Search (751 results, page 1 of 38)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.07705885 = product of:
  0.1541177 = sum of:
    0.1541177 = product of:
      0.4623531 = sum of:
        0.4623531 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4623531 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.411333 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.06 
    0.06421572 = product of:
  0.12843144 = sum of:
    0.12843144 = product of:
      0.3852943 = sum of:
        0.3852943 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3852943 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.411333 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Swigon, M.: Information limits : definition, typology and types (2011) 0.06 
    0.057211276 = product of:
  0.11442255 = sum of:
    0.11442255 = product of:
      0.17163382 = sum of:
        0.11904607 = weight(_text_:universal in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11904607 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
        0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052587755 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to organize the extensive field and to compile the complete list of information limits. Design/methodology/approach - A thorough analysis of literature from the field beginning with the 1960s up to the present has been performed. Findings - A universal typology of information limits has been proposed. A list of barriers mentioned in the literature of the subject has been compiled. Research limitations/implications - The term "information limits" is not commonly used. Originality/value - The complete list of information limits with bibliographical hints (helpful for future research) is presented.
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:22:52
  4. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.06 
    0.055236083 = product of:
  0.110472165 = sum of:
    0.110472165 = product of:
      0.16570824 = sum of:
        0.12626743 = weight(_text_:universal in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12626743 = score(doc=1428,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.49394834 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039440814 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Tennis, J.T.: Load Bearing or Levittown? : the edifice metaphor in conceptualizing the ethos of classification work (2014) 0.05 
    0.050059866 = product of:
  0.10011973 = sum of:
    0.10011973 = product of:
      0.1501796 = sum of:
        0.10416531 = weight(_text_:universal in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10416531 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.40748656 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
        0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046014283 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper introduces the edifice metaphor. This metaphor accounts for the context of time and place when comparing the similarities and differences that obtain between classification schemes. It is argued that this metaphor helps call into question whether or not the contemporary received assumption that all classification is a universal constant.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. Ohly, H.P.: Sociological aspects of knowledge and knowledge organization (2014) 0.05 
    0.04603007 = product of:
  0.09206014 = sum of:
    0.09206014 = product of:
      0.13809021 = sum of:
        0.10522286 = weight(_text_:universal in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10522286 = score(doc=1402,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.4116236 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
        0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032867346 = score(doc=1402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Since the middle of the last century knowledge organization, the development of scientific concepts and arrangements, has been seen as a cognitivistic (or rationalistic) problem and thus as universal and logical (cf. Turing 1950). Older approaches accordingly see areas of knowledge as naturally given and organically grown. The knowledge must only be detected and logically arranged. At latest with the constructivism a 'turn' has entered, which sees knowledge organization as a social convention and accordingly regards universal standards skeptical. Simultaneously in the sciences came up a stronger concern with historical, empirical and sociological studies of its foundations and in philosophy of science the return to different kinds of relativizations has gained more importance. With the challenge of self-organizing ordering systems by social software a new crisis comes up for knowledge organization. The future might be a combination of logical descriptions, specialized evaluation, and accompanying user-driven principles. In this paper, several classical sociological positions are discussed, conclusions are drawn for knowledge and information as well as for science and for knowledge organization and objections and prospects are designated.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  7. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.04 
    0.044951003 = product of:
  0.089902006 = sum of:
    0.089902006 = product of:
      0.269706 = sum of:
        0.269706 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.269706 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.411333 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  8. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.04 
    0.042908456 = product of:
  0.08581691 = sum of:
    0.08581691 = product of:
      0.12872536 = sum of:
        0.08928455 = weight(_text_:universal in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08928455 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039440814 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  9. Doorn, M. van; Polman, K.: From classification to thesaurus ... and back? : subject indexing tools at the library of the Afrika-Studiecentrum Leiden (2010) 0.04 
    0.042908456 = product of:
  0.08581691 = sum of:
    0.08581691 = product of:
      0.12872536 = sum of:
        0.08928455 = weight(_text_:universal in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08928455 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
        0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039440814 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An African Studies Thesaurus was constructed for the purpose of subject indexing and retrieval in the Library of the African Studies Centre (ASC) in Leiden in 2001-2006. A word-based system was considered a more user-friendly alternative to the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) codes which were used for subject access in the ASC catalogue at the time. In the process of thesaurus construction UDC codes were used as a starting point. In addition, when constructing the thesaurus, each descriptor was also assigned a UDC code from the recent edition of the UDC Master Reference File (MRF), thus replacing many of the old UDC codes used by then, some of which dated from the 1952 French edition. The presence of the UDC codes in the thesaurus leaves open the possibility of linking the thesaurus to different language versions of the UDC MRF in the future. In a parallel but separate operation each UDC code which had been assigned to an item in the library's catalogue was subsequently converted into one or more thesaurus descriptors.
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:48:33
  10. Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014) 0.04 
    0.042908456 = product of:
  0.08581691 = sum of:
    0.08581691 = product of:
      0.12872536 = sum of:
        0.08928455 = weight(_text_:universal in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08928455 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039440814 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    I outline a major segment of the history of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in Hungary and all related important events and activities. Significant and committed specialists who played prominent role on a national and international level are also mentioned. It's not an overstatement, that the usage and publications of the UDC in Hungary are significant milestones in the international history of UDC. The usage of UDC has been very widespread and it is found in different types of libraries. People who were responsible for the developing of information retrieval systems and quality of these methods were very engaged and participated in international activities. There were several huge libraries such as special, academic, municipal and national library where UDC has been employed since quite early on and the leaders of these pioneer libraries travelled widely and were active in international researches and practices.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Idrees, H.: Library classification systems and organization of Islamic knowledge (2012) 0.04 
    0.042908456 = product of:
  0.08581691 = sum of:
    0.08581691 = product of:
      0.12872536 = sum of:
        0.08928455 = weight(_text_:universal in 2594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08928455 = score(doc=2594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 2594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2594)
        0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 2594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039440814 = score(doc=2594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2594)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Standard library classification systems like Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), U.S. Library of Congress Classification (LCC), and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) are internationally known and widely used by libraries as the tools for organizing information. Charles Ammi Cutter's Expansive Classification (EC), James Duff Brown's Subject Classification (SC), Henry E. Bliss' Bibliographic Classification (BC), and S. R. Ranganathan's Colon Classification (CC) also are standard classification systems, but they are less commonly used compared to aforementioned three systems. All these systems are easy to use and convenient for most general collection libraries. However, these systems are not adequate for some special collections. Libraries with rich collections on Islam also face problems while using these systems, although such libraries often use expansions in the original systems for their collections. This paper examines this problem and presents a potential optimal solution. The author collected data, using a semistructured interview technique, from a representative sample of thirty libraries in eight countries with strong collections in Islam. These data were analyzed employing qualitative methods.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Höhn, S.: Stalins Badezimmer in Wikipedia : Die Macher der Internet-Enzyklopädie diskutieren über Verantwortung und Transparenz. Der Brockhaus kehrt dagegen zur gedruckten Ausgabe zurück. (2012) 0.04 
    0.042842112 = product of:
  0.085684225 = sum of:
    0.085684225 = product of:
      0.12852633 = sum of:
        0.1052856 = weight(_text_:lexikon in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1052856 = score(doc=2171,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.30408624 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.346236 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
        0.023240723 = weight(_text_:22 in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023240723 = score(doc=2171,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Sie galt international als die renommierteste Enzyklopädie, man nannte sie auch die Königin unter den Nachschlagewerken. Seit 1768 enthielt die Encyclopaedia Britannica das gesammelte Wissen der Menschheit, zuletzt waren es 33 000 Seiten in 32 Bänden. Doch nun ist Schluss. Vor zwei Wochen gab der Verlag mit Sitz in Chicago bekannt: Die Encyclopaedia Britannica wird es in gedruckter Form nicht mehr geben. Nach 244 Jahren geht eine Ära zu Ende. Schon im Jahr 2008 hatte der Brockhaus, das deutsche Pendant des englischsprachigen Nachschlagewerks, vor dem Internet kapituliert. Unter dem Eindruck dieser Nachricht beginnt an diesem Donnerstag in Berlin eine internationale Konferenz der Wikimedia Foundation, Betreiberin der Internet-Enzyklopädie Wikipedia. Aus aller Welt kommen Autoren der Plattform für drei Tage in einem Wilmersdorfer Konferenzzentrum zusammen. Auch der Mitbegründer von Wikipedia, der Amerikaner Jimmy Wales, wird dabei sein. Es geht um alltägliche Probleme der Community, um technische Feinheiten, aber auch um Strategien und die Frage: Wie geht es weiter mit der Enzyklopädie? Die Wikipedianer wissen, dass Ihnen eine immer größere Verantwortung zukommt. Denn den Hauptgrund für das Ende der altehrwürdigen Standardwerke liefert zweifellos Wikipedia. Das kostenlose, immer und überall frei zugängliche Online-Lexikon hat sie aus Sicht vieler Nutzer obsolet gemacht. "Die Verantwortung ist schon gewaltig", sagt Pavel Richter, Chef von Wikimedia Deutschland. "Aber wir werden ihr gerecht, denn wir sind enorm offen und transparent. Jeder kann sehen, was in der Wikipedia passiert, jeder kann mitmachen."
    Der neue Herausgeber des Brockhaus, ein Tochterverlag von Bertelsmann, hat unterdessen angekündigt, zum gedruckten Lexikon zurückzukehren. Etwa Anfang 2015 soll die 22. Auflage erscheinen. In Zeiten des virtuellen Informationsoverkills gebe es einen Bedarf an Orientierung, an Relevanzvorgaben, sagt Geschäftsführer Christoph Hünermann. Ausgerechnet Bertelsmann druckte 2008 ein knapp 1 000 Seiten langes Wikipedia-Lexikon mit den 50 000 meist gesuchten Begriffen. Eine Experten-Redaktion überprüfte die Einträge sicherheitshalber zuvor - soll allerdings kaum Fehler gefunden haben."
    Footnote
    Die Druckausgabe war teuer Die Wikipedia ist ein kostenloses Online-Lexikon, an dem jeder als Autor mitwirken kann. Die Plattform wurde 2001 gegründet. Sie existiert in 280 Sprachen. Die englische Version enthält fast vier Millionen Artikel, die deutsche etwa 1,4 Millionen. Weltweit haben sich schon weit über eine Million Nutzer beteiligt. Der Brockhaus galt lange Zeit als das wichtigste deutsche Nachschlagewerk. 1796 erschien ein Vorläufer der ersten Auflage. 2008 wurde entschieden, die rund 2800 Euro teure Druckausgabe einzustellen. Die Nachfrage war zu stark eingebrochen. Spätestens 2015 soll es nun doch ein Comeback geben. Die Encyclopaedia Britannica gilt als Produkt der schottischen Aufklärung. Ihre aktuelle Auflage kostet rund 1500 Euro. Zuletzt wurden nur noch 8000 Exemplare verkauft. 1990 waren es noch 120.000. Die Encyclopaedia wird es künftig nur noch online geben, zu einem Abo-Preis von 70 Euro pro Jahr. Zu den Themen, die die Wikipedianer in Berlin diskutieren, gehört vor allem die noch sehr einseitige demografische Durchmischung der Autoren. Vor allem Frauen sind mit einem Anteil von nur neun Prozent stark unterrepräsentiert - weltweit. Laut Pavel Richter ist der typische Autor männlich, gut gebildet und zwischen 20 und 30 Jahren alt. "Wir haben uns für dieses Jahr vorgenommen, zu untersuchen woran es liegt, dass Frauen sich kaum beteiligen", sagt er. Eine erste Vermutung sei die stark männlich geprägte Diskussionskultur. Auch Senioren und Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund gibt es unter den Autoren kaum. Die Wikimedia Foundation plant deshalb Projekte zum Beispiel in Seniorenbildungseinrichtungen.
    Source
    Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.76 vom 29.3.2012, S.22-23
  13. Wollweber, M.: Was ist Ihnen das Wissen im Web wert? : Das größte Lexikon der Welt ist im Internet frei und werbefrei zugängich - wollen wir dafür etwas zahlen? (2018) 0.04 
    0.042114243 = product of:
  0.084228486 = sum of:
    0.084228486 = product of:
      0.25268546 = sum of:
        0.25268546 = weight(_text_:lexikon in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25268546 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30408624 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.8309664 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04 
    0.038529426 = product of:
  0.07705885 = sum of:
    0.07705885 = product of:
      0.23117656 = sum of:
        0.23117656 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23117656 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.411333 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  15. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.04 
    0.038529426 = product of:
  0.07705885 = sum of:
    0.07705885 = product of:
      0.23117656 = sum of:
        0.23117656 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23117656 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.411333 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  16. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.04 
    0.036824055 = product of:
  0.07364811 = sum of:
    0.07364811 = product of:
      0.11047216 = sum of:
        0.084178284 = weight(_text_:universal in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084178284 = score(doc=3608,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.32929888 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
        0.026293878 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026293878 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  17. Fóris, A.: Network theory and terminology (2013) 0.04 
    0.035757046 = product of:
  0.07151409 = sum of:
    0.07151409 = product of:
      0.107271135 = sum of:
        0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07440379 = score(doc=1365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
        0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032867346 = score(doc=1365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper aims to present the relations of network theory and terminology. The model of scale-free networks, which has been recently developed and widely applied since, can be effectively used in terminology research as well. Operation based on the principle of networks is a universal characteristic of complex systems. Networks are governed by general laws. The model of scale-free networks can be viewed as a statistical-probability model, and it can be described with mathematical tools. Its main feature is that "everything is connected to everything else," that is, every node is reachable (in a few steps) starting from any other node; this phenomena is called "the small world phenomenon." The existence of a linguistic network and the general laws of the operation of networks enable us to place issues of language use in the complex system of relations that reveal the deeper connection s between phenomena with the help of networks embedded in each other. The realization of the metaphor that language also has a network structure is the basis of the classification methods of the terminological system, and likewise of the ways of creating terminology databases, which serve the purpose of providing easy and versatile accessibility to specialised knowledge.
    Date
    2. 9.2014 21:22:48
  18. Corts Mendes, L.; Pacini de Moura, A.: Documentation as knowledge organization : an assessment of Paul Otlet's proposals (2014) 0.04 
    0.035757046 = product of:
  0.07151409 = sum of:
    0.07151409 = product of:
      0.107271135 = sum of:
        0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07440379 = score(doc=1471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
        0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032867346 = score(doc=1471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper proposes an assessment of Paul Otlet's Documentation anchored in Birger Hjørland's argument that the field of Knowledge Organization (KO) must be formed by two interdependent views, a broad conception on how knowledge is socially and intellectually produced and organized, and a narrow view that deals with the organization of the documents that register knowledge. Otlet's conceptions of individual and collective knowledge are addressed, as well as the role of documents in its conservation and communication, in order to show how the intended universal application of Documentation's principles and methods was supposed to make registered knowledge easily accessible and clearly apprehended as a unified whole. It concludes that Otlet's Documentation fulfils in its own context the requirement claimed by Hjørland for the KO field of narrow conceptions being sustained by broader views of the organization of knowledge, and therefore qualifies itself as a historical component of KO, being capable of contributing as such to its epistemological and theoretical discussions.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Sosinska-Kalata, B.: Semantization and standardization : cooperative or conflicting trends in knowledge organization? (2014) 0.04 
    0.035757046 = product of:
  0.07151409 = sum of:
    0.07151409 = product of:
      0.107271135 = sum of:
        0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07440379 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
        0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032867346 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    There are two most important trends observed in research on knowledge organization (KO) and in the development of knowledge organization systems (KOS) used in practice, i.e. semantization and standardization. These two trends determine current approaches to the development of methods and tools for organizing access to the digitally recorded knowledge in information systems and networks. Fundamental for the semantization of knowledge records is the creation and use of KOS with strong semantics which enable accurate representation of meanings in specified contexts. Standardization requires the unification of methods and tools for representing knowledge recorded in information resources. In practice it is often achieved by the use of universal KOS and implies generalization and homogenization of content representation that makes difficult to identify different interpretation of the phenomena and problems discussed in particular epistemological and cultural contexts. It is argued that the standardization of methods and tools for the representation of knowledge resources accessible in digital environment should not and does not have to imply this kind of generalization and simplification of the representation of their semantic content.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Parrochia, D.; Neuville, D.: Towards a general theory of classifications (2013) 0.04 
    0.035757046 = product of:
  0.07151409 = sum of:
    0.07151409 = product of:
      0.107271135 = sum of:
        0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07440379 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
        0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032867346 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 9.2016 22:04:09
    Series
    Studies in universal logic

Authors

Languages

  • e 550
  • d 191
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 650
  • el 65
  • m 54
  • s 18
  • x 14
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications