Search (1115 results, page 1 of 56)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. (2013 ff.) 0.18 
    0.18415168 = product of:
  0.36830336 = sum of:
    0.36830336 = sum of:
      0.25746986 = weight(_text_:z in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25746986 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.1108335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1108335 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Type
    z
  2. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.15 
    0.15485893 = sum of:
  0.025417656 = product of:
    0.10167062 = sum of:
      0.10167062 = weight(_text_:authors in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10167062 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.12944128 = sum of:
    0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08045933 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051127672 = queryNorm
        0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.04898195 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04898195 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051127672 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  3. Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018) 0.13 
    0.12976968 = sum of:
  0.014674889 = product of:
    0.058699556 = sum of:
      0.058699556 = weight(_text_:authors in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058699556 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.115094796 = sum of:
    0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08045933 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051127672 = queryNorm
        0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
    0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03463547 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051127672 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
    Abstract
    Studies on the state and structure of digital knowledge concerning science generally relate to macro and meso scales. Supported by visualizations, these studies can deliver knowledge about emerging scientific fields or collaboration between countries, scientific centers, or groups of researchers. Analyses of individual activities or single scientific career paths are rarely presented and discussed. The authors decided to fill this gap and developed a web application for visualizing the scientific output of particular researchers. This free software based on bibliographic data from local databases, provides six layouts for analysis. Researchers can see the dynamic characteristics of their own writing activity, the time and place of publication, and the thematic scope of research problems. They can also identify cooperation networks, and consequently, study the dependencies and regularities in their own scientific activity. The current article presents the results of a study of the application's usability and functionality as well as attempts to define different user groups. A survey about the interface was sent to select researchers employed at Nicolaus Copernicus University. The results were used to answer the question as to whether such a specialized visualization tool can significantly augment the individual information space of the contemporary researcher.
    Date
    21.12.2018 17:22:13
  4. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Law, R.: Editorial responsiveness, journal quality, and total review time : an empirical analysis (2012) 0.12 
    0.11523539 = sum of:
  0.035584714 = product of:
    0.14233886 = sum of:
      0.14233886 = weight(_text_:authors in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14233886 = score(doc=245,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.07965067 = product of:
    0.15930134 = sum of:
      0.15930134 = weight(_text_:z in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15930134 = score(doc=245,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.5837686 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study examined the relationships among perceived editorial responsiveness, perceived journal quality, and review time of submissions for authors in mainland China. Online review data generated by authors who have experienced the submission process in 10 Chinese academic journals were collected. The results of Spearman correlation analysis show that Chinese authors' perceived responsiveness of an editorial office is positively correlated with perceived quality of the journal, and the total review time does not affect perceptions of the quality of a journal and its editorial responsiveness.
  5. Gazni, A.; Ghaseminik, Z.: Author practices in citing other authors, institutions, and journals (2016) 0.11 
    0.10585776 = sum of:
  0.0656281 = product of:
    0.2625124 = sum of:
      0.2625124 = weight(_text_:authors in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2625124 = score(doc=3129,freq=40.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          1.1262684 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
            6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
              40.0 = termFreq=40.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.040229663 = product of:
    0.08045933 = sum of:
      0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08045933 = score(doc=3129,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study explores the extent to which authors with different impact and productivity levels cite journals, institutions, and other authors through an analysis of the scientific papers of 37,717 authors during 1990-2013. The results demonstrate that the core-scatter distribution of cited authors, institutions, and journals varies for authors in each impact and productivity class. All authors in the science network receive the majority of their credit from high-impact authors; however, this effect decreases as authors' impact levels decrease. Similarly, the proportion of citations that lower-impact authors make to each other increases as authors' impact levels decrease. High-impact authors, who have the highest degree of membership in the science network, publish fewer papers in comparison to highly productive authors. However, authors with the highest impact make both more references per paper and also more citations to papers in the science network. This suggests that high-impact authors produce the most relevant work in the science network. Comparing practices by productivity level, authors receive the majority of their credit from highly productive authors and authors cite highly productive authors more frequently than less productive authors.
  6. Xie, Z.; Ouyang, Z.; Li, J.; Dong, E.: Modelling transition phenomena of scientific coauthorship networks (2018) 0.09 
    0.085881874 = sum of:
  0.017609866 = product of:
    0.070439465 = sum of:
      0.070439465 = weight(_text_:authors in 4043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.070439465 = score(doc=4043,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4043, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4043)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.06827201 = product of:
    0.13654402 = sum of:
      0.13654402 = weight(_text_:z in 4043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13654402 = score(doc=4043,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.5003731 = fieldWeight in 4043, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4043)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In a range of scientific coauthorship networks, transitions emerge in degree distribution, in the correlation between degree and local clustering coefficient, etc. The existence of those transitions could be regarded because of the diversity in collaboration behaviors of scientific fields. A growing geometric hypergraph built on a cluster of concentric circles is proposed to model two specific collaboration behaviors, namely the behaviors of research team leaders and those of the other team members. The model successfully predicts the transitions, as well as many common features of coauthorship networks. Particularly, it realizes a process of deriving the complex "scale-free" property from the simple "yes/no" decisions. Moreover, it provides a reasonable explanation for the emergence of transitions with the difference of collaboration behaviors between leaders and other members. The difference emerges in the evolution of research teams, which synthetically addresses several specific factors of generating collaborations, namely the communications between research teams, academic impacts and homophily of authors.
  7. Lenzen, M.: Künstliche Intelligenz : was sie kann & was uns erwartet (2018) 0.07 
    0.074211076 = product of:
  0.14842215 = sum of:
    0.14842215 = sum of:
      0.113786675 = weight(_text_:z in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113786675 = score(doc=4295,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
      0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03463547 = score(doc=4295,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    Z 010
    Date
    18. 6.2018 19:22:02
    KAB
    Z 010
  8. Bao, Z.; Han, Z.: What drives users' participation in online social Q&A communities? : an empirical study based on social cognitive theory (2019) 0.07 
    0.074211076 = product of:
  0.14842215 = sum of:
    0.14842215 = sum of:
      0.113786675 = weight(_text_:z in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113786675 = score(doc=5497,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
      0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03463547 = score(doc=5497,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Sarnikar, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, J.L.: Query-performance prediction for effective query routing in domain-specific repositories (2014) 0.07 
    0.073179714 = sum of:
  0.024904111 = product of:
    0.099616446 = sum of:
      0.099616446 = weight(_text_:authors in 1326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099616446 = score(doc=1326,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1326, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1326)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0482756 = product of:
    0.0965512 = sum of:
      0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 1326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0965512 = score(doc=1326,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 1326, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1326)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The effective use of corporate memory is becoming increasingly important because every aspect of e-business requires access to information repositories. Unfortunately, less-than-satisfying effectiveness in state-of-the-art information-retrieval techniques is well known, even for some of the best search engines such as Google. In this study, the authors resolve this retrieval ineffectiveness problem by developing a new framework for predicting query performance, which is the first step toward better retrieval effectiveness. Specifically, they examine the relationship between query performance and query context. A query context consists of the query itself, the document collection, and the interaction between the two. The authors first analyze the characteristics of query context and develop various features for predicting query performance. Then, they propose a context-sensitive model for predicting query performance based on the characteristics of the query and the document collection. Finally, they validate this model with respect to five real-world collections of documents and demonstrate its utility in routing queries to the correct repository with high accuracy.
  10. Ye, F.Y.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The "academic trace" of the performance matrix : a mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3) (2014) 0.07 
    0.07156823 = sum of:
  0.014674889 = product of:
    0.058699556 = sum of:
      0.058699556 = weight(_text_:authors in 1237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058699556 = score(doc=1237,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1237, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1237)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.056893338 = product of:
    0.113786675 = sum of:
      0.113786675 = weight(_text_:z in 1237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113786675 = score(doc=1237,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 1237, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1237)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The h-index provides us with 9 natural classes which can be written as a matrix of 3 vectors. The 3 vectors are: X = (X1, X2, X3) and indicates publication distribution in the h-core, the h-tail, and the uncited ones, respectively; Y = (Y1, Y2, Y3) denotes the citation distribution of the h-core, the h-tail and the so-called "excess" citations (above the h-threshold), respectively; and Z = (Z1, Z2, Z3) = (Y1-X1, Y2-X2, Y3-X3). The matrix V = (X,Y,Z)T constructs a measure of academic performance, in which the 9 numbers can all be provided with meanings in different dimensions. The "academic trace" tr(V) of this matrix follows naturally, and contributes a unique indicator for total academic achievements by summarizing and weighting the accumulation of publications and citations. This measure can also be used to combine the advantages of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3) into a single number with a meaningful interpretation of the values. We illustrate the use of tr(V) for the cases of 2 journal sets, 2 universities, and ourselves as 2 individual authors.
  11. Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010) 0.07 
    0.06905688 = product of:
  0.13811377 = sum of:
    0.13811377 = sum of:
      0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0965512 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
      0.04156256 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04156256 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Unser Projekt soll eine Kreuzkonkordanz zwischen den Universalklassifikationen wie der "Regensburger Verbundsklassifikation (RVK)" und der "Basisklassifikation (BK)" sowie den Fachklassifikationen "Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC2010)" und "Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme (PACS2010)" in den Fachgebieten Mathematik und Physik herstellen. Fazit: "Die klassifikatorische Übereinstmmung zwischen Regensburger Verbundklassifikation und Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme war in einzelnen Fachbereichen (z. B. Kernphysik) recht gut. Doch andere Fachbereiche (z.B. Polymerphysik, Mineralogie) stimmten sehr wenig überein. Insgesamt konnten wir 890 einfache Verbindungen erstellen. Mehrfachverbindungen wurden aus technischen Gründen nicht mitgezählt. Das Projekt war insgesamt sehr umfangreich, daher konnte es im Rahmen der zwanzig Projekttage nicht erschöpfend behandelt werden. Eine Weiterentwicklung, insbesondere hinsichtlich des kollektiven Zuganges in Form eines Webformulars und der automatischen Klassifizierung erscheint jedoch sinnvoll."
    Pages
    22 S
  12. Engerer, V.: Metapher und Wissenstransfers im informationsbezogenen Diskurs (2013) 0.07 
    0.06905688 = product of:
  0.13811377 = sum of:
    0.13811377 = sum of:
      0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0965512 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
      0.04156256 = weight(_text_:22 in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04156256 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Beitrag1 ist ein Versuch, Eigenschaften von Schöns generativer Metapher auf das "statische" Resultat als Fachterminologie, entstanden durch Übertragung eines wissenschaftlichen Bereiches in einen anderen, anzuwenden. Metapher gilt in diesem Bereich als wissenstransferierendes Verfahren der Übertragung von Konzepten einer Disziplin auf eine andere. Weiterhin wird Metapher als Teil des sprachlichen Jargons in der informationswissenschaftlichen und bibliothekarischen Praxis thematisiert. Ein kurzer Durchgang des dänischen bibliotheksmetaphorischen Wortschatzes zeigt u. a., dass in dieser Domäne ein "ontologisches Erfahrungsgefälle" von abstrakt-konkret wirksam ist, da viele bibliothekstechnische, computer-interaktionsbezogene und informationswissenschaftliche Begriffe mit Hilfe konkreterer Konzepte aus besser verstandenen Domänen, z. B. dem Bereich der Nahrungsaufnahme, erklärt werden. Allerdings scheint auch hier der Anteil "entmetaphorisierter", ehemals metaphorischer Ausdrücke hoch zu sein, wie es bei "abgeschliffenen" Ausdrücken auch in der Gemeinsprache der Fall ist. Die Analyse wird abgerundet mit einem Ausblick auf ein Forschungsgebiet, das in dezidierter Weise von der konzeptuellen Ergiebigkeit des Metaphernbegriffs in der Untersuchung der terminologischen Wissenschaftsbeziehungen Gebrauch macht
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:06:49
  13. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.07 
    0.06905688 = product of:
  0.13811377 = sum of:
    0.13811377 = sum of:
      0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0965512 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.04156256 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04156256 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  14. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.07 
    0.06905688 = product of:
  0.13811377 = sum of:
    0.13811377 = sum of:
      0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0965512 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
      0.04156256 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04156256 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Sehr viele Informationen sind bereits im Web verfügbar oder können aus isolierten strukturierten Datenspeichern wie Informationssystemen und sozialen Netzwerken gewonnen werden. Datenintegration durch Nachbearbeitung oder durch Suchmechanismen (z. B. D2R) ist deshalb wichtig, um Informationen allgemein verwendbar zu machen. Semantische Technologien ermöglichen die Verwendung definierter Verbindungen (typisierter Links), durch die ihre Beziehungen zueinander festgehalten werden, was Vorteile für jede Anwendung bietet, die das in Daten enthaltene Wissen wieder verwenden kann. Um ­eine semantische Daten-Landkarte herzustellen, benötigen wir Wissen über die einzelnen Daten und ihre Beziehung zu anderen Daten. Dieser Beitrag stellt unsere Arbeit zur Benutzung von Lexical Linked Data (LLD) durch ein Meta-Modell vor, das alle Ressourcen enthält und zudem die Möglichkeit bietet sie unter unterschiedlichen Gesichtspunkten aufzufinden. Wir verbinden damit bestehende Arbeiten über Wissensgebiete (basierend auf der Information Coding Classification) mit der Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (basierend auf der RDF/OWL-Repräsentation von EuroWordNet und den ähnlichen integrierten lexikalischen Ressourcen MultiWordNet, MEMODATA und die Hamburg Metapher DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
  15. Huang, M.-H.; Tang, M.-C.; Chen, D.-Z.: Inequality of publishing performance and international collaboration in physics (2011) 0.07 
    0.06588547 = sum of:
  0.017609866 = product of:
    0.070439465 = sum of:
      0.070439465 = weight(_text_:authors in 4467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.070439465 = score(doc=4467,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4467, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4467)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0482756 = product of:
    0.0965512 = sum of:
      0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 4467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0965512 = score(doc=4467,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 4467, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4467)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Using a database of 1.4 million papers indexed by Web of Science, we examined the global trends in publication inequality and international collaboration in physics. The publication output and citations received by authors hosted in each country were taken into account. Although inequality decreased over time, further progress toward equality has somewhat abated in recent years. The skewedness of the global distribution in publication output was shown to be correlated with article impact, that is, the inequality is more significant in articles of higher impact. It was also observed that, despite the trend toward more equalitarian distribution, scholarly participation in physics is still determined by a select group. Particularly noteworthy has been China's rapid growth in publication outputs and a gradual improvement in its impact. Finally, the data also suggested regional differences in scientific collaboration. A distinctively high concentration of transnational collaboration and publication performance was found among EU countries.
  16. Lancho Barrantes, B.S.; Guerrero Bote, V.P.; Chinchilla Rodríguez, Z.; Moya Anegón, F. de: Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations (2012) 0.07 
    0.06588547 = sum of:
  0.017609866 = product of:
    0.070439465 = sum of:
      0.070439465 = weight(_text_:authors in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.070439465 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0482756 = product of:
    0.0965512 = sum of:
      0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0965512 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Domestic citation to papers from the same country and the greater citation impact of documents involving international collaboration are two phenomena that have been extensively studied and contrasted. Here, however, we show that it is not so much a national bias, but that papers have a greater impact on their immediate environments, an impact that is diluted as that environment grows. For this reason, the greatest biases are observed in countries with a limited production. Papers that involve international collaboration have a greater impact in general, on the one hand, because they have multiple "immediate environments," and on the other because of their greater quality or prestige. In short, one can say that science knows no frontiers. Certainly there is a greater impact on the authors' immediate environment, but this does not necessarily have to coincide with their national environments, which fade in importance as the collaborative environment expands.
  17. Open Knowledge Foundation: Prinzipien zu offenen bibliographischen Daten (2011) 0.06 
    0.06472064 = product of:
  0.12944128 = sum of:
    0.12944128 = sum of:
      0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08045933 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.04898195 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04898195 = score(doc=4399,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Bibliographische Daten Um den Geltungsbereich der Prinzipien festzulegen, wird in diesem ersten Teil der zugrundeliegende Begriff bibliographischer Daten erläutert. Kerndaten Bibliographische Daten bestehen aus bibliographischen Beschreibungen. Eine bibliographische Beschreibung beschreibt eine bibliographische Ressource (Artikel, Monographie etc. - ob gedruckt oder elektronisch) zum Zwecke 1. der Identifikation der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. des Zeigens auf eine bestimmte Ressource in der Gesamtheit aller bibliographischer Ressourcen und 2. der Lokalisierung der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. eines Hinweises, wo die beschriebene Ressource aufzufinden ist. Traditionellerweise erfüllte eine Beschreibung beide Zwecke gleichzeitig, indem sie Information lieferte über: Autor(en) und Herausgeber, Titel, Verlag, Veröffentlichungsdatum und -ort, Identifizierung des übergeordneten Werks (z.B. einer Zeitschrift), Seitenangaben. Im Web findet Identifikation statt mittels Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) wie z.B. URNs oder DOIs. Lokalisierung wird ermöglicht durch HTTP-URIs, die auch als Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) bezeichnet werden. Alle URIs für bibliographische Ressourcen fallen folglich unter den engen Begriff bibliographischer Daten. Sekundäre Daten Eine bibliographische Beschreibung kann andere Informationen enthalten, die unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen, beispielsweise Nicht-Web-Identifikatoren (ISBN, LCCN, OCLC etc.), Angaben zum Urheberrechtsstatus, administrative Daten und mehr; diese Daten können von Bibliotheken, Verlagen, Wissenschaftlern, Online-Communities für Buchliebhaber, sozialen Literaturverwaltungssystemen und Anderen produziert sein. Darüber hinaus produzieren Bibliotheken und verwandte Institutionen kontrollierte Vokabulare zum Zwecke der bibliographischen Beschreibung wie z. B. Personen- und Schlagwortnormdateien, Klassifikationen etc., die ebenfalls unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen."
    Date
    22. 3.2011 18:22:29
  18. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.06 
    0.06090322 = product of:
  0.12180644 = sum of:
    0.12180644 = product of:
      0.48722577 = sum of:
        0.48722577 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48722577 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43346098 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  19. Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018) 0.06 
    0.05882459 = sum of:
  0.041506857 = product of:
    0.16602743 = sum of:
      0.16602743 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16602743 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017317735 = product of:
    0.03463547 = sum of:
      0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03463547 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
  20. Taheri, S.M.; Shahrestani, Z.; Nezhad, M.H.Y.: Switching languages and the national content consortiums : an overview on the challenges of designing an Iranian model (2014) 0.06 
    0.057547398 = product of:
  0.115094796 = sum of:
    0.115094796 = sum of:
      0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08045933 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03463547 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

Authors

Languages

  • e 886
  • d 220
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 993
  • el 81
  • m 65
  • s 21
  • x 16
  • r 12
  • b 5
  • ag 1
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications