text!) [vgl. S. 8: Hier spricht die Autorin sogar vom "wisdom" of the Editorial Policy Committee!!] - Bowman, J.H.: Essential Dewey. (New York, 2005; 150 S.)(kommentierender Text mit Übungen) [gut strukturiert; Basis für ein grundsätzliches Verständnis.] - Heiner-Freiling, Magda; Landry, Patrice: Die Verwendung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) für die Organisation von Nationalbibliographien: die Schweiz und Deutschland/Österreich (IFLA Oslo, 2005,1.8.2005 (2. Fassung der Übersetzung), 1o S.) [besonders S. 3, 6/8 (DDC Deutsch)] Die knappen Berichte von Anwenderbibliotheken skizzieren einen Gebrauch ohne Kooperation im ohnehin sehr reduzierten Anwenderbereich der UDK in Deutschland. Die ETH Zürich hält ihre UDK-Adaption aktuell und koordiniert in gewisser Weise den Schweizer Anwenderkreis von ca. einem Dutzend kleinerer Bibliotheken. Hingewiesen wurde auf eine kleine Dewey-Ausstellung, die dankenswerterweise durch Hilfe und Initiative von Frau Dr. Margit Sandner (UB Wien) vor dem Besprechungsraum plaziert werden konnte. Sie kann bei Interesse ausgeliehen werden. Die AG DK bestimmte dann nach dem Rücktritt von Frau Rothe (Bibliothek der HTWK Leipzig) im Zusammenhang mit ihrer bevorstehenden Pensionierung, Frau Dr. Monika Lösse (DDB Leipzig) und Herrn Dr. Pika (ETH Zürich) zu neuen stellvertretenden Vorsitzenden.
    Date
    21. 2.1997 19:37:24
  11. Lorenz, B.: AG "Bibliotheken" (AG-BIB) und AG Dezimalklassifikation (AG-DK) : Inhaltserschließung 2006: Sitzungen der bibliothekarischen Arbeitsgruppen bei der Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation an der FU Berlin, 8. und 9. März 2006 (2006) 0.12 
    0.1166354 = product of:
  0.19439232 = sum of:
    0.15164801 = weight(_text_:22nd in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15164801 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6234299 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.24324791 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
    0.018765997 = weight(_text_:21 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018765997 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.085569024 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
    0.02397831 = weight(_text_:22 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02397831 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Content
    Dem Grundsatzreferat folgte ein Sachstandsbericht: Stefan Wolf (BSZ Konstanz) sprach über "Neues zur Sacherschließung im Südwestverbund". Er erinnerte an die Übernahme der Sacherschließungsdaten aus dem Bibliotheksverbund Bayern 2003, an die Übernahme von DDC-Notationen aus dem Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund 2004 und an den Beginn der Arbeit an der RVK-Normdatei im Jahr 2005. Aus der Fülle von angebotenem Material sei hier darauf verwiesen, dass der Südwestverbund inzwischen 25 Prozent seines Bestandes mit Schlagwörtern gemäß RSWK und Schlagwortnormdatei sowie 22 Prozent seines Bestandes mit Notationen gemäß RVK, aber auch DDC bzw. LCC erschlossen hat. Seit Dezember 2005 ist dominierendes Arbeitsthema die Migration zu PICA. Danach berichtete Dipl.-Math. Andreas Neumann (Karlsruhe) über RecommenderSysteme auf dem Hintergrund der Arbeit an der UB Karlsruhe. So konnte u.a. dank des Einsatzes dieser Expertensysteme festgestellt werden, dass 8o Prozent der Anfragen auf 14 Prozent des Bestandes gerichtet sind. Ein weiterer Arbeitsbericht wurde von Wladimir Rudyuk (Kiew) vorgelegt: Kriterien des Klassifizierens auf Dokumentebene im elektronischen Rechtsverkehr. Hier wurde die Brücke zur Erschließung in Archiven geschlagen und festgestellt, dass angesichts der vorhandenen Fülle von Einzellösungen erst noch Kriterien für institutionenübergreifende Klassifizierung zu erarbeiten sind. Der folgende Vortrag "Bibliometrische Anwendungen. Beispiel: Datenbankvergleiche" von Dirk Tunger (Jülich) erwies an einer Menge von Material die Bedeutung bibliometrischer Arbeit. Verglichen wurden dabei SCI und SCOPUS, wobei sich unterschiedliche Akzentsetzungen in der Erschließung und Unterschiede im Datenmaterial zeigten. Hervorstechendes Ergebnis der Untersuchung ist, dass die Bibliometrie nicht zur Qualitätsmessung geeignet ist, sondern zur Wahrnehmung von Publikationen. Dr. Hans-J. Hermes sprach danach über: Auch ein Job des Fachreferenten: ,,Titelfrüherkennung" - kann Klassifikation dabei helfen? Hier wurden am Beispiel der Recherche von Titeln mit dem "Publikationsjahr" 2007 (und folgende!) die Grenzen der Erschließung gezeigt.
    Den zweiten Tag der Jahrestagung begann Dr. Bernd Lorenz mit einem kurzen Literaturauswahlbericht. Zunächst gab er zwei allgemeine Hinweise: - Die Briefe zur Klassifikation Nr. 58, Nov. 2005 S. 8 f. enthalten einen Bericht über die AG DK während der GfKl-Tagung Magdeburg 2005. - Gemäß den "Zehn Punkten von Cottbus 2003" wird Frau Dr. Federica Paradisi ein Referat halten über "Applications of the DDC in Italy". Beim Literaturauswahlbericht wurden folgende Titel genannt: - Scott, Mona L.: Dewey Decimal Classification, 22nd edition: a study manual and number building guide (Westport/CT, 2005; XI, 348 S.) besonders S. 7 (offiziöser Text!) [vgl. S. 8: Hier spricht die Autorin sogar vom "wisdom" of the Editorial Policy Committee!!] - Bowman, J.H.: Essential Dewey. (New York, 2005; 150 S.)(kommentierender Text mit Übungen) [gut strukturiert; Basis für ein grundsätzliches Verständnis.] - Heiner-Freiling, Magda; Landry, Patrice: Die Verwendung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) für die Organisation von Nationalbibliographien: die Schweiz und Deutschland/Österreich (IFLA Oslo, 2005,1.8.2005 (2. Fassung der Übersetzung), 1o S.) [besonders S. 3, 6/8 (DDC Deutsch)] Die knappen Berichte von Anwenderbibliotheken skizzieren einen Gebrauch ohne Kooperation im ohnehin sehr reduzierten Anwenderbereich der UDK in Deutschland. Die ETH Zürich hält ihre UDK-Adaption aktuell und koordiniert in gewisser Weise den Schweizer Anwenderkreis von ca. einem Dutzend kleinerer Bibliotheken. Hingewiesen wurde auf eine kleine Dewey-Ausstellung, die dankenswerterweise durch Hilfe und Initiative von Frau Dr. Margit Sandner (UB Wien) vor dem Besprechungsraum plaziert werden konnte. Sie kann bei Interesse ausgeliehen werden. Die AG DK bestimmte dann nach dem Rücktritt von Frau Rothe (Bibliothek der HTWK Leipzig) im Zusammenhang mit ihrer bevorstehenden Pensionierung, Frau Dr. Monika Lösse (DDB Leipzig) und Herrn Dr. Pika (ETH Zürich) zu neuen stellvertretenden Vorsitzenden.
    Date
    21. 2.1997 19:37:24
  12. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.11 
    0.109425426 = product of:
  0.27356356 = sum of:
    0.12010238 = weight(_text_:21 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12010238 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.54764175 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
    0.15346119 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15346119 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:31:12
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  13. Adams, A.: Using the International Patent Classification in an online environment (2000) 0.11 
    0.109425426 = product of:
  0.27356356 = sum of:
    0.12010238 = weight(_text_:21 in 7380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12010238 = score(doc=7380,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.54764175 = fieldWeight in 7380, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7380)
    0.15346119 = weight(_text_:22 in 7380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15346119 = score(doc=7380,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7380, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7380)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    27. 3.2002 15:21:10
    Source
    World patent information. 22(2000), S.291-300
  14. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.11 
    0.109425426 = product of:
  0.27356356 = sum of:
    0.12010238 = weight(_text_:21 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12010238 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.54764175 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
    0.15346119 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15346119 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:28:41
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  15. Piggott, M.: How the Index Society began - and ended (2000) 0.11 
    0.109425426 = product of:
  0.27356356 = sum of:
    0.12010238 = weight(_text_:21 in 505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12010238 = score(doc=505,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.54764175 = fieldWeight in 505, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=505)
    0.15346119 = weight(_text_:22 in 505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15346119 = score(doc=505,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 505, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=505)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 11:33:00
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.33-35
  16. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.10 
    0.101398304 = product of:
  0.25349575 = sum of:
    0.17676517 = weight(_text_:objects in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17676517 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
    0.076730594 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076730594 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
  17. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.10 
    0.09984751 = product of:
  0.24961877 = sum of:
    0.15466951 = weight(_text_:objects in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15466951 = score(doc=2746,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
    0.09494927 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09494927 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Fundamental forms of information, as well as the term information itself, are defined and developed for the purposes of information science/studies. Concepts of natural and represented information (taking an unconventional sense of representation), encoded and embodied information, as well as experienced, enacted, expressed, embedded, recorded, and trace information are elaborated. The utility of these terms for the discipline is illustrated with examples from the study of information-seeking behavior and of information genres. Distinctions between the information and curatorial sciences with respect to their social (and informational) objects of study are briefly outlined.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  18. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.10 
    0.09801429 = product of:
  0.24503572 = sum of:
    0.18748778 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18748778 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
    0.05754794 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05754794 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  19. Garrod, P.: Use of the UNESCO Thesaurus for archival subject indexing at UK NDAD (2000) 0.10 
    0.09574725 = product of:
  0.23936811 = sum of:
    0.10508958 = weight(_text_:21 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10508958 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.47918653 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
    0.13427854 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13427854 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    4. 8.2001 15:22:42
    Source
    Journal of the Society of Archivists. 21(2000) no.1, S.37-54
  20. Hennecke, J.: Öffentliche Sitzung der VÖB-Kommission für Sacherschliessung Wien 19. September 2000 (2001) 0.10 
    0.09574725 = product of:
  0.23936811 = sum of:
    0.10508958 = weight(_text_:21 in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10508958 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.47918653 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
    0.13427854 = weight(_text_:22 in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13427854 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    17.12.1996 21:11:09
    11. 3.2001 17:22:38

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 2727
  • m 343
  • el 147
  • s 106
  • x 36
  • b 30
  • i 16
  • r 11
  • n 4
  • l 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications