Search (887 results, page 1 of 45)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Mühlbauer, P.: Upload in Computer klappt . (2018) 0.09
    0.0883595 = product of:
      0.176719 = sum of:
        0.176719 = sum of:
          0.12942702 = weight(_text_:v in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12942702 = score(doc=4113,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.53281236 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
          0.04729198 = weight(_text_:22 in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04729198 = score(doc=4113,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: URL: http://www.heise.de/-3962785. Vgl. auch: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnx3d25pcDIwMTd8Z3g6NDQ3YjZhZTZiYWJiNDI5NA. Vgl. auch: Volker Henn, V.: Synthetisches Leben: auf dem Weg zum biologischen Betriebssystem [eBook]. Hannover: Heise Medien 2014. ISBN (epub) 978-3-944099-23-1.
    Date
    12. 2.2018 15:22:19
  2. Moreiro-González, J.A.; Ortiz-Repiso, V.: What is happening about KOS in Spain : scientific production analysis, 2000-2017 (2018) 0.08
    0.0793204 = product of:
      0.1586408 = sum of:
        0.1586408 = sum of:
          0.104592815 = weight(_text_:v in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.104592815 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.05404798 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05404798 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 1.2019 14:22:24
  3. Andrade, T.C.; Dodebei, V.: Traces of digitized newspapers and bom-digital news sites : a trail to the memory on the internet (2016) 0.08
    0.0793204 = product of:
      0.1586408 = sum of:
        0.1586408 = sum of:
          0.104592815 = weight(_text_:v in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.104592815 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
          0.05404798 = weight(_text_:22 in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05404798 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 1.2019 17:42:22
  4. Clavier, V.; Paganelli, C.: Including authorial stance in the indexing of scientific documents (2012) 0.08
    0.07654294 = sum of:
      0.03732064 = product of:
        0.14928256 = sum of:
          0.14928256 = weight(_text_:author's in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14928256 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33509937 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.039222304 = product of:
        0.07844461 = sum of:
          0.07844461 = weight(_text_:v in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07844461 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article argues that authorial stance should be taken into account in the indexing of scientific documents. Authorial stance has been widely studied in linguistics and is a typical feature of scientific writing that reveals the uniqueness of each author's perspective, their scientific contribution, and their thinking. We argue that authorial stance guides the reading of scientific documents and that it can be used to characterize the knowledge contained in such documents. Our research has previously shown that people reading dissertations are interested both in a topic and in a document's authorial stance. Now, we would like to propose a two-tiered indexing system. Dissertations would first be divided into paragraphs; then, each information unit would be defined by topic and by the markers of authorial stance present in the document.
  5. Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010) 0.07
    0.06940535 = product of:
      0.1388107 = sum of:
        0.1388107 = sum of:
          0.091518715 = weight(_text_:v in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.091518715 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
          0.04729198 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04729198 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:41:16
  6. Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010) 0.07
    0.06940535 = product of:
      0.1388107 = sum of:
        0.1388107 = sum of:
          0.091518715 = weight(_text_:v in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.091518715 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
          0.04729198 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04729198 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  7. Hilberer, T.: Numerus currens und iPod : die Organisation von Information mittels Metadaten und die Aufgabe der Bibliotheken im digitalen Zeitalter oder Die Kraft der digitalen Ordnung (2011) 0.07
    0.06940535 = product of:
      0.1388107 = sum of:
        0.1388107 = sum of:
          0.091518715 = weight(_text_:v in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.091518715 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
          0.04729198 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04729198 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  8. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.07
    0.06940535 = product of:
      0.1388107 = sum of:
        0.1388107 = sum of:
          0.091518715 = weight(_text_:v in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.091518715 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.04729198 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04729198 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Roth, G.; Gerhardt, V.; Flaßpöhler, S.: Wie flexibel ist mein Ich? : Dialog (2012) 0.07
    0.06940535 = product of:
      0.1388107 = sum of:
        0.1388107 = sum of:
          0.091518715 = weight(_text_:v in 955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.091518715 = score(doc=955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=955)
          0.04729198 = weight(_text_:22 in 955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04729198 = score(doc=955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=955)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2023 11:14:22
  10. Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019) 0.06
    0.060872786 = sum of:
      0.043982793 = product of:
        0.17593117 = sum of:
          0.17593117 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17593117 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.33509937 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.016889993 = product of:
        0.033779986 = sum of:
          0.033779986 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033779986 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
    Date
    7. 9.2019 21:30:22
  11. Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010) 0.06
    0.059490293 = product of:
      0.11898059 = sum of:
        0.11898059 = sum of:
          0.07844461 = weight(_text_:v in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07844461 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
          0.040535983 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040535983 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:36:46
  12. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.06
    0.059490293 = product of:
      0.11898059 = sum of:
        0.11898059 = sum of:
          0.07844461 = weight(_text_:v in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07844461 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.040535983 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040535983 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  13. Petric, K.; Petric, T.; Krisper, M.; Rajkovic, V.: User profiling on a pilot digital library with the final result of a new adaptive knowledge management solution (2011) 0.06
    0.059490293 = product of:
      0.11898059 = sum of:
        0.11898059 = sum of:
          0.07844461 = weight(_text_:v in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07844461 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
          0.040535983 = weight(_text_:22 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040535983 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2011 14:47:22
  14. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.06
    0.059490293 = product of:
      0.11898059 = sum of:
        0.11898059 = sum of:
          0.07844461 = weight(_text_:v in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07844461 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.040535983 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040535983 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  15. Engerer, V.: Metapher und Wissenstransfers im informationsbezogenen Diskurs (2013) 0.06
    0.059490293 = product of:
      0.11898059 = sum of:
        0.11898059 = sum of:
          0.07844461 = weight(_text_:v in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07844461 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
          0.040535983 = weight(_text_:22 in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040535983 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:06:49
  16. He, L.; Nahar, V.: Reuse of scientific data in academic publications : an investigation of Dryad Digital Repository (2016) 0.06
    0.059490293 = product of:
      0.11898059 = sum of:
        0.11898059 = sum of:
          0.07844461 = weight(_text_:v in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07844461 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
          0.040535983 = weight(_text_:22 in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040535983 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  17. Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019) 0.06
    0.059490293 = product of:
      0.11898059 = sum of:
        0.11898059 = sum of:
          0.07844461 = weight(_text_:v in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07844461 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24291293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
          0.040535983 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040535983 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
  18. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.06
    0.059398938 = product of:
      0.118797876 = sum of:
        0.118797876 = product of:
          0.4751915 = sum of:
            0.4751915 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4751915 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42275468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04986484 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  19. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.06
    0.05758863 = sum of:
      0.03732064 = product of:
        0.14928256 = sum of:
          0.14928256 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14928256 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33509937 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.020267991 = product of:
        0.040535983 = sum of:
          0.040535983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040535983 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  20. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.06
    0.05758863 = sum of:
      0.03732064 = product of:
        0.14928256 = sum of:
          0.14928256 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14928256 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33509937 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.020267991 = product of:
        0.040535983 = sum of:
          0.040535983 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040535983 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17461817 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04986484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55

Languages

  • e 644
  • d 233
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 769
  • el 87
  • m 58
  • s 22
  • x 18
  • r 8
  • b 5
  • v 2
  • i 1
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications