-
Xiao, G.: ¬A knowledge classification model based on the relationship between science and human needs (2013)
0.09
0.088230625 = product of:
0.17646125 = sum of:
0.17646125 = sum of:
0.09440153 = weight(_text_:g in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09440153 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.082059726 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082059726 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 12:36:34
-
Antos, G.: Wie Sprache Entscheidungen (vor)prägt : zum Einfluss und zur Rhetorik kollektiver Selbsttäuschungen (2014)
0.09
0.088230625 = product of:
0.17646125 = sum of:
0.17646125 = sum of:
0.09440153 = weight(_text_:g in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09440153 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
0.082059726 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082059726 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 7.2014 18:22:33
-
Vosgerau, G.: Sprache und Denken (2011)
0.07
0.073525526 = product of:
0.14705105 = sum of:
0.14705105 = sum of:
0.078667946 = weight(_text_:g in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078667946 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
0.068383105 = weight(_text_:22 in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068383105 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 7.2011 13:13:22
-
Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019)
0.06
0.061614446 = sum of:
0.04451867 = product of:
0.17807467 = sum of:
0.17807467 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17807467 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
0.33918214 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017095776 = product of:
0.034191553 = sum of:
0.034191553 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034191553 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
- Date
- 7. 9.2019 21:30:22
-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.06
0.060122635 = product of:
0.12024527 = sum of:
0.12024527 = product of:
0.48098108 = sum of:
0.48098108 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.48098108 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42790538 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Junger, U.: Basisinformationen zur Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (UDK) (2018)
0.06
0.058820423 = product of:
0.117640845 = sum of:
0.117640845 = sum of:
0.06293436 = weight(_text_:g in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06293436 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
0.054706484 = weight(_text_:22 in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054706484 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 7.2018 17:22:00
- Source
- Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg.: H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.06
0.058820423 = product of:
0.117640845 = sum of:
0.117640845 = sum of:
0.06293436 = weight(_text_:g in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06293436 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.054706484 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054706484 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
- Source
- Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg.: H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
-
Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018)
0.06
0.058820423 = product of:
0.117640845 = sum of:
0.117640845 = sum of:
0.06293436 = weight(_text_:g in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06293436 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.054706484 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054706484 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2019 19:04:22
-
Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010)
0.06
0.058290277 = sum of:
0.037775345 = product of:
0.15110138 = sum of:
0.15110138 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15110138 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33918214 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020514932 = product of:
0.041029863 = sum of:
0.041029863 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041029863 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011)
0.06
0.058290277 = sum of:
0.037775345 = product of:
0.15110138 = sum of:
0.15110138 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15110138 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33918214 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020514932 = product of:
0.041029863 = sum of:
0.041029863 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041029863 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
- Date
- 17. 3.2011 19:22:55
-
Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012)
0.05
0.05146787 = product of:
0.10293574 = sum of:
0.10293574 = sum of:
0.055067565 = weight(_text_:g in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055067565 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.047868174 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047868174 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.05
0.05146787 = product of:
0.10293574 = sum of:
0.10293574 = sum of:
0.055067565 = weight(_text_:g in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055067565 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.047868174 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047868174 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
-
Stumpf, G.: "Kerngeschäft" Sacherschließung in neuer Sicht : was gezielte intellektuelle Arbeit und maschinelle Verfahren gemeinsam bewirken können (2015)
0.05
0.05146787 = product of:
0.10293574 = sum of:
0.10293574 = sum of:
0.055067565 = weight(_text_:g in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055067565 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.047868174 = weight(_text_:22 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047868174 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Es handelt sich um den leicht überarbeiteten Text eines Vortrags bei der VDB-Fortbildungsveranstaltung "Wandel als Konstante: neue Aufgaben und Herausforderungen für sozialwissenschaftliche Bibliotheken" am 22./23. Januar 2015 in Berlin.
-
Roth, G.; Gerhardt, V.; Flaßpöhler, S.: Wie flexibel ist mein Ich? : Dialog (2012)
0.05
0.05146787 = product of:
0.10293574 = sum of:
0.10293574 = sum of:
0.055067565 = weight(_text_:g in 955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055067565 = score(doc=955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=955)
0.047868174 = weight(_text_:22 in 955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047868174 = score(doc=955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 5.2023 11:14:22
-
Kim, J.: Faculty self-archiving : motivations and barriers (2010)
0.05
0.05114644 = sum of:
0.03147945 = product of:
0.1259178 = sum of:
0.1259178 = weight(_text_:author's in 3989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1259178 = score(doc=3989,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33918214 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 3989, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3989)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019666987 = product of:
0.039333973 = sum of:
0.039333973 = weight(_text_:g in 3989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039333973 = score(doc=3989,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 3989, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3989)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study investigated factors that motivate or impede faculty participation in self-archiving practices-the placement of research work in various open access (OA) venues, ranging from personal Web pages to OA archives. The author's research design involves triangulation of survey and interview data from 17 Carnegie doctorate universities with DSpace institutional repositories. The analysis of survey responses from 684 professors and 41 telephone interviews identified seven significant factors: (a) altruism-the idea of providing OA benefits for users; (b) perceived self-archiving culture; (c) copyright concerns; (d) technical skills; (e) age; (f) perception of no harmful impact of self-archiving on tenure and promotion; and (g) concerns about additional time and effort. The factors are listed in descending order of their effect size. Age, copyright concerns, and additional time and effort are negatively associated with self-archiving, whereas remaining factors are positively related to it. Faculty are motivated by OA advantages to users, disciplinary norms, and no negative influence on academic reward. However, barriers to self-archiving-concerns about copyright, extra time and effort, technical ability, and age-imply that the provision of services to assist faculty with copyright management, and with technical and logistical issues, could encourage higher rates of self-archiving.
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.05
0.050102197 = product of:
0.10020439 = sum of:
0.10020439 = product of:
0.40081757 = sum of:
0.40081757 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.40081757 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42790538 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Dahl, E.; Pauen, M.: Schuld und freier Wille (2010)
0.04
0.044909097 = product of:
0.089818195 = sum of:
0.089818195 = sum of:
0.05562664 = weight(_text_:g in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05562664 = score(doc=3713,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.2934334 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
0.034191553 = weight(_text_:22 in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034191553 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch die Diskussion: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In: FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4) [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23.
-
Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010)
0.04
0.044909097 = product of:
0.089818195 = sum of:
0.089818195 = sum of:
0.05562664 = weight(_text_:g in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05562664 = score(doc=3739,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.2934334 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
0.034191553 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034191553 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.04
0.044909097 = product of:
0.089818195 = sum of:
0.089818195 = sum of:
0.05562664 = weight(_text_:g in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05562664 = score(doc=1440,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.2934334 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.034191553 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034191553 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to analyze the Gottlob Frege's (1848-1925) theory of definition as a tool for knowledge organization. The objective was achieved by discussing the theory of definition including: the aims of definition, kinds of definition, condition of correct definition, what is undefinable. Frege indicated the following aims of a defining: (1) to introduce a new word, which has had no precise meaning until then (2) to explain the meaning of a word; (3) to catch a thought. We would like to present three kinds of definitions used by Frege: a contextual definition, a stipulative definition and a piecemeal definition. In the history of theory of definition Frege was the first to have formulated the condition of a correct definition. According to Frege not everything can be defined, what is logically simple cannot have a proper definition Usability of Frege's theory of definition is referred in the case study. Definitions that serve as an example are definitions of 'context'. The term 'context' is used in different situations and meanings in the field of knowledge organization. The paper is rounded by a discussion of how Frege's theory of definition can be useful for knowledge organization. To present G. Frege's theory of definition in view of the need for knowledge organization we shall start with different ranges of knowledge organization.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Laßmann, G.: Asimovs Robotergesetze : was leisten sie wirklich? (2017)
0.04
0.044909097 = product of:
0.089818195 = sum of:
0.089818195 = sum of:
0.05562664 = weight(_text_:g in 4067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05562664 = score(doc=4067,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.2934334 = fieldWeight in 4067, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4067)
0.034191553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034191553 = score(doc=4067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05047238 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 1.2018 19:02:22
- Footnote
- Vgl.: urn:nbn:de:101:1-20180104576. Vgl. den Beitrag: Laßmann, G.: Die Aktualität von Asimovs Robotergesetzen (Interview) unter: https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Die-Aktualitaet-von-Asimovs-Robotergesetzen-3940781.html?wt_mc=nl.tp-aktuell.woechentlich.
