Search (2710 results, page 1 of 136)

0.13549909 = sum of:
  0.07675713 = product of:
    0.30702853 = sum of:
      0.30702853 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.30702853 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.46825418 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.058741964 = product of:
    0.08811294 = sum of:
      0.05082521 = weight(_text_:c in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05082521 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.037287734 = weight(_text_:h in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037287734 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.10758997 = product of:
  0.21517994 = sum of:
    0.21517994 = sum of:
      0.102682434 = weight(_text_:c in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.102682434 = score(doc=1838,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.5389696 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
      0.037666302 = weight(_text_:h in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037666302 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
      0.0748312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0748312 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

6.12.2015 17:22:08

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.5/6, S.285-286

0.091977395 = sum of:
  0.017935418 = product of:
    0.07174167 = sum of:
      0.07174167 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07174167 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.07404198 = sum of:
    0.029042976 = weight(_text_:c in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029042976 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05523161 = queryNorm
        0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    0.01506652 = weight(_text_:h in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01506652 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05523161 = queryNorm
        0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    0.029932482 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029932482 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05523161 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)

Abstract

The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.

0.08766783 = sum of:
  0.07055409 = product of:
    0.28221637 = sum of:
      0.28221637 = weight(_text_:2223 in 1102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.28221637 = score(doc=1102,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.531187 = queryWeight, product of:
            9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.5312938 = fieldWeight in 1102, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1102)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01711374 = product of:
    0.051341217 = sum of:
      0.051341217 = weight(_text_:c in 1102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051341217 = score(doc=1102,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 1102, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1102)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2201-2223

0.08587858 = sum of:
  0.026903126 = product of:
    0.107612506 = sum of:
      0.107612506 = weight(_text_:authors in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.107612506 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05897546 = product of:
    0.08846319 = sum of:
      0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043564465 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.04489872 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04489872 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users

Date

22. 7.2010 20:40:56

0.07799884 = sum of:
  0.019023383 = product of:
    0.07609353 = sum of:
      0.07609353 = weight(_text_:authors in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07609353 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05897546 = product of:
    0.08846319 = sum of:
      0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043564465 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.04489872 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04489872 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The explosion of the information available on the Internet has made traditional information retrieval systems, characterized by one size fits all approaches, less effective. Indeed, users are overwhelmed by the information delivered by such systems in response to their queries, particularly when the latter are ambiguous. In order to tackle this problem, the state-of-the-art reveals that there is a growing interest towards contextual information retrieval (CIR) which relies on various sources of evidence issued from the user's search background and environment, in order to improve the retrieval accuracy. This chapter focuses on mobile context, highlights challenges they present for IR, and gives an overview of CIR approaches applied in this environment. Then, the authors present an approach to personalize search results for mobile users by exploiting both cognitive and spatio-temporal contexts. The experimental evaluation undertaken in front of Yahoo search shows that the approach improves the quality of top search result lists and enhances search result precision.

Date

20. 4.2012 13:19:22

Source

Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a

0.07799884 = sum of:
  0.019023383 = product of:
    0.07609353 = sum of:
      0.07609353 = weight(_text_:authors in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07609353 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05897546 = product of:
    0.08846319 = sum of:
      0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043564465 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
      0.04489872 = weight(_text_:22 in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04489872 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This article addresses the problem of unsupervised decomposition of a multi-author text document: identifying the sentences written by each author assuming the number of authors is unknown. An approach, BayesAD, is developed for solving this problem: apply a Bayesian segmentation algorithm, followed by a segment clustering algorithm. Results are presented from an empirical comparison between BayesAD and AK, a modified version of an approach published by Akiva and Koppel in 2013. BayesAD exhibited greater accuracy than AK in all experiments. However, BayesAD has a parameter that needs to be set and which had a nontrivial impact on accuracy. Developing an effective method for eliminating this need would be a fruitful direction for future work. When controlling for topic, the accuracy levels of BayesAD and AK were, in all but one case, worse than a baseline approach wherein one author was assumed to write all sentences in the input text document. Hence, room for improved solutions exists.

Date

22. 1.2016 14:08:11

0.076604106 = sum of:
  0.027457891 = product of:
    0.109831564 = sum of:
      0.109831564 = weight(_text_:authors in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.109831564 = score(doc=109,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.049146216 = product of:
    0.07371932 = sum of:
      0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03630372 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
      0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0374156 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This chapter shows that the wider use of Web search engines, reconsidering the theoretical and methodological frameworks to grasp new information practices. Beginning with an overview of the recent challenges implied by the dynamic nature of the Web, this chapter then traces the information behavior related concepts in order to present the different approaches from the user perspective. The authors pay special attention to the concept of "information practice" and other related concepts such as "use", "activity", and "behavior" largely used in the literature but not always strictly defined. The authors provide an overview of user-oriented studies that are meaningful to understand the different contexts of use of electronic information access systems, focusing on five approaches: the system-oriented approaches, the theories of information seeking, the cognitive and psychological approaches, the management science approaches, and the marketing approaches. Future directions of work are then shaped, including social searching and the ethical, cultural, and political dimensions of Web search engines. The authors conclude considering the importance of Critical theory to better understand the role of Web Search engines in our modern society.

Date

20. 4.2012 13:22:37

Source

Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a

0.07404198 = product of:
  0.14808396 = sum of:
    0.14808396 = sum of:
      0.058085952 = weight(_text_:c in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058085952 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
      0.03013304 = weight(_text_:h in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03013304 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
      0.059864964 = weight(_text_:22 in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059864964 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

21. 3.2015 18:13:22

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.45-55

0.07332508 = sum of:
  0.06579182 = product of:
    0.2631673 = sum of:
      0.2631673 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2631673 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.46825418 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0075332597 = product of:
    0.02259978 = sum of:
      0.02259978 = weight(_text_:h in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02259978 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 73(2020) H.3/4, S.496-503

0.07156549 = sum of:
  0.022419272 = product of:
    0.08967709 = sum of:
      0.08967709 = weight(_text_:authors in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08967709 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.049146216 = product of:
    0.07371932 = sum of:
      0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03630372 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0374156 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a computational model that implicitly predict the children's creative quality of solutions by analyzing the query pattern on a problem-solving-based lesson. Design/methodology/approach A search task related to the competencies acquired in the classroom was applied to automatically measure children' creativity. A blind review process of the creative quality was developed of 255 primary school students' solutions. Findings While there are many creativity training programs that have proven effective, many of these programs require measuring creativity previously which involves time-consuming tasks conducted by experienced reviewers, i.e. far from primary school classroom dynamics. The authors have developed a model that predicts the creative quality of the given solution using the search queries pattern as input. This model has been used to predict the creative quality of 255 primary school students' solutions with 80 percent sensitivity. Research limitations/implications Although the research was conducted with just one search task, participants come from two different countries. Therefore, the authors hope that this model provides detection of non-creative solutions to enable prompt intervention and improve the creative quality of solutions. Originality/value This is the first implicit classification model of query pattern in order to predict the children' creative quality of solutions. This model is based on a conceptual relation between the concept association of creative thinking and query chain model of information search.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.07147718 = product of:
  0.14295436 = sum of:
    0.14295436 = sum of:
      0.07545587 = weight(_text_:c in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07545587 = score(doc=1352,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.3960601 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.02259978 = weight(_text_:h in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02259978 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.04489872 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04489872 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 8.2014 17:11:29

0.071012616 = sum of:
  0.026903126 = product of:
    0.107612506 = sum of:
      0.107612506 = weight(_text_:authors in 4003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.107612506 = score(doc=4003,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 4003, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4003)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.044109493 = product of:
    0.06616424 = sum of:
      0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 4003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043564465 = score(doc=4003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4003)
      0.02259978 = weight(_text_:h in 4003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02259978 = score(doc=4003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4003)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This research empirically evaluated the use of mobile information and communication technology in a large-sized undergraduate class, where the effectiveness of multilearner participation and prompt learner-instructor interaction is often challenged. The authors analyzed the effectiveness of a so-called "lean" communication medium using hand-held mobile devices, whose brief text-based messages considerably limit the speed of information exchange. Adopting a social construction perspective of media richness theory and a reinforced approach to learning and practice, the authors conjectured that an interactive learning system built with wireless PDA devices can enhance individual practices and reinforce peer influences. Consequently, they expected better understanding and higher satisfaction among learners. A field experiment with 118 participants in the treatment and 114 participants in the control group supported their hypotheses. Their results suggested that richness of a "lean" medium could be increased in certain socially constructed conditions, thus extending existing notions of computer-aided instruction towards a techno-social learning model.

0.07055409 = product of:
  0.14110819 = sum of:
    0.14110819 = product of:
      0.56443274 = sum of:
        0.56443274 = weight(_text_:2223 in 1692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.56443274 = score(doc=1692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.531187 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05523161 = queryNorm
            1.0625876 = fieldWeight in 1692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1692)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Scientometrics. 102(2015) no.3, S.2223-2245

0.06686367 = product of:
  0.13372734 = sum of:
    0.13372734 = product of:
      0.200591 = sum of:
        0.1257598 = weight(_text_:c in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1257598 = score(doc=2991,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05523161 = queryNorm
            0.6601002 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
        0.0748312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0748312 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05523161 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

6. 6.2016 18:42:22

Source

Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff

0.06579182 = product of:
  0.13158365 = sum of:
    0.13158365 = product of:
      0.5263346 = sum of:
        0.5263346 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5263346 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.46825418 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05523161 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.06499904 = sum of:
  0.01585282 = product of:
    0.06341128 = sum of:
      0.06341128 = weight(_text_:authors in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06341128 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.049146216 = product of:
    0.07371932 = sum of:
      0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03630372 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
      0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0374156 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate user experiences with a touch-wall interface featuring both clustering and categorization representations of available e-books in a public library to understand human information interactions under work-focused and recreational contexts. Design/methodology/approach - Researchers collected questionnaires from 251 New Taipei City Library visitors who used the touch-wall interface to search for new titles. The authors applied structural equation modelling to examine relationships among hedonic/utilitarian needs, clustering and categorization representations, perceived ease of use (EU) and the extent to which users experienced anxiety and uncertainty (AU) while interacting with the interface. Findings - Utilitarian users who have an explicit idea of what they intend to find tend to prefer the categorization interface. A hedonic-oriented user tends to prefer clustering interfaces. Users reported EU regardless of which interface they engaged with. Results revealed that use of the clustering interface had a negative correlation with AU. Users that seek to satisfy utilitarian needs tended to emphasize the importance of perceived EU, whilst pleasure-seeking users were a little more tolerant of anxiety or uncertainty. Originality/value - The Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) encourages library visitors to borrow digital books through the implementation of an information visualization system. This situation poses an opportunity to validate uses and gratification theory. People with hedonic/utilitarian needs displayed different risk-control attitudes and affected uncertainty using the interface. Knowledge about user interaction with such interfaces is vital when launching the development of a new OPAC.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.06478673 = product of:
  0.12957346 = sum of:
    0.12957346 = sum of:
      0.05082521 = weight(_text_:c in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05082521 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.026366409 = weight(_text_:h in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026366409 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.05238184 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05238184 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2013 14:04:09

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8

0.06349376 = product of:
  0.12698752 = sum of:
    0.12698752 = sum of:
      0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03630372 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.053268194 = weight(_text_:h in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053268194 = score(doc=4147,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0374156 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.

Date

8. 1.2011 19:22:13

Object

h-index

0.063132875 = sum of:
  0.019023383 = product of:
    0.07609353 = sum of:
      0.07609353 = weight(_text_:authors in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07609353 = score(doc=4295,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.044109493 = product of:
    0.06616424 = sum of:
      0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043564465 = score(doc=4295,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
      0.02259978 = weight(_text_:h in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02259978 = score(doc=4295,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05523161 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The study investigates the main structure of the classification applied in the Seven Epitomes (Qilue), the first documented Chinese library catalog completed a few years before the Common Era. Based on a close examination of the partially extant text and structure of the catalog, other historical records and secondary sources, the authors identify two principal classification methods in the scheme being studied: dichotomy and ranking. It is theorized that the compiler of the catalog, Liu Xin, used ru classicism, or Confucianism, as the principle for guiding the construction of three sets of ranked dichotomies that manifested into the six main classes in the set sequence. As a result, he successfully achieved the chief goal he intended for the catalog-to proclaim classicism as the intellectual authority. This design made the catalog, and its numerous successors in imperial China for two thousand years, an effective aid for intellectual, political, and social control.