Search (2566 results, page 1 of 129)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.20 
    0.20004255 = product of:
  0.2667234 = sum of:
    0.063929364 = product of:
      0.19178808 = sum of:
        0.19178808 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19178808 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19178808 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19178808 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.011005932 = product of:
      0.033017796 = sum of:
        0.033017796 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033017796 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.20 
    0.1999683 = product of:
  0.2666244 = sum of:
    0.063929364 = product of:
      0.19178808 = sum of:
        0.19178808 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19178808 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19178808 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19178808 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.010906926 = product of:
      0.03272078 = sum of:
        0.03272078 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03272078 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.17 
    0.17047828 = product of:
  0.34095657 = sum of:
    0.08523914 = product of:
      0.25571743 = sum of:
        0.25571743 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25571743 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.25571743 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25571743 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  4. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.15 
    0.14916852 = product of:
  0.29833704 = sum of:
    0.07458426 = product of:
      0.22375277 = sum of:
        0.22375277 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22375277 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22375277 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22375277 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  5. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.11 
    0.106548935 = product of:
  0.21309787 = sum of:
    0.053274468 = product of:
      0.1598234 = sum of:
        0.1598234 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1598234 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1598234 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1598234 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  6. Kuhlen, R.; Brüning, J.: Creative Commons (CC) - für informationelle Selbstbestimmung, gegen den Trend des Urheberrechts/Copyright als Handelsrecht : Chancen für einen innovativen Drei-Stufen-Test? (2004) 0.09 
    0.09091614 = product of:
  0.18183228 = sum of:
    0.16899203 = weight(_text_:trend in 3048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16899203 = score(doc=3048,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.67764693 = fieldWeight in 3048, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3048)
    0.012840254 = product of:
      0.03852076 = sum of:
        0.03852076 = weight(_text_:29 in 3048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03852076 = score(doc=3048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3048)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Creative commons (CC) ist, zusammen mit Open Access (OA), in kürzester Zeit zum Signal dafür geworden, dass es, wie schon mit Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), Alternativen zur fortschreitenden Kommerzialisierung von Wissen und Information und zur Fremdbestimmung, um nicht zu sagen Ausbeutung von Autoren bzw. Urhebern jedweder kreativen Arbeitgibt. Man kann es auch systematischer formulieren: CC ist der Versuch, dem weltweiten Trend, das Copyright und im Gefolge auch das zentraleuropäische Urheberrecht in erster Linie als Handelsrecht zu verstehen, wieder Einhalt zu gebieten, und der Versuch, die Rechte an Wissen und Information wieder an den Autor/den Urheber zurückzubinden - dies alles zwar nicht gegen die bestehenden rechtlichen Bestimmungen, aber faktisch doch massiv die Verwertungsmonopole der Informationswirtschaft kritisierend.
    Date
    22.12.2004 19:54:29
  7. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.09 
    0.08523914 = product of:
  0.17047828 = sum of:
    0.04261957 = product of:
      0.12785871 = sum of:
        0.12785871 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12785871 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.12785871 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12785871 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34124896 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  8. Yu, E.: Stability and change in organizing knowledge for information systems development (2000) 0.08 
    0.07562038 = product of:
  0.15124077 = sum of:
    0.13656619 = weight(_text_:trend in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13656619 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.5476214 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
    0.014674577 = product of:
      0.04402373 = sum of:
        0.04402373 = weight(_text_:29 in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04402373 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Information systems are complex and dynamic artifacts with numerous components, sub-components, and inter-relationships among them. Systems development, maintenance, and evolution are knowledge-intensive activities. The paper outlines a number of schemes for organizing and managing knowledge used in the information systems area, illustrating a trend towards more explicit representations of knowledge to deal with change, and the social context of knowledge
    Date
    1. 1.2002 20:06:29
  9. Cronin, B.: Bowling alone together : academic writing as distributed cognition (2004) 0.08 
    0.07562038 = product of:
  0.15124077 = sum of:
    0.13656619 = weight(_text_:trend in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13656619 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.5476214 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
    0.014674577 = product of:
      0.04402373 = sum of:
        0.04402373 = weight(_text_:29 in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04402373 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The twentieth century saw the progressive collectivization of science-dramatic growth in teamwork in general and large-scale collaboration in particular. Cognitive partnering in the conduct of research and scholarship has become commonplace, and this trend is reflected in rates of co-authorship and sub-authorship collaboration. The effects of these developments an academic writing are discussed and theorized in terms of distributed cognition.
    Date
    6. 6.2004 21:19:29
  10. Lipinski, T.A.: ¬The myth of technological neutrality in copyright and the rights of institutional users : Recent legal challenges to the information organization as mediator and the impact of the DMCA, WIPO, and TEACH (2003) 0.06 
    0.0649401 = product of:
  0.1298802 = sum of:
    0.12070859 = weight(_text_:trend in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12070859 = score(doc=2111,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.48403352 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
    0.009171611 = product of:
      0.027514832 = sum of:
        0.027514832 = weight(_text_:29 in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027514832 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This article discusses the accelerating trend of ownership rights in digital property, copyright, in specific. This trend is in contrast to the stated legislative purpose of copyright law to be neutral as to the technology that either owners employ to embody the copyrighted work or that others employ to facilitate access and use of the work. Recent legislative initiatives as well as interpretive court decisions have undermined this important concept. There is an ascendancy of digital ownership rights that threatens to undermine the concept of technological neutrality, which in essence guarantees that ownership and well as "use" rights apply equally to analog and digital environments. The result of this skewing is twofold: an unstable environment with respect to the access and use rights of individuals, institutions, and other users of copyrighted material, and the incentive of copyright owners to present works to the public in digital formats alone, where ownership rights are strongest. This article attempts to plot that digital ascendancy and demonstrate the undermining of neutrality principles.
    Date
    5. 7.2003 19:29:34
  11. Poo, D.C.C.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Online Catalog Subject Searching (2009) 0.06 
    0.056715284 = product of:
  0.11343057 = sum of:
    0.10242464 = weight(_text_:trend in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10242464 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.41071606 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
    0.011005932 = product of:
      0.033017796 = sum of:
        0.033017796 = weight(_text_:29 in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033017796 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) is an information retrieval system characterized by short bibliographic records, mainly of books, journals, and audiovisual materials available in a particular library. This, coupled with a Boolean search interface and a heterogeneous user population with diverse needs, presents special problems for subject searching by end users. To perform effective subject searching in the OPAC system requires a wide range of knowledge and skills. Various approaches to improving the OPAC design for subject searching have been proposed and are reviewed in this entry. The trend toward Web-based OPAC interfaces and the developments in Internet and digital library technologies present fresh opportunities for enhancing the effectiveness of the OPAC system for subject searching.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:24:29
  12. Geeb, F.; Spree, U.: Wörterbücher und Enzyklopädien (2004) 0.06 
    0.056665782 = product of:
  0.113331564 = sum of:
    0.10242464 = weight(_text_:trend in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10242464 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.41071606 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
    0.010906926 = product of:
      0.03272078 = sum of:
        0.03272078 = weight(_text_:22 in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03272078 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Als allgemeine Informationsmittel erlauben Wörterbücher und Enzyklopädien einen gezielten Zugriff auf Fakteninformationen. Angesichts des extrem dynamischen Marktes und des hohen Grades der inhaltlichen Spezialisierung, besonders wenn man die zahlreichen elektronischen Produkte mit einbezieht, ist es nicht möglich einen umfassenden systematischen Überblick über den gängigen Bestand von Wörterbüchern und Enzyklopädien zu liefern. Dieser Beitrag wird sich auf einige wenige exemplarische Beispiele beschränken, wesentliche Strukturmerkmale aufzeigen und daneben geeignete Kriterien zur Auswahl und Evaluierung der Qualität von Nachschlagewerken anbieten. Seit einigen Jahren beschäftigen sich Informationswissenschaftler und -praktiker verstärkt mit Wörterbüchern und Enzyklopädien in Hinblick auf die hier seit Jahrhunderten praktizierten Formen der strukturierten Informations- und Wissensaufbereitung. Ein Trend, der durch zwei Entwicklungen entscheidend befördert wurde, den Einsatz von Datenbanken zur Verwaltung lexikographischer Informationen, unabhängig in welchem Medium sie erscheinen, und die Durchsetzung von XML als Auszeichnungssprache für lexikographische Daten.
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:21:22
  13. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.06 
    0.056665782 = product of:
  0.113331564 = sum of:
    0.10242464 = weight(_text_:trend in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10242464 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.41071606 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
    0.010906926 = product of:
      0.03272078 = sum of:
        0.03272078 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03272078 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Payne, N.; Thelwall, M.: Mathematical models for academic webs : linear relationship or non-linear power law? (2005) 0.05 
    0.05174303 = product of:
  0.20697212 = sum of:
    0.20697212 = weight(_text_:trend in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20697212 = score(doc=1066,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.8299446 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Previous studies of academic web interlinking have tended to hypothesise that the relationship between the research of a university and links to or from its web site should follow a linear trend, yet the typical distribution of web data, in general, seems to be a non-linear power law. This paper assesses whether a linear trend or a power law is the most appropriate method with which to model the relationship between research and web site size or outlinks. Following linear regression, analysis of the confidence intervals for the logarithmic graphs, and analysis of the outliers, the results suggest that a linear trend is more appropriate than a non-linear power law.
  15. Garcia Jiménez, A.; Valle Gastaminza, F. del: From thesauri to ontologies: a case study in a digital visual context (2004) 0.05 
    0.04726274 = product of:
  0.09452548 = sum of:
    0.085353866 = weight(_text_:trend in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085353866 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.3422634 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
    0.009171611 = product of:
      0.027514832 = sum of:
        0.027514832 = weight(_text_:29 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027514832 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In this paper a framework for the construction and organization of knowledge organization and representation languages in the context of digital photograph collections is presented. It analyses exigencies of photographs as documentary objects, as well as several models of indexing, different proposals of languages and a theoretical revision of ontologies in this research field, in relation to visual documents. In considering the photograph as an analysis object, it is appropriate to study all its attributes: features, components or properties of an objeet that can be represented in an information processing system. The attributes which are related to visual features include cognitive and affective answers and elements that describe spatial, semantic, symbolic or emotional features about a photograph. In any case, it is necessary to treat: a) morphological and material attributes (emulsion, state of preservation); b) biographical attributes: (school or trend, publication or exhibition); c) attributes of content: what and how a photograph says something; d) relational attributes: visual documents establish relationships with other documents that can be analysed in order to understand them.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 16:20:55
  16. Rajashekar, T.B.: Interoperable institutional digital research repositories and their potential for open access research knowledge management (2006) 0.05 
    0.04726274 = product of:
  0.09452548 = sum of:
    0.085353866 = weight(_text_:trend in 1494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085353866 = score(doc=1494,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.3422634 = fieldWeight in 1494, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1494)
    0.009171611 = product of:
      0.027514832 = sum of:
        0.027514832 = weight(_text_:29 in 1494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027514832 = score(doc=1494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1494)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses various aspects of institutional repositories from the perspective of academic institutions. There is growing interest among individuals and organizations - academic and research organizations in particular - to make innovative use of the digital medium of the Internet and the World Wide Web to reach their constituencies. Researchers and scholars in these are exploring novel ways of disseminating their work, to supplement traditional scholarly communications. The growing number of personal web pages, institutional and organizational websites indicate this trend and the realization by many organizations of the need for developing support systems at the institutional level for capturing, organizing, preserving and disseminating their intellectual output and to leverage on this knowledge capital. Defines institutional repositories, enumerates their features, and discusses their contents, design and development as well as benefits. Open access institutional repositories created and used in institutional environments may have different contents coming from different sources, on different platforms and metadata sets for description, the question of interoperability and enabling ease of access to and use by different categories of users with different information needs, is an important consideration. Several technical and non-technical parameters have a bearing on the success of inter-operable institutional repositories. These include: convincing researchers for content submission and usage of the institutional repositories; defining and managing appropriate content quality; digital rights management (publisher and researcher copyright; and access management); defining and implementing digital preservation strategies; assignment of persistent identifiers to repository items; development of aggregated repository services at consortia/ regional and national level; and development of semantic interoperability schemes. Briefly describes the institutional repositories scenario in India.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 16:45:38
  17. Gnoli, C.: Progress in synthetic classification : towards unique definition of concepts (2007) 0.05 
    0.04726274 = product of:
  0.09452548 = sum of:
    0.085353866 = weight(_text_:trend in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085353866 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.3422634 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
    0.009171611 = product of:
      0.027514832 = sum of:
        0.027514832 = weight(_text_:29 in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027514832 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The evolution of bibliographic classification schemes, from the end of the 19th century to our time, shows a trend of increasing possibilities to combine concepts in a classmark. While the early schemes, like DDC and LCC, were largely enumerative, more and more synthetic devices have appeared with common auxiliaries, facets, and phase relationships. The last editions of UDC and the UDC-derived FATKS project follow this evolution, by introducing more specific phase relationships and more common auxiliaries, like those for general properties and processes. This agrees with the Farradane's principle that each concept should have a place of unique definition, instead of being re-notated in each context where it occurs. This evolution appears to be unfinished, as even in most synthetic schemes many concepts have a different notation according to the disciplinary main classes where they occur. To overcome this limitation, main classes should be defined in terms of phenomena rather than disciplines: the Integrative Level Classification (ILC) research project is currently exploring this possibility. Examples with UDC, FATKS, and ILC notations are discussed.
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.167-182
  18. Härkönen, S.: Digital Reference Konsortien : Kooperative Online-Auskunft in Bibliotheken (2007) 0.05 
    0.047221486 = product of:
  0.09444297 = sum of:
    0.085353866 = weight(_text_:trend in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085353866 = score(doc=1883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.3422634 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
    0.009089106 = product of:
      0.027267316 = sum of:
        0.027267316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027267316 = score(doc=1883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Bibliotheken befinden sich weltweit im Wandel. Der allgemeine Trend, Informationen in zunehmendem Maße (oder gar ausschließlich) aus dem Internet zu beziehen, hat Konsequenzen für die Konzeption des bibliothekarischen Informationsdienstes. Viele Bibliotheken bieten bereits einen digitalen Auskunftsdienst an. Zumeist wird dieser jedoch von einzelnen Bibliotheken bereitgestellt, die dadurch auf synergetische Effekte und Vorteile durch Zusammenarbeit verzichten. Abhilfe schaffen Informationsverbünde, in denen mehrere Bibliotheken arbeitsteilig digitalen Auskunftsdienst anbieten. Die Autorin Sonja Härkönen gibt einen Überblick über die Entwicklung solcher Digital Reference Konsortien in den USA, klärt die Begrifflichkeiten und stellt die verschiedenen Formen des Digital Reference Service vor. Darauf aufbauend diskutiert sie anhand von Praxisbeispielen die Vor- und Nachteile verschiedener konzeptioneller Modelle. Organisatorische und strukturelle Anregungen mit Blick auf das Bibliothekssystem in Deutschland zum Aufbau von kooperativen digitalen Auskunftsdiensten runden die vorliegende Untersuchung ab. Das Buch richtet sich an Entscheidungsträger in Bibliotheken und Verbänden, sowie an Projektmitarbeiter und -manager, die sich mit dem Thema des digitalen Auskunftsdienstes befassen.
    Date
    22. 8.2009 19:50:27
  19. Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006) 0.05 
    0.047221486 = product of:
  0.09444297 = sum of:
    0.085353866 = weight(_text_:trend in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085353866 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.3422634 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
    0.009089106 = product of:
      0.027267316 = sum of:
        0.027267316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027267316 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Müller, W.: CMS - CMP - MAM - DMS - Archivierung - KM (2003) 0.04 
    0.042676933 = product of:
  0.17070773 = sum of:
    0.17070773 = weight(_text_:trend in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17070773 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.6845268 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Content Managment und Cross Media Publishing, Media Asset Management, Document Managment, Knowledge Management und Archivierung; in Mode gekommene Ausdrücke, deren Trend wie selbstverständlich durch klingende "Drei-Buchstaben-Abkürzungen" untermauert wird.

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 2198
  • m 241
  • el 122
  • s 86
  • b 28
  • x 23
  • i 12
  • r 5
  • n 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications