Search (5895 results, page 1 of 295)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.22 
    0.2199604 = product of:
  0.549901 = sum of:
    0.13747525 = product of:
      0.41242573 = sum of:
        0.41242573 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41242573 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.41242573 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.41242573 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.22 
    0.21945658 = product of:
  0.36576095 = sum of:
    0.068737626 = product of:
      0.20621286 = sum of:
        0.20621286 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20621286 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0053943205 = weight(_text_:a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053943205 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.29162902 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29162902 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.18 
    0.18330033 = product of:
  0.45825082 = sum of:
    0.114562705 = product of:
      0.3436881 = sum of:
        0.3436881 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3436881 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.3436881 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3436881 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  4. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.17 
    0.17322202 = product of:
  0.28870335 = sum of:
    0.068737626 = product of:
      0.20621286 = sum of:
        0.20621286 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20621286 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.013752872 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013752872 = score(doc=400,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.27559727 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.20621286 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20621286 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Type
    a
  5. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.15 
    0.1489715 = product of:
  0.24828582 = sum of:
    0.04582508 = product of:
      0.13747524 = sum of:
        0.13747524 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13747524 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008041379 = weight(_text_:a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008041379 = score(doc=5820,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.16114321 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.19441935 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19441935 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  6. Wiechmann, B.: Normdaten (2015) 0.14 
    0.14447203 = product of:
  0.36118007 = sum of:
    0.008900175 = weight(_text_:a in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008900175 = score(doc=3345,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
    0.3522799 = weight(_text_:391 in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3522799 = score(doc=3345,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31395194 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        1.1220822 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.380-391
    Type
    a
  7. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.14 
    0.1440819 = product of:
  0.2401365 = sum of:
    0.057281353 = product of:
      0.17184405 = sum of:
        0.17184405 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17184405 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.011011112 = weight(_text_:a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011011112 = score(doc=4997,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.17184405 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17184405 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  8. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.14 
    0.14214687 = product of:
  0.23691143 = sum of:
    0.057281353 = product of:
      0.17184405 = sum of:
        0.17184405 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17184405 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0077860313 = weight(_text_:a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0077860313 = score(doc=855,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
    0.17184405 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17184405 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  9. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.14 
    0.13824627 = product of:
  0.23041043 = sum of:
    0.006606667 = weight(_text_:a in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006606667 = score(doc=563,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.20621286 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20621286 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.01759089 = product of:
      0.03518178 = sum of:
        0.03518178 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03518178 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15155369 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  10. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.13 
    0.12831023 = product of:
  0.32077557 = sum of:
    0.08019389 = product of:
      0.24058168 = sum of:
        0.24058168 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24058168 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.24058168 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24058168 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  11. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.11 
    0.112014525 = product of:
  0.2800363 = sum of:
    0.0050858143 = weight(_text_:a in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050858143 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.27495047 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27495047 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
    Type
    a
  12. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.09 
    0.091650166 = product of:
  0.22912541 = sum of:
    0.057281353 = product of:
      0.17184405 = sum of:
        0.17184405 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17184405 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17184405 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17184405 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36691502 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  13. Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014) 0.09 
    0.08932992 = product of:
  0.1488832 = sum of:
    0.008409875 = weight(_text_:a in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008409875 = score(doc=1778,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
    0.12581424 = weight(_text_:391 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12581424 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31395194 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.40074366 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
    0.014659075 = product of:
      0.02931815 = sum of:
        0.02931815 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02931815 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15155369 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04327843 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new similarity method to gauge the differences between two subject hierarchical structures. Design/methodology/approach - In the proposed similarity measure, nodes on two hierarchical structures are projected onto a two-dimensional space, respectively, and both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes are considered in the similarity between the two hierarchical structures. The extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be controlled by adjusting a parameter. An experiment was conducted to evaluate soundness of the measure. Eight experts whose research interests were information retrieval and information organization participated in the study. Results from the new measure were compared with results from the experts. Findings - The evaluation shows strong correlations between the results from the new method and the results from the experts. It suggests that the similarity method achieved satisfactory results. Practical implications - Hierarchical structures that are found in subject directories, taxonomies, classification systems, and other classificatory structures play an extremely important role in information organization and information representation. Measuring the similarity between two subject hierarchical structures allows an accurate overarching understanding of the degree to which the two hierarchical structures are similar. Originality/value - Both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes were considered in the proposed similarity method, and the extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be adjusted. In addition, a new evaluation method for a hierarchical structure similarity was presented.
    Date
    8. 4.2015 16:22:13
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 70(2014) no.3, S.364-391
    Type
    a
  14. Iyer, H.: Alternative system of medicine, Ayurveda : challenges to knowledge organization and representation (2016) 0.08 
    0.08404469 = product of:
  0.2101117 = sum of:
    0.008808889 = weight(_text_:a in 4933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008808889 = score(doc=4933,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4933, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4933)
    0.20130281 = weight(_text_:391 in 4933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20130281 = score(doc=4933,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31395194 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.6411899 = fieldWeight in 4933, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4933)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.384-391
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
    Type
    a
  15. Giusti, L.: ¬The Penumbra-line : Ranganathan's journeys and the genesis of the APUPA pattern (2018) 0.08 
    0.08255545 = product of:
  0.20638862 = sum of:
    0.0050858143 = weight(_text_:a in 4770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050858143 = score(doc=4770,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4770, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4770)
    0.20130281 = weight(_text_:391 in 4770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20130281 = score(doc=4770,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31395194 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.6411899 = fieldWeight in 4770, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4770)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.380-391
    Type
    a
  16. Gooch, D.; Vasalou, A.; Benton, L.: Impact in interdisciplinary and cross-sector research : opportunities and challenges (2017) 0.06 
    0.06412814 = product of:
  0.16032034 = sum of:
    0.009343237 = weight(_text_:a in 3348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009343237 = score(doc=3348,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 3348, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3348)
    0.1509771 = weight(_text_:391 in 3348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1509771 = score(doc=3348,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31395194 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.48089242 = fieldWeight in 3348, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3348)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Impact is embedded in today's research culture, with increasing importance being placed on the value of research to society. In interdisciplinary and cross-sector projects, team members may hold distinct views on the types of impact they want to create. Set in the context of an interdisciplinary, cross-sector project comprised of partners from academia, industry, and the nonprofit sector, our paper unpacks how these diverse project members understand impact. Our analysis shows that interdisciplinary projects offer a unique opportunity to create impact on a number of different levels. Moreover, it demonstrates that a lack of accountable design and collaboration practices can potentially hinder pathways to impact. Finally, we find that the interdisciplinary perspectives that such projects introduce encourage a rich gamut of sustainable outcomes that go beyond commercialization. Our findings support researchers working in these complex contexts to appreciate the opportunities and challenges involved in interdisciplinary cross-sector research contexts while imparting them with strategies for overcoming these challenges.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.2, S.378-391
    Type
    a
  17. Tang, D.L.; Bouthillier, F.; Pluye, P.; Grad, R.; Repchinsky, C.: ¬The value of user feedback : healthcare professionals' comments to the health information provider (2015) 0.06 
    0.063442335 = product of:
  0.15860583 = sum of:
    0.0076287217 = weight(_text_:a in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076287217 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
    0.1509771 = weight(_text_:391 in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1509771 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31395194 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.48089242 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The construct of value is highly relevant to information. For research on the value of information, Saracevic and Kantor (1997) proposed a framework from a value perspective in philosophy. In this report, we substantiate the framework with an updated review of the literature and demonstrate its applicability to understanding the value of user feedback as one type of information. Our field study, in the setting of a health information provider whose information products serve thousands of Canadian healthcare professionals, provides an example of how this value-of-information framework can be operationalized for an organization. In addition to the theoretical and methodological contributions, this research adds to the literature by documenting the way that textual feedback data were used to optimize the content of an information resource. This contrasts with published studies that only dealt with the use of quantitative feedback by information providers not involved in content production.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.2, S.377-391
    Type
    a
  18. Versic, I.I.; Ausserhofer, J.: Social science, humanities and their interoperability with the European Open Science Cloud : what is SSHOC? (2019) 0.06 
    0.06303351 = product of:
  0.15758377 = sum of:
    0.006606667 = weight(_text_:a in 5692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006606667 = score(doc=5692,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 5692, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5692)
    0.1509771 = weight(_text_:391 in 5692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1509771 = score(doc=5692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31395194 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.48089242 = fieldWeight in 5692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5692)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The EC H2020 cluster project SSHOC aims to provide a full-fledged Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) Open Cloud where data, tools, and training are available and accessible for users of SSH data. The focus of the project is determined by the goal to further the innovation of infrastructural support for digital scholarship, to stimulate multidisciplinary collaboration across the various subfields of SSH and beyond, and to increase the potential for societal impact. The intention is to create a European open cloud ecosystem for social sciences and humanities, consisting of an infrastructural and human component. SSHOC will encourage secure environments for sharing and using sensitive and confidential data. It will contribute to the Open Science agenda and realization of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), as well as contribute to innovations stemming from the coupling of heterogeneous data types and work on the interoperability principle of FAIR.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 72(2019) H.2-4, S.383-391
    Type
    a
  19. Hansson, J.: ¬The materiality of knowledge organization : epistemology, metaphors and society (2013) 0.06 
    0.061916586 = product of:
  0.15479146 = sum of:
    0.0038143608 = weight(_text_:a in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0038143608 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
    0.1509771 = weight(_text_:391 in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1509771 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31395194 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.48089242 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.6, S.384-391
    Type
    a
  20. Waschatz, B.: Schmökern ist schwierig : Viele Uni-Bibliotheken ordnen ihre Bücher nicht - Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Suche (2010) 0.06 
    0.05778211 = product of:
  0.14445527 = sum of:
    0.0019071804 = weight(_text_:a in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019071804 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.03821847 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.14254808 = sum of:
      0.12495719 = weight(_text_:schlagwort in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12495719 = score(doc=3206,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.30691838 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.0917172 = idf(docFreq=99, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04327843 = queryNorm
          0.40713492 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            7.0917172 = idf(docFreq=99, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
      0.01759089 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01759089 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15155369 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04327843 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    "In einer öffentlichen Bücherei ist die Suche nach einem Werk recht einfach: Man geht einfach die Regale ab, bis man beim richtigen Buchstaben oder Thema angekommen ist. In vielen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken ist das komplizierter. Denn dort müssen sich Studenten durch Datenbanken und Zettelkataloge wühlen. "Eine Ausnahme ist der Lesesaal, erklärt Marlene Grau, Sprecherin der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek in Hamburg. Im Lesesaal stehen die Bücher wie in einer öffentlichen Bibliothek in Reih und Glied nach Fachgebieten wie Jura, Biologie oder Medizin sortiert. So können Studenten ein wenig schmökern und querbeet lesen. Wer jedoch ein bestimmtes Werk sucht, nutzt besser gleich den Katalog der Bibliothek. Darin lässt sich zum einen nach dem Autor oder einem Titelstichwort suchen - in der Biologie etwa "Fliege" oder "Insekt". "Dann kann man hoffen, dass Bücher zum Thema das Stichwort im Titel enthalten", sagt Grau. Die andere Variante ist, nach einem Schlagwort zu suchen. Um das passende zu finden, kann man im Schlagwort-Index blättern. Oder man sucht nach einem bekannten Buch, das zum Thema passt. Dann kann man mit dessen Schlagwörtern weitersuchen. Der Vorteil: Bücher müssen dieses Schlagwort nicht im Titel enthalten. Buchtitel wie 'Keine Angst vor Zahlen' oder 'Grundkurs Rechnen' findet man über die Schlagworte 'Mathematik' und 'Einführung', aber mit Stichworten eher nicht", erklärt Ulrich Hohoff. Er leitet die Universitätsbibliothek in Augsburg.
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 5416
  • el 644
  • m 284
  • s 86
  • x 40
  • r 18
  • n 10
  • b 8
  • i 5
  • ag 2
  • p 1
  • v 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications